Nope. This is what subjective means:
Subjective:
: existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought (opposed to
objective ).
Subjective Define Subjective at Dictionary.com
All that 'serve my interests' nonsense is just you offering us subjective definitions, citing yourself.
You realized you just demonstrated exactly what I'm describing, right?
ROFLMNAO!
Nonsense... The object of thought, is the law of nature, which is to say the nature of the that which is at issue and the principles governing such.
What is at issue?
The inherent consequence of sexual intercourse; meaning those things regarding sexual intercourse which are known by longstanding history of empirical evidence to be reasonable certain to come as a result of the behavior... that thing is conception... what's more medical science has proven through greater understanding formed, from generations of observation and tests, produce the substantial understanding the biological, then through more specific study, the chemical actions and reactions, from which such stem... through to the fullest possible understanding of the genetic processes and the physiological constructs that provides for such.
That understanding exists without regard to my recognition of such and is unaltered by my understanding of such with the same being true, where and when I comment upon such.
These facts in NO WAY serve my interests, except where in the understanding of the reality intrinsic to such, thus the inherent truth regarding such... that I should make better decisions, with regard
TO MY BEHAVIOR RELEVANT TO SUCH.
Now which of the facts regarding the reality that is human physiology are you specifically contesting Skylar?
-That the Human Female is designed specifically to join with the human male for the purposes of procreation?
-That the Human female bears the FULL MEASURE of the predictable consequences common to procreation?
-That as a result of that irrefutable fact, the human female is recognized through objective reason, as having THE RIGHT to choose, with whom, where and when she allows herself to be conjoined with a male?
-That due to all of the above facts, it falls to the female to bear the responsibility to not submit herself for sexual behavior, until such time that she has settled upon a man who she can reasonably trust to sustain her and her offspring?
Which of the above NATURAL LAWS, do you SPECIFICALLY dispute and on what SPECIFIC GROUNDS?
(The Reader should recognize that the 'debate', with regard to Skylar and her flailing rationalization has now, effectively, come to a close. She will concede to the argument with her next post. More than likely as a direct result of her patented deflection of the standing points.
I hope you've enjoyed the exercise, as it has been a marvelous demonstration of the two fundamental elements required to defeat a Leftist in debate:
1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to speak.
And this due to the three inalterable elements of Relativism:
Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance.)
