I support Moore just because I hate the media.

[jillian]

Remember Congressman Gerry Studds, who fucked a 17-year-old male Congressional page? Remember how outraged the Washington Post was? Not at Congressman Studds, but at the homophobic Christian bigots who thought the incident made Studds unfit for office? Haha, me too.

If you are a Christian in Alabama and you don't vote for Judge Moore you are a lapdog of your enemies. You are a useful idiot. You are doing the bidding of people who hate you. You are a pathetic fool who deserves to be locked in a room with a million Gerry Studds for eternity. Judge Moore is not your enemy. Gloria Allred is. The Washington Post is. The left is. Open your fucking eyes, for crying out loud.

If you aren't in Alabama, but know someone there, forward this to them.

Apparently, the GOP is now the party of CHILD MOLESTATION! At least the media tell me that’s the meaning of President Trump’s endorsement of Senate candidate Roy Moore.

Are we allowed to mention that Moore denies the charges?

It’s hard to disprove accusations from 40 years ago—that’s why we have statutes of limitations—but, despite that, there are a surprising number of problems with the allegations against Moore.

One accuser has been called a liar by her own stepson, who says he’s voting for Moore. Another neglected to mention that Moore sent her brother to prison.

In defense of one of Moore’s accusers, Gloria Allred produced a yearbook allegedly signed by Moore, apparently in two different inks and giving his title as “D.A.” He was not the district attorney and didn’t sign his name that way. Allred refuses to produce the yearbook for handwriting analysis or to deny that it’s a forgery.

Contrary to what you have heard one million times a day on TV, there aren’t “multiple accusers.” There are two, and that’s including the one with the fishy yearbook inscription whose stepson says she’s lying.

The other “accusers” claim he dated them when they were 16 to 19 years old and Moore was in his early 30s—or younger than Jerry Seinfeld was (39) when he dated 17-year-old Shoshanna Lonstein.

That would also make Moore 15 years younger than Bill Clinton when he had a 22-year-old intern performing oral sex on him in the Oval Office. Moore’s date “accusers” say he did nothing more than kiss them.

The media throw the dating claims in with the molestation claims so they can keep howling about “multiple accusers.” In fact, only two women are alleging anything that, if true, would merit national attention.

TV anchors think it’s very clever of them to ask anyone who isn’t bowled over by the claims of Moore’s (two) accusers: So you’re calling the women “liars”?

Checkmate!

There’s a lot of room between HE’S A CHILD MOLESTER and THE WOMEN ARE LIARS.

They could be misremembering. They could be confusing Moore with someone else. They could be suggestible. They could be delusional. They could have repeated the story to themselves so many times that they believe it. They could be really, really disgusted with Jerry Seinfeld.

The main accuser has gotten a lot of her facts wrong, such as where she was living at the time (she moved to another town 10 days after meeting Moore); the corner where she allegedly met Moore for their liaisons (she named a corner more than a mile away from her house, across a busy intersection); and when she began to get into trouble with boys and alcohol (it was before meeting Moore, not after).

It was 40 years ago! But it’s just weeks before the election and that’s the media’s favorite time to produce wild accusations against Republicans.

Four days before the 1992 presidential election, Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh dropped an indictment of Reagan’s defense secretary, Caspar Weinberger, which seemed to implicate President George H.W. Bush in a lie. Bush lost the election, and about a month later a judge threw out the indictment.

In the middle of the 2004 presidential campaign, CBS’s Dan Rather produced forged documents allegedly proving that President George W. Bush had shirked his National Guard service decades earlier.

In September 2006, just before the midterm elections, the media released GOP congressman Mark Foley’s creepy emails to House pages. No physical contact was alleged. The corpus delicti was that Foley told pages they looked “hot” in their soccer shorts.

The entire GOP was crucified by the media for not having discovered this “pedophile” in its midst. Republican congressmen who had never met Foley lost their seats because of the media’s timing of the email release.

More than 20 years earlier, a Democratic congressman, Gerry Studds, who had actually buggered a 17-year-old page, indignantly defied his House censure and proudly stood for re-election. His outraged Massachusetts constituents elected him six more times. Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy denounced the “witch hunt” against Studds, saying his critics wanted “to torch the congressman for his private life.”

When Studds died in 2006, The Washington Post’s headline on his obituary was: Gerry Studds; Gay Pioneer in Congress. The New York Times‘ headline was, Gerry Studds Dies at 69; First Openly Gay Congressman.

I supported Rep. Mo Brooks in the primary, but Alabamians would be crazy to let the media vilification of Moore affect their vote. Moore’s real crime is that he’s a believing Christian who goes around wantonly quoting the Bible on sodomy. Journalists react to that like Linda Blair in “The Exorcist.”

The media say that Republicans support Moore just because they want another GOP vote in the Senate. I support Moore just because I hate the media.

Ann Coulter: Alabamians Would Be Crazy To Let Media Affect Their Vote For Roy Moore | VDARE - premier news outlet for patriotic immigration reform.​

if that's why you support a child molester then you're an evil evil lowlife.

 

[mdk]

You hate the media because Reality Mainstream Media does not support your racialism.

Right. They hate my race.

Klingon?

circling Uranus?

No, Orion's Belt. lol

 

[jc456]

Remember Congressman Gerry Studds, who fucked a 17-year-old male Congressional page? Remember how outraged the Washington Post was? Not at Congressman Studds, but at the homophobic Christian bigots who thought the incident made Studds unfit for office? Haha, me too.

If you are a Christian in Alabama and you don't vote for Judge Moore you are a lapdog of your enemies. You are a useful idiot. You are doing the bidding of people who hate you. You are a pathetic fool who deserves to be locked in a room with a million Gerry Studds for eternity. Judge Moore is not your enemy. Gloria Allred is. The Washington Post is. The left is. Open your fucking eyes, for crying out loud.

If you aren't in Alabama, but know someone there, forward this to them.

Apparently, the GOP is now the party of CHILD MOLESTATION! At least the media tell me that’s the meaning of President Trump’s endorsement of Senate candidate Roy Moore.

Are we allowed to mention that Moore denies the charges?

It’s hard to disprove accusations from 40 years ago—that’s why we have statutes of limitations—but, despite that, there are a surprising number of problems with the allegations against Moore.

One accuser has been called a liar by her own stepson, who says he’s voting for Moore. Another neglected to mention that Moore sent her brother to prison.

In defense of one of Moore’s accusers, Gloria Allred produced a yearbook allegedly signed by Moore, apparently in two different inks and giving his title as “D.A.” He was not the district attorney and didn’t sign his name that way. Allred refuses to produce the yearbook for handwriting analysis or to deny that it’s a forgery.

Contrary to what you have heard one million times a day on TV, there aren’t “multiple accusers.” There are two, and that’s including the one with the fishy yearbook inscription whose stepson says she’s lying.

The other “accusers” claim he dated them when they were 16 to 19 years old and Moore was in his early 30s—or younger than Jerry Seinfeld was (39) when he dated 17-year-old Shoshanna Lonstein.

That would also make Moore 15 years younger than Bill Clinton when he had a 22-year-old intern performing oral sex on him in the Oval Office. Moore’s date “accusers” say he did nothing more than kiss them.

The media throw the dating claims in with the molestation claims so they can keep howling about “multiple accusers.” In fact, only two women are alleging anything that, if true, would merit national attention.

TV anchors think it’s very clever of them to ask anyone who isn’t bowled over by the claims of Moore’s (two) accusers: So you’re calling the women “liars”?

Checkmate!

There’s a lot of room between HE’S A CHILD MOLESTER and THE WOMEN ARE LIARS.

They could be misremembering. They could be confusing Moore with someone else. They could be suggestible. They could be delusional. They could have repeated the story to themselves so many times that they believe it. They could be really, really disgusted with Jerry Seinfeld.

The main accuser has gotten a lot of her facts wrong, such as where she was living at the time (she moved to another town 10 days after meeting Moore); the corner where she allegedly met Moore for their liaisons (she named a corner more than a mile away from her house, across a busy intersection); and when she began to get into trouble with boys and alcohol (it was before meeting Moore, not after).

It was 40 years ago! But it’s just weeks before the election and that’s the media’s favorite time to produce wild accusations against Republicans.

Four days before the 1992 presidential election, Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh dropped an indictment of Reagan’s defense secretary, Caspar Weinberger, which seemed to implicate President George H.W. Bush in a lie. Bush lost the election, and about a month later a judge threw out the indictment.

In the middle of the 2004 presidential campaign, CBS’s Dan Rather produced forged documents allegedly proving that President George W. Bush had shirked his National Guard service decades earlier.

In September 2006, just before the midterm elections, the media released GOP congressman Mark Foley’s creepy emails to House pages. No physical contact was alleged. The corpus delicti was that Foley told pages they looked “hot” in their soccer shorts.

The entire GOP was crucified by the media for not having discovered this “pedophile” in its midst. Republican congressmen who had never met Foley lost their seats because of the media’s timing of the email release.

More than 20 years earlier, a Democratic congressman, Gerry Studds, who had actually buggered a 17-year-old page, indignantly defied his House censure and proudly stood for re-election. His outraged Massachusetts constituents elected him six more times. Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy denounced the “witch hunt” against Studds, saying his critics wanted “to torch the congressman for his private life.”

When Studds died in 2006, The Washington Post’s headline on his obituary was: Gerry Studds; Gay Pioneer in Congress. The New York Times‘ headline was, Gerry Studds Dies at 69; First Openly Gay Congressman.

I supported Rep. Mo Brooks in the primary, but Alabamians would be crazy to let the media vilification of Moore affect their vote. Moore’s real crime is that he’s a believing Christian who goes around wantonly quoting the Bible on sodomy. Journalists react to that like Linda Blair in “The Exorcist.”

The media say that Republicans support Moore just because they want another GOP vote in the Senate. I support Moore just because I hate the media.

Ann Coulter: Alabamians Would Be Crazy To Let Media Affect Their Vote For Roy Moore | VDARE - premier news outlet for patriotic immigration reform.​

if that's why you support a child molester then you're an evil evil lowlife.

didn't you back Clinton? I'm saying you have no moral ground there fella.

 

[cnelsen]

You hate the media because Reality Mainstream Media does not support your racialism.

Right. They hate my race.

You hate your race.

Haha, ok.

 

[1stRambo]

You hate the media because Reality Mainstream Media does not support your racialism.

Right. They hate my race.

You hate your race.

Yo, you sound like most in the streets running their mouth, a High School Drop-Out!!!

"GTP"

 

[cnelsen]

Remember Congressman Gerry Studds, who fucked a 17-year-old male Congressional page? Remember how outraged the Washington Post was? Not at Congressman Studds, but at the homophobic Christian bigots who thought the incident made Studds unfit for office? Haha, me too.

If you are a Christian in Alabama and you don't vote for Judge Moore you are a lapdog of your enemies. You are a useful idiot. You are doing the bidding of people who hate you. You are a pathetic fool who deserves to be locked in a room with a million Gerry Studds for eternity. Judge Moore is not your enemy. Gloria Allred is. The Washington Post is. The left is. Open your fucking eyes, for crying out loud.

If you aren't in Alabama, but know someone there, forward this to them.

Apparently, the GOP is now the party of CHILD MOLESTATION! At least the media tell me that’s the meaning of President Trump’s endorsement of Senate candidate Roy Moore.

Are we allowed to mention that Moore denies the charges?

It’s hard to disprove accusations from 40 years ago—that’s why we have statutes of limitations—but, despite that, there are a surprising number of problems with the allegations against Moore.

One accuser has been called a liar by her own stepson, who says he’s voting for Moore. Another neglected to mention that Moore sent her brother to prison.

In defense of one of Moore’s accusers, Gloria Allred produced a yearbook allegedly signed by Moore, apparently in two different inks and giving his title as “D.A.” He was not the district attorney and didn’t sign his name that way. Allred refuses to produce the yearbook for handwriting analysis or to deny that it’s a forgery.

Contrary to what you have heard one million times a day on TV, there aren’t “multiple accusers.” There are two, and that’s including the one with the fishy yearbook inscription whose stepson says she’s lying.

The other “accusers” claim he dated them when they were 16 to 19 years old and Moore was in his early 30s—or younger than Jerry Seinfeld was (39) when he dated 17-year-old Shoshanna Lonstein.

That would also make Moore 15 years younger than Bill Clinton when he had a 22-year-old intern performing oral sex on him in the Oval Office. Moore’s date “accusers” say he did nothing more than kiss them.

The media throw the dating claims in with the molestation claims so they can keep howling about “multiple accusers.” In fact, only two women are alleging anything that, if true, would merit national attention.

TV anchors think it’s very clever of them to ask anyone who isn’t bowled over by the claims of Moore’s (two) accusers: So you’re calling the women “liars”?

Checkmate!

There’s a lot of room between HE’S A CHILD MOLESTER and THE WOMEN ARE LIARS.

They could be misremembering. They could be confusing Moore with someone else. They could be suggestible. They could be delusional. They could have repeated the story to themselves so many times that they believe it. They could be really, really disgusted with Jerry Seinfeld.

The main accuser has gotten a lot of her facts wrong, such as where she was living at the time (she moved to another town 10 days after meeting Moore); the corner where she allegedly met Moore for their liaisons (she named a corner more than a mile away from her house, across a busy intersection); and when she began to get into trouble with boys and alcohol (it was before meeting Moore, not after).

It was 40 years ago! But it’s just weeks before the election and that’s the media’s favorite time to produce wild accusations against Republicans.

Four days before the 1992 presidential election, Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh dropped an indictment of Reagan’s defense secretary, Caspar Weinberger, which seemed to implicate President George H.W. Bush in a lie. Bush lost the election, and about a month later a judge threw out the indictment.

In the middle of the 2004 presidential campaign, CBS’s Dan Rather produced forged documents allegedly proving that President George W. Bush had shirked his National Guard service decades earlier.

In September 2006, just before the midterm elections, the media released GOP congressman Mark Foley’s creepy emails to House pages. No physical contact was alleged. The corpus delicti was that Foley told pages they looked “hot” in their soccer shorts.

The entire GOP was crucified by the media for not having discovered this “pedophile” in its midst. Republican congressmen who had never met Foley lost their seats because of the media’s timing of the email release.

More than 20 years earlier, a Democratic congressman, Gerry Studds, who had actually buggered a 17-year-old page, indignantly defied his House censure and proudly stood for re-election. His outraged Massachusetts constituents elected him six more times. Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy denounced the “witch hunt” against Studds, saying his critics wanted “to torch the congressman for his private life.”

When Studds died in 2006, The Washington Post’s headline on his obituary was: Gerry Studds; Gay Pioneer in Congress. The New York Times‘ headline was, Gerry Studds Dies at 69; First Openly Gay Congressman.

I supported Rep. Mo Brooks in the primary, but Alabamians would be crazy to let the media vilification of Moore affect their vote. Moore’s real crime is that he’s a believing Christian who goes around wantonly quoting the Bible on sodomy. Journalists react to that like Linda Blair in “The Exorcist.”

The media say that Republicans support Moore just because they want another GOP vote in the Senate. I support Moore just because I hate the media.

Ann Coulter: Alabamians Would Be Crazy To Let Media Affect Their Vote For Roy Moore | VDARE - premier news outlet for patriotic immigration reform.​

if that's why you support a child molester then you're an evil evil lowlife.

First, he is not a pedophile, you lying jewess, second, I support him because I hate the media. The media is our (((enemy))). Judge Moore is not. I don't care if he rapes an entire elementary school every afternoon and feeds the faculty to alligators. He is not me enemy. The (((Washington Post))) is. He will not work for genocide of my people. The (((New York Times))) is. Got it, Esther?

 

[cnelsen]

Remember Congressman Gerry Studds, who fucked a 17-year-old male Congressional page? Remember how outraged the Washington Post was? Not at Congressman Studds, but at the homophobic Christian bigots who thought the incident made Studds unfit for office? Haha, me too.

If you are a Christian in Alabama and you don't vote for Judge Moore you are a lapdog of your enemies. You are a useful idiot. You are doing the bidding of people who hate you. You are a pathetic fool who deserves to be locked in a room with a million Gerry Studds for eternity. Judge Moore is not your enemy. Gloria Allred is. The Washington Post is. The left is. Open your fucking eyes, for crying out loud.

If you aren't in Alabama, but know someone there, forward this to them.

Apparently, the GOP is now the party of CHILD MOLESTATION! At least the media tell me that’s the meaning of President Trump’s endorsement of Senate candidate Roy Moore.

Are we allowed to mention that Moore denies the charges?

It’s hard to disprove accusations from 40 years ago—that’s why we have statutes of limitations—but, despite that, there are a surprising number of problems with the allegations against Moore.

One accuser has been called a liar by her own stepson, who says he’s voting for Moore. Another neglected to mention that Moore sent her brother to prison.

In defense of one of Moore’s accusers, Gloria Allred produced a yearbook allegedly signed by Moore, apparently in two different inks and giving his title as “D.A.” He was not the district attorney and didn’t sign his name that way. Allred refuses to produce the yearbook for handwriting analysis or to deny that it’s a forgery.

Contrary to what you have heard one million times a day on TV, there aren’t “multiple accusers.” There are two, and that’s including the one with the fishy yearbook inscription whose stepson says she’s lying.

The other “accusers” claim he dated them when they were 16 to 19 years old and Moore was in his early 30s—or younger than Jerry Seinfeld was (39) when he dated 17-year-old Shoshanna Lonstein.

That would also make Moore 15 years younger than Bill Clinton when he had a 22-year-old intern performing oral sex on him in the Oval Office. Moore’s date “accusers” say he did nothing more than kiss them.

The media throw the dating claims in with the molestation claims so they can keep howling about “multiple accusers.” In fact, only two women are alleging anything that, if true, would merit national attention.

TV anchors think it’s very clever of them to ask anyone who isn’t bowled over by the claims of Moore’s (two) accusers: So you’re calling the women “liars”?

Checkmate!

There’s a lot of room between HE’S A CHILD MOLESTER and THE WOMEN ARE LIARS.

They could be misremembering. They could be confusing Moore with someone else. They could be suggestible. They could be delusional. They could have repeated the story to themselves so many times that they believe it. They could be really, really disgusted with Jerry Seinfeld.

The main accuser has gotten a lot of her facts wrong, such as where she was living at the time (she moved to another town 10 days after meeting Moore); the corner where she allegedly met Moore for their liaisons (she named a corner more than a mile away from her house, across a busy intersection); and when she began to get into trouble with boys and alcohol (it was before meeting Moore, not after).

It was 40 years ago! But it’s just weeks before the election and that’s the media’s favorite time to produce wild accusations against Republicans.

Four days before the 1992 presidential election, Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh dropped an indictment of Reagan’s defense secretary, Caspar Weinberger, which seemed to implicate President George H.W. Bush in a lie. Bush lost the election, and about a month later a judge threw out the indictment.

In the middle of the 2004 presidential campaign, CBS’s Dan Rather produced forged documents allegedly proving that President George W. Bush had shirked his National Guard service decades earlier.

In September 2006, just before the midterm elections, the media released GOP congressman Mark Foley’s creepy emails to House pages. No physical contact was alleged. The corpus delicti was that Foley told pages they looked “hot” in their soccer shorts.

The entire GOP was crucified by the media for not having discovered this “pedophile” in its midst. Republican congressmen who had never met Foley lost their seats because of the media’s timing of the email release.

More than 20 years earlier, a Democratic congressman, Gerry Studds, who had actually buggered a 17-year-old page, indignantly defied his House censure and proudly stood for re-election. His outraged Massachusetts constituents elected him six more times. Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy denounced the “witch hunt” against Studds, saying his critics wanted “to torch the congressman for his private life.”

When Studds died in 2006, The Washington Post’s headline on his obituary was: Gerry Studds; Gay Pioneer in Congress. The New York Times‘ headline was, Gerry Studds Dies at 69; First Openly Gay Congressman.

I supported Rep. Mo Brooks in the primary, but Alabamians would be crazy to let the media vilification of Moore affect their vote. Moore’s real crime is that he’s a believing Christian who goes around wantonly quoting the Bible on sodomy. Journalists react to that like Linda Blair in “The Exorcist.”

The media say that Republicans support Moore just because they want another GOP vote in the Senate. I support Moore just because I hate the media.

Ann Coulter: Alabamians Would Be Crazy To Let Media Affect Their Vote For Roy Moore | VDARE - premier news outlet for patriotic immigration reform.​

if that's why you support a child molester then you're an evil evil lowlife.

didn't you back Clinton? I'm saying you have no moral ground there fella.

Exactly. The left knows this has nothing to do with pedophilia. Judge Moore's real crime is he is a devout Christian and the left hates Christians. That's why the Bolsheviks killed 66 million of them.

 

[Rambunctious]

I support Moore because I believe in innocent until proven guilty...I do not want to reward last min dirty politics by throwing Moore under the bus...
The left must learn that this is not the way we do things in America...here we have elections...and elections have consequences...LAST MIN Dirty tricks and lies are not paid attention to. You would think that the left would have learned this in the election but they didn't...
Now their trick has backfired on them...Moore will be a US Senator and Franken and many other infamous dems get taken down...got ta love it!

 

[Rambunctious]

The Mother of all Backfires!!!!!

 

[cnelsen]

Remember Congressman Gerry Studds, who fucked a 17-year-old male Congressional page? Remember how outraged the Washington Post was? Not at Congressman Studds, but at the homophobic Christian bigots who thought the incident made Studds unfit for office? Haha, me too.

If you are a Christian in Alabama and you don't vote for Judge Moore you are a lapdog of your enemies. You are a useful idiot. You are doing the bidding of people who hate you. You are a pathetic fool who deserves to be locked in a room with a million Gerry Studds for eternity. Judge Moore is not your enemy. Gloria Allred is. The Washington Post is. The left is. Open your fucking eyes, for crying out loud.

If you aren't in Alabama, but know someone there, forward this to them.

Apparently, the GOP is now the party of CHILD MOLESTATION! At least the media tell me that’s the meaning of President Trump’s endorsement of Senate candidate Roy Moore.

Are we allowed to mention that Moore denies the charges?

It’s hard to disprove accusations from 40 years ago—that’s why we have statutes of limitations—but, despite that, there are a surprising number of problems with the allegations against Moore.

One accuser has been called a liar by her own stepson, who says he’s voting for Moore. Another neglected to mention that Moore sent her brother to prison.

In defense of one of Moore’s accusers, Gloria Allred produced a yearbook allegedly signed by Moore, apparently in two different inks and giving his title as “D.A.” He was not the district attorney and didn’t sign his name that way. Allred refuses to produce the yearbook for handwriting analysis or to deny that it’s a forgery.

Contrary to what you have heard one million times a day on TV, there aren’t “multiple accusers.” There are two, and that’s including the one with the fishy yearbook inscription whose stepson says she’s lying.

The other “accusers” claim he dated them when they were 16 to 19 years old and Moore was in his early 30s—or younger than Jerry Seinfeld was (39) when he dated 17-year-old Shoshanna Lonstein.

That would also make Moore 15 years younger than Bill Clinton when he had a 22-year-old intern performing oral sex on him in the Oval Office. Moore’s date “accusers” say he did nothing more than kiss them.

The media throw the dating claims in with the molestation claims so they can keep howling about “multiple accusers.” In fact, only two women are alleging anything that, if true, would merit national attention.

TV anchors think it’s very clever of them to ask anyone who isn’t bowled over by the claims of Moore’s (two) accusers: So you’re calling the women “liars”?

Checkmate!

There’s a lot of room between HE’S A CHILD MOLESTER and THE WOMEN ARE LIARS.

They could be misremembering. They could be confusing Moore with someone else. They could be suggestible. They could be delusional. They could have repeated the story to themselves so many times that they believe it. They could be really, really disgusted with Jerry Seinfeld.

The main accuser has gotten a lot of her facts wrong, such as where she was living at the time (she moved to another town 10 days after meeting Moore); the corner where she allegedly met Moore for their liaisons (she named a corner more than a mile away from her house, across a busy intersection); and when she began to get into trouble with boys and alcohol (it was before meeting Moore, not after).

It was 40 years ago! But it’s just weeks before the election and that’s the media’s favorite time to produce wild accusations against Republicans.

Four days before the 1992 presidential election, Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh dropped an indictment of Reagan’s defense secretary, Caspar Weinberger, which seemed to implicate President George H.W. Bush in a lie. Bush lost the election, and about a month later a judge threw out the indictment.

In the middle of the 2004 presidential campaign, CBS’s Dan Rather produced forged documents allegedly proving that President George W. Bush had shirked his National Guard service decades earlier.

In September 2006, just before the midterm elections, the media released GOP congressman Mark Foley’s creepy emails to House pages. No physical contact was alleged. The corpus delicti was that Foley told pages they looked “hot” in their soccer shorts.

The entire GOP was crucified by the media for not having discovered this “pedophile” in its midst. Republican congressmen who had never met Foley lost their seats because of the media’s timing of the email release.

More than 20 years earlier, a Democratic congressman, Gerry Studds, who had actually buggered a 17-year-old page, indignantly defied his House censure and proudly stood for re-election. His outraged Massachusetts constituents elected him six more times. Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy denounced the “witch hunt” against Studds, saying his critics wanted “to torch the congressman for his private life.”

When Studds died in 2006, The Washington Post’s headline on his obituary was: Gerry Studds; Gay Pioneer in Congress. The New York Times‘ headline was, Gerry Studds Dies at 69; First Openly Gay Congressman.

I supported Rep. Mo Brooks in the primary, but Alabamians would be crazy to let the media vilification of Moore affect their vote. Moore’s real crime is that he’s a believing Christian who goes around wantonly quoting the Bible on sodomy. Journalists react to that like Linda Blair in “The Exorcist.”

The media say that Republicans support Moore just because they want another GOP vote in the Senate. I support Moore just because I hate the media.

Ann Coulter: Alabamians Would Be Crazy To Let Media Affect Their Vote For Roy Moore | VDARE - premier news outlet for patriotic immigration reform.​

Woooooow. Look at this guy, supporting child molestation because the media opposes it.

Holy shit.

Your posts are like the shopping carts people leave scattered around supermarket parking lots. Annoying, unsightly products of laziness that only make you take a little longer to get what you came for.

 

[sartre play]

Just a clue, support people for office (they affect all our life's) who are qualified for the job. Moore is not.

 

[jillian]

You hate the media because Reality Mainstream Media does not support your racialism.

Right. They hate my race.

You hate your race.

Yo, you sound like most in the streets running their mouth, a High School Drop-Out!!!

"GTP"

I love watching stupid people call their betters "dummy".

 

[cnelsen]

Just a clue, support people for office (they affect all our life's) who are qualified for the job. Moore is not.

He is qualified by virtue of the fact the Washington Post opposes him.

 

[Votto]

Remember Congressman Gerry Studds, who fucked a 17-year-old male Congressional page? Remember how outraged the Washington Post was? Not at Congressman Studds, but at the homophobic Christian bigots who thought the incident made Studds unfit for office? Haha, me too.

If you are a Christian in Alabama and you don't vote for Judge Moore you are a lapdog of your enemies. You are a useful idiot. You are doing the bidding of people who hate you. You are a pathetic fool who deserves to be locked in a room with a million Gerry Studds for eternity. Judge Moore is not your enemy. Gloria Allred is. The Washington Post is. The left is. Open your fucking eyes, for crying out loud.

If you aren't in Alabama, but know someone there, forward this to them.

Apparently, the GOP is now the party of CHILD MOLESTATION! At least the media tell me that’s the meaning of President Trump’s endorsement of Senate candidate Roy Moore.

Are we allowed to mention that Moore denies the charges?

It’s hard to disprove accusations from 40 years ago—that’s why we have statutes of limitations—but, despite that, there are a surprising number of problems with the allegations against Moore.

One accuser has been called a liar by her own stepson, who says he’s voting for Moore. Another neglected to mention that Moore sent her brother to prison.

In defense of one of Moore’s accusers, Gloria Allred produced a yearbook allegedly signed by Moore, apparently in two different inks and giving his title as “D.A.” He was not the district attorney and didn’t sign his name that way. Allred refuses to produce the yearbook for handwriting analysis or to deny that it’s a forgery.

Contrary to what you have heard one million times a day on TV, there aren’t “multiple accusers.” There are two, and that’s including the one with the fishy yearbook inscription whose stepson says she’s lying.

The other “accusers” claim he dated them when they were 16 to 19 years old and Moore was in his early 30s—or younger than Jerry Seinfeld was (39) when he dated 17-year-old Shoshanna Lonstein.

That would also make Moore 15 years younger than Bill Clinton when he had a 22-year-old intern performing oral sex on him in the Oval Office. Moore’s date “accusers” say he did nothing more than kiss them.

The media throw the dating claims in with the molestation claims so they can keep howling about “multiple accusers.” In fact, only two women are alleging anything that, if true, would merit national attention.

TV anchors think it’s very clever of them to ask anyone who isn’t bowled over by the claims of Moore’s (two) accusers: So you’re calling the women “liars”?

Checkmate!

There’s a lot of room between HE’S A CHILD MOLESTER and THE WOMEN ARE LIARS.

They could be misremembering. They could be confusing Moore with someone else. They could be suggestible. They could be delusional. They could have repeated the story to themselves so many times that they believe it. They could be really, really disgusted with Jerry Seinfeld.

The main accuser has gotten a lot of her facts wrong, such as where she was living at the time (she moved to another town 10 days after meeting Moore); the corner where she allegedly met Moore for their liaisons (she named a corner more than a mile away from her house, across a busy intersection); and when she began to get into trouble with boys and alcohol (it was before meeting Moore, not after).

It was 40 years ago! But it’s just weeks before the election and that’s the media’s favorite time to produce wild accusations against Republicans.

Four days before the 1992 presidential election, Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh dropped an indictment of Reagan’s defense secretary, Caspar Weinberger, which seemed to implicate President George H.W. Bush in a lie. Bush lost the election, and about a month later a judge threw out the indictment.

In the middle of the 2004 presidential campaign, CBS’s Dan Rather produced forged documents allegedly proving that President George W. Bush had shirked his National Guard service decades earlier.

In September 2006, just before the midterm elections, the media released GOP congressman Mark Foley’s creepy emails to House pages. No physical contact was alleged. The corpus delicti was that Foley told pages they looked “hot” in their soccer shorts.

The entire GOP was crucified by the media for not having discovered this “pedophile” in its midst. Republican congressmen who had never met Foley lost their seats because of the media’s timing of the email release.

More than 20 years earlier, a Democratic congressman, Gerry Studds, who had actually buggered a 17-year-old page, indignantly defied his House censure and proudly stood for re-election. His outraged Massachusetts constituents elected him six more times. Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy denounced the “witch hunt” against Studds, saying his critics wanted “to torch the congressman for his private life.”

When Studds died in 2006, The Washington Post’s headline on his obituary was: Gerry Studds; Gay Pioneer in Congress. The New York Times‘ headline was, Gerry Studds Dies at 69; First Openly Gay Congressman.

I supported Rep. Mo Brooks in the primary, but Alabamians would be crazy to let the media vilification of Moore affect their vote. Moore’s real crime is that he’s a believing Christian who goes around wantonly quoting the Bible on sodomy. Journalists react to that like Linda Blair in “The Exorcist.”

The media say that Republicans support Moore just because they want another GOP vote in the Senate. I support Moore just because I hate the media.

Ann Coulter: Alabamians Would Be Crazy To Let Media Affect Their Vote For Roy Moore | VDARE - premier news outlet for patriotic immigration reform.​

Conservatives are faced with the option of voting for a potential pedophile of some 30 years ago or choosing a current advocate of infanticide.

The decision is a bad one, but not that hard to make.

 

[1stRambo]

Just a clue, support people for office (they affect all our life's) who are qualified for the job. Moore is not.

Yo, WHY? Because You Say So? He has more "Government Experience" than your Boy Obama had, and he became President, I know, his Color helped him, you had to Vote for the Boy, or be called a Racist, sick!!!!

"GTP"

 

[jc456]

I support Moore because I believe in innocent until proven guilty...I do not want to reward last min dirty politics by throwing Moore under the bus...
The left must learn that this is not the way we do things in America...here we have elections...and elections have consequences...LAST MIN Dirty tricks and lies are not paid attention to. You would think that the left would have learned this in the election but they didn't...
Now their trick has backfired on them...Moore will be a US Senator and Franken and many other infamous dems get taken down...got ta love it!

well I have more interest that Jones likes to kill babies and that trumps wanting to look at teenage girls in my book. The left think differently. And at this time I don't have any clue who is lying, but I do know that having Jones as the rep, changes trump's agenda and that is worse than me not knowing what happened 38 years ago. That affects hundreds of millions of people. Especially the killing babies part of this thing. So where the Moore thing is one thing, the Jones rule would be what I have been against as a person.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Woooooow. Look at this guy, supporting child molestation because the media opposes it

Accusations are NOT reality.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Sad it takes so little to support a pedophile

Who's a pedophile?

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Just a clue, support people for office (they affect all our life's) who are qualified for the job. Moore is not.

He's the best, and we can't wait.

 

[jc456]

Just a clue, support people for office (they affect all our life's) who are qualified for the job. Moore is not.

why? give us your reasons. you don't get to tell us your opinion like it's fact or something. come now child show us your bibliography of why.