Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 61,080
- 25,603
- 2,173
Where does the first amendment say it doesn’t apply to lawful permanent resident?He just does not qualify. Thats reality si go shill for criminals some more
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where does the first amendment say it doesn’t apply to lawful permanent resident?He just does not qualify. Thats reality si go shill for criminals some more
Do you think boycotts are illegal?![]()
Mare keeps arguing the issue here is free speech. When he well knows there is a specific statute regarding the deportablility of any alien whose actions constitute a "reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States"I wasn't here at point #1, can you clue me in regarding your 20 repetitions of a single point, so what was the original point?
No, I think they're stupid....Unless they happen organically....Do you think boycotts are illegal?
Nope, true. You seem to be confusing the right of the executive to declare and alien a threat and the due process that follows.That's false. See #482 for why.
Boycotts are speech, actually. Protected by the first amendment.No, I think they're stupid....Unless they happen organically....
Yes it’s equal. The constitution protects all under its jurisdiction equallyTo a lesser extent that is true, but it's not equal to a green card holder, but I didn't say the constitution didn't protect undocs to a lesser extent. If you are claiming equal, that's not accurate. We can go over the differences, if you want.
And usually had the charges dropped by complacent blue city sympathetic officials.
You have no clue what usually happened.
District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office dismissed cases against 31 of 46 people charged with trespassing in the Ivy League school’s Hamilton Hall after a dramatic April 30 NYPD raid rounded up protesters on the Morningside Heights campus.
Prosecutors largely cited lack of evidence, such as security video footage, that could tie the students or staff to the building takeover for leaving them free and clear without even a slap on the wrist.
The dismissals quickly drew fury from rank-and-file NYPD officers, higher education officials and Jewish leaders who spoke with The Post.
I live in NYC, I've seen it play out on local news.
Outrage as Manhattan DA Bragg’s office drops nearly all cases from Columbia University’s anti-Israel protest
It's too haaaaard for Bragg to make these cases, but making up 34 charges over supposed business record issues? Well they had all the time in the ******* world for that.
Says nothing about blocking traffic.
Prosecutors are poised to drop misdemeanor charges against dozens of people who were arrested for blocking rush hour traffic outside the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport during an April pro-Palestinian protest.
Prosecutors with the city of SeaTac agreed on Tuesday to dismiss charges after a maximum of six months on the condition that each defendant attends court hearings as needed, has no crime violations and does not step on Sea-Tac Airport property except for travel purposes. They can file for immediate dismissal if they do 10 hours of community service, or after three months if they meet the conditions.
If you have to walk around someone, the person is impeding, blocking, your progress.
Trump said blocking access to an abortion clinic shouldn’t be prosecuted.Why over-prosecute people for political reasons?
As repeat offenders they would get progressively more time.
Unlike you I don't feel the need to over-prosecute my political opponents, just use the non-political laws they break and prosecute them for it.
Blue cities often don't even do that to lefty protesters, meanwhile right leaning ones they throw the book at.
Truckers did it in Canada for days and the right supported them.And blocking traffic so cars are stuck for hours on a highway is just free speech right?
Outraged that charges were dropped against people due to insufficient evidence is pretty weakIt's too haaaaard for Bragg to make these cases, but making up 34 charges over supposed business record issues? Well they had all the time in the ******* world for that.
It’s not speakingSaying Israel should stop bombing Gaza is a threat to our national security?
Terrorism is: the use of violence to achieve a political goal by creating fear in a population. It can involve threats or actual violence against people or property.So terrorism can mean anything in the reich. That denigrates 9/11 doesnt it ?
No that’s physical acts. Not verbiage but rather physical restraintAnd blocking traffic so cars are stuck for hours on a highway is just free speech right?