Hypocrisy- a virtue of the left

[daws101]

your husband if not using the facilities is invading anyone who is using them right to privacy no matter the gender.
the other problem is your lack of courage ,
it's an insult to more independent women.

He will pee right beside the other dudes with dicks. Now what's the problem?

in a women's rest room it's all stalls so you'd be alone anyway unless you need him to wipe for you .

Hold on buckwheat. If men are allowed to use them, city code will likely allow urinals, some may mandate them

nope ! if it's transgender compliant no urinals will be needed .
men can pee sitting ,you do it all the time. alfalfa ...
strike one!

Will there be a law that says they have to sit down?

do you want one?

 

[WillowTree]

Ohhhhh, you get to make the codes now?

I think you understand very little.

never said that .
the codes are already in force and many progressive businesses have already made the change over .
the Indian casino my wife and I go to has had unisex restrooms for years .
just last sunday we used them because the " norma"l restrooms
were being refurbished .
there are no unrinals just toilets in stalls so no ones right to privacy is being compromised.

Make up your mind. Just a bit ago you said they were public restrooms and there was no expectation of privacy. So, which is it?

I'm not the one who's confused about the definition of privacy a standard stall is more than sufficient.
are you really this ignorant or do you work at it?

Is there or is there not an expectation of privacy in a public restroom?

it depends on your interpretation.
the kind of privacy you are expecting is a fantasy .

Privacy
Privacy is the ability of an individual or group to seclude themselves, or information about themselves, and thereby express themselves selectively. The boundaries and content of what is considered private differ among cultures and individuals, but share common themes. When something is private to a person, it usually means that something is inherently special or sensitive to them.

Oh goody. That means in public places we can take pictures!

 

[daws101]

never said that .
the codes are already in force and many progressive businesses have already made the change over .
the Indian casino my wife and I go to has had unisex restrooms for years .
just last sunday we used them because the " norma"l restrooms
were being refurbished .
there are no unrinals just toilets in stalls so no ones right to privacy is being compromised.

Make up your mind. Just a bit ago you said they were public restrooms and there was no expectation of privacy. So, which is it?

I'm not the one who's confused about the definition of privacy a standard stall is more than sufficient.
are you really this ignorant or do you work at it?

Is there or is there not an expectation of privacy in a public restroom?

it depends on your interpretation.
the kind of privacy you are expecting is a fantasy .

Privacy
Privacy is the ability of an individual or group to seclude themselves, or information about themselves, and thereby express themselves selectively. The boundaries and content of what is considered private differ among cultures and individuals, but share common themes. When something is private to a person, it usually means that something is inherently special or sensitive to them.

Oh goody. That means in public places we can take pictures!

who's the pervert again?
major chicken shit dodge too!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Of course the left will be unable to grasp it and if they do they won't acknowledge it


NC Representative Fires Back At PayPal Hypocrisy

North Carolina’s representatives are not backing down.

Last week saw the state’s Lieutenant Governor Dan Forest respond to PayPal’s announcement that they were suspending plans to expand their business in North Carolina, in objection to the recently passed bathroom bill. Lt. Governor Forest posted a photo of PayPal’s global operations center, which has clearly defined, gender-specific bathrooms.


The cultural Marxist crowd really are all about “Do as I say, not as I do.”

Not to be outdone, NC Representative Robert Pittenger issues this statement:

“PayPal does business in 25 countries where homosexual behavior is illegal, including 5 countries where the penalty is death, yet they object to the North Carolina legislature overturning a misguided ordinance about letting men in the women’s bathroom? Perhaps PayPal would like to try and clarify this seemingly very hypocritical position?”

NC Representative Fires Back At PayPal Hypocrisy | RedState

As with the other rightwing nitwit's thread on the same topic, this fails as a false comparison fallacy, and in no way constitutes "hypocrisy."

Get lost, if all you can do is screech "composition fallacy"...it's old worn out and tiresome, loon. Grab a clue, everyone makes fun of you over it...that also includes red herring fallacy. See how predictable you are?

Using the argumentum ad populum and argument from ignorance fallicies to rationalize her bullshit.

Is a "composition fallacy" similar to a "comparison fallacy" in "stupid" ?

Most on the right excel at composition fallacies as well – their wrongheaded, unwarranted attacks on Islam being ‘responsible’ for terrorism is the most obvious example.

And whether a conservative’s argument fails as a comparison fallacy or composition fallacy, it represents the stupidity common to most on the right – such as this thread.

 

[WillowTree]

I am going to buy a camera on a selfie stick to document this unisex shit!

 

[daws101]

several pages of the I might see a dick defense have been fun!

 

[daws101]

I am going to buy a camera on a selfie stick to document this unisex shit!

for you own masturbatory enjoyment or will you sell it to fox or Joel Osteen?

 

[Uncensored2008]

that's cause you're still an ignorant bigoted twit, willow.

good to know you haven't changed any

You know those men you invite into the womens room aren't there to look at you...

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

How do Paypal qualify as "Leftist" ? They arent a workers Co-operative.

That's your "loony" conservative logic..........

Yes "loony" Conservative logic is not wanting men in female bathrooms

Loony Leftist "logic" advocating that men should be allowed into female bathrooms

They are "transgender" - if it is a transgender female....it's not like having a "man" in the bathroom. You would be more at risk having another woman, a "lesbian" in the bathroom, as they do like other women, however, there have never been any reported crimes of a transgender trying to attack a straight in a bathroom, but conservatives live in la-la-land and have their own imaginations.

.




So how would you deal with straights or others claiming to be transgender to gain access? How will that work?

What’s amusing is that you and others on the right don’t even know how idiotic you sound.

There isn’t even a ‘plan’ to enforce this moronic law.

The Nation is laughing at NC, and those on the right who defend the bigotry and hate the state saw fit to codify, and appropriately so.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Of course the left will be unable to grasp it and if they do they won't acknowledge it


NC Representative Fires Back At PayPal Hypocrisy

North Carolina’s representatives are not backing down.

Last week saw the state’s Lieutenant Governor Dan Forest respond to PayPal’s announcement that they were suspending plans to expand their business in North Carolina, in objection to the recently passed bathroom bill. Lt. Governor Forest posted a photo of PayPal’s global operations center, which has clearly defined, gender-specific bathrooms.


The cultural Marxist crowd really are all about “Do as I say, not as I do.”

Not to be outdone, NC Representative Robert Pittenger issues this statement:

“PayPal does business in 25 countries where homosexual behavior is illegal, including 5 countries where the penalty is death, yet they object to the North Carolina legislature overturning a misguided ordinance about letting men in the women’s bathroom? Perhaps PayPal would like to try and clarify this seemingly very hypocritical position?”

NC Representative Fires Back At PayPal Hypocrisy | RedState

As with the other rightwing nitwit's thread on the same topic, this fails as a false comparison fallacy, and in no way constitutes "hypocrisy."

Get lost, if all you can do is screech "composition fallacy"...it's old worn out and tiresome, loon. Grab a clue, everyone makes fun of you over it...that also includes red herring fallacy. See how predictable you are?

Using the argumentum ad populum and argument from ignorance fallicies to rationalize her bullshit.

Is a "composition fallacy" similar to a "comparison fallacy" in "stupid" ?

Most on the right excel at composition fallacies as well – their wrongheaded, unwarranted attacks on Islam being ‘responsible’ for terrorism is the most obvious example.

And whether a conservative’s argument fails as a comparison fallacy or composition fallacy, it represents the stupidity common to most on the right – such as this thread.

You're stuck on stupid...and fallacy. You realize you're sort of a joke spewing that all the time or are you not reading responses before you run away?

 

[daws101]

that's cause you're still an ignorant bigoted twit, willow.

good to know you haven't changed any

You know those men you invite into the womens room aren't there to look at you...

how bout the ones you invite? tube o lube in hand.

 

[daws101]

As with the other rightwing nitwit's thread on the same topic, this fails as a false comparison fallacy, and in no way constitutes "hypocrisy."

Get lost, if all you can do is screech "composition fallacy"...it's old worn out and tiresome, loon. Grab a clue, everyone makes fun of you over it...that also includes red herring fallacy. See how predictable you are?

Using the argumentum ad populum and argument from ignorance fallicies to rationalize her bullshit.

Is a "composition fallacy" similar to a "comparison fallacy" in "stupid" ?

Most on the right excel at composition fallacies as well – their wrongheaded, unwarranted attacks on Islam being ‘responsible’ for terrorism is the most obvious example.

And whether a conservative’s argument fails as a comparison fallacy or composition fallacy, it represents the stupidity common to most on the right – such as this thread.

You're stuck on stupid...and fallacy. You realize you're sort of a joke spewing that all the time or are you not reading responses before you run away?

constantly repeating bullshit will never make it true ....

 

[WillowTree]

How do Paypal qualify as "Leftist" ? They arent a workers Co-operative.

That's your "loony" conservative logic..........

Yes "loony" Conservative logic is not wanting men in female bathrooms

Loony Leftist "logic" advocating that men should be allowed into female bathrooms

They are "transgender" - if it is a transgender female....it's not like having a "man" in the bathroom. You would be more at risk having another woman, a "lesbian" in the bathroom, as they do like other women, however, there have never been any reported crimes of a transgender trying to attack a straight in a bathroom, but conservatives live in la-la-land and have their own imaginations.

.




So how would you deal with straights or others claiming to be transgender to gain access? How will that work?

What’s amusing is that you and others on the right don’t even know how idiotic you sound.

There isn’t even a ‘plan’ to enforce this moronic law.

The Nation is laughing at NC, and those on the right who defend the bigotry and hate the state saw fit to codify, and appropriately so.

So, you have no problem with my male husband accompanying me to the women's restroom. Correct?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

How can you live in a nation and deny people their rights to exist in the spirit of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence?

Nobody—at least on my side—is trying to deny anyone's right to exist.

We just don't want our mothers, daughters, sisters, wives, and other female loved ones to be compelled to share restroom and dressing facilities with creepy male perverts. And there is nothing in the Declaration of Independence, nor in the Constitution, that suggests that women should have to put up with such violations of their safety and modesty.

Straw man fallacy, red herring fallacy – more ignorance and bigotry from the right.

The Fifth Amendment’s Liberty Clause guarantees each American the right to decide for himself how best to conduct his life, to express himself as an individual, and to express his individual liberty, immune from unwarranted attack by government.

And the 14th Amendment’s Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses prohibit state and local governments from likewise violating the right of citizens to engage in free expression and individual liberty.

The state of North Carolina has sought to disadvantage transgender Americans for no other reason than who they are, predicated solely on fear, ignorance, and hate.

And to conceal this bigotry and hate state lawmakers and their apologists on the right contrived this ridiculous ‘restroom’ façade, yet another example of the demagoguery and propensity to lie common to most on the right.

 

[Uncensored2008]

^ has the op made a substantive post in the thread yet..?

^ has the Rati sock made a substantive post on the board, ever?

 

[Uncensored2008]

how bout the ones you invite? tube o lube in hand.

Fantasizing while touching yourself again, duhs!

 

[WillowTree]

How can you live in a nation and deny people their rights to exist in the spirit of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence?

Nobody—at least on my side—is trying to deny anyone's right to exist.

We just don't want our mothers, daughters, sisters, wives, and other female loved ones to be compelled to share restroom and dressing facilities with creepy male perverts. And there is nothing in the Declaration of Independence, nor in the Constitution, that suggests that women should have to put up with such violations of their safety and modesty.

Straw man fallacy, red herring fallacy – more ignorance and bigotry from the right.

The Fifth Amendment’s Liberty Clause guarantees each American the right to decide for himself how best to conduct his life, to express himself as an individual, and to express his individual liberty, immune from unwarranted attack by government.

And the 14th Amendment’s Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses prohibit state and local governments from likewise violating the right of citizens to engage in free expression and individual liberty.

The state of North Carolina has sought to disadvantage transgender Americans for no other reason than who they are, predicated solely on fear, ignorance, and hate.

And to conceal this bigotry and hate state lawmakers and their apologists on the right contrived this ridiculous ‘restroom’ façade, yet another example of the demagoguery and propensity to lie common to most on the right.

So this means you have no problem with my male husband going with me to the women's restroom if that makes him happy? Correct?

 

[daws101]

how bout the ones you invite? tube o lube in hand.

Fantasizing while touching yourself again, duhs!

No but you must be.

 

[daws101]

How can you live in a nation and deny people their rights to exist in the spirit of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence?

Nobody—at least on my side—is trying to deny anyone's right to exist.

We just don't want our mothers, daughters, sisters, wives, and other female loved ones to be compelled to share restroom and dressing facilities with creepy male perverts. And there is nothing in the Declaration of Independence, nor in the Constitution, that suggests that women should have to put up with such violations of their safety and modesty.

Straw man fallacy, red herring fallacy – more ignorance and bigotry from the right.

The Fifth Amendment’s Liberty Clause guarantees each American the right to decide for himself how best to conduct his life, to express himself as an individual, and to express his individual liberty, immune from unwarranted attack by government.

And the 14th Amendment’s Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses prohibit state and local governments from likewise violating the right of citizens to engage in free expression and individual liberty.

The state of North Carolina has sought to disadvantage transgender Americans for no other reason than who they are, predicated solely on fear, ignorance, and hate.

And to conceal this bigotry and hate state lawmakers and their apologists on the right contrived this ridiculous ‘restroom’ façade, yet another example of the demagoguery and propensity to lie common to most on the right.

So this means you have no problem with my male husband going with me to the women's restroom if that makes him happy? Correct?

He said nothing either way .
Why would you need your husband in the restroom anyway.
You've given no logical answer to that question .
If your hubby needs to be in a restroom with you to be happy , the amount of issues he has with other things must be staggering

 

[Moonglow]

How can you live in a nation and deny people their rights to exist in the spirit of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence?

Nobody—at least on my side—is trying to deny anyone's right to exist.

We just don't want our mothers, daughters, sisters, wives, and other female loved ones to be compelled to share restroom and dressing facilities with creepy male perverts. And there is nothing in the Declaration of Independence, nor in the Constitution, that suggests that women should have to put up with such violations of their safety and modesty.

Straw man fallacy, red herring fallacy – more ignorance and bigotry from the right.

The Fifth Amendment’s Liberty Clause guarantees each American the right to decide for himself how best to conduct his life, to express himself as an individual, and to express his individual liberty, immune from unwarranted attack by government.

And the 14th Amendment’s Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses prohibit state and local governments from likewise violating the right of citizens to engage in free expression and individual liberty.

The state of North Carolina has sought to disadvantage transgender Americans for no other reason than who they are, predicated solely on fear, ignorance, and hate.

And to conceal this bigotry and hate state lawmakers and their apologists on the right contrived this ridiculous ‘restroom’ façade, yet another example of the demagoguery and propensity to lie common to most on the right.

So this means you have no problem with my male husband going with me to the women's restroom if that makes him happy? Correct?

He said nothing either way .
Why would you need your husband in the restroom anyway.
You've given no logical answer to that question .
If your hubby needs to be in a restroom with you to be happy , the amount of issues he has with other things must be staggering

Damn flea markets, garage sales and shopping centers..