I realize the mere mention of Rachel Maddow's name makes Trumplton's apoplectic, but..........

[Polishprince]

She is the Rush Limbaugh of the left.
Crazy as all get out.

Mr. Limbaugh is the recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom as well as a past nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize. Ms. Maddow isn't in his league.

Rachael Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar while the best Rush has on his resume is High School Graduate

Cecil Rhodes was a racist and a colonialist, and Maddow not only sought but received his scholarship? Disgraceful, she should be repudiated.

 

[healthmyths]

.................if you would like to see a comprehensive explanation of how Trump has corrupted the CDC, in this case with respect to their guidelines for re-opening schools, watch this.



During the segment she shows a document that was part of the CDC's original guidelines, the ones they issued before Trump forced them to be changed. It shows a large STOP sign indicating consideration for school re-opening by local officials should stop at the point when the area the school is in is experiencing difficulty in handling the spread of COVID.

Anyway, the video is self explanatory.

It is my contention that during any other presidency this would be a scandal of enormous magnitude. There would be unrelenting coverage of a story showing how the POTUS pressured the CDC to modify its guidelines despite there being no change in the science on which the original ones were based. A story leaving no doubt in people's minds that the public's safety is knowingly being jeopardized by an official policy of a US government agency, after being directed to do so by the POTUS, that does not reflect the best available scientific information.

Normally, this would end whatever increasingly slim chance Don had for a second term. It would be front page news on the cover of every newspaper and the lead on every news show. The Sunday morning talk shows would be speaking of nothing else.

As it is, the story will likely be dropped from the news cycle by tomorrow. Replaced by the next scandal that would normally end the presidency of any other politician. And so it goes.

Like I said, she comes off like my high school math teacher in sometimes it's grating to the ears. But she's always well prepared, well researched, and well spoken. That's why she brings out such strong feeling the right wingers. They have to resort to commenting on her looks or her sexuality. Her show requires you to think. To be invested in not only what she's talking about, but thinking about the reasons or the solutions. You don't have to think with Hannity's show. It's a hour of fist bumping, conspiracy theory spouting..right on!!

Rachel Maddow’s ratings continue to tank at MSNBC
Her May numbers were even sadder with the key adult demo of 25-54. There she caught 455,000 viewers to end up tied for No. 7 in cable news, even behind a show at ratings bottom-feeder CNN.

Rachel Maddow's ratings continue to tank at MSNBC

When you think of ultraliberal media stars a lot of names come to mind. But one who has stood out for a while has been Rachel Maddow of MSNBC. However, it

www.lifezette.com

Tucker Carlson Tonight and Hannity were the only shows to break four million viewers, with Hannity just behind Carlson (4.331 million viewers vs. 4.311 million). Fox News had the five top-rated shows overall, including The Five(3.898 million viewers), Special Report with Bret Baier (3.658 million viewers) and The Ingraham Angle (3.622 million viewers). The same five shows—in the same order—led among viewers in the key demo, with Carlson delivering 791,000 viewers, according to ratings data compiled by Nielsen.

Tucker Carlson Has Highest-Rated Program In Cable News History

Tucker Carlson just edged ahead of Fox News' Sean Hannity as the only two shows on cable TV to deliver more than four million viewers in 2Q 2020.

www.forbes.com

YEA... I'm sure her influence is very minimal at 455,000 viewers..

 

[bripat9643]

.................if you would like to see a comprehensive explanation of how Trump has corrupted the CDC, in this case with respect to their guidelines for re-opening schools, watch this.



During the segment she shows a document that was part of the CDC's original guidelines, the ones they issued before Trump forced them to be changed. It shows a large STOP sign indicating consideration for school re-opening by local officials should stop at the point when the area the school is in is experiencing difficulty in handling the spread of COVID.

Anyway, the video is self explanatory.

It is my contention that during any other presidency this would be a scandal of enormous magnitude. There would be unrelenting coverage of a story showing how the POTUS pressured the CDC to modify its guidelines despite there being no change in the science on which the original ones were based. A story leaving no doubt in people's minds that the public's safety is knowingly being jeopardized by an official policy of a US government agency, after being directed to do so by the POTUS, that does not reflect the best available scientific information.

Normally, this would end whatever increasingly slim chance Don had for a second term. It would be front page news on the cover of every newspaper and the lead on every news show. The Sunday morning talk shows would be speaking of nothing else.

As it is, the story will likely be dropped from the news cycle by tomorrow. Replaced by the next scandal that would normally end the presidency of any other politician. And so it goes.

So she blew herself up, in her own discussion.

If you take a look at the entire nation as a whole, you are applying a national statistic, to every single community, as if, having New York City see a huge surge in cases, means that therefore Post Falls Idaho is also having a spike in covid-19 cases.

Now I don't know if they are, or are not, but you don't know that. You can't say to me, that simply because NYC is having a surge in cases, that every single community in the entire country is having a surge in cases.

BOOM.... there went Maddow's entire argument up in smoke.

Thanks for playing. You lost again. Here's your copy of the home game.

Cases have increased because of massive increases in testing, and also possibly because of the riots and protests.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Rachael Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar while the best Rush has on his resume is High School Graduate

Kind of like the fact that I have an Sc.D. and you didn't quite make it all the way through third grade...

Regardless, Madcow would be crushed by Rush in a debate.

CONSIDER this troll, Mark Levin has an open invitation to have Madcow on his show and discuss issues with xer, or to go on zir show. But Rachel is a coward and ducks him. Xhe knows Zhi is no match for any intellectual on the right. She depends on the stupidity of her audience.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

She is the Rush Limbaugh of the left.
Crazy as all get out.

Mr. Limbaugh is the recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom as well as a past nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize. Ms. Maddow isn't in his league.

Rachael Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar

Means about as much as Obama's Nobel.

Off the top of my head, so are Cory Booker and Eric Garcetti, and they're fuckin' idiots.

 

[Uncensored2008]

.................if you would like to see a comprehensive explanation of how Trump has corrupted the CDC, in this case with respect to their guidelines for re-opening schools, watch this.



During the segment she shows a document that was part of the CDC's original guidelines, the ones they issued before Trump forced them to be changed. It shows a large STOP sign indicating consideration for school re-opening by local officials should stop at the point when the area the school is in is experiencing difficulty in handling the spread of COVID.

Anyway, the video is self explanatory.

It is my contention that during any other presidency this would be a scandal of enormous magnitude. There would be unrelenting coverage of a story showing how the POTUS pressured the CDC to modify its guidelines despite there being no change in the science on which the original ones were based. A story leaving no doubt in people's minds that the public's safety is knowingly being jeopardized by an official policy of a US government agency, after being directed to do so by the POTUS, that does not reflect the best available scientific information.

Normally, this would end whatever increasingly slim chance Don had for a second term. It would be front page news on the cover of every newspaper and the lead on every news show. The Sunday morning talk shows would be speaking of nothing else.

As it is, the story will likely be dropped from the news cycle by tomorrow. Replaced by the next scandal that would normally end the presidency of any other politician. And so it goes.

Like I said, she comes off like my high school math teacher in sometimes it's grating to the ears. But she's always well prepared, well researched, and well spoken. That's why she brings out such strong feeling the right wingers. They have to resort to commenting on her looks or her sexuality. Her show requires you to think. To be invested in not only what she's talking about, but thinking about the reasons or the solutions. You don't have to think with Hannity's show. It's a hour of fist bumping, conspiracy theory spouting..right on!!

Rachel Maddow’s ratings continue to tank at MSNBC
Her May numbers were even sadder with the key adult demo of 25-54. There she caught 455,000 viewers to end up tied for No. 7 in cable news, even behind a show at ratings bottom-feeder CNN.

Rachel Maddow's ratings continue to tank at MSNBC

When you think of ultraliberal media stars a lot of names come to mind. But one who has stood out for a while has been Rachel Maddow of MSNBC. However, it

www.lifezette.com

Tucker Carlson Tonight and Hannity were the only shows to break four million viewers, with Hannity just behind Carlson (4.331 million viewers vs. 4.311 million). Fox News had the five top-rated shows overall, including The Five(3.898 million viewers), Special Report with Bret Baier (3.658 million viewers) and The Ingraham Angle (3.622 million viewers). The same five shows—in the same order—led among viewers in the key demo, with Carlson delivering 791,000 viewers, according to ratings data compiled by Nielsen.

Tucker Carlson Has Highest-Rated Program In Cable News History

Tucker Carlson just edged ahead of Fox News' Sean Hannity as the only two shows on cable TV to deliver more than four million viewers in 2Q 2020.

www.forbes.com

YEA... I'm sure her influence is very minimal at 455,000 viewers..

The Communist Chinese State run news organization of NBC is in trouble in general.

 

[petro]

Since when does anyone take Rachel Madcow seriously three years of blaring about Russia “collusion” and Mueller?

Just idiots like deanrd's sock, berg80 and the faux squaw drooling lahkota.
True Maddow groupies tell the end.

 

[Canon Shooter]

She is the Rush Limbaugh of the left.
Crazy as all get out.

Mr. Limbaugh is the recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom as well as a past nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize. Ms. Maddow isn't in his league.

Rachael Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar while the best Rush has on his resume is High School Graduate

The most ignorant and stupid people I've ever met are also the most highly educated.

Rachael Maddow can only dream of the kind of success Limbaugh has achieved.

Limbaugh has won five Marconi Awards. Maddow? She was voted "Lesbian/Bi Woman of the Year" in the 2008 Visibility Awards . Limbaugh's been awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Maddow? Now so much. Maddow's net worth is around $20 million. Limbaugh's net worth is right around a half a billion dollars; $500 million.

Maddow is but a pimple on the ass of America...

 

[BluesLegend]

We love Rachel Maddow, it's a toss up between that moron and AOC who's a better spokesperson for the left.

 

[Crixus]

.................if you would like to see a comprehensive explanation of how Trump has corrupted the CDC, in this case with respect to their guidelines for re-opening schools, watch this.



During the segment she shows a document that was part of the CDC's original guidelines, the ones they issued before Trump forced them to be changed. It shows a large STOP sign indicating consideration for school re-opening by local officials should stop at the point when the area the school is in is experiencing difficulty in handling the spread of COVID.

Anyway, the video is self explanatory.

It is my contention that during any other presidency this would be a scandal of enormous magnitude. There would be unrelenting coverage of a story showing how the POTUS pressured the CDC to modify its guidelines despite there being no change in the science on which the original ones were based. A story leaving no doubt in people's minds that the public's safety is knowingly being jeopardized by an official policy of a US government agency, after being directed to do so by the POTUS, that does not reflect the best available scientific information.

Normally, this would end whatever increasingly slim chance Don had for a second term. It would be front page news on the cover of every newspaper and the lead on every news show. The Sunday morning talk shows would be speaking of nothing else.

As it is, the story will likely be dropped from the news cycle by tomorrow. Replaced by the next scandal that would normally end the presidency of any other politician. And so it goes.

Like I said, she comes off like my high school math teacher in sometimes it's grating to the ears. But she's always well prepared, well researched, and well spoken. That's why she brings out such strong feeling the right wingers. They have to resort to commenting on her looks or her sexuality. Her show requires you to think. To be invested in not only what she's talking about, but thinking about the reasons or the solutions. You don't have to think with Hannity's show. It's a hour of fist bumping, conspiracy theory spouting..right on!!

Well researched? Except for that Trump tax return thing.

 

[WillowTree]

.................if you would like to see a comprehensive explanation of how Trump has corrupted the CDC, in this case with respect to their guidelines for re-opening schools, watch this.



During the segment she shows a document that was part of the CDC's original guidelines, the ones they issued before Trump forced them to be changed. It shows a large STOP sign indicating consideration for school re-opening by local officials should stop at the point when the area the school is in is experiencing difficulty in handling the spread of COVID.

Anyway, the video is self explanatory.

It is my contention that during any other presidency this would be a scandal of enormous magnitude. There would be unrelenting coverage of a story showing how the POTUS pressured the CDC to modify its guidelines despite there being no change in the science on which the original ones were based. A story leaving no doubt in people's minds that the public's safety is knowingly being jeopardized by an official policy of a US government agency, after being directed to do so by the POTUS, that does not reflect the best available scientific information.

Normally, this would end whatever increasingly slim chance Don had for a second term. It would be front page news on the cover of every newspaper and the lead on every news show. The Sunday morning talk shows would be speaking of nothing else.

As it is, the story will likely be dropped from the news cycle by tomorrow. Replaced by the next scandal that would normally end the presidency of any other politician. And so it goes.

Or an eruption of laughter lol

I farted!

 

[ColonelAngus]

CDC says schools should reopen.

Why the CDC Is Stressing the Importance of Schools Reopening This Fall

COVID has created another new and intense debate: should schools reopen in the fall? If you watch CN

townhall.com

I agree.

“The best available evidence indicates that COVID-19 poses relatively low risks to school-aged children. Children appear to be at lower risk for contracting COVID-19 compared to adults. To put this in perspective, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as of July 17, 2020, the United States reported that children and adolescents under 18 years old account for under 7 percent of COVID-19 cases and less than 0.1 percent of COVID-19-related deaths.[5] Although relatively rare, flu-related deaths in children occur every year. From 2004-2005 to 2018-2019, flu-related deaths in children reported to CDC during regular flu seasons ranged from 37 to 187 deaths. During the H1N1pandemic (April 15, 2009 to October 2, 2010), 358 pediatric deaths were reported to CDC. So far in this pandemic, deaths of children are less than in each of the last five flu seasons, with only 64.† Additionally, some children with certain underlying medical conditions, however, are at increased risk of severe illness from COVID”

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

.................if you would like to see a comprehensive explanation of how Trump has corrupted the CDC, in this case with respect to their guidelines for re-opening schools, watch this.



During the segment she shows a document that was part of the CDC's original guidelines, the ones they issued before Trump forced them to be changed. It shows a large STOP sign indicating consideration for school re-opening by local officials should stop at the point when the area the school is in is experiencing difficulty in handling the spread of COVID.

Anyway, the video is self explanatory.

It is my contention that during any other presidency this would be a scandal of enormous magnitude. There would be unrelenting coverage of a story showing how the POTUS pressured the CDC to modify its guidelines despite there being no change in the science on which the original ones were based. A story leaving no doubt in people's minds that the public's safety is knowingly being jeopardized by an official policy of a US government agency, after being directed to do so by the POTUS, that does not reflect the best available scientific information.

Normally, this would end whatever increasingly slim chance Don had for a second term. It would be front page news on the cover of every newspaper and the lead on every news show. The Sunday morning talk shows would be speaking of nothing else.

As it is, the story will likely be dropped from the news cycle by tomorrow. Replaced by the next scandal that would normally end the presidency of any other politician. And so it goes.

Like I said, she comes off like my high school math teacher in sometimes it's grating to the ears. But she's always well prepared, well researched, and well spoken. That's why she brings out such strong feeling the right wingers. They have to resort to commenting on her looks or her sexuality. Her show requires you to think. To be invested in not only what she's talking about, but thinking about the reasons or the solutions. You don't have to think with Hannity's show. It's a hour of fist bumping, conspiracy theory spouting..right on!!

 

[Polishprince]

.................if you would like to see a comprehensive explanation of how Trump has corrupted the CDC, in this case with respect to their guidelines for re-opening schools, watch this.



During the segment she shows a document that was part of the CDC's original guidelines, the ones they issued before Trump forced them to be changed. It shows a large STOP sign indicating consideration for school re-opening by local officials should stop at the point when the area the school is in is experiencing difficulty in handling the spread of COVID.

Anyway, the video is self explanatory.

It is my contention that during any other presidency this would be a scandal of enormous magnitude. There would be unrelenting coverage of a story showing how the POTUS pressured the CDC to modify its guidelines despite there being no change in the science on which the original ones were based. A story leaving no doubt in people's minds that the public's safety is knowingly being jeopardized by an official policy of a US government agency, after being directed to do so by the POTUS, that does not reflect the best available scientific information.

Normally, this would end whatever increasingly slim chance Don had for a second term. It would be front page news on the cover of every newspaper and the lead on every news show. The Sunday morning talk shows would be speaking of nothing else.

As it is, the story will likely be dropped from the news cycle by tomorrow. Replaced by the next scandal that would normally end the presidency of any other politician. And so it goes.

Like I said, she comes off like my high school math teacher in sometimes it's grating to the ears. But she's always well prepared, well researched, and well spoken. That's why she brings out such strong feeling the right wingers. They have to resort to commenting on her looks or her sexuality. Her show requires you to think. To be invested in not only what she's talking about, but thinking about the reasons or the solutions. You don't have to think with Hannity's show. It's a hour of fist bumping, conspiracy theory spouting..right on!!

Rachel Maddow’s ratings continue to tank at MSNBC
Her May numbers were even sadder with the key adult demo of 25-54. There she caught 455,000 viewers to end up tied for No. 7 in cable news, even behind a show at ratings bottom-feeder CNN.

Rachel Maddow's ratings continue to tank at MSNBC

When you think of ultraliberal media stars a lot of names come to mind. But one who has stood out for a while has been Rachel Maddow of MSNBC. However, it

www.lifezette.com

Tucker Carlson Tonight and Hannity were the only shows to break four million viewers, with Hannity just behind Carlson (4.331 million viewers vs. 4.311 million). Fox News had the five top-rated shows overall, including The Five(3.898 million viewers), Special Report with Bret Baier (3.658 million viewers) and The Ingraham Angle (3.622 million viewers). The same five shows—in the same order—led among viewers in the key demo, with Carlson delivering 791,000 viewers, according to ratings data compiled by Nielsen.

Tucker Carlson Has Highest-Rated Program In Cable News History

Tucker Carlson just edged ahead of Fox News' Sean Hannity as the only two shows on cable TV to deliver more than four million viewers in 2Q 2020.

www.forbes.com

YEA... I'm sure her influence is very minimal at 455,000 viewers..

Maddow was on top of the ratings world for a while. Every other day was a new Bombshell, the beginning of the end for President Trump as the walls were said to be closing in.

All of that turned out to be bullshit, and really damaged her credibility. And considering the fact that she is a homely broad, men don't want to tune it to start just to see her.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

People have nothing but contempt for maddow often calling her madcow.

 

[BluesLegend]

Rachel Maddow is the left's leader and champion Joe Biden is their presidential hopeful

 

[Gdjjr]

Her show requires you to think.

Her show tells watchers what she thinks- that doesn't require a watcher to think- FYI

 

[Gdjjr]

Rachael Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar while the best Rush has on his resume is High School Graduate

Kris Kristofferson is a Rhodes Scholar as well- who's smartest?
Rush is a multi-gazillionaire- Kristofferson is a lyrical genius and fairly good actor- what is Maddow?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Like I said, she comes off like my high school math teacher in sometimes it's grating to the ears. But she's always well prepared, well researched, and well spoken. That's why she brings out such strong feeling the right wingers. They have to resort to commenting on her looks or her sexuality. Her show requires you to think. To be invested in not only what she's talking about, but thinking about the reasons or the solutions. You don't have to think with Hannity's show. It's a hour of fist bumping, conspiracy theory spouting..right on!!

You made it to high school? I had not considered the possibility.

Maddow is a propagandist just like Hannity, except that she is trotted out as if she is some sort of legitimate news person, instead. She isn't. She is simply a hack doing what a hack does.

 

[Polishprince]

She is the Rush Limbaugh of the left.
Crazy as all get out.

Mr. Limbaugh is the recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom as well as a past nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize. Ms. Maddow isn't in his league.

Rachael Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar while the best Rush has on his resume is High School Graduate

Mr. Limbaugh dropped out of college because he knew what he wanted to do and realized that college wouldn't help him.