I Have A Challenge For Usmb Republicans. This Shouldn't Be Hard To Do

[The Rabbi]

Why are wages low? Because there are more people looking for work than employers. Check out NorthDakota where average starting wage is 10-17/hr. It used to be sort of like that when Bush was president.
We've had 3 increases in min wage in the last 10 years or less. How much better off is anyone? Why will this be the charm?
Thanks, Obama.

It will be the charm because people can at least try to live off 10/h. Can you live with a wage under 10 per hour? It will also be closer to keep up with inflation. It will lift 16 million people out of poverty and any jobs lost will be regained with more through the increase of consumer spending.

More UNSUPPORTED keynesian BS.

How are you so dumb to not understand the effect of consumer spending?

It's actually you who has a laughable command of economics.

It's laughable to you because you have the mentality of a school girl. Consumer spending drives the economy. Any economist will tell you that.

Well no. No economist except idiot Keynesians believe that. We've had years operating under just that fallacy and it is a fail.

 

[Rotagilla]

 

[Billy000]

It will be the charm because people can at least try to live off 10/h. Can you live with a wage under 10 per hour? It will also be closer to keep up with inflation. It will lift 16 million people out of poverty and any jobs lost will be regained with more through the increase of consumer spending.

More UNSUPPORTED keynesian BS.

How are you so dumb to not understand the effect of consumer spending?

It's actually you who has a laughable command of economics.

It's laughable to you because you have the mentality of a school girl. Consumer spending drives the economy. Any economist will tell you that.

Well no. No economist except idiot Keynesians believe that. We've had years operating under just that fallacy and it is a fail.

How can you not understand the free market? Business thrives because people spend money on them. My god you are dumb.

 

[Rotagilla]

More UNSUPPORTED keynesian BS.

How are you so dumb to not understand the effect of consumer spending?

It's actually you who has a laughable command of economics.

It's laughable to you because you have the mentality of a school girl. Consumer spending drives the economy. Any economist will tell you that.

Well no. No economist except idiot Keynesians believe that. We've had years operating under just that fallacy and it is a fail.

How can you not understand the free market? Business thrives because people spend money on them. My god you are dumb.

So you're against ACA, then, right?

 

[Dot Com]

The entire 1st page was populated w/ rw "opinions". Why are rightists too lazy to provide sourcing

 

[The Rabbi]

More UNSUPPORTED keynesian BS.

How are you so dumb to not understand the effect of consumer spending?

It's actually you who has a laughable command of economics.

It's laughable to you because you have the mentality of a school girl. Consumer spending drives the economy. Any economist will tell you that.

Well no. No economist except idiot Keynesians believe that. We've had years operating under just that fallacy and it is a fail.

How can you not understand the free market? Business thrives because people spend money on them. My god you are dumb.

You're cute when you'er stupid. Did you know that?

 

[Billy000]

How are you so dumb to not understand the effect of consumer spending?

It's actually you who has a laughable command of economics.

It's laughable to you because you have the mentality of a school girl. Consumer spending drives the economy. Any economist will tell you that.

Well no. No economist except idiot Keynesians believe that. We've had years operating under just that fallacy and it is a fail.

How can you not understand the free market? Business thrives because people spend money on them. My god you are dumb.

You're cute when you'er stupid. Did you know that?

I'm adorable no matter what. You're a dumb bigoted douche bag 24/7.

 

[Listening]

Where is backup from unbiased sources on that claim.

I'll decide what is unbiased.

This article by Wikipedia cites BLS data

Jobs created during U.S. presidential terms - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

This is from the article itself:

The exact usefulness of these numbers is debated.

Beyond that, the article does nothing to back up your claim that Bush's policies. That is a completely different analysis.

You admitted yourself you watch a lot of TV.

Why don't you try getting an on-line course in logic and debate ?

I have a problem with logic huh? Lol tell me genius. If we can't trust the BLS, what should we trust? Sean Hannity?

Missed the part where they said themselves the usefulness of the numbers is "debated". They then give both sides.

So, when even they say....the numbers are in question.....you say.....

But but but but.....SEAN HANNITY.

You are a moron.

Why we waste time with your stupid threads is beyond me.

You're just butthurt because you know I'm right. You have no argument and you know it.

I have a better argument than you.

So I have nothing, what does that mean you have ?

Worse than nothing.

You are an incredibly close-minded arrogant jerkwad.

 

[Listening]

So why are fewer people working? Why is household income lower than 2009?

Many factors have contributed to labor participation such as disability and retirement. It also has to do with low wages. People cannot live on under 10 an hour so they do not settle for those jobs. How is it Obama's fault wages are still low? You do realize of course he pushed for a miminum wage increase right? That's the ONLY way to raise wages. Corporate profits are at an all time high. They could raise wages if they really wanted to.

Why are wages low? Because there are more people looking for work than employers. Check out NorthDakota where average starting wage is 10-17/hr. It used to be sort of like that when Bush was president.
We've had 3 increases in min wage in the last 10 years or less. How much better off is anyone? Why will this be the charm?
Thanks, Obama.

It will be the charm because people can at least try to live off 10/h. Can you live with a wage under 10 per hour? It will also be closer to keep up with inflation. It will lift 16 million people out of poverty and any jobs lost will be regained with more through the increase of consumer spending.

More UNSUPPORTED keynesian BS.

How are you so dumb to not understand the effect of consumer spending?

The real question is how you can continue to worship at the feet of a discredited Moron named Keynes.

 

[Listening]

Why are wages low? Because there are more people looking for work than employers. Check out NorthDakota where average starting wage is 10-17/hr. It used to be sort of like that when Bush was president.
We've had 3 increases in min wage in the last 10 years or less. How much better off is anyone? Why will this be the charm?
Thanks, Obama.

It will be the charm because people can at least try to live off 10/h. Can you live with a wage under 10 per hour? It will also be closer to keep up with inflation. It will lift 16 million people out of poverty and any jobs lost will be regained with more through the increase of consumer spending.

More UNSUPPORTED keynesian BS.

How are you so dumb to not understand the effect of consumer spending?

It's actually you who has a laughable command of economics.

It's laughable to you because you have the mentality of a school girl. Consumer spending drives the economy. Any economist will tell you that.

You'd be lucky to has him mentality.

You can't keep an argument framed.

Nobody is arguing consumer spending.

But consumer spending alone does not do it.

And taking money from one person and giving it to another does not guarantee anything.

 

[Listening]

The entire 1st page was populated w/ rw "opinions". Why are rightists too lazy to provide sourcing

You first...you've never sourced anything.