If Jimmy Kimmel was on obamacare when his son had his surgery....

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
112,048
52,330
2,290
Yeah...it is a good thing that jimmy kimmel is one of the rich 1 percent in this country.....he could actually afford obamacare....unlike most people...

Articles: Jimmy Kimmel Left Out Some Important Bits About Obamacare

First scenario. Suppose the Kimmels had a bronze plan with a $12,000 deductible? Pocket change for Jimmy Kimmel, but one quarter of the average family income, currently $52,000. To be paid up front. And that’s each year, for a child likely to need regular cardiology appointments, ultrasound and stress tests, catheterization and possibly medication. Unaffordable to the average family.

Second scenario. Regardless of which type of Obamacare plan the Kimmels had, suppose their particular plan had a narrow network of providers – physicians and hospitals. Not an issue for Billy Kimmel as he was turning blue and needed urgent surgery. What if instead he had a heart murmur but was otherwise stable, not turning blue, oxygenating well? He would have been discharged a few days after birth with instructions to see a pediatric cardiologist.

Suppose Cedars-Sinai, UCLA and Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles were all out of network for his insurance? Instead the only in-network hospital being one with a mortality rate for pediatric open heart surgery 3 to 5 times the national average?

This is not fearmongering but reality as mortality rates indeed vary widely between hospitals. Now what? Accept lower quality care by necessity because the top-tier hospitals won’t take his insurance? How different is that from the issue of preexisting conditions?

Obamacare may provide insurance but what good is it if it is still unaffordable in terms of premiums, co-payments and deductibles? Or if the doctor or hospital you want to use won’t accept your insurance? And the one that does may be of below-average quality?

What happened to “If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor”? Conveniently overlooked by Jimmy Kimmel who, based on his economic status, won’t ever have to contend with such issues.
 
Works that way with all insurance...even before Obamacare

Now, with the Republican plan, the boy would have a pre-existing condition and be scrambling for for coverage the rest of his life
 
Works that way with all insurance...even before Obamacare

Now, with the Republican plan, the boy would have a pre-existing condition and be scrambling for for coverage the rest of his life


No....actually, he wouldn't.....but thanks for lying.....they have a huge pile of money for people with pre existing conditions.......
 
Trump voters go to veterinarians for medical attention ...
 
Huge pile of money?


The bill's $23 billion in funding specifically for such people would cover just 110,000 Americans, according to the Avalere Health study released Thursday.

That's only 5 percent of the 2.2 million current enrollees in the individual insurance market with some type of pre-existing chronic condition.

GOP's Obamacare replacement bill would protect just 5% of people with pre-existing conditions: Analysis
Don't worry. You preexisting Trump-Hate psychosis will be looked after when you're admitted to the psych ward.
Hope you like eating cat food sandwiches. LOL!
 
Yeah...it is a good thing that jimmy kimmel is one of the rich 1 percent in this country.....he could actually afford obamacare....unlike most people...

Articles: Jimmy Kimmel Left Out Some Important Bits About Obamacare

First scenario. Suppose the Kimmels had a bronze plan with a $12,000 deductible? Pocket change for Jimmy Kimmel, but one quarter of the average family income, currently $52,000. To be paid up front. And that’s each year, for a child likely to need regular cardiology appointments, ultrasound and stress tests, catheterization and possibly medication. Unaffordable to the average family.

Second scenario. Regardless of which type of Obamacare plan the Kimmels had, suppose their particular plan had a narrow network of providers – physicians and hospitals. Not an issue for Billy Kimmel as he was turning blue and needed urgent surgery. What if instead he had a heart murmur but was otherwise stable, not turning blue, oxygenating well? He would have been discharged a few days after birth with instructions to see a pediatric cardiologist.

Suppose Cedars-Sinai, UCLA and Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles were all out of network for his insurance? Instead the only in-network hospital being one with a mortality rate for pediatric open heart surgery 3 to 5 times the national average?

This is not fearmongering but reality as mortality rates indeed vary widely between hospitals. Now what? Accept lower quality care by necessity because the top-tier hospitals won’t take his insurance? How different is that from the issue of preexisting conditions?

Obamacare may provide insurance but what good is it if it is still unaffordable in terms of premiums, co-payments and deductibles? Or if the doctor or hospital you want to use won’t accept your insurance? And the one that does may be of below-average quality?

What happened to “If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor”? Conveniently overlooked by Jimmy Kimmel who, based on his economic status, won’t ever have to contend with such issues.
Yeah...it is a good thing that jimmy kimmel is one of the rich 1 percent in this country.....he could actually afford obamacare....unlike most people...

Articles: Jimmy Kimmel Left Out Some Important Bits About Obamacare

First scenario. Suppose the Kimmels had a bronze plan with a $12,000 deductible? Pocket change for Jimmy Kimmel, but one quarter of the average family income, currently $52,000. To be paid up front. And that’s each year, for a child likely to need regular cardiology appointments, ultrasound and stress tests, catheterization and possibly medication. Unaffordable to the average family.

Second scenario. Regardless of which type of Obamacare plan the Kimmels had, suppose their particular plan had a narrow network of providers – physicians and hospitals. Not an issue for Billy Kimmel as he was turning blue and needed urgent surgery. What if instead he had a heart murmur but was otherwise stable, not turning blue, oxygenating well? He would have been discharged a few days after birth with instructions to see a pediatric cardiologist.

Suppose Cedars-Sinai, UCLA and Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles were all out of network for his insurance? Instead the only in-network hospital being one with a mortality rate for pediatric open heart surgery 3 to 5 times the national average?

This is not fearmongering but reality as mortality rates indeed vary widely between hospitals. Now what? Accept lower quality care by necessity because the top-tier hospitals won’t take his insurance? How different is that from the issue of preexisting conditions?

Obamacare may provide insurance but what good is it if it is still unaffordable in terms of premiums, co-payments and deductibles? Or if the doctor or hospital you want to use won’t accept your insurance? And the one that does may be of below-average quality?

What happened to “If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor”? Conveniently overlooked by Jimmy Kimmel who, based on his economic status, won’t ever have to contend with such issues.
I see you remain as God damn stupid as ever.

The ACA has subsidies to help people buy insurance.

The ACA offers a wide range of options including country wide networks & low deductibles.

The ACA does not set provider networks. You choose the plan you want.

Under your hero's Trumpcare, that baby has a pre-existing condition that Trump will make him pay huge premiums for the rest of his life.
 
Works that way with all insurance...even before Obamacare

Now, with the Republican plan, the boy would have a pre-existing condition and be scrambling for for coverage the rest of his life


No....actually, he wouldn't.....but thanks for lying.....they have a huge pile of money for people with pre existing conditions.......
8 billion dollas over ten years. Experts say not nearly enough.

Who pays for these high risk pools? You do. So why change it? Why not keep it the way it is?
Do you think you will pay less? If so, you are as fricken stupid as I kn ow you are.

You think your premiums will come down if you don't have to help pay for pre-existing conditions. Instead your tax dollars & parts of your premiums will go into these high risk polls.
 
Works that way with all insurance...even before Obamacare

Now, with the Republican plan, the boy would have a pre-existing condition and be scrambling for for coverage the rest of his life


No....actually, he wouldn't.....but thanks for lying.....they have a huge pile of money for people with pre existing conditions.......

are you kidding? allocating just $8 billion dollars over a 5 year period for 27% of the US population with pre existing conditions comes out to:

.

$8B divided by 5 years = 1.6 B a year

$1.6B divided by 52 million US citizens = $31 per person per year.

Search | Pre-Existing Conditions | Search Results | The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

$8 Billion Comes Nowhere Close to Meeting Republican Commitments to People with Pre-Existing Conditions
http://kff.org/tag/pre-existing-conditions/
not to mention the $880 B cut to medicaid which helps low income citizens... but also seniors in nursing homes. medicare does NOT pay for long term care.
 
Works that way with all insurance...even before Obamacare

Now, with the Republican plan, the boy would have a pre-existing condition and be scrambling for for coverage the rest of his life


No....actually, he wouldn't.....but thanks for lying.....they have a huge pile of money for people with pre existing conditions.......

A heart condition is not a pre-existing condition?
Any time the kid changed jobs or has a break in insurance he will be charged exorbitant rates
 

Forum List

Back
Top