I think this needs to happen.

Youre scared for your life so you cross the ocean in a fucking dingy to make it to mexico or honduras?
Asylum is about going to the next country. Not travel all around the world.
Trump had the third country transit bar rule. One of the few good things he did in office.
That rule is no longer in place, and we see the effects of that.
You disturbing freaks voted for this BS.
We’ve had asylum seekers from Europe and Asia for decades.

That’s ok but not Africa?
 
For wanting reasonable immigration laws? Shove your gaslighting up your ass.
No, most people want reasonable immigration laws. My comment was more about your Pavlovian response to raising the issue of immigration without even bothering to read the article reporting the Biden admin appears ready to compromise on measures Repubs are asking for. But then haters gotta hate.
 
They shouldnt be coming here either.
But they are. One aspect of the reform under consideration tries to discourage them coming in the first place once higher standards for asylum seekers are in place. It's a good faith effort to address the problem being negotiated by both sides. What the hell more do you want?
 
But they are. One aspect of the reform under consideration tries to discourage them coming in the first place once higher standards for asylum seekers are in place. It's a good faith effort to address the problem being negotiated by both sides. What the hell more do you want?
They want Trump in the White House

If they get that… the situation need not change but will become unicorns and roses immediacy
 
WHAT MIGHT CHANGE WITH ASYLUM?

Asylum is a type of protection that allows a migrant to stay in the U..S. and have a path to American citizenship. To qualify for asylum, someone has to demonstrate fear of persecution back home due to a fairly specific set of criteria: race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinions. Asylum-seekers must be on U.S. soil when they ask for this protection.

They generally go through an initial screening called a credible fear interview. If they are determined to have a chance of getting asylum, they are allowed to stay in the U.S. to pursue their case in immigration court. That process can take years. In the meantime, asylum-seekers can start to work, get married, have children and create a life.

Some of what lawmakers are discussing would raise the bar that migrants need to meet during that initial credible fear interview. Those who do not meet it would be sent home.

https://apnews.com/article/immigrat...asylum-trump-5b5808183c1642bae520b7d9456cc36d

We need to find a way to reduce the number of people trying to immigrate to the US across the southern border. As heartbreaking as it is to do so the standard for asylum must be raised in order to achieve the former. It's a part of what I hope will be a bipartisan compromise to address what has been a major problem in need of reform for a very long time. Reform that could have happened in 2013 had House Repubs not blocked a bill the Senate had passed 68 to 32 with 14 Repubs voting in the affirmative.
Make it illegal to hire them...Oh fuck it already is.....Try enforcing the law, ,,Oh fuck rich people have more influence and allow the illegals to stay so they can be exploited by the rich people.
 
So if Ann Frank had applied for asylum, you would have said fuck off?
Yep. If you are in fear of your life, why are you going to make a hard trek halfway across the world? I call BS.
 
Make it illegal to hire them...Oh fuck it already is.....Try enforcing the law, ,,Oh fuck rich people have more influence and allow the illegals to stay so they can be exploited by the rich people.
Its perfectly legal to hire asylum seekers.
 
But they are. One aspect of the reform under consideration tries to discourage them coming in the first place once higher standards for asylum seekers are in place. It's a good faith effort to address the problem being negotiated by both sides. What the hell more do you want?
He is only doing this to fund the corrupt ukies. And this will probably end up being horseshit, like immigration "reform" always is. Neither party actually wants to fix immigration. Or it would have been done long ago.
 
Of your dumbassery? That case was closed dec 21st, 2016.
You just admitted that you would have turned away Ann Frank had she sought asylum

There’s nothing more you need to say
 
So if Ann Frank had applied for asylum, you would have said fuck off?
FDR did. The real person. A globalist who did his part to get world government. Life means nothing for Progressive agendas.
 
You just admitted that you would have turned away Ann Frank had she sought asylum

There’s nothing more you need to say
What would make her any different than someone in africa fleeing slavery or violence? The UK was right fucking there.
 
FDR did. The real person. A globalist who did his part to get world government. Life means nothing for Progressive agendas.
Considering that Congress had set a limit on immigration the president can't change that quota alone. One needs to understand the system to complain about the system.
 

Forum List

Back
Top