"I Love Hitler" Leaked Messages Expose Young Republican Racist Chat.

[Correll]

As I initially stated, and you are confirming, you’re desperate to ignore the problem because you really don’t want to acknowledge it.

You’re like a person who finds a lump on their neck. That could be anything, right? There’s no real evidence it’s cancer.

I'm not ignoring it, I'm willing to discuss it. I am discussing it right now, with you.

YOu made a claim that it is widespread.

I am asking you to support that claim. When posted a link, I read it. And responded seriously and honestly.

in other words, using your analogy, let's get the lump tested. Show me the data.


There is an old saying, "where there is smoke there is fire".

Anyone who has ever tired to start a fire, knows that is bullshit. It is really easy to get smoke and no fire. Especially if the wood is wet.

 

[Marener]

I'm not ignoring it, I'm willing to discuss it. I am discussing it right now, with you.

YOu made a claim that it is widespread.

I am asking you to support that claim. When posted a link, I read it. And responded seriously and honestly.

in other words, using your analogy, let's get the lump tested. Show me the data.


There is an old saying, "where there is smoke there is fire".

Anyone who has ever tired to start a fire, knows that is bullshit. It is really easy to get smoke and no fire. Especially if the wood is wet.

I did support it. You just want to ignore it. Exactly as I said.

The support group does test the lump. It shows the cancer.

Why were the participants in the focus group right wingers attracted to some Nazi ideology?

You should know your leadership uses rhetoric that steers into it. You’re party uses a lot of blood and soil rhetoric.

 

[Correll]

I did support it. You just want to ignore it. Exactly as I said.

All I want to know, is that the group was a random sample of gen z republicans.

A completely reasonable request. It is sad that the article was not smart enough to give that.

The support group does test the lump. It shows the cancer.

Why were the participants in the focus group right wingers attracted to some Nazi ideology?

The article said ONE partcipant agree with Fuentes, and the artice admitted he was an outlier.

So.... if not for him, there was be NO support for your .... attack.

You should know your leadership uses rhetoric that steers into it. You’re party uses a lot of blood and soil rhetoric.

On the one hand, we have some rhetoric and on the other, we have you people allowing in literally tens of millions of invaders.


So.... you are teh bad guys here. By far.

 

[Hafar1014]

The number I care about is working class wages, especially compared to inflation.

Craft policy to get that number growing faster than inflation, AS A LONG TERM TREND, and let it simmer for 3 or 4 generations,

and this country will be a ******* utopia. Relative to the clown world we live in now.



True. But on the other hand, if there is a big disconnect betwen what you see and what the official numbers are saying,

then it is time to start asking some hard questions.




Two points.

1. The tariff panic mongers said that we were already in a recession. I was half convinced. It makes sense that the transition to reindustrialization could be rought. The last economic numbers, ie 4.3% is shocking and changes everything.

2. My white landscapers, as far as I know, have not raised prices for...several years. WE are probably overdue. I will check with wife to see if they raised rates at some point and she didn't mention it. Truely, the 4.3% changes everything. I was waiting for the next recession, to give me that last drop before we start really seeing what our numbers will be for retirement. But now... we might manage to soft land out of the bubble.




The new line of defense, is that this is just an AI bubble.

Well, a bubble can last years. I could see great growth for that time and not lose it all in the pop, when it finally comes.

There is no AI bubble this is a supply and demand dynamic and AI is the future.
Wages have increased more than inflation and after the tax cuts wages will be even higher.
Thank Trump for that and if democrats get back in power all that will reverse and we will have Biden 2.0

 

[Correll]

There is no AI bubble is a supply and demand dynamic and AI is the future.
Wages have increased mire than inflation and after the tax cuts wages will be even higher.
Thank Trump for that and if democrats get back in power all that will reverse and we will have Biden 2.0

More and more, that vision is firming up into reality.

MAGA.

 

[Mac-7]

The racial divide in America is real

And I dont deny that it touches young people in collages and universities

all we can do is to condemn irresponsible racial insults by future leaders of the country

 

[Marener]

All I want to know, is that the group was a random sample of gen z republicans.

A completely reasonable request. It is sad that the article was not smart enough to give that.

By all means, call the Manhattan Institute and ask them. The reality is you’re just looking for an excuse to ignore it without using any common sense.

The article said ONE partcipant agree with Fuentes, and the artice admitted he was an outlier.

Only one wholeheartedly agreed with Fuentes but if you read the discussion, about 4-5 of them are either interested in his ideas or agree with him in part.

So.... if not for him, there was be NO support for your .... attack.

The popularity of his podcast and similar ones. The popularity of Candace Owens. The popularity of Andrew Tate. The fact that a college Republican organization was brimming with this rhetoric.

But it’s all just nothing, right? Ignore. Deny.

On the one hand, we have some rhetoric and on the other, we have you people allowing in literally tens of millions of invaders.

Sounds like the rhetoric Fuentes would use.

So.... you are teh bad guys here. By far.

Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

 

[Marener]

The racial divide in America is real

And I dont deny that it touches young people in collages and universities

all we can do is to condemn irresponsible racial insults by future leaders of the country

Is that all you can do?

Your party successfully handled David Duke, but you seem unwilling to do that again.

 

[Mac-7]

Is that all you can do?

Your party successfully handled David Duke, but you seem unwilling to do that again.

I dont know what you expect me to do about college kids who I have never met

But the racial insults exist on both sides

 

[Marener]

I dont know what you expect me to do about college kids who I have never met

You could start by trying to understand why this is happening.

 

[Mac-7]

You could start by trying to understand why this is happening.

Its a reaction to attacks on whites by black race hustlers

Stop blaming whites for the failure of black people and the anger on both sides will go down

 

[Marener]

Its a reaction to attacks on whites by black race hustlers

Stop blaming whites for the failure if black people and the anger on both sides will go down

Maybe it has something to do with conservative’s penchant for always blaming someone else. Lol

 

[Correll]

By all means, call the Manhattan Institute and ask them. The reality is you’re just looking for an excuse to ignore it without using any common sense.

It is common sense to want to know that the group used is random or representative.

Only one wholeheartedly agreed with Fuentes but if you read the discussion, about 4-5 of them are either interested in his ideas or agree with him in part.

Want to vague that up a bit for me? I mean, "in part" could mean ANYTHING, down to agreeing that wearing black looks good.

Give me what you consider the nick fuentes money shot, his most important policy point. And lets discuss if it i reasonable and/or popular.

The popularity of his podcast and similar ones. The popularity of Candace Owens. The popularity of Andrew Tate. The fact that a college Republican organization was brimming with this rhetoric.

What has Owens said that overlaps with Fuentes?

...


Sounds like the rhetoric Fuentes would use.

THe tens of millions of invaders is... real. If Fuentes is against that, and you are for it....

then YOU made the world that made Fuentes relevant, not me.

Don’t say we didn’t warn you.

Well, actually, what you've done is cry wolf for generations.


From your article.

"After a decade of hearing the same accusations leveled at everyone from John McCain to Mitt Romney to Donald Trump, some see allegations of bigotry as table stakes. "


So, if a real danger is finally, FINALLY, on the scene, who's fault is it, that we don't take him or you seriously?


Maybe you should have thought on that, before you normalized the word.

 

[Correll]

Is that all you can do?

Your party successfully handled David Duke, but you seem unwilling to do that again.

And afterwards, you lefties gave us no credit for that and continued to smear us ALL as wacist and nazis.

So, you suck.

 

[Mac-7]

Maybe it has something to do with conservative’s penchant for always blaming someone else. Lol

No

Its the black race hustlers starting with the Obamas that keep stirring the pot of divisiveness

And have been since these college kids were in kindergarten

 

[Marener]

It is common sense to want to know that the group used is random or representative.

You’re going to keep using what amounts to a “no true Scotsman” defense. Next thing you’ll be saying a random 20 people isn’t enough to be representative. But go ahead and call them.

One of the things you’re missing is that radicals who like Fuentes are much more likely to be politically active. That’s why it’s unsurprising to find them in young Republican clubs in college.

Want to vague that up a bit for me? I mean, "in part" could mean ANYTHING, down to agreeing that wearing black looks good.

Read the focus group, when they ask about Fuentes multiple people chime in with their amenability to his ideas.

Give me what you consider the nick fuentes money shot, his most important policy point. And let’s discuss if it i reasonable and/or popular.

What has Owens said that overlaps with Fuentes?

THe tens of millions of invaders is... real. If Fuentes is against that, and you are for it....

then YOU made the world that made Fuentes relevant, not me.

Fuentes loves him the great replacement theory. So do you apparently.

Well, actually, what you've done is cry wolf for generations.


From your article.

"After a decade of hearing the same accusations leveled at everyone from John McCain to Mitt Romney to Donald Trump, some see allegations of bigotry as table stakes. "

So, if a real danger is finally, FINALLY, on the scene, who's fault is it, that we don't take him or you seriously?

Maybe you should have thought on that, before you normalized the word.

Always looking for someone else to blame.

 

[Marener]

No

Its the black race hustlers starting with the Obamas that keep stirring the pot of divisiveness

And have been since these college kids were in kindergarten

Obama pointed out that racism still exists. The only difference is now people in your party can admit it and don’t care.

Why don’t young republicans care about being racist? Because there’s no longer repercussions.

 

[Marener]

And afterwards, you lefties gave us no credit for that and continued to smear us ALL as wacist and nazis.

So, you suck.

Your party leadership did that, but those kinds of people have been excommunicated from mainstream Republicanism.

The biggest change in the Republican Party is the move towards lack of consequences and shame.

You can say basically whatever you want. It’s all entertainment.

 

[Correll]

You’re going to keep using what amounts to a “no true Scotsman” defense. Next thing you’ll be saying a random 20 people isn’t enough to be representative. But go ahead and call them.

Err, nope. I simply asked if the group was random, or somehow representative.

Your assumption that I am operating in bad faith, is you projecting.

One of the things you’re missing is that radicals who like Fuentes are much more likely to be politically active. That’s why it’s unsurprising to find them in young Republican clubs in college.

I'm not sure that's true. I could see relatively non-political types being attracted to him just becasue he is fringe, without being really... informed on the political...landscape.

Read the focus group, when they ask about Fuentes multiple people chime in with their amenability to his ideas.

Actually, they did NOT say that.

"About half knew who Nick Fuentes is. Some described him as funny or provocative; others saw him as toxic; none was fully panicked."

Saying someone "funny or provocative" in no way indicates aggreement. On anything.

Fuentes loves him the great replacement theory. So do you apparently.

You whined about rhetoric, while supporting a massive harm to the nation as a whole and a violation of our right to self determination.

You saying "fuentes", to try to give your extreme hostility to America, is not valid.

YOU are the bad guy here, not me. You are treasonous.

Always looking for someone else to blame.

Buddy. Your intent is to smear me and mine as nazis, so that you can justify massive opposition and hostility to us and everything we want or cherish.

So, I repeat, you are the bad guy here.

 

[Correll]

Your party leadership did that, but those kinds of people have been excommunicated from mainstream Republicanism.

The republican voters agreed and supported that move.

Years later when DUke ran for President, he got less than one percent of the popular vote.

And yet, you people keep pushing the idea that w.s. or nazism is a real force in this country.

You are liars.

The biggest change in the Republican Party is the move towards lack of consequences and shame.

From your link, .

" After a decade of hearing the same accusations leveled at everyone from John McCain to Mitt Romney to Donald Trump, some see allegations of bigotry as table stakes. "

YOU did that. A man would have to be a fool to take lefty accusations of shit, seriously.

You can say basically whatever you want. It’s all entertainment.

Where did you get that idea?