jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,262
- 34,415
- 2,180
Another all in on baby unalivingUnder certain circumstance, yes. Cry somewhere else. You are wasting your time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another all in on baby unalivingUnder certain circumstance, yes. Cry somewhere else. You are wasting your time.
You mean like human life begins at conception? Yeah, that's a real batty belief.ding has some batty opinions, for sure. He has a right to them.
The beating heart belongs to the baby, and not the mother! Forced stoppage is unalivingThat's for the states to decide. But it's a start that you don't acknowledge them as property or chattel.
If medically the correct answer. I have no intention of getting in between mother and doctor, as if I had the right, the training or superior morality. You don't either, but its kind of your thing.Another all in on baby unaliving
I regard them as dependent lives.That's for the states to decide. But it's a start that you don't acknowledge them as property or chattel.
Which still doesn't speak to any biological dependence.And were LEGALLY regarded as property to be disposed of at the will of their owners.
You regard them as property to be disposed of like slaves.I regard them as dependent lives.
Which still doesn't speak to any biological dependence.
Are you really going to make me unleash a parade of quotes from embryologists?You are wrong, Ding. God says life starts at first breath. Go away.
Now you're just repeating strawman that have already been burnt to the ground. I regard them as dependent lives who shouldn't have a legal right to gestate inside another independent life.You regard them as property to be disposed of like slaves.
Ah, a leftist suggesting others are simpletonsIt's not. But trying to claim the womb as the legal jurisdiction of the state requires insanely intrusive government and makes slaves of women. The insides of another person's body are none of your business. Regardless of what you think is in there.
I know this won't change your mind. For you it's very simple. Because you're a simpleton.
If so, then the same right should be afforded to the man. No man should ever be forced to become a father.
Calling me a leftist is clear evidence of your ignorance. Maybe stop typing?Ah, a leftist suggesting others are simpletons
He should be finding out what she will do if she becomes pregnant, BEFORE he has sex with her. If she says "I'm having the baby, and suing you for support", he'd better run. No man who kept it in his pants has been forced to become a father. If the man doesn't want to be a father, he should be using birth control, or keeping it in his pants.
She cannot get pregnant without him so he bears MORE of the responsibility for the pregnancy than she does.
Men don’t have sex to have babies. Don’t be a silly goose. Everyone knows that.
Pot calling kettle black!Well then it's pretty stupid of them not to take precautions to protect themselves, now isn't it?
She cannot get pregnant without him so he bears MORE of the responsibility for the pregnancy than she does.
I know what unaliving isIf medically the correct answer. I have no intention of getting in between mother and doctor, as if I had the right, the training or superior morality. You don't either, but its kind of your thing.