- Thread starter
- #41
Did two courts find Trump engaged in an insurrection or not?Try to read WITH comprehension, ya retarded pussy.
They rendered their opinions. But those opinions have no actual valid factual bases.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Did two courts find Trump engaged in an insurrection or not?Try to read WITH comprehension, ya retarded pussy.
They rendered their opinions. But those opinions have no actual valid factual bases.
You still lack comprehension.Did two courts find Trump engaged in an insurrection or not?
@LiesAgain "Two courts did not find Tump engaged in insurrection."You still lack comprehension.
Headline: based on facts: facts are:
Trump was disqualified for insurrection in the only two states that heard evidence and decided on the merits.
Like them or not, those are facts.
Those aren’t facts. They are conclusions devoid of any meritorious bases.
Your reading comprehension is on display, The Dainty. And you have none.@LiesAgain "Two courts did not find Tump engaged in insurrection."
Set up:
Response:
Did two courts find Trump engaged in an insurrection or not?
Liability Fail number 3,789You still lack comprehension.
Your reading comprehension is on display, The Dainty. And you have none.
Now, since The Dainty is tragically retarded, let’s try to set him straight:
A Lower Colorado court heard some alleged “evidence” about the alleged “insurrection” but somehow concluded that Trump had been involved in that alleged insurrection.
The Colorado Supreme Court essentially affirmed that determination.
But that’s the case which our SCOTUS is poised to overturn.
Does The Dainty comprehend WHY it is likely to be reversed?
No.
The Dainty is just a dishonest hack.
The Dainty lies ^ again.Liability Fail number 3,789
Good gawd, you're hard on me today.The Dainty lies ^ again.
You’re just seeking attention again, ya schmuck.Good gawd, you're hard on me today.
What's up sweetie, you getting ignored by the others?
Already answered.Liability/Fail now knonw as @LiesAgain, can't even answer a simple question: Did two courts find Trump engaged in an insurrection or not?
Is Procrustes in fact our weird Dante?The Dainty lies ^ again.
Narcissistic Personality DisorderYou’re just seeking attention again, ya schmuck.
Speaking of you, have you ever come up with an even slightly credible pretense for why you used to insist on referring to yourself in the third person?
The Dainty is indeed back as Crusty.Is Procrustes in fact our weird Dante?
YupThe Dainty is indeed back as Crusty.
Why comment?What insurrection?
To point out that there wa no insurrection. .Why comment?
If the Congress (Both Houses) Work For The American People, then the American people who were protesting have every right to enter the capitol. You can't have it both ways, dumbass.If the Congress (Both Houses) Work For The American People and Not For The Government, was not the riot/attempted, failed insurrection an assault on the American people?
Can't have it both ways. I know people want to. People with speak of attacking the government, yet claim it's not an attack on the American people.
Which is it? Where do you stand? Are you confused or principled in arguments?
The court that matters is striking that shit down. Do you even know how the judicial system works, kid?Okay.
You are claiming it is not a fact that the two courts found Trump engaged in an insurrection?
note: save keeper Liability @LiesAgain (new suggested scream name)
'wa no insurrection', sure.To point out that there wa no insurrection. .