Moonglow
Diamond Member
She doesn't have to because there is NO discrimination based on sex. Which part do you not understand?Did Sarah Fuller claim to be a male?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She doesn't have to because there is NO discrimination based on sex. Which part do you not understand?Did Sarah Fuller claim to be a male?
She gave the dopiest answer I've ever heard since "it depends on what your meaning of 'is' is"
Recall the judge that once said that he couldn't define pornography, but that "I know it when I see it."
She thought, 'Those idiot Democrats who I counted on the affirmative action my ass all the way to the supreme court sure don't make it easy with their asinine claim that gender is fluid. But, hey! I've been doing great at stalling every questioner with rambling answers, so this will all be over soon. Clarence will rule the day I came in to straighten his happy ass out!'Jackson perceived that the question was political, so she gave a political answer. Pretty smart actually.
Obviously, they are an anomaly. They may not be able to fairly compete in either Women's or Men's athletics. Huh. Another example that life isn't fair. Special Olympians who use wheelchairs can't participate in pole vaulting, either. That's much more common than that XY chromosomes with testicles and penises scenario you are stressing out about.What about a person with xy chromosomes, a vagina and testicles instead of ovaries? Again, real life isn't as binary as you frightened clowns desperately need to pretend it is.
To show how a deity dies?
Yet gave an out for those that can't.He was God in the flesh while on earth, but had all the same qualities and tendencies of man.
He proved man could live without sin.
She doesn't have to because there is NO discrimination based on sex. Which part do you not understand?
Awesome. The Junior High that I teach at had two females on its football team a few years ago. One was an offensive "lineman" and one was a running back. First string, no shit. Clearly, you and I have proven, with those few examples, that Football at all levels is a completely co-ed sport, open to anyone and, not at all a "men's" sport.Yes, just like men's sports are open to women there is a female kicker on a college football team. I don't hear you town criers crying over her playing on a men's sports team.
Sarah Fuller
Senior student-athlete Sarah Fuller became the first woman to play in a football game in the Southeastern Conference and for a Power Five program when she kicked off at the start of the second half against the University of Missouri on Nov. 28.Feb 18, 2021
Kicking Down Barriers: Sarah Fuller makes history as kicker ...
https://news.vanderbilt.edu › 2021/02/18 › kicking-down-...
Congratulations did they have to know that to get a job?are you admitting she's female? then you must know the definition. Certainly Fuller does and so does the coach......and the media.
Athletic ability is not sex.Awesome. The Junior High that I teach at had two females on its football team a few years ago. Clearly, you and I have proven, with those few examples, that Football at all levels is a co-ed sport, not a "men's" sport.
So, you advocate ending the categorization of sports in to "Men's" and "Women's?" This is my local "Women's" pro football team, the Houston Energy, with their coach:
View attachment 621521
I would love to be on that team. I was QB in Junior High and I had excellent timing for my passes. But in high school, all of the boys had grown a head taller than I and I could no longer see over their heads to pass downfield. I wound up on the bench all my Freshman year and off the team the next year.
But I could easily play with those athletes. If I sue to get on the team, will you support that lawsuit? There would be no downside to them not discriminating period, amirite?
Yet gave an out for those that can't.
Of course not.Athletic ability is not sex.
I really couldn't care if they stopped playing sports tomorrow. Amazing how the world still managed to exist without massive amounts of sporting events in the first millions of years of humans.Of course not.
So do you advocate ending the practice of categorizing sports into "Men's" and "Women's"
Yes, or no, then explain all you like.
Dodging the question. They won't stop playing sports tomorrow. Because they will play sports tomorrow, people will have rights when it comes to sports, whether moonglow is a sports fan or not. Or maybe you think they don't have rights, because Moonglow doesn't care about sports?I really couldn't care if they stopped playing sports tomorrow. Amazing how the world still managed to exist without massive amounts of sporting events in the first millions of years of humans.
You are conflating two separate issues, biology and sociology. On the biological question of what is a male and female the answer isn't binary. The biological fact that some people are born with any mixture of chromosomes and sex organs proves that point.Obviously, they are an anomaly. They may not be able to fairly compete in either Women's or Men's athletics. Huh.
In that case they would be biologically incapable of running which is a key aspect of the vaulting. A better analogy and question would be what to do with someone who wanted to compete with artifical legs.Another example that life isn't fair. Special Olympians who use wheelchairs can't participate in pole vaulting, either. That's much more common than that XY chromosomes with testicles and penises scenario you are stressing out about.
This is a woman:
![]()
Yes, she certainly is.![]()
Congratulations did they have to know that to get a job?