If Christians are allowed to discriminate against gays ...

[dblack]

As far a whether a child should see it- frankly I think small children don't care- it is more of a challenge for the pre-pubescents and early teens who get easily embarrassed- but ultimately it is parents choice.

No way. This can't be left to parents. We need government making the call. On everything.

 

[dblack]

I live in San Francisco and have been to maybe a dozen Pride Parades. Certainly 'R' rated but no more 'R' rated than the Carnival Parade or even the Bay to Breakers race. And no one 'has to see it in public'- since if you were there- you remember how much effort it took to see the parade- large crowds, blocked off streets. No one is forced to watch the Pride or Carnival parades. As far a whether a child should see it- frankly I think small children don't care- it is more of a challenge for the pre-pubescents and early teens who get easily embarrassed- but ultimately it is parents choice.

Hmmm.. I've seen pictures posters here have shared of guys giving each other blow jobs right on the street before a parade in your lovely home town of San Francisco. Dry humping is the norm and full frontal nudity with lewd gestures and the like. Are you suggesting that the reason they are "R" rated is because the erect penis in the guy's g-string bikini isn't actually making penetration in the guy's asshole in front of him as he mock ***** him in front of kids? That's a fine line for sure. One the law isn't going to buy if that same behavior is outside the schoolyard at recess the next day.

So for the record you believe that it's OK for kids, especially small kids to be exposed to lewd and graphic sex behaviors (barely clothed or not) with full frontal nudity on public streets as "iconic" of the LGBT culture? OK, there you go folks. For the record.

I live in San Francisco and have been to maybe a dozen Pride Parades. Certainly 'R' rated but no more 'R' rated than the Carnival Parade or even the Bay to Breakers race. And no one 'has to see it in public'- since if you were there- you remember how much effort it took to see the parade- large crowds, blocked off streets. No one is forced to watch the Pride or Carnival parades. As far a whether a child should see it- frankly I think small children don't care- it is more of a challenge for the pre-pubescents and early teens who get easily embarrassed- but ultimately it is parents choice.

Hmmm.. I've seen pictures posters here have shared of guys giving each other blow jobs right on the street before a parade in your lovely home town of San Francisco. Dry humping is the norm and full frontal nudity with lewd gestures and the like. Are you suggesting that the reason they are "R" rated is because the erect penis in the guy's g-string bikini isn't actually making penetration in the guy's asshole in front of him as he mock ***** him in front of kids? That's a fine line for sure. One the law isn't going to buy if that same behavior is outside the schoolyard at recess the next day.

So for the record you believe that it's OK for kids, especially small kids to be exposed to lewd and graphic sex behaviors (barely clothed or not) with full frontal nudity on public streets as "iconic" of the LGBT culture? OK, there you go folks. For the record.

You're really into this stuff. For the record.

 

[buttercup]

As far a whether a child should see it- frankly I think small children don't care- it is more of a challenge for the pre-pubescents and early teens who get easily embarrassed- but ultimately it is parents choice.

No way. This can't be left to parents. We need government making the call. On everything.

No one said anything about the government in regard to the parades, are there any other snide strawmen remarks you'd like to make?

 

[buttercup]

I live in San Francisco and have been to maybe a dozen Pride Parades. Certainly 'R' rated but no more 'R' rated than the Carnival Parade or even the Bay to Breakers race. And no one 'has to see it in public'- since if you were there- you remember how much effort it took to see the parade- large crowds, blocked off streets. No one is forced to watch the Pride or Carnival parades. As far a whether a child should see it- frankly I think small children don't care- it is more of a challenge for the pre-pubescents and early teens who get easily embarrassed- but ultimately it is parents choice.

Hmmm.. I've seen pictures posters here have shared of guys giving each other blow jobs right on the street before a parade in your lovely home town of San Francisco. Dry humping is the norm and full frontal nudity with lewd gestures and the like. Are you suggesting that the reason they are "R" rated is because the erect penis in the guy's g-string bikini isn't actually making penetration in the guy's asshole in front of him as he mock ***** him in front of kids? That's a fine line for sure. One the law isn't going to buy if that same behavior is outside the schoolyard at recess the next day.

So for the record you believe that it's OK for kids, especially small kids to be exposed to lewd and graphic sex behaviors (barely clothed or not) with full frontal nudity on public streets as "iconic" of the LGBT culture? OK, there you go folks. For the record.

I live in San Francisco and have been to maybe a dozen Pride Parades. Certainly 'R' rated but no more 'R' rated than the Carnival Parade or even the Bay to Breakers race. And no one 'has to see it in public'- since if you were there- you remember how much effort it took to see the parade- large crowds, blocked off streets. No one is forced to watch the Pride or Carnival parades. As far a whether a child should see it- frankly I think small children don't care- it is more of a challenge for the pre-pubescents and early teens who get easily embarrassed- but ultimately it is parents choice.

Hmmm.. I've seen pictures posters here have shared of guys giving each other blow jobs right on the street before a parade in your lovely home town of San Francisco. Dry humping is the norm and full frontal nudity with lewd gestures and the like. Are you suggesting that the reason they are "R" rated is because the erect penis in the guy's g-string bikini isn't actually making penetration in the guy's asshole in front of him as he mock ***** him in front of kids? That's a fine line for sure. One the law isn't going to buy if that same behavior is outside the schoolyard at recess the next day.

So for the record you believe that it's OK for kids, especially small kids to be exposed to lewd and graphic sex behaviors (barely clothed or not) with full frontal nudity on public streets as "iconic" of the LGBT culture? OK, there you go folks. For the record.

You're really into this stuff. For the record.

Quit trolling, troll.

 

[buttercup]

Oh you have been making that lie for a long time Silhouette.

Sorry to jump in here, but I want to ask... what in particular are you claiming he is lying about?

Are you denying that inappropriate behavior goes on at those parades and rallies, right in front of children?

Because he is correct, it does. Stuff that nobody in their right mind would do in front of children. That is not to say it happens at every single parade, but it does happen. Wouldn't you agree that shows a lack of judgment, or a terribly wrong mindset for a potential parent?

First of all- Silhouette is a she- and I have been confronting Silhouette's homophobic lies for years.

The specific lie I was pointing out was this:
the LGBT lifestylists defend public graphic acts of sex where they invite and hope children are watching ".

I have yet to see anyone 'defend' public graphic acts of sex- nor is there any evidence at all- other than the voices in her head- that anyone is inviting children to watch public sex acts.

Now does public sex happen at times? Certainly- the only times I have observed it in my very, very gay city, was drunk straight couples.
Does it happen other times- I am sure it has- but I have lived here for over 20 years and that is my experience.

I have been to our Gay Pride Parade maybe a dozen times- and have never once seen 'public graphic acts of sex'. I have seen nudity- I have seen suggestiveness- but I came expecting to see it. Now some parents would find nudity offensive- and those parents don't bring their kids to these parades. These parades are really intended for adults but kids are not prohibitted.

Silhouette has never been to a single parade- she web surfs looking for gay porn that appears to be part of a gay parade. She knows nothing about what happens at a Pride Parade- and doesn't really care- all of this is just another of your baker's dozen of methods to attack gays.

She lies- all the time. Sometimes I don't know whether she is just delusional, but they are falsehoods just the same.

Have you seen where she accuses Dylan Roof- the kid who shot up the Charleston Church- of being secretely gay and doing the shooting because of gay marriage?

Where she says that the Pope was blackmailed into resigning by the gay?

Those are just the more outragious- most of her lies are more mundane and repeated over and over.

Thank you for the clarification. I haven't seen anyone defend it either… But I also haven't seen anyone condemn it. What I have been seeing is people acting like it doesn't happen, or not responding at all, or trying to turn the tables on her and accusing her of being a perverted sicko. Oh, and pointing to things like Mardi Gras, as a response.

And no, I haven't seen any of those wild claims… I don't post here that much, and only came back recently.

BTW, what city do you live in? I used to live in San Francisco, and a friend of mine was a professional photographer. He asked me a couple times if I wanted to accompany him to a couple of those pride events. That was many years ago, but I was kind of blown away by how much rated R (to put it mildly) stuff was right out there in the open, on a public street. Stuff that no one should have to see in public… Let alone a child.

I live in San Francisco and have been to maybe a dozen Pride Parades.

Certainly 'R' rated but no more 'R' rated than the Carnival Parade or even the Bay to Breakers race.

And no one 'has to see it in public'- since if you were there- you remember how much effort it took to see the parade- large crowds, blocked off streets. No one is forced to watch the Pride or Carnival parades.

As far a whether a child should see it- frankly I think small children don't care- it is more of a challenge for the pre-pubescents and early teens who get easily embarrassed- but ultimately it is parents choice.

To put it on the same level as the other events you mentioned is ludicrous, but I can understand why you think that.

 

[dblack]

As far a whether a child should see it- frankly I think small children don't care- it is more of a challenge for the pre-pubescents and early teens who get easily embarrassed- but ultimately it is parents choice.

No way. This can't be left to parents. We need government making the call. On everything.

No one said anything about the government in regard to the parades, are there any other snide strawmen remarks you'd like to make?

Gobs of them, yeah. Homophobia isn't the topic.

 

[dblack]

Hmmm.. I've seen pictures posters here have shared of guys giving each other blow jobs right on the street before a parade... .

I don't think I've ever met anyone more obsessed with gay sex. How many hours a week do you spending looking at this stuff?

 

[dblack]

Hmmm.. I've seen pictures posters here have shared of guys giving each other blow jobs right on the street before a parade... .

I don't think I've ever met anyone more obsessed with gay sex. How many hours a week do you spending looking at this stuff?

Gay pride parade pictures? Good to see you equating them with gay sex. Because that's what they are. Stepped in that one didn't you?

Anytime I respond to any of your posts, I'm 'stepping in it'.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I'll defer to you as the resident authority on shit. You're one sick ****, Sil.

The only sicker ***** than me are adults who put on graphic deviant sex parades inviting kids to watch. (or maybe their apologists on online chat boards)...

As told to you by the voices in your head. Didn't I instruct you to provide documentation as to where and when that sort of thing is happening?

 

[Silhouette]

I'll defer to you as the resident authority on shit. You're one sick ****, Sil.

The only sicker ***** than me are adults who put on graphic deviant sex parades inviting kids to watch. (or maybe their apologists on online chat boards)...

As told to you by the voices in your head. Didn't I instruct you to provide documentation as to where and when that sort of thing is happening?

You mean besides the millions of existing photos and video footage in cities and towns across the US, every year since the 1960s? You require more proof than that? Or is it also your assertion that people cannot possibly manage to type in the words "gay pride parade" in Google images and access some of the tamer photos still depicting the crime of graphic acts of sex in front of kids by invitation?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I'll defer to you as the resident authority on shit. You're one sick ****, Sil.

The only sicker ***** than me are adults who put on graphic deviant sex parades inviting kids to watch. (or maybe their apologists on online chat boards)...

As told to you by the voices in your head. Didn't I instruct you to provide documentation as to where and when that sort of thing is happening?

.
You mean besides the millions of existing photos and video footage in cities and towns across the US, every year since the 1960s? You require more proof than that? Or is it also your assertion that people cannot possibly manage to type in the words "gay pride parade" in Google images and access some of the tamer photos still depicting the crime of graphic acts of sex in front of kids by invitation?

I did google it sweetheart. Let us know when you find all of that sex and nudity. Things have changed , but some of these photos go back to 1972. Nothing lascivious there either, although I will concede that some of what you was going on way back then. This should shut you up for good, but I doubt that it will.

Gay Pride parades used to mean protests. Now they're an excuse for straight kids to party

Gay Pride Parades & Events: 2018 Gay Pride Calendar for the LGBT Community

Small Cities Celebrating Their First Pride Parades in 2018 - CityLab

LGBT pride parades across the world

Celebration, defiance mix at New York City gay pride parade

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I'll defer to you as the resident authority on shit. You're one sick ****, Sil.

The only sicker ***** than me are adults who put on graphic deviant sex parades inviting kids to watch. (or maybe their apologists on online chat boards)...

As told to you by the voices in your head. Didn't I instruct you to provide documentation as to where and when that sort of thing is happening?

You mean besides the millions of existing photos and video footage in cities and towns across the US, every year since the 1960s? You require more proof than that? Or is it also your assertion that people cannot possibly manage to type in the words "gay pride parade" in Google images and access some of the tamer photos still depicting the crime of graphic acts of sex in front of kids by invitation?

Here is more . Where is the sex and nudity. Identify is location in the video. I wait here while you waste your time

gay pride parades changed - Bing video

 

[Syriusly]

Oh you have been making that lie for a long time Silhouette.

Sorry to jump in here, but I want to ask... what in particular are you claiming he is lying about?

Are you denying that inappropriate behavior goes on at those parades and rallies, right in front of children?

Because he is correct, it does. Stuff that nobody in their right mind would do in front of children. That is not to say it happens at every single parade, but it does happen. Wouldn't you agree that shows a lack of judgment, or a terribly wrong mindset for a potential parent?

First of all- Silhouette is a she- and I have been confronting Silhouette's homophobic lies for years.

The specific lie I was pointing out was this:
the LGBT lifestylists defend public graphic acts of sex where they invite and hope children are watching ".

I have yet to see anyone 'defend' public graphic acts of sex- nor is there any evidence at all- other than the voices in her head- that anyone is inviting children to watch public sex acts.

Now does public sex happen at times? Certainly- the only times I have observed it in my very, very gay city, was drunk straight couples.
Does it happen other times- I am sure it has- but I have lived here for over 20 years and that is my experience.

I have been to our Gay Pride Parade maybe a dozen times- and have never once seen 'public graphic acts of sex'. I have seen nudity- I have seen suggestiveness- but I came expecting to see it. Now some parents would find nudity offensive- and those parents don't bring their kids to these parades. These parades are really intended for adults but kids are not prohibitted.

Silhouette has never been to a single parade- she web surfs looking for gay porn that appears to be part of a gay parade. She knows nothing about what happens at a Pride Parade- and doesn't really care- all of this is just another of your baker's dozen of methods to attack gays.

She lies- all the time. Sometimes I don't know whether she is just delusional, but they are falsehoods just the same.

Have you seen where she accuses Dylan Roof- the kid who shot up the Charleston Church- of being secretely gay and doing the shooting because of gay marriage?

Where she says that the Pope was blackmailed into resigning by the gay?

Those are just the more outragious- most of her lies are more mundane and repeated over and over.

Thank you for the clarification. I haven't seen anyone defend it either… But I also haven't seen anyone condemn it. What I have been seeing is people acting like it doesn't happen, or not responding at all, or trying to turn the tables on her and accusing her of being a perverted sicko. Oh, and pointing to things like Mardi Gras, as a response.

And no, I haven't seen any of those wild claims… I don't post here that much, and only came back recently.

BTW, what city do you live in? I used to live in San Francisco, and a friend of mine was a professional photographer. He asked me a couple times if I wanted to accompany him to a couple of those pride events. That was many years ago, but I was kind of blown away by how much rated R (to put it mildly) stuff was right out there in the open, on a public street. Stuff that no one should have to see in public… Let alone a child.

I live in San Francisco and have been to maybe a dozen Pride Parades.

Certainly 'R' rated but no more 'R' rated than the Carnival Parade or even the Bay to Breakers race.

And no one 'has to see it in public'- since if you were there- you remember how much effort it took to see the parade- large crowds, blocked off streets. No one is forced to watch the Pride or Carnival parades.

As far a whether a child should see it- frankly I think small children don't care- it is more of a challenge for the pre-pubescents and early teens who get easily embarrassed- but ultimately it is parents choice.

To put it on the same level as the other events you mentioned is ludicrous, but I can understand why you think that.

And I guess I understand why you think you should be the judge of every parent who parents their children differently than yourself.

 

[Syriusly]

I'll defer to you as the resident authority on shit. You're one sick ****, Sil.

The only sicker ***** than me are adults who put on graphic deviant sex parades inviting kids to watch. (or maybe their apologists on online chat boards)...

As told to you by the voices in your head. Didn't I instruct you to provide documentation as to where and when that sort of thing is happening?

You mean besides the millions of existing photos and video footage in cities and towns across the US, every year since the 1960s?

LOL- how much gay porn have you looked at?

FYI- first gay pride parade of any kind: 1970.

First time you actually saw a gay pride parade= never.

 

[Syriusly]

That sounds good but it's not where the Court is heading with all this. How do I know? How do you know? Because if the baker had discriminated and said "no wedding cake for you" based on one or both of the couple being born black, the Opinion in this decision would've been very different. Period. There's your sign.

Yes, because the Bible clearly doesn't want black folk to marry...

Were you always this stupid, or have you taken courses?

You will find over time that this has additional considerations outside the Bible. And my point didn't exclude your point, stupid. I agree. The Bible doesn't say a word about skin color being inferior in the eyes of God. The Bible DOES say though that behaviors are abominations in the eyes of God. Romans 1. Jude 1.

What I mean by "additional considerations" is that just recently with this USSC decision, LGBTs were demoted to behavioral where they were skating along for some time on the false premise that they are "an innate group" (like race, hence my example). Being found behavioral is huge. Why? Because a behavioral group cannot be condoned or supported that holds endemic to itself "in pride" the 4-decades long regular practice across the US in cities and towns everywhere of deviant sex acts in parades where they invite and hope children will be watching. Let that sink in.

If for some reason you argue that this group CAN force others to play along or condone them, then what other groups that self-identify as a clique or habitual or give themselves a moniker "LGBT" can be turned away? The answer is none. Once a minority repugnant behavioral group can not only escape majority rule but then turn around and force the majority to play along with their BEHAVIORS then we no longer have a country to govern. If one group gets special privileges, they all do.

This creates a NIGHTMARE for the US Supreme Court. Their hands are tied in "sifting out" behaviors they don't like. And let's not forget that LGBT got this unworkable pass from majority rule simply because the 5 liberal Justices on the Court were playing favorites. That's a thing they are disallowed to do. And this baker case drove that home. As we all know, you give the LGBT cult an inch and they'll take a mile. That's what this USSC decision was about: telling LGBT "you're not getting that mile, we gave you an inch now be satisfied with it".

Only the law doesn't work that way. The "inch" the 5 assholes on the USSC gave this cult in 2015 was as good as a mile in that you cannot give people special status and privileges from majority rule and "discrimination" (against behaviors? we do that all the time and must in the case of child sex offenders), and then turn around and tell people "oh, you can pick and choose if you want to discriminate against them or not." Which is what they kind of just said in this Ruling along with "we gave you an inch but you're not getting a mile". That's a legal paradox that cannot stand with itself and the shit is going to hit the fan on that paradox.

As with all of Silhouettes posts
a) Basically all a lie
b) Just posted to cause harm to gays and their children.

 

[Silhouette]

As with all of Silhouettes posts
a) Basically all a lie
b) Just posted to cause harm to gays and their children.

Two words, pick one to describe. "harm" "help". Are adults putting on deviant sex parades where they invite kids to watch 1. harming or 2. helping the children? Just pick one.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

As with all of Silhouettes posts
a) Basically all a lie
b) Just posted to cause harm to gays and their children.

Two words, pick one to describe. "harm" "help". Are adults putting on deviant sex parades where they invite kids to watch 1. harming or 2. helping the children? Just pick one.

Interesting to note that you have no comment on my posts from yesterday where I provided numerous links on recent gay pride parades challenging you to find evidence of nudity and sexual activity that children are exposed to, along with a discussion of how these events have changed. Obviously,you have nothing meaningful to say when confronted with the evidence of your delusional obsession- but rather run from it and prattle on about "deviant sex.... bla, bla , bla

 

[Silhouette]

Interesting to note that you have no comment on my posts from yesterday where I provided numerous links on recent gay pride parades challenging you to find evidence of nudity and sexual activity that children are exposed to, along with a discussion of how these events have changed. Obviously,you have nothing meaningful to say when confronted with the evidence of your delusional obsession- but rather run from it and prattle on about "deviant sex.... bla, bla , bla

PP, every single person reading these posts has common knowledge of what goes on at gay pride parades every year across US cities and towns since the 1960s. There are literally millions of photos and video reel of these events since then to present day. People can also use Google to search "gay pride parade" in images. It's like you're operating in a parallel universe. Your statement sounds as sane as someone saying "you have yet to prove that water is wet". I hope your credibility can recover.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Interesting to note that you have no comment on my posts from yesterday where I provided numerous links on recent gay pride parades challenging you to find evidence of nudity and sexual activity that children are exposed to, along with a discussion of how these events have changed. Obviously,you have nothing meaningful to say when confronted with the evidence of your delusional obsession- but rather run from it and prattle on about "deviant sex.... bla, bla , bla

PP, every single person reading these posts has common knowledge of what goes on at gay pride parades every year across US cities and towns since the 1960s. There are literally millions of photos and video reel of these events since then to present day. People can also use Google to search "gay pride parade" in images. It's like you're operating in a parallel universe. Your statement sounds as sane as someone saying "you have yet to prove that water is wet". I hope your credibility can recover.

 

[Syriusly]

As with all of Silhouettes posts
a) Basically all a lie
b) Just posted to cause harm to gays and their children.

Two words, pick one to describe. "harm" "help"..

The courts have pointed out- the same courts you cite- have pointed out- that denying equal rights to gay couples harms their children.

Why do you promote an agenda that you know will harm children?