NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Who should go without?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who should go without?
Republicans And when their health gets really bad do unto them as we do unto horses in painWho should go without?
False dilemmaWho should go without?
Who should go without?
Who should go without?
People on social programs. Every time this subject comes up in the media, their first concern is what about the poor people? Well, what about the working people is my question?
Working people are the ones who are paying for the non-working, and some of us working people don't have coverage ourselves. In the meantime, the poor are popping out kids like a popcorn machine and the rest of us have to support them including their medical.
False dilemmaWho should go without?
Do you have a good argument as to why those groups should be punished for doing no wrong?
Do you have a good argument as to why those groups should be punished for doing no wrong?
Those 2 groups are unnecessary. Children can be replaced and the elderly no longer add anything to Society.
i would comment but i know were your mindset is at....Do you have a good argument as to why those groups should be punished for doing no wrong?
Those 2 groups are unnecessary. Children can be replaced and the elderly no longer add anything to Society.
Those not paying in. If you want universal healthcare then you must have universal paying for it right? Not this shit you try to sell where one group pays and others don't. Fuck that. Let's all pay equally for the exact same benefits. No specialists because that would mean someone gets more benefit. No, we all get the same treatment. We just draw a line at what basic care should be and those that exceed that limit get to die... with dignity I believe is how the English court phrased it.Who should go without?
The republican elected officials should be the ones who do without health care. Also, the religious Right (god will heal them).
But, seriously, NY, do you really want the RW people to reveal just how mean spirited they really are to the poor, elderly, and children? I find it downright depressing, myself.
Those not paying in. If you want universal healthcare then you must have universal paying for it right? Not this shit you try to sell where one group pays and others don't. Fuck that. Let's all pay equally for the exact same benefits. No specialists because that would mean someone gets more benefit. No, we all get the same treatment. We just draw a line at what basic care should be and those that exceed that limit get to die... with dignity I believe is how the English court phrased it.Who should go without?
You want universal care then drop the bullshit about caring for people. You just want your shit payed for. How about you pony up and pay what everyone else has to. And if you fall outside that... there's always the dignified way out.
Who should go without?
Those who cannot pay for it, or receive it as a benefit for their employment.
Who should go without?
People on social programs. Every time this subject comes up in the media, their first concern is what about the poor people? Well, what about the working people is my question?
Working people are the ones who are paying for the non-working, and some of us working people don't have coverage ourselves. In the meantime, the poor are popping out kids like a popcorn machine and the rest of us have to support them including their medical.
So poor children and the elderly who are poor should go without?
Do you have a good argument as to why those groups should be punished for doing no wrong?
So poor children and the elderly who are poor should go without?
Do you have a good argument as to why those groups should be punished for doing no wrong?
Who should go without?
People on social programs. Every time this subject comes up in the media, their first concern is what about the poor people? Well, what about the working people is my question?
Working people are the ones who are paying for the non-working, and some of us working people don't have coverage ourselves. In the meantime, the poor are popping out kids like a popcorn machine and the rest of us have to support them including their medical.
So poor children and the elderly who are poor should go without?
Do you have a good argument as to why those groups should be punished for doing no wrong?
Who should go without?
Those who cannot pay for it, or receive it as a benefit for their employment.