Hunter Biden Story Disappearing....

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
70,105
Reaction score
12,170
Points
2,210
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
 

Gary Lee

Active Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2020
Messages
188
Reaction score
118
Points
43
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Dumbfuck, you morons LIED about "Russian Collusion." Your own Grand Inquisitor had to admit it.

Russia has interfered in every election since 1918. But the interference by Russia is miniscule in comparison to the MASSIVE election tampering by Facebook and Twitter on behalf of the filthy democrats.

Oh, and your country interferes as well.

:cuckoo:
It always amazes me how brave with the name calling & insults some of you lefties get when you can hide behind a keyboard.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
70,105
Reaction score
12,170
Points
2,210
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Dumbfuck, you morons LIED about "Russian Collusion." Your own Grand Inquisitor had to admit it.

Russia has interfered in every election since 1918. But the interference by Russia is miniscule in comparison to the MASSIVE election tampering by Facebook and Twitter on behalf of the filthy democrats.

Oh, and your country interferes as well.

:cuckoo:
It always amazes me how brave with the name calling & insults some of you lefties get when you can hide behind a keyboard.
Oh? You don't see the same from the right?
 

Beef_Supreme

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
1,569
Points
1,908
Now Tucker Swanson Carlson is backtracking!


It's over, folks.

He is saying that the focus shouldn’t be in hunter Biden and his constant fuck ups.
As more and more is released, the point is not to keep showing what a fuck up hunter Biden is, but you keep showing more and more examples of stuff that you got off the VERY REAL hard drive. The VERY REAL HARDDRIVE tgat cintains the VERY REAL EMAILS showing “the big guy” Hoe Hidin getting money from foreign governments, laundered through a son hunter.
He doesn’t want people to do what you guys do, and wiggle out of it by switching the focus to hunter, and say dumb shit like “good thing we aren’t electing hunter”, trying to shift the focus away yet more evidence of Hoe Hidin’s corruption.
But again, I’m not telling you this to correct you. Not really. I’m clowning on you, as most in this thread have been doing since the start.
 

Unkotare

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
94,484
Reaction score
9,979
Points
2,030
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Dumbfuck, you morons LIED about "Russian Collusion." Your own Grand Inquisitor had to admit it.

Russia has interfered in every election since 1918. But the interference by Russia is miniscule in comparison to the MASSIVE election tampering by Facebook and Twitter on behalf of the filthy democrats.

Oh, and your country interferes as well.

:cuckoo:
It always amazes me how brave with the name calling & insults some of you lefties get when you can hide behind a keyboard.
Uh-oh! Tough guy moment coming!
 
OP
candycorn

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
69,765
Reaction score
12,736
Points
2,180
So much for that legend....
Hunter Biden's business partner already confirmed the legitimacy of their activities. The only reason the story would "go away" is because of dishonest and dishonorable people like yourself in the media and the government who care more about your political party than your country.
Oh...you mean the guy who waited 3 years to come forward...just in time for an election?

Rrrrrrriiiiiight
He came forward when your candidate started smearing him as being another "Russian" stooge. The man happens to be a lifelong Democratic donor and friend to the Bidens.

The bottom line is he validated these communications. The Senate Intelligence Committee validated the data as legitimate as did the Director of Intelligence.

You supported impeachment based on less evidence than this, so like I said, it's party before country with you people. No reason to deny the obvious.
I'm glad he was able to control his anger for 3 years..I know that must have been hard.

One of the threads on this board you "moderate" also said Bullshitinsky made recordings....are you sure he was a "friend"?


Making the assumption you have friends, do you often record them without their knowledge?

As for the Republican controlled Senate Intel committee...yeah...make me laugh harder.
 

Synthaholic

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
47,656
Reaction score
8,813
Points
2,030
Location
Kicking PoliticalChic's ass up & down the forum

Synthaholic

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
47,656
Reaction score
8,813
Points
2,030
Location
Kicking PoliticalChic's ass up & down the forum
OP
candycorn

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
69,765
Reaction score
12,736
Points
2,180
So much for that legend....

The manufactured evidence never elevated into the realm of believability. That a computer repair guy would first go through someone's laptop...THEN hand it over to the FBI (not just call the local police)...THEN hand a copy to Rudy Guliani's lawyer....it is straight out of a bad Hollywood script.

Here is the story that lays out the above chain of custody.


When you read this dude's words...you have less confidence (if possible) that this is legit....

“When you’re afraid that you don’t know anything about the depth of the waters that you’re in, you kind of, you want to find a lifeguard.”

Sounds like he botched a line he was fed.

Anyway..the story is fading into the ether... Good.
Apparently you didn't see the Tucker Carlson interview with Bobulinski just a day ago did you? He had 7 MILLION viewers for that episode.

Believe me, this story is anything but dead.
A mediocre football game had 11M views. Nobody except right wing losers like yourself believe this bullshit story. You're much like the 9/11 truthers in that sense....its a circular confirmation community you've set up.

The FBI--ran by the blob--has had this laptop for a while. Where are the indictments.
You're now going to say that the FBI is corrupt and isn't doing their job.

The LapTop repair guy didn't call the Wilmington Police or the Delaware State Police...he calls the FBI on this?
You're not going to say this move is absurd because it would cast doubt on the whole story when we all know it is.

The LapTop repair guy not only went through the files of one of his customers but decided he was going to make copies of the hard drive.
Again, you're not going to call this behavior what it is (totally out of line) because again, it would cast doubt on the whole story....precisely zero legitimate repair businesses would do this.

The LapTop repair guy not only doesn't call the local police, not only makes copies of a laptop's hard drive of one of his customers, but hands the copies to Rudy Guliani of all people.
For a third time, you're not going to state that this is completely bizarre because, well, you want to tarnish Biden's candidacy.

I could go on and on about Bullshitinsky making recordings, holding onto evidence for three years before becoming "outraged", etc...but there isn't a point.

Like 9/11 truthers, you will believe ANYTHING that shows the Bidens in a bad light.

You don't do this out of any sort of belief system. It is because you're stupid.
 

Tipsycatlover

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Messages
43,740
Reaction score
16,199
Points
2,290
So much for that legend....

The manufactured evidence never elevated into the realm of believability. That a computer repair guy would first go through someone's laptop...THEN hand it over to the FBI (not just call the local police)...THEN hand a copy to Rudy Guliani's lawyer....it is straight out of a bad Hollywood script.

Here is the story that lays out the above chain of custody.


When you read this dude's words...you have less confidence (if possible) that this is legit....

“When you’re afraid that you don’t know anything about the depth of the waters that you’re in, you kind of, you want to find a lifeguard.”

Sounds like he botched a line he was fed.

Anyway..the story is fading into the ether... Good.
most networks were advised to not discuss this or televise it because if Biden won they would never have access to him.
What we have here is a criminal coverup and the media should be destroyed over their treachery
B.S.
The story leaves out a few important details. The repairman did not call in the FBI because of emails. It was because of photographs of compromised children. When the FBI didn't get back to him, the repairman called Guiliani.
 

Beef_Supreme

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
1,569
Points
1,908
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
70,105
Reaction score
12,170
Points
2,210
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
 

Beef_Supreme

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
1,569
Points
1,908
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
Fair enough.
I would dispute what you say caused the investigation. It wasn’t russian hacking, it was alleged Russia interference/collusion, whic we now know what made up by the Hillary clique, discussed with Obama officials, the Christopher Steele was paid to put together that bullshit dossiers, which was then shopped around and used as justification to get warrants on the Trump campaign. But the fbi knew the dossier was garbage, they chose to lie to the fisa courts anyway, on multiple occasions.
See, the IG said the warrants were obtained improperly, which we already knew and was all but proven at that point. But he conspicuously stopped there. He didn’t say “and why did the fbi lie to get these warrants, and other people subsequently lie to get more warrants, and keep extending the surveillanceHe didn’t bother, because doing so would implicate a shit load of Obama administration officials, Hillary Clinton, head of the fbi, cia, etc is illegally spying on a lolitical opponent when Trump was just a candidate, and then what could be called treason in staging a coup against a sitting president.
he didn’t bother to ask motive. He just simply stopped with “that wasn’t proper procedure... tisk tisk”.
Once again... they were all let off the hook.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
70,105
Reaction score
12,170
Points
2,210
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
Fair enough.
I would dispute what you say caused the investigation. It wasn’t russian hacking, it was alleged Russia interference/collusion, whic we now know what made up by the Hillary clique, discussed with Obama officials, the Christopher Steele was paid to put together that bullshit dossiers, which was then shopped around and used as justification to get warrants on the Trump campaign. But the fbi knew the dossier was garbage, they chose to lie to the fisa courts anyway, on multiple occasions.
See, the IG said the warrants were obtained improperly, which we already knew and was all but proven at that point. But he conspicuously stopped there. He didn’t say “and why did the fbi lie to get these warrants, and other people subsequently lie to get more warrants, and keep extending the surveillanceHe didn’t bother, because doing so would implicate a shit load of Obama administration officials, Hillary Clinton, head of the fbi, cia, etc is illegally spying on a lolitical opponent when Trump was just a candidate, and then what could be called treason in staging a coup against a sitting president.
he didn’t bother to ask motive. He just simply stopped with “that wasn’t proper procedure... tisk tisk”.
Once again... they were all let off the hook.
No, it was absolutely Russian hacking. That is not even in dispute.

 
OP
candycorn

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
69,765
Reaction score
12,736
Points
2,180
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
Fair enough.
I would dispute what you say caused the investigation. It wasn’t russian hacking, it was alleged Russia interference/collusion, whic we now know what made up by the Hillary clique, discussed with Obama officials, the Christopher Steele was paid to put together that bullshit dossiers, which was then shopped around and used as justification to get warrants on the Trump campaign. But the fbi knew the dossier was garbage, they chose to lie to the fisa courts anyway, on multiple occasions.
See, the IG said the warrants were obtained improperly, which we already knew and was all but proven at that point. But he conspicuously stopped there. He didn’t say “and why did the fbi lie to get these warrants, and other people subsequently lie to get more warrants, and keep extending the surveillanceHe didn’t bother, because doing so would implicate a shit load of Obama administration officials, Hillary Clinton, head of the fbi, cia, etc is illegally spying on a lolitical opponent when Trump was just a candidate, and then what could be called treason in staging a coup against a sitting president.
he didn’t bother to ask motive. He just simply stopped with “that wasn’t proper procedure... tisk tisk”.
Once again... they were all let off the hook.
No, it was absolutely Russian hacking. That is not even in dispute.


It details the contact between Russian Intel and Trump's campaign.

And this comes from the GOP dominated Senate intelligence committee.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
70,105
Reaction score
12,170
Points
2,210
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
Fair enough.
I would dispute what you say caused the investigation. It wasn’t russian hacking, it was alleged Russia interference/collusion, whic we now know what made up by the Hillary clique, discussed with Obama officials, the Christopher Steele was paid to put together that bullshit dossiers, which was then shopped around and used as justification to get warrants on the Trump campaign. But the fbi knew the dossier was garbage, they chose to lie to the fisa courts anyway, on multiple occasions.
See, the IG said the warrants were obtained improperly, which we already knew and was all but proven at that point. But he conspicuously stopped there. He didn’t say “and why did the fbi lie to get these warrants, and other people subsequently lie to get more warrants, and keep extending the surveillanceHe didn’t bother, because doing so would implicate a shit load of Obama administration officials, Hillary Clinton, head of the fbi, cia, etc is illegally spying on a lolitical opponent when Trump was just a candidate, and then what could be called treason in staging a coup against a sitting president.
he didn’t bother to ask motive. He just simply stopped with “that wasn’t proper procedure... tisk tisk”.
Once again... they were all let off the hook.
No, it was absolutely Russian hacking. That is not even in dispute.


It details the contact between Russian Intel and Trump's campaign.

And this comes from the GOP dominated Senate intelligence committee.
But it doesn't show the Trump campaign participated. On top of which, Mueller investigated the matter and reached the same conclusion -- that Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary's campaign chairman; but that neither Trump nor his associates conspired with the Russian hackers.
 

Dale Smith

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
23,440
Reaction score
8,271
Points
910
Location
Dallas, Texas
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
Fair enough.
I would dispute what you say caused the investigation. It wasn’t russian hacking, it was alleged Russia interference/collusion, whic we now know what made up by the Hillary clique, discussed with Obama officials, the Christopher Steele was paid to put together that bullshit dossiers, which was then shopped around and used as justification to get warrants on the Trump campaign. But the fbi knew the dossier was garbage, they chose to lie to the fisa courts anyway, on multiple occasions.
See, the IG said the warrants were obtained improperly, which we already knew and was all but proven at that point. But he conspicuously stopped there. He didn’t say “and why did the fbi lie to get these warrants, and other people subsequently lie to get more warrants, and keep extending the surveillanceHe didn’t bother, because doing so would implicate a shit load of Obama administration officials, Hillary Clinton, head of the fbi, cia, etc is illegally spying on a lolitical opponent when Trump was just a candidate, and then what could be called treason in staging a coup against a sitting president.
he didn’t bother to ask motive. He just simply stopped with “that wasn’t proper procedure... tisk tisk”.
Once again... they were all let off the hook.
No, it was absolutely Russian hacking. That is not even in dispute.


It details the contact between Russian Intel and Trump's campaign.

And this comes from the GOP dominated Senate intelligence committee.
But it doesn't show the Trump campaign participated. On top of which, Mueller investigated the matter and reached the same conclusion -- that Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary's campaign chairman; but that neither Trump nor his associates conspired with the Russian hackers.
Stupid lil faun, the pervert, none of the 17 three lettered alphabet agencies ever got to examine the DNC server and the Crowd Source owner even said under oath that they were only speculating that the ROOSKIES hacked it when it was Seth Rich that was BEHIND the firewall copied incriminating e-mails and passed them off to a British ambassador to give to Assange and Wikileaks, ya lying sack of miserable leftard shit.
 
OP
candycorn

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
69,765
Reaction score
12,736
Points
2,180
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
Fair enough.
I would dispute what you say caused the investigation. It wasn’t russian hacking, it was alleged Russia interference/collusion, whic we now know what made up by the Hillary clique, discussed with Obama officials, the Christopher Steele was paid to put together that bullshit dossiers, which was then shopped around and used as justification to get warrants on the Trump campaign. But the fbi knew the dossier was garbage, they chose to lie to the fisa courts anyway, on multiple occasions.
See, the IG said the warrants were obtained improperly, which we already knew and was all but proven at that point. But he conspicuously stopped there. He didn’t say “and why did the fbi lie to get these warrants, and other people subsequently lie to get more warrants, and keep extending the surveillanceHe didn’t bother, because doing so would implicate a shit load of Obama administration officials, Hillary Clinton, head of the fbi, cia, etc is illegally spying on a lolitical opponent when Trump was just a candidate, and then what could be called treason in staging a coup against a sitting president.
he didn’t bother to ask motive. He just simply stopped with “that wasn’t proper procedure... tisk tisk”.
Once again... they were all let off the hook.
No, it was absolutely Russian hacking. That is not even in dispute.


It details the contact between Russian Intel and Trump's campaign.

And this comes from the GOP dominated Senate intelligence committee.
But it doesn't show the Trump campaign participated. On top of which, Mueller investigated the matter and reached the same conclusion -- that Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary's campaign chairman; but that neither Trump nor his associates conspired with the Russian hackers.
You're only citing volume 1. Try volume 5:

" (U) The Committee's bipartisan Report found that Paul Manafort, while he was Chairman of the Trump Campaign, was secretly communicating with a Russian intelligence officer with whom he discussed Campaign strategy and repeatedly shared internal Campaign polling data. "

1604033214409.png



Thats on page 943.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top