JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,527
- 2,165
- Banned
- #21
The OP is an atttack on the cred of WaPo, but the OP fails to give us any hard facts.there is a basic truth argument and that is if you want someone to accept your proof and change his or her mind about something you need to have a reputation where you are trusted.
so know we have the Wahington Post (besides others) trying to convince those people that think Trump dd the right thing by pulling out of the Iran deal to reconsider our position and we are suppose to reconsider our opinion because they (the Washington Post) writes a so -called (by them) truthful and fact checked article on why the Iran deal was good. The problem with the position of the Washington Post (and many other sources) is that they have been caught in numerous (I mean lots and lots) of lies. So in reading their so-called fact based article I keep asking myself well they said that such and such was fact based and that turned out to be untrue.
sources like the Washington Post can not have it both ways: If you consistantly lie then I am not going to believe you.
this logic has also escaped James Comey who told us that he had performed a legimate investigation of Hilliaary Clintons e mail and it is his considered professional opinion that no reasonable prosecutor would try this case. Yet we found out all kinds of mistakes or errors that comey made including failing to interview Hiliary before writing his opinion. So now Comey wants us to believe him,.. Sorry Jim it does not work that way
I think it will be much easier for every factual and honest personality to believe Comey over the OP>