"If Dr. Gosnell had shot seven infants with an AR-15, it would be national news"

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
20,232
Reaction score
2,406
Points
280
The media also censor news of the 100 people killed on our highways every day by the car crazies. Only gun deaths count to the state media.

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/if...infants-with-an-ar-15-it-would-be-national-ne

Thu Apr 11, 2013

WASHINGTON, D.C., April 11, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) - "If Dr. Gosnell had walked into a nursery and shot seven infants with an AR-15, it would be national news and the subject of presidential hand-wringing." That was the challenging observation made this morning by Rep. Chris Smith, R-NJ, on the floor of the U.S. House.

Because Kermit Gosnell instead allegedly snipped the spinal cords of seven newborn babies in a building called an abortion clinic, the national media has almost uniformly ignored the case, said Smith, something that he charged amounted to a deliberate "cover-up."

"Will the decades-long major national news media cover-up of the brutality—and violence—of abortion methods ever end?" asked Smith. "Will Americans ever be told the horrifying details as to how—and how often—abortionists dismember, decapitate, and chemically poison innocent babies?"

Kermit Gosnell is currently undergoing trial on charges of murdering seven newborn infants by slitting their spinal cords after failed abortions. Former employees of Gosnell have testified that hundreds of babies - many of them viable - were "aborted" in this way at Gosnell's "House of Horrors" clinic.
 
Reminds me of one of my favorites; My guns killed less people than Ted Kennedy's car.
 
There's a big difference between war and slaughter. You stupid ******* idiots can't get it through your head that there's a huge difference.

When we're at war we're dealing with a enemy that we have to beat(submit). Yes, people are going to die, but that is part of winning the thing. I'll ask you this again if we get into it with North Korea.

When you take a baby into a abortion clinic you're having someone kill it. You have the choice.
 
Last edited:
There's a big difference between war and slaughter. You stupid ******* idiots can't get it through your head that there's a huge difference.

When we're at war we're dealing with a enemy that we have to beat(submit). Yes, people are going to die, but that is part of winning the thing. I'll ask you this again if we get into it with North Korea.

Hey stupid. What has North Korea done to us? And what did iraq do to us?. America has STARTED all the "wars" she has been in since WW2. They're not really wars. Just mass murder for profit. THINK
 
A true monster this dr.gosnell is. A savage.

But liberals support abortion so he's a good guy. Just like the anti-war crowd vanished once obozo got in office. Liberals only oppose killing done by gun owners or republicans.
 
There's a big difference between war and slaughter. You stupid ******* idiots can't get it through your head that there's a huge difference.

When we're at war we're dealing with a enemy that we have to beat(submit). Yes, people are going to die, but that is part of winning the thing. I'll ask you this again if we get into it with North Korea.

Hey stupid. What has North Korea done to us? And what did iraq do to us?. America has STARTED all the "wars" she has been in since WW2. They're not really wars. Just mass murder for profit. THINK

Hey, idiot, America has treaties and allies to defend around the world. The worlds better off with one power instead of a dozen that got us into the major wars.

Afifuckingstan was because of bin laden. Remember we were attacked.
Iraq=**** if I know. Maybe we shouldn't of attack that one.
Pakistan-no reason to attack.
Lybia-no reason to attack
Syria-not our job

Now North Korea. We're at war with them as the armice of the 1950's didn't end that war. We're also allies to south Korea and so we're expected to be there. Murder or what? People that tie bombs around their children and hide behind schools. scum.
 
Bush killed more children in Iraq in the first week of the war than this nut did.
I agree!

That makes those baby deaths ok.

So you think we had the choice in war? You're trying to win the damn thing not really thinking about who you're hitting.

I'll ask you the same question when Obama is blowing the shit out of North Korea. IF THEY ATTACK the south.
 
You would have millions of liberals screeching for gun control as they are now.
 
Hey stupid. What has North Korea done to us? And what did iraq do to us?. America has STARTED all the "wars" she has been in since WW2. They're not really wars. Just mass murder for profit. THINK

Hey, idiot, America has treaties and allies to defend around the world. The worlds better off with one power instead of a dozen that got us into the major wars.

.

BS - No american war of the last 70 years has been about treaties or defending allies. Wars are about profiteering. Period. You telling me we HAD to invade vietnam and iraq (twice)?
 
Hey stupid. What has North Korea done to us? And what did iraq do to us?. America has STARTED all the "wars" she has been in since WW2. They're not really wars. Just mass murder for profit. THINK

Hey, idiot, America has treaties and allies to defend around the world. The worlds better off with one power instead of a dozen that got us into the major wars.

.

BS - No american war of the last 70 years has been about treaties or defending allies. Wars are about profiteering. Period. You telling me we HAD to invade vietnam and iraq (twice)?

Nope, but would you rather have a unstable world that invites major wars on the scale of wwII? I'd rather America be the super power and nip a asshole in the ass every once in awhile then another set of equal nations/alliances such that lead up to every major war in history.

America want into nam to stand with a democracy and against communism. You're inviting a serious power to invade our home land if we do nothing.
 
15th post
Afifuckingstan was because of bin laden. Remember we were attacked.
Iraq=**** if I know. Maybe we shouldn't of attack that one.
Pakistan-no reason to attack.
Lybia-no reason to attack
Syria-not our job

Afghanistan - A war for Lithium

Iraq - A war declared because Saddam Hussein put Oil on the Euro standard, instead of the dollar standard (Petro Dollar).

Pakistan - King Obama wanted ANYTHING he could have on his record that was positive, in order to negate what a failure he has been in the Middle East otherwise.

Libya - Libya attempted to change to a GOLD STANDARD, in order to escape the paper FIAT money system of the international banks

Syria - The United States (Obama) is funding Al Qaeda to attack Israel, therefore forcing Israel to fire back (and Israeli leadership knows the US is funding them :)), creating a humanitarian crisis, allowing NATO to get involved and overthrow Assad.

World War 3 coming to a theater near you!
 
Bush killed more children in Iraq in the first week of the war than this nut did.

Obozo has also killed thousands of kids in iraq and afg, and pak. Three countries that never did anything to us.

And who started those wars? Oh yeah, that piece of shit Bush.

And he went to war with those countries without Congressional approval, too!

...Oh, no wait. He didn't. Congressional Democrats signed off on both of those wars, even though they've conveniently forgotten about that.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom