ICE deportations ignore the promise of 'never again'

[drudge X]

Then send them to their countries.

Ahhh yes, they are such productive members of society that their own country refused to allow them back.

 

[drudge X]

Granted, but he did not have the authority to overstep US immigration law.

Were you concerned when Biden refused to enforce immigration law when he sworn to defend the country from invaders?

 

[Concerned American]

Were you concerned when Biden refused to enforce immigration law when he sworn to defend the country from invaders?

I believe that is exactly what I said in the post that you replied to.

 

[struth]

‘A new memo outlines plans by Immigration and Customs Enforcement to deport potentially thousands of immigrants to countries that are not their own. The Trump administration’s assiduous efforts to send people to places like Libya and South Sudan are clearly intended to scare noncitizens, both those in the U.S. and those who might contemplate coming.

To understand what’s so bad about these deportations, however, takes more than an intuitive sense that these are dangerous places. You need to go back to the Holocaust, which is the reason we have rules guiding such deportations in the first place.

In the run-up to the Final Solution, Jews fleeing the Nazis were refused entry at the gates of the U.S. Postwar horror at what had happened helped lead to the adoption of the international law principle that refugees cannot be sent back to places where they may be subject to persecution and torture. (The principle is known by its French name, “non-refoulement,” which roughly means “non-return.”) The U.S. laws at issue today in the Trump deportations can be traced to international treaties that the U.S. signed, which, in different ways, give legal force to the non-return principle.

The first international treaty to mention non-refoulement is the Convention Relating to the International Status of Refugees, which dates to 1933, before World War II. Article 3 of the treaty said the signatories wouldn’t return refugees who were “authorised” to reside there regularly, and that they wouldn’t turn back refugees from their borders. Only nine countries agreed to the treaty, and one of them, the United Kingdom, didn’t even agree to the second principle.’

Comment: ICE deportations ignore the promise of ‘never again’ | HeraldNet.com

The lawless, criminal removal of immigrants to dangerous countries is reprehensible and wrong – typical of the Trump regime.

I certainly hope illegals plan on never again coming here illegally

Not sure why anyone would want anything different

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Illegally, yes.

But we all know who invited them.

Yes, American business, you ass.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Nope! You and the other goober, Hunter Biden, can whine and disagree and throw tantrums all you want. SCOTUS says YOU'RE wrong.

Prove it. You can't.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You are not. You are sending some to countries not theirs.

Because they are so violent their own country doesn't want then.

 

[Concerned American]

Prove it. You can't.

Hide and watch donkey, the proof is in the pudding. Everything I've posted is true and YOU know it.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

 

[EvilCat Breath]

So what's your rationale here? To bring about some kind of change? To convince Trump-supporters that they were wrong in supporting him? To get "likes" and "thumbs up" from those who agree with you?

Personally, I don't see why you waste your time on these never-ending Trump threads. Nobody except a few people really care and nothing's going to change one way or the other.

He's reminding us of how wonderful Trump is.