I dont give two craps about israel OR palestine

[yiostheoy]

Dude, the Jews have been hated for thousands of years. Don't give me that bullshit
And I am well aware the Palestinians are violent and shit. So us the Israeli govt.

The Jews first appear in secular archaeology in 323 BCE in the history of Alexander The Great, as inscribed by Ptolemy one of his 4 greatest generals. Prior to this all we have is Jewish religious history in the Tenakh (Hebrew Old Testament). The Tenakh is consistent with other external archaeology as far back as the Hittites in 1300 BCE however. So whoever was transcribing the Tenakh during mid Roman Empire times was aware of the Hittites several thousand years before modern archaeologists rediscovered them again in the 1940's.

That the Jews were hated is not an accurate portrayal.

That they would not bow to Greek or Roman statues of gods was cause for unrest.

That they rebelled from Roman rule was cause for the sacking of Jerusalem.

That they persecuted and tried to exterminate early Christians with the cooperation of the Roman Emperors is why they were whipsawed after Constantine issued his edict of tolerance in 325 A.D.

The Catholic Church hated them for a while but eventually became tolerant.

Adolf took anti Semitism to a new level and managed to erase Judaism from most of Germany in about 5 years. In France, Italy, and the Balkans the Jews persisted however.

It is Adolf who is most responsible, together with Stalin, for the migrations of massive numbers of Jews to Palestine in the late 1940's.

So Adolf and Stalin unwittingly helped create the new State Of Israel.

And the Palestinians have hated them ever since.

 

[yiostheoy]

Why is it such a big deal anyways? Is it because of the doom and gloom from religious prophecies? Lol...
How much can people care about two groups of people that resort to terrorism and destruction constantly?

Well the Israelis having discovered world wide bigotry against them would just like to live in their own ancestral lands in peace.

And the Palestinians who have a claim to the lower coastal regions since the time of the ancient Greeks even before the Israelis' ancestors moved there want all of the land too.

So while an Israeli would never blow you up with a bomb a Palestinian surely would if given half a chance.

That's why it affects you.

Moron.

Dude, the Jews have been hated for thousands of years. Don't give me that bullshit
And I am well aware the Palestinians are violent and shit. So us the Israeli govt.

TNHarley you are about as intellectual as the innertube on your motorcycle front tire.

Your opinion of me changes with the discussion, dumbfuck. You are so dishonest..

Any friend of SONNY_FOKKING_CLARK is a moron.

 

[yiostheoy]

Why is it such a big deal anyways? Is it because of the doom and gloom from religious prophecies? Lol...
How much can people care about two groups of people that resort to terrorism and destruction constantly?

TNHarley you should have started this thread in the Flame Zone so that we could choose the STFU button on your statements.

If you were self aware, you would have killed yourself long ago.

Save it for the 4F, moron, you'll need all the points you can get.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

For those who did not care to read one of the links I posted:

The Deception of Palestinian Nationalism – Stanford Review

To understand the PLO’s conception of a Palestinian state, it is instructive to examine Article 24 of the original PLO Charter. It reads: “this Organization [the PLO] does not exercise any regional sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, in the Gaza Strip or the Himmah area.” If not the West Bank and Gaza, then what exactly what did, the PLO claim? The Palestine that the PLO wanted was in fact the State of Israel.

--------------
The Arabs were not demanding a return of Judea, Samaria (West Bank as named by the Hashemites in 1950)into "Palestinian" hands before 1967.

And today pro Palestinians cannot figure out why.

I don't know if it so much that they haven't bothered to read it so much as that hey are too stupid to understand it.

There is a famous letter to America by King Abdullah of Jorden written close to the time Israel achieved statehood. It is called "How the Arabs see the Jews", and contains the usual laundry list of grievances that supremacist Arabs level at anybody who isn't Arab. What it DOESN'T contain, however, is any reference to a Palestinian people, because, of course, no such identity existed at that time.

 

[TNHarley]

Dude, the Jews have been hated for thousands of years. Don't give me that bullshit
And I am well aware the Palestinians are violent and shit. So us the Israeli govt.

The Jews first appear in secular archaeology in 323 BCE in the history of Alexander The Great, as inscribed by Ptolemy one of his 4 greatest generals. Prior to this all we have is Jewish religious history in the Tenakh (Hebrew Old Testament). The Tenakh is consistent with other external archaeology as far back as the Hittites in 1300 BCE however. So whoever was transcribing the Tenakh during mid Roman Empire times was aware of the Hittites several thousand years before modern archaeologists rediscovered them again in the 1940's.

That the Jews were hated is not an accurate portrayal.

That they would not bow to Greek or Roman statues of gods was cause for unrest.

That they rebelled from Roman rule was cause for the sacking of Jerusalem.

That they persecuted and tried to exterminate early Christians with the cooperation of the Roman Emperors is why they were whipsawed after Constantine issued his edict of tolerance in 325 A.D.

The Catholic Church hated them for a while but eventually became tolerant.

Adolf took anti Semitism to a new level and managed to erase Judaism from most of Germany in about 5 years. In France, Italy, and the Balkans the Jews persisted however.

It is Adolf who is most responsible, together with Stalin, for the migrations of massive numbers of Jews to Palestine in the late 1940's.

So Adolf and Stalin unwittingly helped create the new State Of Israel.

And the Palestinians have hated them ever since.

Way to obliterate my post lol... :/

 

[Indeependent]

You can blame The New Testament for the Christian attitude towards Jews settling in Israel.
They are in heat for The Rapture.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Dude, the Jews have been hated for thousands of years. Don't give me that bullshit
And I am well aware the Palestinians are violent and shit. So us the Israeli govt.

The Jews first appear in secular archaeology in 323 BCE in the history of Alexander The Great, as inscribed by Ptolemy one of his 4 greatest generals. Prior to this all we have is Jewish religious history in the Tenakh (Hebrew Old Testament). The Tenakh is consistent with other external archaeology as far back as the Hittites in 1300 BCE however. So whoever was transcribing the Tenakh during mid Roman Empire times was aware of the Hittites several thousand years before modern archaeologists rediscovered them again in the 1940's.

That the Jews were hated is not an accurate portrayal.

That they would not bow to Greek or Roman statues of gods was cause for unrest.

That they rebelled from Roman rule was cause for the sacking of Jerusalem.

That they persecuted and tried to exterminate early Christians with the cooperation of the Roman Emperors is why they were whipsawed after Constantine issued his edict of tolerance in 325 A.D.

The Catholic Church hated them for a while but eventually became tolerant.

Adolf took anti Semitism to a new level and managed to erase Judaism from most of Germany in about 5 years. In France, Italy, and the Balkans the Jews persisted however.

It is Adolf who is most responsible, together with Stalin, for the migrations of massive numbers of Jews to Palestine in the late 1940's.

So Adolf and Stalin unwittingly helped create the new State Of Israel.

And the Palestinians have hated them ever since.

May I correct the point that the first mention of Jews (as Israel) appears here:

Merneptah Stele - Wikipedia

-----
Also let us not forget that about 200 years before, the leaders of the Jews (Israelites) were taken to Babylon. Is it not written in one Babylonian document or another?

I do not believe that Catholicism has ever stopped maligning Jews.
The Inquisition and the Pogroms before and after that event did not happen in a vacuum.

And the Palestinians, one will not find one document before the Mandate for Palestine which will mention the Arabs as Palestinians, just as the Jews and Druze and Bedouin, etc were also being mentioned as Palestinians during the Mandate until 1948.

Also, the State of Israel was going to happen despite the existence of Hitler and Stalin and what they did.

The decision to re-create sovereignty in the Land of Israel for all Jews began in 1892. That is what Zionism is. That is probably even before Hitler and Stalin were born.

Therefore there was "massive" Jewish migration back to their ancient homeland at least 50 years before WWII.

And all of it because the Jews could see that the Europeans were never going to respect them and treat them as equals. Why stay in a place which is not your homeland and where you are not wanted.

So, they started to migrate back to the Land of Israel, where many had already migrated from early 1800s, and even before that.

Jewish migration back to the Land of Israel has happened at every point when Jews were attacked, be it in Europe or in Muslim conquered land.

Palestinians are Arabs who recently acquired that identity.
For the purpose of bringing the Land of Israel back into Muslim hands.
Because the Muslims conquered all of that land and more for the last 1400 years.

And the Muslims want the part of Spain they once had. And Vienna. And every piece ever conquered by them for the past 1400 years.


There is no Israel/Palestinians conflict.

There is a "Jews are not allowed to be sovereign of their own ancient land" while there are any Muslims around issue.

No cry about Gaza or the "West Bank" between 1948 and 1967.

And too many people do not ask WHY ( ? )

 

[montelatici]

For those who did not care to read one of the links I posted:

The Deception of Palestinian Nationalism – Stanford Review

To understand the PLO’s conception of a Palestinian state, it is instructive to examine Article 24 of the original PLO Charter. It reads: “this Organization [the PLO] does not exercise any regional sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, in the Gaza Strip or the Himmah area.” If not the West Bank and Gaza, then what exactly what did, the PLO claim? The Palestine that the PLO wanted was in fact the State of Israel.

--------------
The Arabs were not demanding a return of Judea, Samaria (West Bank as named by the Hashemites in 1950)into "Palestinian" hands before 1967.

And today pro Palestinians cannot figure out why.

I don't know if it so much that they haven't bothered to read it so much as that hey are too stupid to understand it.

There is a famous letter to America by King Abdullah of Jorden written close to the time Israel achieved statehood. It is called "How the Arabs see the Jews", and contains the usual laundry list of grievances that supremacist Arabs level at anybody who isn't Arab. What it DOESN'T contain, however, is any reference to a Palestinian people, because, of course, no such identity existed at that time.

There is a famous letter from 1922 that blows your bullshit propaganda to smithereens:

PALESTINE.
​

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.​

​

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:​

​

PUBLISHED BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE.
To be purchased directly from H.M. STATIONERY OFFICE, at the
following address:
Adastra House, Kingsway, London, W.C. 2; 120, George Street, Edinburgh:
York Street, Manchester; 1, St. Andre's Crescent, Cardiff;
15, Donegall Square West, Belfast; or through any Bookseller​

​

1922.
[Reprinted 1929]
Price 1s. od.net.
​

".........Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.

If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration..."

https://unispal.un.org/DPA/DPR/unispal.nsf/0/48A7E5584EE1403485256CD8006C3FBE

​

 

[Sixties Fan]

Dude, the Jews have been hated for thousands of years. Don't give me that bullshit
And I am well aware the Palestinians are violent and shit. So us the Israeli govt.

The Jews first appear in secular archaeology in 323 BCE in the history of Alexander The Great, as inscribed by Ptolemy one of his 4 greatest generals. Prior to this all we have is Jewish religious history in the Tenakh (Hebrew Old Testament). The Tenakh is consistent with other external archaeology as far back as the Hittites in 1300 BCE however. So whoever was transcribing the Tenakh during mid Roman Empire times was aware of the Hittites several thousand years before modern archaeologists rediscovered them again in the 1940's.

That the Jews were hated is not an accurate portrayal.

That they would not bow to Greek or Roman statues of gods was cause for unrest.

That they rebelled from Roman rule was cause for the sacking of Jerusalem.

That they persecuted and tried to exterminate early Christians with the cooperation of the Roman Emperors is why they were whipsawed after Constantine issued his edict of tolerance in 325 A.D.

The Catholic Church hated them for a while but eventually became tolerant.

Adolf took anti Semitism to a new level and managed to erase Judaism from most of Germany in about 5 years. In France, Italy, and the Balkans the Jews persisted however.

It is Adolf who is most responsible, together with Stalin, for the migrations of massive numbers of Jews to Palestine in the late 1940's.

So Adolf and Stalin unwittingly helped create the new State Of Israel.

And the Palestinians have hated them ever since.

I also suggest you update your archeological knowledge.
There is definite proof of the existence of King David, and also King Solomon for those who wish to bother looking into it:

The Tel Dan Inscription: The First Historical Evidence of King David from the Bible - Biblical Archaeology Society

-----------
Until very recently, there was no evidence outside the Bible for the existence of King David. There are no references to him in Egyptian, Syrian or Assyrian documents of the time, and the many archaeological digs in the City of David failed to turn up so much as a mention of his name. Then, on July 21, 1993, a team of archaeologists led by Prof. Avraham Biran, excavating Tel Dan in the northern Galilee, found a triangular piece of basalt rock, measuring 23 x 36 cm. inscribed in Aramaic. It was subsequently identified as part of a victory pillar erected by the king of Syria and later smashed by an Israelite ruler. The inscription, which dates to the ninth century BCE, that is to say, about a century after David was thought to have ruled Israel, includes the words Beit David ("House" or "Dynasty" of David"). It is the first near-contemporaneous reference to David ever found. It is not conclusive; but it does strongly indicate that a king called David established a dynasty in Israel during the relevant period.

Another piece of significant evidence comes from Dr. Avi Ofer's archaeological survey conducted in the hills of Judea during the last decade, which shows that in the 11th-10th centuries BCE, the population of Judah almost doubled compared to the preceding period. The so-called Rank Size Index (RSI), a method of analyzing the size and positioning of settlements to evaluate to what extent they were a self-contained group, indicates that during this period - David's supposed period - a strong centre of population existed at the edge of the region. Jerusalem is the most likely candidate for this centre.

To sum up the evidence then: in the tenth century BCE, a dynasty was established by David; the population doubled in the hill country of Judah, which acquired a strong central point, probably Jerusalem, a previously settled site that was important enough to be mentioned in Egyptian documents. These facts are certainly consistent with the biblical account; but, before examining the biblical version, we should consider the nature of the Bible and of the historical material it contains.

Myth and Reality of King David's Jerusalem

 

[Indeependent]

For those who did not care to read one of the links I posted:

The Deception of Palestinian Nationalism – Stanford Review

To understand the PLO’s conception of a Palestinian state, it is instructive to examine Article 24 of the original PLO Charter. It reads: “this Organization [the PLO] does not exercise any regional sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, in the Gaza Strip or the Himmah area.” If not the West Bank and Gaza, then what exactly what did, the PLO claim? The Palestine that the PLO wanted was in fact the State of Israel.

--------------
The Arabs were not demanding a return of Judea, Samaria (West Bank as named by the Hashemites in 1950)into "Palestinian" hands before 1967.

And today pro Palestinians cannot figure out why.

I don't know if it so much that they haven't bothered to read it so much as that hey are too stupid to understand it.

There is a famous letter to America by King Abdullah of Jorden written close to the time Israel achieved statehood. It is called "How the Arabs see the Jews", and contains the usual laundry list of grievances that supremacist Arabs level at anybody who isn't Arab. What it DOESN'T contain, however, is any reference to a Palestinian people, because, of course, no such identity existed at that time.

There is a famous letter from 1922 that blows your bullshit propaganda to smithereens:

PALESTINE.

CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.

Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:




PUBLISHED BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE.
To be purchased directly from H.M. STATIONERY OFFICE, at the
following address:
Adastra House, Kingsway, London, W.C. 2; 120, George Street, Edinburgh:
York Street, Manchester; 1, St. Andre's Crescent, Cardiff;
15, Donegall Square West, Belfast; or through any Bookseller


1922.
[Reprinted 1929]
Price 1s. od.net.
​

".........Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.

If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration..."

https://unispal.un.org/DPA/DPR/unispal.nsf/0/48A7E5584EE1403485256CD8006C3FBE

​

Your usual partial, out of context, document bullshit.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

​

Hey, Monte. Long time, no see.

How is life in the sleeper cell these days?

 

[louie888]

...So Adolf and Stalin unwittingly helped create the new State Of Israel.....

Nothing at all Adolph did was "unwittingly." He was working directly with the zionists.

https://www.amazon.com/51-Documents...Nazis/dp/1569804338&tag=ff0d01-20?tag=usmb-20

This is why we see so much overlapping behavior with the Germany's nazis and Israel's zionists.

 

[TNHarley]

Dude, the Jews have been hated for thousands of years. Don't give me that bullshit
And I am well aware the Palestinians are violent and shit. So us the Israeli govt.

The Jews first appear in secular archaeology in 323 BCE in the history of Alexander The Great, as inscribed by Ptolemy one of his 4 greatest generals. Prior to this all we have is Jewish religious history in the Tenakh (Hebrew Old Testament). The Tenakh is consistent with other external archaeology as far back as the Hittites in 1300 BCE however. So whoever was transcribing the Tenakh during mid Roman Empire times was aware of the Hittites several thousand years before modern archaeologists rediscovered them again in the 1940's.

That the Jews were hated is not an accurate portrayal.

That they would not bow to Greek or Roman statues of gods was cause for unrest.

That they rebelled from Roman rule was cause for the sacking of Jerusalem.

That they persecuted and tried to exterminate early Christians with the cooperation of the Roman Emperors is why they were whipsawed after Constantine issued his edict of tolerance in 325 A.D.

The Catholic Church hated them for a while but eventually became tolerant.

Adolf took anti Semitism to a new level and managed to erase Judaism from most of Germany in about 5 years. In France, Italy, and the Balkans the Jews persisted however.

It is Adolf who is most responsible, together with Stalin, for the migrations of massive numbers of Jews to Palestine in the late 1940's.

So Adolf and Stalin unwittingly helped create the new State Of Israel.

And the Palestinians have hated them ever since.

I also suggest you update your archeological knowledge.
There is definite proof of the existence of King David, and also King Solomon for those who wish to bother looking into it:

The Tel Dan Inscription: The First Historical Evidence of King David from the Bible - Biblical Archaeology Society

-----------
Until very recently, there was no evidence outside the Bible for the existence of King David. There are no references to him in Egyptian, Syrian or Assyrian documents of the time, and the many archaeological digs in the City of David failed to turn up so much as a mention of his name. Then, on July 21, 1993, a team of archaeologists led by Prof. Avraham Biran, excavating Tel Dan in the northern Galilee, found a triangular piece of basalt rock, measuring 23 x 36 cm. inscribed in Aramaic. It was subsequently identified as part of a victory pillar erected by the king of Syria and later smashed by an Israelite ruler. The inscription, which dates to the ninth century BCE, that is to say, about a century after David was thought to have ruled Israel, includes the words Beit David ("House" or "Dynasty" of David"). It is the first near-contemporaneous reference to David ever found. It is not conclusive; but it does strongly indicate that a king called David established a dynasty in Israel during the relevant period.

Another piece of significant evidence comes from Dr. Avi Ofer's archaeological survey conducted in the hills of Judea during the last decade, which shows that in the 11th-10th centuries BCE, the population of Judah almost doubled compared to the preceding period. The so-called Rank Size Index (RSI), a method of analyzing the size and positioning of settlements to evaluate to what extent they were a self-contained group, indicates that during this period - David's supposed period - a strong centre of population existed at the edge of the region. Jerusalem is the most likely candidate for this centre.

To sum up the evidence then: in the tenth century BCE, a dynasty was established by David; the population doubled in the hill country of Judah, which acquired a strong central point, probably Jerusalem, a previously settled site that was important enough to be mentioned in Egyptian documents. These facts are certainly consistent with the biblical account; but, before examining the biblical version, we should consider the nature of the Bible and of the historical material it contains.

Myth and Reality of King David's Jerusalem

That can't even be agreed upon in the scientific community. You will need something else besides the tel Dan

 

[Indeependent]

...So Adolf and Stalin unwittingly helped create the new State Of Israel.....

Nothing at all Adolph did was "unwittingly." He was working directly with the zionists.

View attachment 127164

51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis: Lenni Brenner: 9781569804339: Amazon.com: Books

This is why we see so much overlapping behavior with the Germany's nazis and Israel's zionists.

Look ma, an image!

 

[montelatici]

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

​

Hey, Monte. Long time, no see.

How is life in the sleeper cell these days?

Funny how the facts expose your bullshit. Are you ever going to give up bullshitting?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Dude, the Jews have been hated for thousands of years. Don't give me that bullshit
And I am well aware the Palestinians are violent and shit. So us the Israeli govt.

The Jews first appear in secular archaeology in 323 BCE in the history of Alexander The Great, as inscribed by Ptolemy one of his 4 greatest generals. Prior to this all we have is Jewish religious history in the Tenakh (Hebrew Old Testament). The Tenakh is consistent with other external archaeology as far back as the Hittites in 1300 BCE however. So whoever was transcribing the Tenakh during mid Roman Empire times was aware of the Hittites several thousand years before modern archaeologists rediscovered them again in the 1940's.

That the Jews were hated is not an accurate portrayal.

That they would not bow to Greek or Roman statues of gods was cause for unrest.

That they rebelled from Roman rule was cause for the sacking of Jerusalem.

That they persecuted and tried to exterminate early Christians with the cooperation of the Roman Emperors is why they were whipsawed after Constantine issued his edict of tolerance in 325 A.D.

The Catholic Church hated them for a while but eventually became tolerant.

Adolf took anti Semitism to a new level and managed to erase Judaism from most of Germany in about 5 years. In France, Italy, and the Balkans the Jews persisted however.

It is Adolf who is most responsible, together with Stalin, for the migrations of massive numbers of Jews to Palestine in the late 1940's.

So Adolf and Stalin unwittingly helped create the new State Of Israel.

And the Palestinians have hated them ever since.

I also suggest you update your archeological knowledge.
There is definite proof of the existence of King David, and also King Solomon for those who wish to bother looking into it:

The Tel Dan Inscription: The First Historical Evidence of King David from the Bible - Biblical Archaeology Society

-----------
Until very recently, there was no evidence outside the Bible for the existence of King David. There are no references to him in Egyptian, Syrian or Assyrian documents of the time, and the many archaeological digs in the City of David failed to turn up so much as a mention of his name. Then, on July 21, 1993, a team of archaeologists led by Prof. Avraham Biran, excavating Tel Dan in the northern Galilee, found a triangular piece of basalt rock, measuring 23 x 36 cm. inscribed in Aramaic. It was subsequently identified as part of a victory pillar erected by the king of Syria and later smashed by an Israelite ruler. The inscription, which dates to the ninth century BCE, that is to say, about a century after David was thought to have ruled Israel, includes the words Beit David ("House" or "Dynasty" of David"). It is the first near-contemporaneous reference to David ever found. It is not conclusive; but it does strongly indicate that a king called David established a dynasty in Israel during the relevant period.

Another piece of significant evidence comes from Dr. Avi Ofer's archaeological survey conducted in the hills of Judea during the last decade, which shows that in the 11th-10th centuries BCE, the population of Judah almost doubled compared to the preceding period. The so-called Rank Size Index (RSI), a method of analyzing the size and positioning of settlements to evaluate to what extent they were a self-contained group, indicates that during this period - David's supposed period - a strong centre of population existed at the edge of the region. Jerusalem is the most likely candidate for this centre.

To sum up the evidence then: in the tenth century BCE, a dynasty was established by David; the population doubled in the hill country of Judah, which acquired a strong central point, probably Jerusalem, a previously settled site that was important enough to be mentioned in Egyptian documents. These facts are certainly consistent with the biblical account; but, before examining the biblical version, we should consider the nature of the Bible and of the historical material it contains.

Myth and Reality of King David's Jerusalem

That can't even be agreed upon in the scientific community. You will need something else besides the tel Dan

Jews do not need anything to "prove" to others that they have their history.
Other people do not, neither does the Jewish Nation.

Proof abounds on the Land of Israel, being dug up every day.

That leaves haters like you............simply hating Jews even more.

What do Jews care about haters like you?

Not at all.

 

[louie888]

...That leaves haters like you............simply hating Jews even more....

Do ever question WHY so many people hate Jews?

...What do Jews care about haters like you?...

Well, for one, there was this guy named Hitler about 70 years ago... oh never mind...

 

[Indeependent]

...That leaves haters like you............simply hating Jews even more....

Do ever question WHY so many people hate Jews?

...What do Jews care about haters like you?...

Well, for one, there was this guy named Hitler about 70 years ago... oh never mind...

And I'm certain Hitler's soul is having a grand ole time at the moment.

 

[Hollie]

...So Adolf and Stalin unwittingly helped create the new State Of Israel.....

Nothing at all Adolph did was "unwittingly." He was working directly with the zionists.

View attachment 127164

51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis: Lenni Brenner: 9781569804339: Amazon.com: Books

This is why we see so much overlapping behavior with the Germany's nazis and Israel's zionists.

That's the same conspiracy theory tripe you have cut and pasted multiple times across multiple threads.

 

[Indeependent]

...That leaves haters like you............simply hating Jews even more....

Do ever question WHY so many people hate Jews?

...What do Jews care about haters like you?...

Well, for one, there was this guy named Hitler about 70 years ago... oh never mind...

Speaking of which, Hitler would have had you murdered.