For some reason I can't cut/paste from this link, but it shows the Zionists were at fault for the conflict and were not supposed to get sovereignty.
British Mandate of Palestine- the Shaw Commission suggested partition as a solution to the conflicts as it recognized two incongruous societies...
www.wise2wisdom.org
Specifically why they were at fault is that they illegally flooded Palestine with more than 10 times the legal quota, and illegally murdered the British high command in the King David Hotel bombing.
They were immigrants so had no rights to the land, while the Palestinians did have rights as natives.
You're the kind who says Mexicans have a right to enter our country illegally and that the government is committing a crime when it deports them.
Well the Mexicans are native and we are not.
So yes, I tend to think our immigration laws are racist and unfair.
They are inherently contradictory.
When we negotiated the purchase of states like CA, AZ, NM, UT, NV, CO, OK, TX, LA, FL, etc. it was done with the guarantee the million or so Mexican citizens would retain their property rights, whether or not they decided to become US citizens.
Well we reneged on that deal and started murdering Mexicans in the US, in order to steal their land.
That kind of nullifies the treaty, which then should cause the land to default back to Mexico.
They are not native to the USA, numskull. The Mexicans that were already here did retain their property and even gained U.S. citizenship. No property was taking from Mexicans, moron. No ne was murdered except what occurs in the normal course of affairs.
As always, you have a serious misunderstanding of history.
Wrong.
The Mexicans largely are US natives who fled to Mexico, and Mexicans came from the north originally, all the way across the Bearing Straits.
So all native south of the US had to live in the US at one time.
And no, the US is notorious for murdering Mexicans in order to steal their land.
This is just one of dozens, maybe hundreds or massacres.
“People say the past is the past, and you’ve got to move on. Unfortunately, that is just not the case. Violence against Latinos ... has become more relevant."
www.nbcnews.com
{...
'Porvenir, Texas' details massacre of Mexican Americans by U.S. soldiers, rangers
“People say the past is the past, and you’ve got to move on. Unfortunately, that is just not the case. Violence against Latinos ... has become more relevant."
Sept. 27, 2019, 7:33 AM MDT / Updated Sept. 27, 2019, 10:11 AM MDT
By Raul A. Reyes
Arlinda Valencia was at a family funeral when she heard what sounded like a wild rumor. One of her uncles mentioned that the Texas Rangers had murdered her great-grandfather. This idea seemed so ludicrous that some of Valencia’s relatives laughed. No one believed the story. But the tale stuck with Valencia, and later she went online to read about Texas history.
At her computer, Valencia, who lives in El Paso, discovered an account of
a massacre carried out by Texas Rangers. Among a list of the victims, she recognized her great-grandfather’s name. “His name was there,” she recalled. “The story was true. It sent chills down my back.”
Valencia’s great-grandfather Longino Flores had indeed lived in the small West Texas border town of Porvenir.
In the early morning hours of Jan. 28, 1918, a group of ranchers, Texas Rangers, and U.S. Army cavalry soldiers entered the village and rousted the residents from their beds. They led away 15 unarmed men and boys of Mexican descent to a nearby bluff, where they shot and killed them. These victims ranged in age from 16 to 72, and some were American citizens. The town’s women and children fled across the border to Mexico for safety. The next day, the perpetrators returned and burned the village to the ground. Porvenir ceased to exist.
...
During the mid-19th century into the early 20th century thousands of men, women, and children of Mexican descent were victims of
extrajudicial lynchings and killings in the Southwest. Yet these events remain largely unknown by the public, including Latinos.
...}
