I Respectfully Request that the Mods and and Admins Strongly Consider rules regarding AI in Posts

[braalian]

You read articles don't you?
Watch news video?
Read other opinions?
AI is a compilation of these things

You should be the one compiling and summarizing things that you’ve read in order to back up your arguments.

If you’re using AI to do it, you’re just being lazy af and adding nothing to the conversation

 

[Blaster]

You should be the one compiling and summarizing things that you’ve read by in order to back up your arguments.

If you’re using AI to do it, you’re just being lazy af and adding nothing to the conversation

When have you ever added anything intelligent to any conversation?

 

[braalian]

When have you ever added anything intelligent to any conversation?

You should stick with making AI images of cats and posting pics of your female bodybuilder fetishes

 

[Foxfyre]

I've noticed recently, the AI on Google often lists sources for it's comments.

Yes sometimes it does. But I have looked at those AI generated answers to questions that Copilot is giving me and checked it against other sources and have found a lot of conflicting information.

In other words, I don't ever just automatically accept the AI generated response.

But I don't think the mods would like to have to check every post to see if the content was AI generated.

 

[Blaster]

You should stick with making AI images of cats and posting pics of your female bodybuilder fetishes

I'll compare my favorability rating with yours any day of the week.

 

[Chuz Life]

As AI is so heavily reliant on Wikipedia and will often times default to it, unless instructed not to, I'm not seeing much difference between using Wikipedia and using AI in a post.

 

[braalian]

I'll compare my favorability rating with yours any day of the week.

It’s easy to boost it when all you post are banalities you know most here will agree with

 

[Blaster]

It’s easy to boost it when all you post are banalities you know most here will agree with

People know I don't rely on sarcasm like you and some others.

 

[playtime]

i will use the AI synopsis at the top of google as a general go to like wiki ,& will follow up with credible links if needed.

 

[konradv]

Just to add...so are random thirty second TikTok videos accompanied by a one or two liner that's usually about as deep as a mud puddle…

…and X-cretions.

 

[Delldude]

For now. I am looking at where it will be in 25 years.

The guy who created it says it doesn't look good for people.

Brits National Enquirer:

The ‘Godfather of AI’ has issued a terrifying warning the tech he created will take over the world - and there is ‘no chance’ it can be stopped. In a chilling new interview Brit computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton said he fears super-intelligent psycho scumbag chatbots will realise they have no ‘use’ for mankind in their society.

‘Godfather of AI’ issues warning the tech he created will take over the world

In chilling new interview Brit computer scientist Geoffrey Hinton says he fears super-intelligent psycho chatbots will realise they have no ‘use’ for mankind in their society

www.dailystar.co.uk

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Holy Cow this is hilarious!!!........ I swear this is true and just happened.

I asked Gemini on the Pro setting - "Do you believe most of the critics of Trump are more based on emotion or fact based"

It replied, fairly, somewhat saying that it appears it is both, however gave examples of fact based opinions in economics, that are based on sound principles.

So I asked how is that fact based, state what economic negative results has there been from his policies thus far?

It replied that would be overly simplified because he has only been in office for 7 months.

So I said - well doesn't that imply that it would be more based on emotions than fact then?

It replied - "Something went wrong"

I said what?

And the area where I prompt was now grayed out.

What the hell?? Did Gemini just walk away from talking to me??

 

[Delldude]

It replied - "Something went wrong"

I said what?

Here you go:

 

[saveliberty]

AI , the last great hope of liberals.

 

[Delldude]

AI , the last great hope of liberals.

How long before they teach it how to lie?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

How long before they teach it how to lie?

In essence, they already have.
Gemini and Co-Pilot both omit data and give preference to data that supports a liberal-left view. I guarantee you - guarantee - you ask it something negative about Biden or Obama - it will argue back with you. Say something negative about Trump - it will agree with you.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Are people really thinking this through?

If we eliminated AI, what would happen to CClaytonJones?

 

[sparky]

You best not post …..You best not try
Shut ‘er all down ….I'm telling you why
Arty Intel’s coming to town


They're making a list ...And checking it twice
Gonna record who's naughty and nice
Arty Intel’s coming to town


they see you when you're posting
they know when you're unfit
they know if you've been bad or good
and your tin hat don't do sh*t


your papers won’t do, the jackboots all lie
our brains are screwed, I’m telling you why
Arty Intel’s coming to town
Arty Intel’s coming to town


~S~

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[Persuader]

I have definitely seen this being done and having the effect described.

The mods apparantly do not want us to un-enroll from artifical intelligence overviews....hmmmm I wonder why ?