If we're going to boycott Israel, we need to boycott the United States too...

[LordBrownTrout]

That’s why he stopped Israel from completely defeating it’s neighbors.

LBJ didn't "stop" Israel. LBJ gave them their arms, our US made arms, billed the US taxpayer for them, stiffed our troops in 'nam with outdated older weapons, and greenlighted Israel's land grab.

Then LBJ allowed Israel to deliberately murder the crew of the USS Liberty, the US spy ship sent out to find out whether the "rumors" of Israeli concentration camps for "occupied territory" residents were true or not.... if they weren't true, why did Israel attack the Liberty???

Marine still convinced Israeli attack on U.S. ship during Six-Day War ship was no accident

"Lockwood was on the lower deck of that ship when it was attacked in 1967 by Israeli aircraft during the Six-Day War in the Middle East. Nine men were killed. About 14 minutes later, it was attacked again by darting Israeli torpedo boats.

He was below deck when a torpedo hit amidships. It killed 25 more fellow Americans, including one civilian from the top-secret National Security Agency.

Israel quickly apologized, saying that in the fog of war it mistook the Liberty, a spy ship, for a much smaller Egyptian vessel."

a laughable excuse....

"But there are doubters like Lockwood; some of them once held high office in the United States government. These doubters will go to their graves believing that the truth was sacrificed to preserve the ties that bind the United States and Israel."



ISRAEL murdered the USS Liberty because ISRAEL did have concentration camps going and knew the Liberty was going to FIND THEM....

Haha, you're whacked .

 

[Indeependent]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

US, New Zealand they give so much benefits to the natives, Israel bomb the shit out of the occupied territories, torture their kids, shoot their men big difference.

How about some video?

My pleasure...I'll post few out of thousands ....the UN, volunteers, doctors without borders and others...have been documenting Israeli crimes....I know they dont show it to you on FOX.

Now post the video of what happened 3 minutes before those edits.

 

[Shusha]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

There is a big difference. When those other countries were conquered, military conquest was not illegal. There were no international laws to protect those people.

When Israel conquered Palestine, military conquest was illegal. Boycotting Israel is to compel it to abide by international law.

When did return become illegal?

 

[Shusha]

What's unique, is that Israel is the only modern country to do this.

Israel is the only indigenous peoples to have regained sovereignty on their ancestral and historical homelands. So far.

Personally, I support the sovereignty of all indigenous peoples -- in Canada, the US, Australia, New Zealand and Israel.

 

[Shusha]

A majority of Jews have made it clear they will not accept a non-Jewish minority of more than 20%.

That example of blatant apartheid should be exterminated everywhere.

Is that the standard? Then half a million Jews need to move to Gaza. And half a million Jews need to move to the West Bank.

or else apartheid, right?

 

[Shusha]

Those people were living there for centuries. Your people went in there with US made arms and slaughtered them. Your justification for doing so is "it really wasn't a country...."

Those people were living there for centuries, and the Jewish people were living there for millennia. Your people went in there with US made arms The Jewish people peacefully returned to their ancestral and historical lands from which they had been ethnically cleansed. Arabs tried to slaughtered them. Your justification for murdering Jews doing so is "it really wasn't a country...."


There. Fixed it for you.

 

[Issa]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

US, New Zealand they give so much benefits to the natives, Israel bomb the shit out of the occupied territories, torture their kids, shoot their men big difference.

How about some video?

My pleasure...I'll post few out of thousands ....the UN, volunteers, doctors without borders and others...have been documenting Israeli crimes....I know they dont show it to you on FOX.

Now post the video of what happened 3 minutes before those edits.

Edits of what ? Is documented that Israel have been killing innocent civilians foe decades. So many IDF and Israeli members cant go out of Israel in fear of being tried. The US vetoed dozens of condemnations by the UN.

 

[Linkiloo]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

There is a big difference. When those other countries were conquered, military conquest was not illegal. There were no international laws to protect those people.

When Israel conquered Palestine, military conquest was illegal. Boycotting Israel is to compel it to abide by international law.

This argument would only make sense if there were a standards universally applicable to all countries, currently involved in civil or cross border disputes. But if Israel is condemned more than other much bloodier conflicts, that is anti-semitism.

The Palestinians have called for a boycott. I don't think anyone else has.

Did you read the part where I spoke about double standards re: condemnation? If a boycott were being called by you against China or Russia, Saudi or Sudan, I might actually believe that you care about human rights.

 

[P F Tinmore]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

There is a big difference. When those other countries were conquered, military conquest was not illegal. There were no international laws to protect those people.

When Israel conquered Palestine, military conquest was illegal. Boycotting Israel is to compel it to abide by international law.

This argument would only make sense if there were a standards universally applicable to all countries, currently involved in civil or cross border disputes. But if Israel is condemned more than other much bloodier conflicts, that is anti-semitism.

The Palestinians have called for a boycott. I don't think anyone else has.

Did you read the part where I spoke about double standards re: condemnation? If a boycott were being called by you against China or Russia, Saudi or Sudan, I might actually believe that you care about human rights.

The boycott is a Palestinian call. China or Russia, Saudi or Sudan are not occupying Palestine.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

There is a big difference. When those other countries were conquered, military conquest was not illegal. There were no international laws to protect those people.

When Israel conquered Palestine, military conquest was illegal. Boycotting Israel is to compel it to abide by international law.

You are speaking of an arbitrary, artificial cut-off date. It is like saying that what the Nazis did wasn't illegal because it happened before the Geneva Conventions or before the U.N. was established.

If you would be intellectually honest with yourself and non-hypocritical, you would move back to Scandinavia where your grandparents came from. Not only that, but you PERSONALLY took part in the occupation of Vietnam.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

US, New Zealand they give so much benefits to the natives, Israel bomb the shit out of the occupied territories, torture their kids, shoot their men big difference.

The U.S. made many false treaties with Native Americans, slaughtered them, and herded them onto reservations. Furthermore, the U.S. participated in the slavery of black ppl.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

When European Jews began the Zionist project intended to convert Palestine into a Jewish majority state, there were ten times as many non-Jews as Jews living there.

By 1948 the ratio had shrunk to 2:1

Today there are roughly equal numbers of Jews and non-Jews living between the River and the sea.

A majority of Jews have made it clear they will not accept a non-Jewish minority of more than 20%.

That example of blatant apartheid should be exterminated everywhere.

Nakba 68 - The Tragedy continues - Skibbereen Eagle

You did not address the OP at all, unless you are implying that there was an insignificant amount of Native Americans living in America when the Europeans came. There were, in fact, 500 American Indian nations. Columbus instigated many massacres of the Native Americans, as well as torturing many of them.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Helping Israel is the worst mistake in US history. Israel has done virtually all of the "unsolved" or "misdiagnosed" terror attacks on the US, starting with JFK.

Conspiracy theory about JFK, and ridiculous considering that JFK was staunchly pro-Israel. What is true, beyond a shadow of a doubt, is that a Palestinian assassinated Robert Kennedy.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Helping Israel is the worst mistake in US history. Israel has done virtually all of the "unsolved" or "misdiagnosed" terror attacks on the US, starting with JFK.

Six Day War a certain victory for Israel.
US President Lyndon B Johnson stops Israel.
The US owes Israel big time.

Although we are on the same side, I must point out that Nixon and Kissinger are usually blamed for stopping the Yom Kippur War before a more decisive victory for Israel could be achieved. Israel achieved a spectacular victory in the Six-day War, which is the war you are referencing, despite whether what you say about LBJ is true or not. Israel "conquered" the Sinai, Golan Heights, all of Jerusalem and the West Bank. I don't know how much more could've been achieved and the fact that it took only six days made it more of a miracle. If you are suggesting that Israel should have conquered all of Egypt, Syria and Jordan, that would've placed millions of more Arabs under its control, and Israel didn't need that. It is already having enough troubles with the West Bank Arabs.

 

[Indeependent]

Helping Israel is the worst mistake in US history. Israel has done virtually all of the "unsolved" or "misdiagnosed" terror attacks on the US, starting with JFK.

Six Day War a certain victory for Israel.
US President Lyndon B Johnson stops Israel.
The US owes Israel big time.

Although we are on the same side, I must point out that Nixon and Kissinger are usually blamed for stopping the Yom Kippur War before a more decisive victory for Israel could be achieved. Israel achieved a spectacular victory in the Six-day War, which is the war you are referencing, despite whether what you say about LBJ is true or not. Israel "conquered" the Sinai, Golan Heights, all of Jerusalem and the West Bank. I don't know how much more could've been achieved and the fact that it took only six days made it more of a miracle. If you are suggesting that Israel should have conquered all of Egypt, Syria and Jordan, that would've placed millions of more Arabs under its control, and Israel didn't need that. It is already having enough troubles with the West Bank Arabs.

There’s no problem with the West Bank Jordanians that Jordan couldn’t solve in a week by allowing them into Jordan.

 

[LaDairis]

Conspiracy theory about JFK, and ridiculous considering that JFK was staunchly pro-Israel. What is true, beyond a shadow of a doubt, is that a Palestinian assassinated Robert Kennedy.

More of that issue for Hebrews here trying to post in English...

JFK wasn't sending ARMS to ISRAEL.

WHERE did ISRAEL get the ARMS for the 67 deliberate planned invasion/land grab???

A: Zionist Traitor LBJ


As is true with all Zionist Frauds, there is always a "muslim" to blame...

With LBJ, however, there is a pattern. Jackie O never bought the Oswald alone BS. She always blamed LBJ. The MLK family in 1998 exonerated KKK convict James Earl Ray and blamed... LBJ. Even super dumbass and drug addict RFK Jr finally got it right....


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-sirhan/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.99b4aaa1e82f


"Kennedy had joined those who believe there was a second gunman, and that it was not Sirhan who killed his father"


It was the same Mossad marksman who killed all three: JFK, MLK, and RFK....

But don't expect our media to report any of that... they don't like truth about Zionism anymore than you do posting from Tel Aviv

 

[LaDairis]

. Israel achieved a spectacular victory in the Six-day War, which is the war you are referencing, despite whether what you say about LBJ is true or not.

The US CIA said that, the US CIA before Slick Willie sold it to the Mossad in the 1990s by appointing George "911" Tenet to run AQ from it....

Israel got US arms for free, because LBJ and Congress bought those arms for US troops in 'nam, and the arms got diverted to Israel for free....


One more time. While about to get on TV to tell us Israel was attacked and was just defending itself....

CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency


"The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move."



This was the entire motive for taking out JFK. Once JFK is offed, LBJ starts shipping arms to Israel immediately. By 67, the deliberate and planned invasion/land grab is executed, and once again the Zionists LIED and blamed "the muslims..."

 

[bodecea]

A pox on both their houses.

 

[Linkiloo]

Who was the President of this imaginary country of "Palestine" when Israel conquered it?
Where was their central bank located? What was the exchange rate of their imaginary currency?
How many soldiers in the imaginary Palestinian military at that time?

Those people were living there for centuries. Your people went in there with US made arms and slaughtered them. Your justification for doing so is "it really wasn't a country...."


Netanyahu is the Hitler of our time...

He sucks as Hilter, considering the fact that Hitler decimated the Jewish population and palestinians have seen a massive increase in population and obesity.

 

[Linkiloo]

...and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every other nation where Europeans moved in and pushed aside or pushed down the native inhabitants.

Israel is not uniquely guilty, and to treat them as uniquely guilty is a form of anti-Semitism.

There is a big difference. When those other countries were conquered, military conquest was not illegal. There were no international laws to protect those people.

When Israel conquered Palestine, military conquest was illegal. Boycotting Israel is to compel it to abide by international law.

This argument would only make sense if there were a standards universally applicable to all countries, currently involved in civil or cross border disputes. But if Israel is condemned more than other much bloodier conflicts, that is anti-semitism.

The Palestinians have called for a boycott. I don't think anyone else has.

Did you read the part where I spoke about double standards re: condemnation? If a boycott were being called by you against China or Russia, Saudi or Sudan, I might actually believe that you care about human rights.

The boycott is a Palestinian call. China or Russia, Saudi or Sudan are not occupying Palestine.

Are you palestinian? Why are you calling for it and not for a boycott of any number of other countries where human rights do not exist?