Hobbit
Senior Member
This might go in the sports section, but I'm not sure. Feel free to move it.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2004/soccer/07/25/bc.crime.southafrica.soccer/index.html?cnn=yes
Now I've seen football games where I thought the fans would shoot the ref. There have been soccer games where the fans actually did shoot the ref (that's why many soccer refs wear a full suit of kevlar, helmet and all), but I've never seen a game where the ref shot a coach. That's just freaky.
After the Jackson "wardrobe malfunction," I kept hearing from ultralibs that kids didn't need to watch football anyway, because it was too violent (BS!). However, soccer was considered a perfectly safe "non-contact" sport. Well, what do you say now?
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2004/soccer/07/25/bc.crime.southafrica.soccer/index.html?cnn=yes
JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) -- A South African soccer referee pulled a gun and shot dead a coach who questioned one of his rulings, police said on Sunday.
Inspector Mali Govender of the Grahamstown police in the Eastern Cape province said a fight broke out after the referee gave a yellow warning card to a player in a local match on Saturday.
Now I've seen football games where I thought the fans would shoot the ref. There have been soccer games where the fans actually did shoot the ref (that's why many soccer refs wear a full suit of kevlar, helmet and all), but I've never seen a game where the ref shot a coach. That's just freaky.
After the Jackson "wardrobe malfunction," I kept hearing from ultralibs that kids didn't need to watch football anyway, because it was too violent (BS!). However, soccer was considered a perfectly safe "non-contact" sport. Well, what do you say now?