Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,506
- 2,250
The White House website.Do you have a legitimate source. The source you gave is considered questionable....?
Mediabias.com
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Taki’s Magazine as Questionable based on extreme right-wing editorial bias and affiliation with those labeled as promoters of hate.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Propaganda, Hate Group
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
History
Founded on February 5, 2007, Taki’s Magazine is an extreme right-wing online magazine of politics and culture published by journalist Taki Theodoracopulos. According to a Guardian article entitled “The way of the Jackal,” Taki Theodoracopulos has racist views.
Taki’s Magazine proclaims on its about page: “Our only ideology is to be against the junk culture foisted upon us by Hollywood and the mainstream media, and mirages of a new world order.” Taki’s Magazine’s former Executive Editor was Richard Spencer, an American white supremacist who coined the term Alternative Right. Gavin McInnes, the founder of the hate group known as the Proud Boys, wrote his last column entitled “So Long, Taki!” He has been described in media reports as a significant figure within the alt-right movement. Gavin McInnes has also been featured in Hatewatch articles by the Southern Poverty Law Center, found here and here.
___________________
But even if your article is true, the things you posted for minorities of color adds up to about $2 to $3 billion out of a $2.0 trillion dollar bill....that's 2000 BILLION DOLLARS..... Spending $2 billion, just 1/10 of 1% of the money in the bill, to help 40% of Americans that fall in to that category of minorities, it's really not this outrageous amount as these authors describe and try to get you upset over.... Even if they were spending 10 times more than the $2 billion you listed, or even 100 times that amount, $200 billion spent, it's still way below 40% of the 2000 billion in the bill which would be $800 billion being spent on minorities.
This is what questionable sources do....they promote hatred, outrage, even tickle people in to violence. Be aware! Be careful not to let yourself be dragged in to this kind of intentional deceit and hatefulness and jealousy....