Abort your baby or I will not pay child support....got it
Or keep the baby, but I don't want it.
This
Why can a woman KILL the baby but the man is FORCED to abide by whatever decision she makes.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating fathers to drop out of their child's life. I am advocating that the responsible parties have equally say so in the outcomes of their own futures.
And my children are fully grown so leave the personal bullshit out of the thread.
Life isn't always fair. You're a Grampa and you still haven't learned that?
Women's lives are disproportionately affected by children. They have to bear them, they take more time off work, they disproportionately have to tend to them.
Then you whine they get to decide whether have to carry the baby in their own bodies or not? Too damned bad.
Then you whine about the money? The father doesn't want to support the kid so the options for the kid end up being to be killed or potentially live in poverty on the mother's income?
Here's an option the father had if he didn't want kids. Keep it in his pants. Since he didn't and wasn't responsible, shit happened. Welcome to life.
Seems to me the only ones whining in this thread are those than can't take my opinion. Most of you, including you, have done nothing more than lash out emotionally. There is no logic in most of the responses in this thread.
Obvious nonsense. I've shredded your claims using nothing but logic. The obligation of both parents is always equal. Either they're both responsible for supporting their child, or neither is. A woman can create no scenario where she has no responsibility for supporting her child while a man does. Or visa versa.
Obligations are always equal.
You're demanding unequal obligation. Where a woman is responsible for every child she bears. While a man is never responsible for any child he fathers. That's not equality. But startling inequality.
And it splatters on the windshielf of the nature of the obligation itself: to the child. Not to the other parent. If the child exists, the obligation exists. No child, no obligation.
You've never been able to produce a rational, logical counter to these simple points. Nor any reason why we would support unequal obligation that robs a child of an entire parent's worth of support.
Killing your argument twice.
Tell you what. When you courageless pricks can go down to the ghettos and preach your keep it in your pants nonsense to all those fathers who have children for a half dozen different mothers then AND ONLY THEN can you suggest to me what I, A RESPONSIBLE PARENT, should do about the children in my life.
