If Democrats Want to Win They Need to Stop Being Weird

[Edgetho]

They're certifiable nuts

They are now. They might have had a chance to grow up normal and lead normal lives at one time.

People change. I knew girls in school that were quite 'plain' but grew up to be raving beauties. I knew guys who seemed to completely lack Testosterone. One comes to mind who was a classmate of mine. He went on to become a Navy SEAL and an MMA fighter in its early days. Has three wonderful children and married to a lovely and charming lady who just happens to be a Doctor.

But dimocrap FILTH get to them in Grade School (or earlier) and convince them that something is wrong with them and that they need surgery.

Why do they do it? Simple...... Because they're scum. The whole party is.

Yes, Nature makes mistakes, You can see it in here every day.

 

[marvin martian]

Define "weird" in this context OP. You mean disagreeing with and/or yelling at the President while he's giving an address?

Or were you referring to something else?

Advocating for men beating the shit out of women in sports.
Sexually mutilating children.
Importing foreign criminals who rape, rob, and murder Americans.
Funding forever wars/money-laundering operations.
Enabling government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Putting porn in schools.

 

[Edgetho]

Advocating for men beating the shit out of women in sports.
Sexually mutilating children.
Importing foreign criminals who rape, rob, and murder Americans.
Funding forever wars/money-laundering operations.
Enabling government fraud, waste, and abuse.
Putting porn in schools.

If Logic worked on dimocrap scum, they wouldn't be dimocrp scum in the first place.

You're pissing into the wind

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Welp, I'm not a fan of the ways and means of the orange bag O' shit. He's not going to make anything better for anyone but himself and his billionaire oligarch buddies and I'm not going to be quiet about it. And I ain't going anywhere.

We don't want you to go anywhere. We have too much fun laughing at you.

 

[BlackSand]

The recent behavior of the Democratic Party since Trump's reelection is not going to entice many supporters. In a vote two days ago every single Democrat in the U.S. Senate voted against cloture to advance legislation that would prevent males competing in female sports. This is an issue that has overwhelming support among the American people and would seem to be an obvious issue to support among swing state Dems, yet not a single one of them voted to advance it. Their antics last night were further telling. Aside from Congressman Al Green needing to be forcefully removed, not a single Democratic member of Congress in attendance stood up and joined in the applause for D.J. Daniel, a 13-year-old boy with brain cancer, who wants to hopefully grow up someday and become a police officer. To double down, a pundit on MSNBC commented that she hoped if Daniel did grow up and fulfill his dream he doesn't commit suicide someday. They also didn't stand when it was announced that the mastermind behind the Abbey Gate attack was apprehended.

None of these are partisan issues, but our politics have been so infected with hate that the only thing anyone seems to stand for anymore is to be against whatever the other side is for.

.

There are places where President Trump could have pushed issues with the Democrats in attendance.
For instance ... He was talking about the Lincoln Riley Act ... And the Democrats remained unmoved.

He should have challenged the Democrats at that point ... Called out the names of the twelve Democrats ...
That voted for it and made the Lincoln Riley Act bi-partisan ... And put them in the spotlight.

Simple little things like that ... Could start to melt the edges on the divide ...
But he had already called the Democrats out in the beginning of the speech ...
And dared them to be stupid ...

I am guessing he doesn't mind ... If Democrats further alienating themselves.

.​

 

[badbob85037]

The recent behavior of the Democratic Party since Trump's reelection is not going to entice many supporters. In a vote two days ago every single Democrat in the U.S. Senate voted against cloture to advance legislation that would prevent males competing in female sports. This is an issue that has overwhelming support among the American people and would seem to be an obvious issue to support among swing state Dems, yet not a single one of them voted to advance it. Their antics last night were further telling. Aside from Congressman Al Green needing to be forcefully removed, not a single Democratic member of Congress in attendance stood up and joined in the applause for D.J. Daniel, a 13-year-old boy with brain cancer, who wants to hopefully grow up someday and become a police officer. To double down, a pundit on MSNBC commented that she hoped if Daniel did grow up and fulfill his dream he doesn't commit suicide someday. They also didn't stand when it was announced that the mastermind behind the Abbey Gate attack was apprehended.

None of these are partisan issues, but our politics have been so infected with hate that the only thing anyone seems to stand for anymore is to be against whatever the other side is for.

The only thing democrats need to do is die or face deportation. I would even be willing to let them pick.

 

[Missourian]

Future Dem leader.......

View attachment 1086251

Green/AOC 2028

Angry and Stupid......Your Dem Party!

Representing the pimp vote since 1977.

 

[Nobody911]

Gee, I wish the US Supreme Court would consider a case like this right now! I don't think trying to eliminate transgender individuals is a good idea. Frankly, they may seem unusual to some, but they are not freaks.

The argument that transgender individuals with XY chromosomes should not be allowed to play in female sports because they are stronger is overly simplistic and not supported by recent scientific evidence. Here's why:

Complex Physiological Differences: Studies have shown that while transgender women may retain some physical advantages, such as higher grip strength, they also have significant disadvantages compared to cisgender women, including lower lung capacity, VO2 max, and jumping ability125. These differences suggest that their overall athletic performance is not uniformly superior.

Hormone Therapy Effects: Transgender women who undergo hormone therapy experience a reduction in muscle mass and strength over time, which can offset any initial advantages they might have had12. This means that after transitioning, their physical capabilities are not necessarily superior to those of cisgender women.

Sport-Specific Considerations: Athletic performance is highly sport-specific. In some sports, like volleyball or long-distance running, transgender women might actually be at a disadvantage due to lower cardiovascular fitness and endurance12.

Need for Individual Assessment: Rather than blanket bans, many experts advocate for sport-specific assessments and policies that consider individual physiological differences rather than relying solely on gender identity or chromosomes57.

In sum, while there are some physical differences, they do not universally favor transgender women in all sports, and policies should be based on nuanced, sport-specific research rather than broad assumptions about strength or chromosomes.

sources:
1. Research Suggests Trans Women Don’t Have a Complete Athletic Advantage
2. IOC Releases Study on Whether Trans Women Have Athletic Advantages
3. Frontiers | Sex differences and athletic performance. Where do trans individuals fit into sports and athletics based on current research?
4. Strength, power and aerobic capacity of transgender athletes: a cross-sectional study | British Journal of Sports Medicine
5. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/23/world/europe/paris-olympics-transgender-athletes.html
6. Transgender Athletes Could Be At A Physical Disadvantage, New Research Shows
7. https://cces.ca/sites/default/files...tes-and-elitesport-a-scientific-review-en.pdf
8. Transwoman Elite Athletes: Their Extra Percentage Relative to Female Physiology - PMC

 

[struth]

What's left of the dembots, is nothing but weirdness

 

[jbrownson0831]

Gee, I wish the US Supreme Court would consider a case like this right now! I don't think trying to eliminate transgender individuals is a good idea. Frankly, they may seem unusual to some, but they are not freaks.

The argument that transgender individuals with XY chromosomes should not be allowed to play in female sports because they are stronger is overly simplistic and not supported by recent scientific evidence. Here's why:

Complex Physiological Differences: Studies have shown that while transgender women may retain some physical advantages, such as higher grip strength, they also have significant disadvantages compared to cisgender women, including lower lung capacity, VO2 max, and jumping ability125. These differences suggest that their overall athletic performance is not uniformly superior.

Hormone Therapy Effects: Transgender women who undergo hormone therapy experience a reduction in muscle mass and strength over time, which can offset any initial advantages they might have had12. This means that after transitioning, their physical capabilities are not necessarily superior to those of cisgender women.

Sport-Specific Considerations: Athletic performance is highly sport-specific. In some sports, like volleyball or long-distance running, transgender women might actually be at a disadvantage due to lower cardiovascular fitness and endurance12.

Need for Individual Assessment: Rather than blanket bans, many experts advocate for sport-specific assessments and policies that consider individual physiological differences rather than relying solely on gender identity or chromosomes57.

In sum, while there are some physical differences, they do not universally favor transgender women in all sports, and policies should be based on nuanced, sport-specific research rather than broad assumptions about strength or chromosomes.

sources:
1. Research Suggests Trans Women Don’t Have a Complete Athletic Advantage
2. IOC Releases Study on Whether Trans Women Have Athletic Advantages
3. Frontiers | Sex differences and athletic performance. Where do trans individuals fit into sports and athletics based on current research?
4. Strength, power and aerobic capacity of transgender athletes: a cross-sectional study | British Journal of Sports Medicine
5. New Study Bolsters Idea of Athletic Differences Between Men and Trans Women
6. Transgender Athletes Could Be At A Physical Disadvantage, New Research Shows
7. https://cces.ca/sites/default/files...tes-and-elitesport-a-scientific-review-en.pdf
8. Transwoman Elite Athletes: Their Extra Percentage Relative to Female Physiology - PMC

Baloney, pure hogwash.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Gee, I wish the US Supreme Court would consider a case like this right now! I don't think trying to eliminate transgender individuals is a good idea. Frankly, they may seem unusual to some, but they are not freaks.

The argument that transgender individuals with XY chromosomes should not be allowed to play in female sports because they are stronger is overly simplistic and not supported by recent scientific evidence. Here's why:

Complex Physiological Differences: Studies have shown that while transgender women may retain some physical advantages, such as higher grip strength, they also have significant disadvantages compared to cisgender women, including lower lung capacity, VO2 max, and jumping ability125. These differences suggest that their overall athletic performance is not uniformly superior.

Hormone Therapy Effects: Transgender women who undergo hormone therapy experience a reduction in muscle mass and strength over time, which can offset any initial advantages they might have had12. This means that after transitioning, their physical capabilities are not necessarily superior to those of cisgender women.

Sport-Specific Considerations: Athletic performance is highly sport-specific. In some sports, like volleyball or long-distance running, transgender women might actually be at a disadvantage due to lower cardiovascular fitness and endurance12.

Need for Individual Assessment: Rather than blanket bans, many experts advocate for sport-specific assessments and policies that consider individual physiological differences rather than relying solely on gender identity or chromosomes57.

In sum, while there are some physical differences, they do not universally favor transgender women in all sports, and policies should be based on nuanced, sport-specific research rather than broad assumptions about strength or chromosomes.

sources:
1. Research Suggests Trans Women Don’t Have a Complete Athletic Advantage
2. IOC Releases Study on Whether Trans Women Have Athletic Advantages
3. Frontiers | Sex differences and athletic performance. Where do trans individuals fit into sports and athletics based on current research?
4. Strength, power and aerobic capacity of transgender athletes: a cross-sectional study | British Journal of Sports Medicine
5. New Study Bolsters Idea of Athletic Differences Between Men and Trans Women
6. Transgender Athletes Could Be At A Physical Disadvantage, New Research Shows
7. https://cces.ca/sites/default/files...tes-and-elitesport-a-scientific-review-en.pdf
8. Transwoman Elite Athletes: Their Extra Percentage Relative to Female Physiology - PMC

Cool story dude, no dicks in girls' sports.

 

[BrokeLoser]

The recent behavior of the Democratic Party since Trump's reelection is not going to entice many supporters. In a vote two days ago every single Democrat in the U.S. Senate voted against cloture to advance legislation that would prevent males competing in female sports. This is an issue that has overwhelming support among the American people and would seem to be an obvious issue to support among swing state Dems, yet not a single one of them voted to advance it. Their antics last night were further telling. Aside from Congressman Al Green needing to be forcefully removed, not a single Democratic member of Congress in attendance stood up and joined in the applause for D.J. Daniel, a 13-year-old boy with brain cancer, who wants to hopefully grow up someday and become a police officer. To double down, a pundit on MSNBC commented that she hoped if Daniel did grow up and fulfill his dream he doesn't commit suicide someday. They also didn't stand when it was announced that the mastermind behind the Abbey Gate attack was apprehended.

None of these are partisan issues, but our politics have been so infected with hate that the only thing anyone seems to stand for anymore is to be against whatever the other side is for.

The weirdos have fully pigeonholed themselves…Their default has to remain ‘ORANGE MAN BAD’ no matter what.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

As a lifelong Dem, I never thought I’d see my party embarrass itself so much

As a lifelong Democrat, I never imagined I would watch my own party embarrass itself so thoroughly— and so publicly — as it did during Tuesday’s joint session of Congress.

nypost.com

 

[scruffy]

Weird how you take absolutely no responsibility for how your vote might affect others, Magaturd.

We don't vote for others, bleeding heart shit for brains.

 

[Foolardi]

The Trump Haters my wife and I know personally are dug in and not changing. Neither are their Democrat leaders. So keep the crazy train rolling and score more wins for the Good Guys in '26 and '28!

One can't enjoy Boxing if they wait until another great like Jack
Demsey surfaces.Arguably the toughest boxer in history.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

We don't vote for others, bleeding heart shit for brains.

No, you vote for an orange bag O' shit because you're low class.

 

[toobfreak]

If Democrats Want to Win They Need to Stop Being Weird​

None of these are partisan issues

You are asking for the impossible, because the democrat party is now the party of the weird, the extreme, and any other minority view which does not proudly put America first.

Any position they might take on any popular topic just puts them closer to agreeing with Trump, and they would rather die than do that.

Democrats have painted themselves into an indefensible position: they want to win, but to win they must change, and to change means abandoning what they really stand for.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

they must change, and to change means abandoning what they really stand for.

Like magaturds did?

 

[BluesLegend]

You are asking for the impossible, because the democrat party is now the party of the weird, the extreme, and any other minority view which does not proudly put America first.

Any position they might take on any popular topic just puts them closer to agreeing with Trump, and they would rather die than do that.

Democrats have painted themselves into an indefensible position: they want to win, but to win they must change, and to change means abandoning what they really stand for.

The Dem party is kaput! The raging whacko left wing took over and wrecked it. RIP Dem party, good riddance!

 

[HeyNorm]

I support transgenders being able to function in society without harassment or demands they hide in the shadows.

I don’t support transgenders in women’s sports.
We have women’s sports for a reason. Because they are athletically inferior to males .
A transgender who went through puberty as a male and has male muscle mass is not suited for women’s sports.
Not only is it a competitive advantage but can be a safety issue

Every Dem Senator voted to allow men in womens sports.

The Dems lost % of their credibility on every issue because they support that idiocy.

RIP the Democrat party.