If Iran Backs a Terror Attack inside the United States and More or Less takes Credit for it, how Many of You would Demand Immediate U.S. Surrender?

Seymour Flops

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2021
Messages
27,693
Reaction score
24,147
Points
2,288
Location
Texas
Iran says it has "New Cards on the Battlefield" to play:


Iran’s parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf sent a direct warning to President Donald Trump Monday on X, saying that Iran will not accept negotiations with the U.S. while under threat.
"Trump, by imposing a blockade and violating the ceasefire, seeks, in his view, to turn the negotiating table into a table of surrender or to justify renewed warmongering," he said.
"We do not accept negotiations under the shadow of threat, and over the past two weeks, we have prepared to reveal new cards on the battlefield," Ghalibaf added.


My best guess is that these "new cards" will actually be the same old card - terror attacks against civilians. But this time on U.S. soil. I don't believe Iran will openly admit they did it, but will say someting like, "Not suprising that oppressed people will rise up . . . " But it will be no secret who is behind it.

What will the posters on here say? I'm guessing many of the multiple account operators (the ballot harvesters of social media) will of course insist on the surrender option. Unless of course Trump goes way out of character and announced an immediate surrender a la Biden. Then those schizophrenia patients who should not be allowed near communication devices will say that was the worst thing that he could have done.

What should we do? Surrender, negotiate, fight harder, or something else?
 
Do as George Washington instructed and mind our own business.
 
Iran says it has "New Cards on the Battlefield" to play:


Iran’s parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf sent a direct warning to President Donald Trump Monday on X, saying that Iran will not accept negotiations with the U.S. while under threat.
"Trump, by imposing a blockade and violating the ceasefire, seeks, in his view, to turn the negotiating table into a table of surrender or to justify renewed warmongering," he said.
"We do not accept negotiations under the shadow of threat, and over the past two weeks, we have prepared to reveal new cards on the battlefield," Ghalibaf added.


My best guess is that these "new cards" will actually be the same old card - terror attacks against civilians. But this time on U.S. soil. I don't believe Iran will openly admit they did it, but will say someting like, "Not suprising that oppressed people will rise up . . . " But it will be no secret who is behind it.

What will the posters on here say? I'm guessing many of the multiple account operators (the ballot harvesters of social media) will of course insist on the surrender option. Unless of course Trump goes way out of character and announced an immediate surrender a la Biden. Then those schizophrenia patients who should not be allowed near communication devices will say that was the worst thing that he could have done.

What should we do? Surrender, negotiate, fight harder, or something else?
.

They're so funny.

Be aware, those of you who live near any of those low-hanging Islamofascist freaks.

.
 
Iran says it has "New Cards on the Battlefield" to play:


Iran’s parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf sent a direct warning to President Donald Trump Monday on X, saying that Iran will not accept negotiations with the U.S. while under threat.
"Trump, by imposing a blockade and violating the ceasefire, seeks, in his view, to turn the negotiating table into a table of surrender or to justify renewed warmongering," he said.
"We do not accept negotiations under the shadow of threat, and over the past two weeks, we have prepared to reveal new cards on the battlefield," Ghalibaf added.


My best guess is that these "new cards" will actually be the same old card - terror attacks against civilians. But this time on U.S. soil. I don't believe Iran will openly admit they did it, but will say someting like, "Not suprising that oppressed people will rise up . . . " But it will be no secret who is behind it.

What will the posters on here say? I'm guessing many of the multiple account operators (the ballot harvesters of social media) will of course insist on the surrender option. Unless of course Trump goes way out of character and announced an immediate surrender a la Biden. Then those schizophrenia patients who should not be allowed near communication devices will say that was the worst thing that he could have done.

What should we do? Surrender, negotiate, fight harder, or something else?

I think you are babbling. Trump has painted himself into a corner and he doesn't have a way out.

Bombing isn't working; it's just reinforcing Iranian resolve. The world economy is declining. And he doesn't have the option of sending in Boots on the Ground because he doesn't have enough of them in theater.
 
I think you are babbling. Trump has painted himself into a corner and he doesn't have a way out.

Bombing isn't working; it's just reinforcing Iranian resolve. The world economy is declining. And he doesn't have the option of sending in Boots on the Ground because he doesn't have enough of them in theater.
One vote for immediate surrender, then!
 
Democrats will be responsible as they let the sleeper cells in.
 
672687323_1278885127774561_8254445340156721794_n.webp
 
Bombing is working, they have quit pretending they are a government lead by one and instead are a military dictatorship. they have no money and their supply source is cut off all we have to do is keep it up and they will collapse soon enough.
 
Iran says it has "New Cards on the Battlefield" to play:


Iran’s parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf sent a direct warning to President Donald Trump Monday on X, saying that Iran will not accept negotiations with the U.S. while under threat.
"Trump, by imposing a blockade and violating the ceasefire, seeks, in his view, to turn the negotiating table into a table of surrender or to justify renewed warmongering," he said.
"We do not accept negotiations under the shadow of threat, and over the past two weeks, we have prepared to reveal new cards on the battlefield," Ghalibaf added.


My best guess is that these "new cards" will actually be the same old card - terror attacks against civilians. But this time on U.S. soil. I don't believe Iran will openly admit they did it, but will say someting like, "Not suprising that oppressed people will rise up . . . " But it will be no secret who is behind it.

What will the posters on here say? I'm guessing many of the multiple account operators (the ballot harvesters of social media) will of course insist on the surrender option. Unless of course Trump goes way out of character and announced an immediate surrender a la Biden. Then those schizophrenia patients who should not be allowed near communication devices will say that was the worst thing that he could have done.

What should we do? Surrender, negotiate, fight harder, or something else?
Judging from what I read here, the leftists/liberals/Democrats here have already surrendered.
 
15th post
Iran says it has "New Cards on the Battlefield" to play:


Iran’s parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf sent a direct warning to President Donald Trump Monday on X, saying that Iran will not accept negotiations with the U.S. while under threat.
"Trump, by imposing a blockade and violating the ceasefire, seeks, in his view, to turn the negotiating table into a table of surrender or to justify renewed warmongering," he said.
"We do not accept negotiations under the shadow of threat, and over the past two weeks, we have prepared to reveal new cards on the battlefield," Ghalibaf added.


My best guess is that these "new cards" will actually be the same old card - terror attacks against civilians. But this time on U.S. soil. I don't believe Iran will openly admit they did it, but will say someting like, "Not suprising that oppressed people will rise up . . . " But it will be no secret who is behind it.

What will the posters on here say? I'm guessing many of the multiple account operators (the ballot harvesters of social media) will of course insist on the surrender option. Unless of course Trump goes way out of character and announced an immediate surrender a la Biden. Then those schizophrenia patients who should not be allowed near communication devices will say that was the worst thing that he could have done.

What should we do? Surrender, negotiate, fight harder, or something else?

USA should stop the war because it is wrong. Not because of a terror attack. Look at all the terrorists we unleashed in IRAN to take it down. Look at the regime change operations we have sponsored for 1-3/4 centuries around the world.

United States involvement in regime change - Wikipedia

1846–1848: Annexation of Texas and invasion of California
1865–1867: Mexico
1887–1889: Samoa
1893: Kingdom of Hawaii
1899–1902: Philippines
1903: Colombia
1906–1909: Cuba
1909–1910: Nicaragua
1912–1933: Nicaragua
1914: Mexico
1915–1934: Haiti
1916–1924: Dominican Republic
1917–1919: Germany
1917–1920: Austria-Hungary
1918–1920: Russia
1941–1952: Japan
1941–1949: Germany
1941–1946: Italy
1944–1946: France
1944–1945: Belgium
1944–1945: Netherlands
1944–1945: Philippines
1945–1955: Austria
1945–1948: South Korea
1947–1949: Greece
1949–1953: Albania
1949: Syria
1950–1953: Burma and China
1952: Egypt
1952: Guatemala
1952–1953: Iran
1954: Guatemala
1956–1957: Syria
1957–1959: Indonesia
1959: Iraq
1959–1963: South Vietnam
1959–1962: Cuba
1959: Cambodia
1960–1965: Congo-Leopoldville
1960: Laos
1961: Dominican Republic
1963: Iraq
1964: British Guiana
1964: Brazil
1965–1967: Indonesia
1970–1979: Cambodia
1970–1973: Chile
1971: Bolivia
1974–1991: Ethiopia
1975–1991: Angola
1975–1999: East Timor
1979–1992: Afghanistan
1980–1989: Poland
1981–1982: Chad
1981–1990: Nicaragua
1983: Grenada
1989–1994: Panama
1986–1991: Soviet Union
1991: Iraq
1991: Haiti
1992–1996: Iraq
1994–1995: Haiti
1996–1997: Zaire
2000: FR Yugoslavia
2001–2021: Afghanistan
2002: Venezuela
2003–2021: Iraq
2004: Haiti
2005: Kyrgyzstan
2006–2007: Palestine
2005–2009: Syria
2011: Libya
2012–2017: Syria
2019: Bolivia
2019–2022: Venezuela

...and the list is not up to date.

Wikipedia

amen treasure island.gif
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom