Zone1 HYPOCRISY: In The End Ayn Rand Revealed Her True Self And It Was Not Pretty or Objective

[Robert W]

Some people know. I was doxed before they had a name for it. I've been thinking of sending people like to link on a blog/website I'm developing.

Like, love, or trust you .. I fear very little. I've aged like a fine wine.

You?

btw, that image is moi

Isn't it difficult for you to remark that Ayn Rand used an author form of name when you also use yours?

 

[Dante]

Isn't it difficult for you to remark that Ayn Rand used an author form of name when you also use yours?

I'm not applying for benefits. We are on a WWW Message Board. I seriously thought you'd acknowledge the difference.

You've actually accomplished something few people online could even approach -- you've disappointed Dante.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Thank you, Dante.

My thread on Ayn Rand was closed, erroneously imo, because supposedly it was not cited in the OP.

Rand was a hypocrite.

 

[TNHarley]

Boy! What leaps and jumps you're capable of. Of course she had to if she did not get divorc=ced and go back to her maiden name.

The ultimate irony: The woman who preached independence, ended up dependent. She never admitted it.

Dante posted:
While she often used the pseudonym "Ayn Rand" for her professional writing, the government records utilized her legal name.
So, what the eff are you on about? You did not catch Dante misleading, like you are well known to do.

But the thing here is most people who knew of her would NEVER have expected her to be collecting. She knew that. Most people did not associate her marriage name with Ayn Rand the personality. Why would somebody make teh connection back then?

She was hiding. Why wasn't a huge public story at the time? She never held back on crap before. She was embarrassed she'd be found out as a fraud.

Don't forget her pal:

Ayn Rand did not have to take her SS and Medicare. If she actually stood by her cherished principles, which she used to beat other people unmercifully, she would have done what a friend of hers did: refuse to accept the Socialistic payments

THAT IS THE POINT HERE. And TNHarley knows it.

Her principled friends Rose Wilder Lane and Isabel Paterson, both rejected Social Security

She paid into the system, you retard. She was receiving her own money back.

 

[ding]

What are you rambling on about here?

It does not fit in with...

never mind

Your idiocy in thinking Ayn Rand was conspiring to hide taking SS benefits. Taking SS benefits fits in totally with her dogma of the "Virtue of Selfishness."

 

[ding]

Rand was a hypocrite.

Who isn't? Sometimes. I disagree with most of what she believed but she nailed libertarians.

 

[ding]

View attachment 1255468

~S~

Like I wrote earlier today... "I disagree with most of what she believed." One of which is the "Virtue of Selfishness."

Virtue is the greatest organizing principle known to mankind. Greed... not so much. But alas... we live in a Darwinian world. Which is why it's so surprising so many people rail against it while embracing it themselves. I guess what's good for the goose isn't good for the gander. Who knew.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Empathy is the most ennobling virtue of mankind.

 

[Dante]

Who isn't? Sometimes. I disagree with most of what she believed but she nailed libertarians.

Lame.

That's like comparing a child sneaking a cookie from the cookie jar, with a violent Bank Robber.

 

[Dante]

She paid into the system, you retard. She was receiving her own money back.

Unlike her pals, she was a hypocrite. Stop ignoring the relevant facts, just so you can defend that old hag.

 

[TNHarley]

Unlike her pals, she was a hypocrite. Stop ignoring the relevant facts, just so you can defend that old hag.

The relevant fact is, she was getting HER money back.

 

[Dante]

The relevant fact is, she was getting HER money back.

With Social Security, people do not get their money back.

No, Social Security does not function as a personal savings account where your contributions are held for you. Instead, FICA taxes paid today go immediately toward funding current beneficiaries (a pay-as-you-go system). While you do not get your specific contributions back, you generally get a stream of income during retirement.

• Not a Personal Account: There is no "bucket of money" with your name on it.

Under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), both the employer and employee share the cost of Social Security, with the employer responsible for matching the employee's contribution of 6.2% of taxable wages, totaling 12.4%. Employers are legally required to withhold this tax from employee paychecks and remit it to the IRS.

 

[TNHarley]

With Social Security, people do not get their money back.



Under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), both the employer and employee share the cost of Social Security, with the employer responsible for matching the employee's contribution of 6.2% of taxable wages, totaling 12.4%. Employers are legally required to withhold this tax from employee paychecks and remit it to the IRS.

omg

 

[ding]

Lame.

That's like comparing a child sneaking a cookie from the cookie jar, with a violent Bank Robber.

How so?

 

[Dante]

How so?

Not sure why you are so hung up on that

Are you okay?

 

[ding]

Not sure why you are so hung up on that

Are you okay?

Yeah, I'm fine. I'm trying to understand your reasoning. You blurt out things and expect others to accept them without question. I don't work that way.

 

[Robert W]

I'm not applying for benefits.

Not now. Will you reject benefits?

 

[Dante]

Not now. Will you reject benefits?

I already receive benefits. So I am not applying. Not sure what you believe y life has to do with the hypocrisy of Ayn Rand?

 

[ding]

I already receive benefits. So I am not applying. Not sure what you believe y life has to do with the hypocrisy of Ayn Rand?

What if I don't need the money but take it anyway?

 

[Dante]

What if I don't need the money but take it anyway?

Are you Ayn Rand?