someone told me once they had him listed in wiki as a 'philosopher', among other things, I see, hes a philosopher too? How much does that cost?
He's not a philosopher but he wants to be one. He'd rather be that than a hedge fund manager.
Or so I've read.
you can talk about all the wall st. scum you like, some of them are scum, no doubt, but currency speculators occupy a special place, most especially those that try to corner markets and blow up currencies*shrugs*
I have some sympathy for that pertaining to small, illiquid currencies, where they are easy to push around. I have zero sympathy for that when it comes to big, liquid currencies like the pound.
When currencies come under speculative attack, there is usually an economic reason (except perhaps during contagion when markets get irrational). In this case, the pound was too high.
Currency speculation follows a pretty easy script (though it's harder to do in practice). All else being equal, currencies go up when the economy is strong and go down when the economy is weak. When there is no government manipulation - i.e. there is no currency peg - when the economy weakens, the government will cut interest rates. When the economy strengthens, the government will raise interest rates. Interest rates affect capital flows and the prices of currencies. When interest rates rise, it will attract capital, increasing the demand for the home currency, causing the currency to rise. When interest rates fall, capital will leave as it seeks higher yields elsewhere and the home currency will fall. Generally, the higher the interest rates, the higher the cost of capital to the economy and the economy slows. Likewise, the lower the interest rates, the lower the cost of capital and the economy picks up. So, when you think an economy is going to weaken, you sell the currency because you think interest rates will fall. If you think the economy is going to strengthen, you buy the currency because you think interest rates are going to rise.
Notice I didn't say that "You sell the currency because you think the economy is going to weaken and you think interest rates will
rise." Basic economic theory tells you this is wrong.
What Soros and other currency traders saw - and it wasn't just Soros who did this, many others did as well - and saw correctly was that the pound should have been weaker because Britain was in a recession. But the British government was steadfast in keeping the pound within the ERM.
It was the British government who was keeping the pound way above its market value. The government used interest rates to keep the value of the pound in the peg. As I noted earlier, the real interest rate in the UK was 6.5%. Though I sympathize with the government's attempt to kill the double-digit inflation from a few years prior, that's ******* insane when the economy is in a recession. A trader with a basic understanding of economics would think "That can't last, it's irrational," which is what Soros and many other traders thought at the time.
Given CG's seeming inability to articulate the economics of what exactly Soros did that was so evil, and given that the British economy began to expand once the speculators freed the pound from the chains of the ERM, I can only assume that all these bad things she claims had befallen average Britons occurred
before the pound left the ERM.
What happened then was that to defend the pound against speculative attack, the British government jacked up overnight rates to something like 15% - double digit real interest rates - to keep capital within the country and the pound with the band. Over the summer, British stocks and bonds did fall, which, again, is in the standard playbook of capital allocation within financial markets.
Again, this is the dialogue the government and the market was having at the time.
The government: "This is the price."
The market: "No it isn't."
The government: "Yes it is."
The market: "No it isn't. It's too high. I'm going to sell."
The government: "OK. Then I'm going to manipulate the price by skyrocketing interest rates. You'll see."
The market: "Nope. Sorry."
And guess what? The market
was right. The pound broke the band and stayed there for awhile and the British economy recovered. Meanwhile, the Bank of England lost £3.5 billion and ordinary Britons suffered.
But who is at fault? The government for trying to artificially set the price or the market?
Usually, it is the socialists who blame the market for thwarting the will of the government. In this case, it is CG and others we would normally think of as on the Right for blaming "evil speculators" for thwarting the will of the government.
Up is down and down is up.