If Hillary is a crook, why...

[OKTexas]

Neither do societies that redistribute wealth to people who haven't earned it. It's a never ending cycle with the non-earners constantly demanding more. Like Franklin said, when the people discover they can vote themselves money for the treasury it will signal the end of the republic. That's paraphrasing of course.

The greedy idiot rich GOP discovered that 30 years ago...now the middle class is almost ruined...

Tell me dupe, who's responsible for allowing a political class to flourish? Great big hint, it ain't the 1%.

With their giant propaganda machine it is...with the usual dupes...

My God you're acting like a freaking child. Propaganda is worthless against people who stay informed. I guess you think you're informed, yet your swallowing all the crap the propaganda machine is feeding you RIGHT NOW. Feel free to keep doing the same thing and expecting different results, see how far that gets ya.

Only the GOP has a propaganda machine. And a giant pile of crap.

That has to be the funniest thing you've ever said.

 

[hadit]

Oh bullshit, Comey said NO REASONABLE PERSON IN HER POSITION WOULD HAVE THE CONVERSATIONS SHE DID ON AN INSECURE SYSTEM, didn't have a ******* thing to do with the computer guy. Now you're moving from the absurd to just silliness.

Actually what he said was, "There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation."

He only stated that there was evidence. He rendered no opinion. You did. You jumped to the conclusion that since he said there was evidence then she was guilty without even knowing what that evidence was. This is understandable because you believed Hillary was liar and crook without every seeing the evidence

He also did not say specify that there was evidence that Clinton should have known that an unclassified system was no place for the conversation. He said Clinton or the government employees with whom she was corresponding should have known... Whether Clinton should have known depends on the construction of the conversation and whether Clinton saw the classified document. If Clinton never saw the classified document, then it is the person that sent it to her who should have know... Again you jump to a conclusion because of what you believe about Clinton.

The bottom line is if she had nothing to hide, she could have used the dot.gov website from anywhere in the world including from the comfort of her own home. If I were to be contacting a customer of the company I work for and instead of using my company e-mail addy, I were to use my Yahoo address because I wanted to make a "side deal" and didn't want a record of my e-mail being on the company server because it's a conflict of interest....would that be moral? You can't whitewash this nor can you justify what she did no matter how hard you all try.

You are starting with a conclusion that the reason for the private server was to hide information. However, from all the investigations, the problem centered around Clinton's insistence on using her Blackberry which was tethered to a private server. She had no problem having it connected to the secure network in the State Dept. Apparently the IT and Security folks did. She said, she just wanted to use a single device, namely the Blackberry or a similar device that Obama used and a single email address for both private and state department use. This she latter admitted was a mistake.

An extremely careless mistake, to be sure. One that would get a lesser mortal in a lot of trouble.

For anyone but Clinton, this issue would have ended with an administrative hearing. If she had announced that she was not going to run for office, there would have been no House Committee Hearings and no FBI investigation.

Somebody owes Gen Petraeus a big apology.

 

[hadit]

Good points. She is obviously clearly a smarter crook than Donald is a businessman. But then if she is THAT smart why is she still talking about those damned emails?

Because she's not guilty of anything but possible incompetence, dupe. Not hacked, none marked classified. You people are ridiculous and brainwashed...

Incompetent, what I've been saying from the beginning. There was no way she was ever going to be indicted. She's too powerful and knows where too many skeletons are buried. Extremely careless is enough for me to want her kept out of the White House.

What evidence do you have besides the partisan comments by the FBI Director that HRC is "incompetent"? Post it, or be forever known as nothing more than one more echo from the chamber of biddable fools.

What more is needed beside the non-partisan comments by the FBI Director? She was extremely careless but he decided not to indict her, but as you know, lesser mortals have been prosecuted for such carelessness. She was the Sec State, trained and responsible to mark classified information classified and handle it properly. This she did not do. The post to which I responded indicate that she could be guilty of incompetence. Have you issue with that as well?

Dems are too much for good gov't to say it, but the FBI director is GOP and talks too much. He was wrong too about things, as he admitted the next day. Can you imagine the New BS GOP in such a case. See Lois Lerner...

Got any evidence that the FBI Director allows partisan bias to sway his judgement? Beyond, of course, the fact that he decided not to indict, despite her being extremely careless with national security, something that would put other people behind bars. You do know, don't you, that lawyers are now planning to use the 'Hillary defense' for defendants who say they didn't intend harm when they compromised classified information?

 

[hadit]

Good points. She is obviously clearly a smarter crook than Donald is a businessman. But then if she is THAT smart why is she still talking about those damned emails?

Because she's not guilty of anything but possible incompetence, dupe. Not hacked, none marked classified. You people are ridiculous and brainwashed...

Incompetent, what I've been saying from the beginning. There was no way she was ever going to be indicted. She's too powerful and knows where too many skeletons are buried. Extremely careless is enough for me to want her kept out of the White House.

What evidence do you have besides the partisan comments by the FBI Director that HRC is "incompetent"? Post it, or be forever known as nothing more than one more echo from the chamber of biddable fools.

What more is needed beside the non-partisan comments by the FBI Director? She was extremely careless but he decided not to indict her, but as you know, lesser mortals have been prosecuted for such carelessness. She was the Sec State, trained and responsible to mark classified information classified and handle it properly. This she did not do. The post to which I responded indicate that she could be guilty of incompetence. Have you issue with that as well?

As if she was in charge of computer security, dupe.

Awww, look at you, trying to be insulting and failing. She demanded her own setup and deliberately refused to use the government supplied channels. That makes her responsible for the protection of her data. But you knew that, right?

 

[hadit]

Hitlery is the most dangerous ever....even worse than the Barrypuppet...hands down.

This ^^^ is one of the most childish idiot-grams to date.

She is a globalist and a crook. She is thicker than thieves with the very .01 percent you leftard morons claim to be so against. Seriously, your type of "stupid" should be declared a mental illness.

There's the 0.1% for raising their own taxes for the good of the country, and there are scumbag GOP 0.1%ers who've brainwashed you, dupe.

No need to raise their own taxes, the government takes donations, as much as you want to give.

Silly talking point. We need ALL the rich to pay their fair share to make the difference, of course.

They already are.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I have spent hours investigating liar lair crooked Hillary claims, and there is nothing there but accusations, assumptions, and fantasies from whitewatergate, cardgate, filegate, BengaziGate, to emailgate. It's all nonsense. For what would pass as a minor incident or honest mistake by most politicians is turned into a hanging offence by Republicans.

You're either as incompetent as the hildabitch or just as big liar. Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence in his press conference, that's all that's required under current statute for a conviction. Intent is NOT a required element to convict. Then in his congressional testimony he agreed with Gowdy that she displayed characteristics of intent.

Mens rea: the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused.

Comey is a Republican who acknowledged the FBI used due diligence in their finding that no crime had been committed. His editorial comments were the usual, a partisan Republican character assassination, aka calumny, and should not be taken seriously.

Bullshit, she knew what she was doing was wrong, personal convenience is not an excuse to ignore aids that were telling her to use her state.gov email. It was set up for her and never used. State also briefed her on their classification policies about emails generated at the State Dept., she ignored that also. Probably 60% of the email she generated was automatically classified by the State Dept. Any correspondence with a foreign official, classified, any correspondence containing personal identifying information, classified. So don't give me this shit, she didn't know, she just didn't care, she was a Clinton she wrote her own rules. BTW she also ignored the State Dept. policies to CC the State Dept archivist on every work related email sent outside the state.gov system, in order to comply with federal records keeping laws. If all these facts plus many more I could name didn't demonstrate intent, nothing is adequate to do so.

So you don't understand this crap either lol.....SOMEBODY (neutral journalist) should look into this lol. IE, how many of this, and how many of that. MY fact checkers say ZERO marked classified, no hacks, personal e-mails deleted as one expects...Your fact checkers (LOL) say treason lol...

Hummmmmmm, I wonder where the one with a confidential header on it came from? Hummmmmmmmm

OOPS! There goes your ZERO marked classified claim.

View attachment 84952

Breaking: Hillary Clinton Sent Information Marked Classified

A clear breach of national security, I'm sure V. Putin is able to take this document and do nefarious things. Our national sovereignty is at stake when such an e-mail, something like the pie to be served at the next meeting of the security council, gets to Putin's desk.

If this is the best evidence you have to convict HRC in absentia, be prepared to be laughed at more than you usually are. Sect. Clinton didn't send it dipshit, and given "Texas Justice" i'm pretty sure you missed the boat and haven't called for the execution of the original author.

Shit happens and it is not always intentional, the recent 'deployment' of three armored vehicles by the army sans parachutes is something to consider when one looks to be captious. One data point taken from tens of thousands of e-mails is laughable when the document itself is innocuous. I suggest you get a life and read the Ten Commandments, there is something there you ought to consider.

 

[Wry Catcher]

November 8th the jury votes. The only jury that counts and right now 67% of the American voters say she is guilty.

Dumb ^^^

You see the American voting public as dumb? 67% think she is a liar and a cheat.

111% think otherwise (sarcasm alert, anyone can make up numbers)

 

[OKTexas]

You're either as incompetent as the hildabitch or just as big liar. Comey laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence in his press conference, that's all that's required under current statute for a conviction. Intent is NOT a required element to convict. Then in his congressional testimony he agreed with Gowdy that she displayed characteristics of intent.

Mens rea: the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused.

Comey is a Republican who acknowledged the FBI used due diligence in their finding that no crime had been committed. His editorial comments were the usual, a partisan Republican character assassination, aka calumny, and should not be taken seriously.

Bullshit, she knew what she was doing was wrong, personal convenience is not an excuse to ignore aids that were telling her to use her state.gov email. It was set up for her and never used. State also briefed her on their classification policies about emails generated at the State Dept., she ignored that also. Probably 60% of the email she generated was automatically classified by the State Dept. Any correspondence with a foreign official, classified, any correspondence containing personal identifying information, classified. So don't give me this shit, she didn't know, she just didn't care, she was a Clinton she wrote her own rules. BTW she also ignored the State Dept. policies to CC the State Dept archivist on every work related email sent outside the state.gov system, in order to comply with federal records keeping laws. If all these facts plus many more I could name didn't demonstrate intent, nothing is adequate to do so.

So you don't understand this crap either lol.....SOMEBODY (neutral journalist) should look into this lol. IE, how many of this, and how many of that. MY fact checkers say ZERO marked classified, no hacks, personal e-mails deleted as one expects...Your fact checkers (LOL) say treason lol...

Hummmmmmm, I wonder where the one with a confidential header on it came from? Hummmmmmmmm

OOPS! There goes your ZERO marked classified claim.

View attachment 84952

Breaking: Hillary Clinton Sent Information Marked Classified

A clear breach of national security, I'm sure V. Putin is able to take this document and do nefarious things. Our national sovereignty is at stake when such an e-mail, something like the pie to be served at the next meeting of the security council, gets to Putin's desk.

If this is the best evidence you have to convict HRC in absentia, be prepared to be laughed at more than you usually are. Sect. Clinton didn't send it dipshit, and given "Texas Justice" i'm pretty sure you missed the boat and haven't called for the execution of the original author.

Shit happens and it is not always intentional, the recent 'deployment' of three armored vehicles by the army sans parachutes is something to consider when one looks to be captious. One data point taken from tens of thousands of e-mails is laughable when the document itself is innocuous. I suggest you get a life and read the Ten Commandments, there is something there you ought to consider.

Keep excusing the lies, and thanks for proving yourself an intellectually dishonest partisan HACK.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Mens rea: the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused.

Comey is a Republican who acknowledged the FBI used due diligence in their finding that no crime had been committed. His editorial comments were the usual, a partisan Republican character assassination, aka calumny, and should not be taken seriously.

Bullshit, she knew what she was doing was wrong, personal convenience is not an excuse to ignore aids that were telling her to use her state.gov email. It was set up for her and never used. State also briefed her on their classification policies about emails generated at the State Dept., she ignored that also. Probably 60% of the email she generated was automatically classified by the State Dept. Any correspondence with a foreign official, classified, any correspondence containing personal identifying information, classified. So don't give me this shit, she didn't know, she just didn't care, she was a Clinton she wrote her own rules. BTW she also ignored the State Dept. policies to CC the State Dept archivist on every work related email sent outside the state.gov system, in order to comply with federal records keeping laws. If all these facts plus many more I could name didn't demonstrate intent, nothing is adequate to do so.

So you don't understand this crap either lol.....SOMEBODY (neutral journalist) should look into this lol. IE, how many of this, and how many of that. MY fact checkers say ZERO marked classified, no hacks, personal e-mails deleted as one expects...Your fact checkers (LOL) say treason lol...

Hummmmmmm, I wonder where the one with a confidential header on it came from? Hummmmmmmmm

OOPS! There goes your ZERO marked classified claim.

View attachment 84952

Breaking: Hillary Clinton Sent Information Marked Classified

A clear breach of national security, I'm sure V. Putin is able to take this document and do nefarious things. Our national sovereignty is at stake when such an e-mail, something like the pie to be served at the next meeting of the security council, gets to Putin's desk.

If this is the best evidence you have to convict HRC in absentia, be prepared to be laughed at more than you usually are. Sect. Clinton didn't send it dipshit, and given "Texas Justice" i'm pretty sure you missed the boat and haven't called for the execution of the original author.

Shit happens and it is not always intentional, the recent 'deployment' of three armored vehicles by the army sans parachutes is something to consider when one looks to be captious. One data point taken from tens of thousands of e-mails is laughable when the document itself is innocuous. I suggest you get a life and read the Ten Commandments, there is something there you ought to consider.

Keep excusing the lies, and thanks for proving yourself an intellectually dishonest partisan HACK.

And you're not? How many e-mails did Sect. HRC SEND which were classified Top secret or secret? The subject matter in the example posted by you is a ridiculous, and not one which would benefit any foreign enemy; of course domestic enemies (you and the Trumpets) will react hysterically to any minor issue which arises - true or not (example the hysteria around the claim she would raise the taxes of the middle class - a lie which is the grist of members of the crazy right wing (CRW), i.e. Trump supporters).

Do you ever listen to the words of Clinton and Trump, really listen without bias? Clinton speaks without notes, when Trump does his handlers immediately issue statements on what he really meant to say. Thus his handlers have now begun to give him words to read - gee, remember the hysteria from the CRW about Obama's use of the Teleprompter? Hypocrisy isn't a virtue but seems to be one to people like you.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Because she's not guilty of anything but possible incompetence, dupe. Not hacked, none marked classified. You people are ridiculous and brainwashed...

Incompetent, what I've been saying from the beginning. There was no way she was ever going to be indicted. She's too powerful and knows where too many skeletons are buried. Extremely careless is enough for me to want her kept out of the White House.

What evidence do you have besides the partisan comments by the FBI Director that HRC is "incompetent"? Post it, or be forever known as nothing more than one more echo from the chamber of biddable fools.

What more is needed beside the non-partisan comments by the FBI Director? She was extremely careless but he decided not to indict her, but as you know, lesser mortals have been prosecuted for such carelessness. She was the Sec State, trained and responsible to mark classified information classified and handle it properly. This she did not do. The post to which I responded indicate that she could be guilty of incompetence. Have you issue with that as well?

As if she was in charge of computer security, dupe.

She had physical control of the server, hell yeah she was in charge of security.

I had physical control of the servers during the time I was office manager, and if I even touched one the IT team would have strung me up.

 

[Flopper]

As if she was in charge of computer security, dupe.

She had physical control of the server, hell yeah she was in charge of security.

Ex NSA was the expert...

And who was his boss? What happened to the buck stopping at the top? Were you NEVER in a supervisory position?

And wth is the big deal anyway lol? NOTHING HAPPENED but a gigantic pile of BS GOP propaganda....

How about you ask Comey, if he can state with absolute certainty that the hildabitches server was not compromised? His answer would be a resounding NO!

It is impossible to tell with absolute certainly that the server has not been compromised. So by GOP logic, it must have been and since Hillary was responsible for everything that occurs within the State Dept, she's as guilty as sin.

 

[OKTexas]

Bullshit, she knew what she was doing was wrong, personal convenience is not an excuse to ignore aids that were telling her to use her state.gov email. It was set up for her and never used. State also briefed her on their classification policies about emails generated at the State Dept., she ignored that also. Probably 60% of the email she generated was automatically classified by the State Dept. Any correspondence with a foreign official, classified, any correspondence containing personal identifying information, classified. So don't give me this shit, she didn't know, she just didn't care, she was a Clinton she wrote her own rules. BTW she also ignored the State Dept. policies to CC the State Dept archivist on every work related email sent outside the state.gov system, in order to comply with federal records keeping laws. If all these facts plus many more I could name didn't demonstrate intent, nothing is adequate to do so.

So you don't understand this crap either lol.....SOMEBODY (neutral journalist) should look into this lol. IE, how many of this, and how many of that. MY fact checkers say ZERO marked classified, no hacks, personal e-mails deleted as one expects...Your fact checkers (LOL) say treason lol...

Hummmmmmm, I wonder where the one with a confidential header on it came from? Hummmmmmmmm

OOPS! There goes your ZERO marked classified claim.

View attachment 84952

Breaking: Hillary Clinton Sent Information Marked Classified

A clear breach of national security, I'm sure V. Putin is able to take this document and do nefarious things. Our national sovereignty is at stake when such an e-mail, something like the pie to be served at the next meeting of the security council, gets to Putin's desk.

If this is the best evidence you have to convict HRC in absentia, be prepared to be laughed at more than you usually are. Sect. Clinton didn't send it dipshit, and given "Texas Justice" i'm pretty sure you missed the boat and haven't called for the execution of the original author.

Shit happens and it is not always intentional, the recent 'deployment' of three armored vehicles by the army sans parachutes is something to consider when one looks to be captious. One data point taken from tens of thousands of e-mails is laughable when the document itself is innocuous. I suggest you get a life and read the Ten Commandments, there is something there you ought to consider.

Keep excusing the lies, and thanks for proving yourself an intellectually dishonest partisan HACK.

And you're not? How many e-mails did Sect. HRC SEND which were classified Top secret or secret? The subject matter in the example posted by you is a ridiculous, and not one which would benefit any foreign enemy; of course domestic enemies (you and the Trumpets) will react hysterically to any minor issue which arises - true or not (example the hysteria around the claim she would raise the taxes of the middle class - a lie which is the grist of members of the crazy right wing (CRW), i.e. Trump supporters.

Do you ever listen to the words of Clinton and Trump, really listen without bias? Clinton speaks without notes, when Trump does his handlers immediately issue statements on what he really meant to say. Thus his handlers have now begun to give him words to read - gee, remember the hysteria from the CRW about Obama's use of the Teleprompter? Hypocrisy isn't a virtue but seems to be one to people like you.

So perjury before congress is insignificant? She said NO emails marked classified were sent or RECEIVED on her email system. We know that statement to be an absolute LIE. At least one had a classified header and others contained portion markers indicating the information was classified. Others generated by her were automatically classified by state dept protocol. So feel free to keep excusing her deception, I'm also sure you think willies perjury was insignificant, you folks seem to loves u som criminals.

 

[OKTexas]

Incompetent, what I've been saying from the beginning. There was no way she was ever going to be indicted. She's too powerful and knows where too many skeletons are buried. Extremely careless is enough for me to want her kept out of the White House.

What evidence do you have besides the partisan comments by the FBI Director that HRC is "incompetent"? Post it, or be forever known as nothing more than one more echo from the chamber of biddable fools.

What more is needed beside the non-partisan comments by the FBI Director? She was extremely careless but he decided not to indict her, but as you know, lesser mortals have been prosecuted for such carelessness. She was the Sec State, trained and responsible to mark classified information classified and handle it properly. This she did not do. The post to which I responded indicate that she could be guilty of incompetence. Have you issue with that as well?

As if she was in charge of computer security, dupe.

She had physical control of the server, hell yeah she was in charge of security.

I had physical control of the servers during the time I was office manager, and if I even touched one the IT team would have strung me up.

Of course a corporate structure is totally comparable to an individual, right? What a fool.

 

[OKTexas]

She had physical control of the server, hell yeah she was in charge of security.

Ex NSA was the expert...

And who was his boss? What happened to the buck stopping at the top? Were you NEVER in a supervisory position?

And wth is the big deal anyway lol? NOTHING HAPPENED but a gigantic pile of BS GOP propaganda....

How about you ask Comey, if he can state with absolute certainty that the hildabitches server was not compromised? His answer would be a resounding NO!

It is impossible to tell with absolute certainly that the server has not been compromised. So by GOP logic, it must have been and since Hillary was responsible for everything that occurs within the State Dept, she's as guilty as sin.

That's why federal law makes it illegal to move classified information out of a secure system to begin with, it increases the possibility of compromise. We know for a fact that people she was communicating with on commercial systems were compromised, how many of those compromised emails contained classified information, at this point no one is saying.

 

[Flopper]

Actually what he said was, "There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation."

He only stated that there was evidence. He rendered no opinion. You did. You jumped to the conclusion that since he said there was evidence then she was guilty without even knowing what that evidence was. This is understandable because you believed Hillary was liar and crook without every seeing the evidence

He also did not say specify that there was evidence that Clinton should have known that an unclassified system was no place for the conversation. He said Clinton or the government employees with whom she was corresponding should have known... Whether Clinton should have known depends on the construction of the conversation and whether Clinton saw the classified document. If Clinton never saw the classified document, then it is the person that sent it to her who should have know... Again you jump to a conclusion because of what you believe about Clinton.

The bottom line is if she had nothing to hide, she could have used the dot.gov website from anywhere in the world including from the comfort of her own home. If I were to be contacting a customer of the company I work for and instead of using my company e-mail addy, I were to use my Yahoo address because I wanted to make a "side deal" and didn't want a record of my e-mail being on the company server because it's a conflict of interest....would that be moral? You can't whitewash this nor can you justify what she did no matter how hard you all try.

You are starting with a conclusion that the reason for the private server was to hide information. However, from all the investigations, the problem centered around Clinton's insistence on using her Blackberry which was tethered to a private server. She had no problem having it connected to the secure network in the State Dept. Apparently the IT and Security folks did. She said, she just wanted to use a single device, namely the Blackberry or a similar device that Obama used and a single email address for both private and state department use. This she latter admitted was a mistake.

An extremely careless mistake, to be sure. One that would get a lesser mortal in a lot of trouble.

For anyone but Clinton, this issue would have ended with an administrative hearing. If she had announced that she was not going to run for office, there would have been no House Committee Hearings and no FBI investigation.

Somebody owes Gen Petraeus a big apology.

Why? Petraeus intentionally gave classified information to a reporter, obstructed justice, admitted it and never served jail time.

 

[Wry Catcher]

So you don't understand this crap either lol.....SOMEBODY (neutral journalist) should look into this lol. IE, how many of this, and how many of that. MY fact checkers say ZERO marked classified, no hacks, personal e-mails deleted as one expects...Your fact checkers (LOL) say treason lol...

Hummmmmmm, I wonder where the one with a confidential header on it came from? Hummmmmmmmm

OOPS! There goes your ZERO marked classified claim.

View attachment 84952

Breaking: Hillary Clinton Sent Information Marked Classified

A clear breach of national security, I'm sure V. Putin is able to take this document and do nefarious things. Our national sovereignty is at stake when such an e-mail, something like the pie to be served at the next meeting of the security council, gets to Putin's desk.

If this is the best evidence you have to convict HRC in absentia, be prepared to be laughed at more than you usually are. Sect. Clinton didn't send it dipshit, and given "Texas Justice" i'm pretty sure you missed the boat and haven't called for the execution of the original author.

Shit happens and it is not always intentional, the recent 'deployment' of three armored vehicles by the army sans parachutes is something to consider when one looks to be captious. One data point taken from tens of thousands of e-mails is laughable when the document itself is innocuous. I suggest you get a life and read the Ten Commandments, there is something there you ought to consider.

Keep excusing the lies, and thanks for proving yourself an intellectually dishonest partisan HACK.

And you're not? How many e-mails did Sect. HRC SEND which were classified Top secret or secret? The subject matter in the example posted by you is a ridiculous, and not one which would benefit any foreign enemy; of course domestic enemies (you and the Trumpets) will react hysterically to any minor issue which arises - true or not (example the hysteria around the claim she would raise the taxes of the middle class - a lie which is the grist of members of the crazy right wing (CRW), i.e. Trump supporters.

Do you ever listen to the words of Clinton and Trump, really listen without bias? Clinton speaks without notes, when Trump does his handlers immediately issue statements on what he really meant to say. Thus his handlers have now begun to give him words to read - gee, remember the hysteria from the CRW about Obama's use of the Teleprompter? Hypocrisy isn't a virtue but seems to be one to people like you.

So perjury before congress is insignificant? She said NO emails marked classified were sent or RECEIVED on her email system. We know that statement to be an absolute LIE. At least one had a classified header and others contained portion markers indicating the information was classified. Others generated by her were automatically classified by state dept protocol. So feel free to keep excusing her deception, I'm also sure you think willies perjury was insignificant, you folks seem to loves u som criminals.

You are so full of shit and so partisan it blows my mind. Your claim of perjury is ridiculous when one puts the witch hunts into perspective without bias. How many e-mails did HRC send and receive - what is the total number? You don't know, nor do I.

But, as a manager in an agency with 500+ employees which interacted with local, state and federal LE agencies, the courts and prosecutors/defense attorneys, and publicand the civilian population, elected officials and the press I got dozens in my inbox everyday. And I was in my office everyday clearing out the inbox. When on vacation, even with a note that I was away, messages still grew everyday. Clinton was on the road, in daily meetings and briefings and I can presume the volume of e-mails were enormous.

The witch hunters entered the Congressional Hearing asking the same questions, over and over, with an obvious evert to elicit a contradiction. The truth of the matter which you refuse to acknowledge - because you are too biased - is that people make mistakes, and making a mistake is not a felony. To prove perjury (and in every trial people testify under oath contradictory statements, and are rarely accused of perjury) one must prove mens rea.

Of course that is how a justice system outside of Texass, Texans like you seem to believe one is guilty until they can prove their innocence.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The bottom line is if she had nothing to hide, she could have used the dot.gov website from anywhere in the world including from the comfort of her own home. If I were to be contacting a customer of the company I work for and instead of using my company e-mail addy, I were to use my Yahoo address because I wanted to make a "side deal" and didn't want a record of my e-mail being on the company server because it's a conflict of interest....would that be moral? You can't whitewash this nor can you justify what she did no matter how hard you all try.

You are starting with a conclusion that the reason for the private server was to hide information. However, from all the investigations, the problem centered around Clinton's insistence on using her Blackberry which was tethered to a private server. She had no problem having it connected to the secure network in the State Dept. Apparently the IT and Security folks did. She said, she just wanted to use a single device, namely the Blackberry or a similar device that Obama used and a single email address for both private and state department use. This she latter admitted was a mistake.

An extremely careless mistake, to be sure. One that would get a lesser mortal in a lot of trouble.

For anyone but Clinton, this issue would have ended with an administrative hearing. If she had announced that she was not going to run for office, there would have been no House Committee Hearings and no FBI investigation.

Somebody owes Gen Petraeus a big apology.

Why? Petraeus intentionally gave classified information to a reporter, obstructed justice, admitted it and never served jail time.

Facts only confuse Hadit, better to laugh at him/her.

 

[OKTexas]

Hummmmmmm, I wonder where the one with a confidential header on it came from? Hummmmmmmmm

OOPS! There goes your ZERO marked classified claim.

View attachment 84952

Breaking: Hillary Clinton Sent Information Marked Classified

A clear breach of national security, I'm sure V. Putin is able to take this document and do nefarious things. Our national sovereignty is at stake when such an e-mail, something like the pie to be served at the next meeting of the security council, gets to Putin's desk.

If this is the best evidence you have to convict HRC in absentia, be prepared to be laughed at more than you usually are. Sect. Clinton didn't send it dipshit, and given "Texas Justice" i'm pretty sure you missed the boat and haven't called for the execution of the original author.

Shit happens and it is not always intentional, the recent 'deployment' of three armored vehicles by the army sans parachutes is something to consider when one looks to be captious. One data point taken from tens of thousands of e-mails is laughable when the document itself is innocuous. I suggest you get a life and read the Ten Commandments, there is something there you ought to consider.

Keep excusing the lies, and thanks for proving yourself an intellectually dishonest partisan HACK.

And you're not? How many e-mails did Sect. HRC SEND which were classified Top secret or secret? The subject matter in the example posted by you is a ridiculous, and not one which would benefit any foreign enemy; of course domestic enemies (you and the Trumpets) will react hysterically to any minor issue which arises - true or not (example the hysteria around the claim she would raise the taxes of the middle class - a lie which is the grist of members of the crazy right wing (CRW), i.e. Trump supporters.

Do you ever listen to the words of Clinton and Trump, really listen without bias? Clinton speaks without notes, when Trump does his handlers immediately issue statements on what he really meant to say. Thus his handlers have now begun to give him words to read - gee, remember the hysteria from the CRW about Obama's use of the Teleprompter? Hypocrisy isn't a virtue but seems to be one to people like you.

So perjury before congress is insignificant? She said NO emails marked classified were sent or RECEIVED on her email system. We know that statement to be an absolute LIE. At least one had a classified header and others contained portion markers indicating the information was classified. Others generated by her were automatically classified by state dept protocol. So feel free to keep excusing her deception, I'm also sure you think willies perjury was insignificant, you folks seem to loves u som criminals.

You are so full of shit and so partisan it blows my mind. Your claim of perjury is ridiculous when one puts the witch hunts into perspective without bias. How many e-mails did HRC send and receive - what is the total number? You don't know, nor do I.

But, as a manager in an agency with 500+ employees which interacted with local, state and federal LE agencies, the courts and prosecutors/defense attorneys, and publicand the civilian population, elected officials and the press I got dozens in my inbox everyday. And I was in my office everyday clearing out the inbox. When on vacation, even with a note that I was away, messages still grew everyday. Clinton was on the road, in daily meetings and briefings and I can presume the volume of e-mails were enormous.

The witch hunters entered the Congressional Hearing asking the same questions, over and over, with an obvious evert to elicit a contradiction. The truth of the matter which you refuse to acknowledge - because you are too biased - is that people make mistakes, and making a mistake is not a felony. To prove perjury (and in every trial people testify under oath contradictory statements, and are rarely accused of perjury) one must prove mens rea.

Of course that is how a justice system outside of Texass, Texans like you seem to believe one is guilty until they can prove their innocence.

Another regressive comedian, she consistently told the same lies for at least 2 years, she wasn't trapped by anyone. Why don't you just admit the truth and stop with all your little side shows.

 

[Flopper]

Ex NSA was the expert...

And who was his boss? What happened to the buck stopping at the top? Were you NEVER in a supervisory position?

And wth is the big deal anyway lol? NOTHING HAPPENED but a gigantic pile of BS GOP propaganda....

How about you ask Comey, if he can state with absolute certainty that the hildabitches server was not compromised? His answer would be a resounding NO!

It is impossible to tell with absolute certainly that the server has not been compromised. So by GOP logic, it must have been and since Hillary was responsible for everything that occurs within the State Dept, she's as guilty as sin.

That's why federal law makes it illegal to move classified information out of a secure system to begin with, it increases the possibility of compromise. We know for a fact that people she was communicating with on commercial systems were compromised, how many of those compromised emails contained classified information, at this point no one is saying.

We don't even know if Clinton ever even saw any of the classified material on the server. About the only thing we do know for sure is there was classified information on the server and that she should not have allowed her IT employees to setup an un-certified private email server for her use. That was a mistake. However, reading about her lack knowledge of the technology, I doubt she understood the implications at the time. The purpose of the server was to handle her private email and State Dept email was to be stored on secure government servers, but that never happened.

Come January, Clinton will have Obama's phone will one email address for all of her email both private and government.

 

[OKTexas]

And who was his boss? What happened to the buck stopping at the top? Were you NEVER in a supervisory position?

And wth is the big deal anyway lol? NOTHING HAPPENED but a gigantic pile of BS GOP propaganda....

How about you ask Comey, if he can state with absolute certainty that the hildabitches server was not compromised? His answer would be a resounding NO!

It is impossible to tell with absolute certainly that the server has not been compromised. So by GOP logic, it must have been and since Hillary was responsible for everything that occurs within the State Dept, she's as guilty as sin.

That's why federal law makes it illegal to move classified information out of a secure system to begin with, it increases the possibility of compromise. We know for a fact that people she was communicating with on commercial systems were compromised, how many of those compromised emails contained classified information, at this point no one is saying.

We don't even know if Clinton ever even saw any of the classified material on the server. About the only thing we do know for sure is there was classified information on the server and that she should not have allowed her IT employees to setup an un-certified private email server for her use. That was a mistake. However, reading about her lack knowledge of the technology, I doubt she understood the implications at the time. The purpose of the server was to handle her private email and State Dept email was to be stored on secure government servers, but that never happened.

Come January, Clinton will have Obama's phone will one email address for all of her email both private and government.

The one I posted that was marked confidential was addressed directly to the hildabitch. Of course she saw them. She also issued and signed a policy letter forbidding dept employees form doing the very thing she was guilty of herself. An ambassador was fired in part for not using the state.gov system. There is NO WAY she can claim ignorance, and you trying to do it for her just makes you look silly.