Hunter Biden Story Disappearing....

Dale Smith

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
23,513
Reaction score
8,370
Points
910
Location
Dallas, Texas
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
Fair enough.
I would dispute what you say caused the investigation. It wasn’t russian hacking, it was alleged Russia interference/collusion, whic we now know what made up by the Hillary clique, discussed with Obama officials, the Christopher Steele was paid to put together that bullshit dossiers, which was then shopped around and used as justification to get warrants on the Trump campaign. But the fbi knew the dossier was garbage, they chose to lie to the fisa courts anyway, on multiple occasions.
See, the IG said the warrants were obtained improperly, which we already knew and was all but proven at that point. But he conspicuously stopped there. He didn’t say “and why did the fbi lie to get these warrants, and other people subsequently lie to get more warrants, and keep extending the surveillanceHe didn’t bother, because doing so would implicate a shit load of Obama administration officials, Hillary Clinton, head of the fbi, cia, etc is illegally spying on a lolitical opponent when Trump was just a candidate, and then what could be called treason in staging a coup against a sitting president.
he didn’t bother to ask motive. He just simply stopped with “that wasn’t proper procedure... tisk tisk”.
Once again... they were all let off the hook.
No, it was absolutely Russian hacking. That is not even in dispute.


It details the contact between Russian Intel and Trump's campaign.

And this comes from the GOP dominated Senate intelligence committee.
But it doesn't show the Trump campaign participated. On top of which, Mueller investigated the matter and reached the same conclusion -- that Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary's campaign chairman; but that neither Trump nor his associates conspired with the Russian hackers.
You're only citing volume 1. Try volume 5:

" (U) The Committee's bipartisan Report found that Paul Manafort, while he was Chairman of the Trump Campaign, was secretly communicating with a Russian intelligence officer with whom he discussed Campaign strategy and repeatedly shared internal Campaign polling data. "

View attachment 408587


Thats on page 943.
Paul Manafort and the Podesta brothers worked together. The Podesta brothers were given amnesty....Hmmmmm?
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
70,448
Reaction score
12,362
Points
2,210
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
Fair enough.
I would dispute what you say caused the investigation. It wasn’t russian hacking, it was alleged Russia interference/collusion, whic we now know what made up by the Hillary clique, discussed with Obama officials, the Christopher Steele was paid to put together that bullshit dossiers, which was then shopped around and used as justification to get warrants on the Trump campaign. But the fbi knew the dossier was garbage, they chose to lie to the fisa courts anyway, on multiple occasions.
See, the IG said the warrants were obtained improperly, which we already knew and was all but proven at that point. But he conspicuously stopped there. He didn’t say “and why did the fbi lie to get these warrants, and other people subsequently lie to get more warrants, and keep extending the surveillanceHe didn’t bother, because doing so would implicate a shit load of Obama administration officials, Hillary Clinton, head of the fbi, cia, etc is illegally spying on a lolitical opponent when Trump was just a candidate, and then what could be called treason in staging a coup against a sitting president.
he didn’t bother to ask motive. He just simply stopped with “that wasn’t proper procedure... tisk tisk”.
Once again... they were all let off the hook.
No, it was absolutely Russian hacking. That is not even in dispute.


It details the contact between Russian Intel and Trump's campaign.

And this comes from the GOP dominated Senate intelligence committee.
But it doesn't show the Trump campaign participated. On top of which, Mueller investigated the matter and reached the same conclusion -- that Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary's campaign chairman; but that neither Trump nor his associates conspired with the Russian hackers.
Stupid lil faun, the pervert, none of the 17 three lettered alphabet agencies ever got to examine the DNC server and the Crowd Source owner even said under oath that they were only speculating that the ROOSKIES hacked it when it was Seth Rich that was BEHIND the firewall copied incriminating e-mails and passed them off to a British ambassador to give to Assange and Wikileaks, ya lying sack of miserable leftard shit.
Poor, dickless delusional dale. The FBI was given a byte-for-byte copy. An exact duplicate. Which the FBI stated was an acceptable substitution. Your demented conspiracies, like PizzaGate, Sandy Hook, chemtrails and this, do nothing but expose just how fucked in the head you really are.

 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
70,448
Reaction score
12,362
Points
2,210
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
Fair enough.
I would dispute what you say caused the investigation. It wasn’t russian hacking, it was alleged Russia interference/collusion, whic we now know what made up by the Hillary clique, discussed with Obama officials, the Christopher Steele was paid to put together that bullshit dossiers, which was then shopped around and used as justification to get warrants on the Trump campaign. But the fbi knew the dossier was garbage, they chose to lie to the fisa courts anyway, on multiple occasions.
See, the IG said the warrants were obtained improperly, which we already knew and was all but proven at that point. But he conspicuously stopped there. He didn’t say “and why did the fbi lie to get these warrants, and other people subsequently lie to get more warrants, and keep extending the surveillanceHe didn’t bother, because doing so would implicate a shit load of Obama administration officials, Hillary Clinton, head of the fbi, cia, etc is illegally spying on a lolitical opponent when Trump was just a candidate, and then what could be called treason in staging a coup against a sitting president.
he didn’t bother to ask motive. He just simply stopped with “that wasn’t proper procedure... tisk tisk”.
Once again... they were all let off the hook.
No, it was absolutely Russian hacking. That is not even in dispute.


It details the contact between Russian Intel and Trump's campaign.

And this comes from the GOP dominated Senate intelligence committee.
But it doesn't show the Trump campaign participated. On top of which, Mueller investigated the matter and reached the same conclusion -- that Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary's campaign chairman; but that neither Trump nor his associates conspired with the Russian hackers.
You're only citing volume 1. Try volume 5:

" (U) The Committee's bipartisan Report found that Paul Manafort, while he was Chairman of the Trump Campaign, was secretly communicating with a Russian intelligence officer with whom he discussed Campaign strategy and repeatedly shared internal Campaign polling data. "

View attachment 408587


Thats on page 943.
That's not about the hacking. There's no evidence Impeached Trump or those close to him conspired with Russia to hack anyone.
 

Deplorable Yankee

Platinum Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
5,289
Points
1,065
Location
DIXIE
So much for that legend....

The manufactured evidence never elevated into the realm of believability. That a computer repair guy would first go through someone's laptop...THEN hand it over to the FBI (not just call the local police)...THEN hand a copy to Rudy Guliani's lawyer....it is straight out of a bad Hollywood script.

Here is the story that lays out the above chain of custody.


When you read this dude's words...you have less confidence (if possible) that this is legit....

“When you’re afraid that you don’t know anything about the depth of the waters that you’re in, you kind of, you want to find a lifeguard.”

Sounds like he botched a line he was fed.

Anyway..the story is fading into the ether... Good.

 
OP
candycorn

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
70,156
Reaction score
12,988
Points
2,180
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
Fair enough.
I would dispute what you say caused the investigation. It wasn’t russian hacking, it was alleged Russia interference/collusion, whic we now know what made up by the Hillary clique, discussed with Obama officials, the Christopher Steele was paid to put together that bullshit dossiers, which was then shopped around and used as justification to get warrants on the Trump campaign. But the fbi knew the dossier was garbage, they chose to lie to the fisa courts anyway, on multiple occasions.
See, the IG said the warrants were obtained improperly, which we already knew and was all but proven at that point. But he conspicuously stopped there. He didn’t say “and why did the fbi lie to get these warrants, and other people subsequently lie to get more warrants, and keep extending the surveillanceHe didn’t bother, because doing so would implicate a shit load of Obama administration officials, Hillary Clinton, head of the fbi, cia, etc is illegally spying on a lolitical opponent when Trump was just a candidate, and then what could be called treason in staging a coup against a sitting president.
he didn’t bother to ask motive. He just simply stopped with “that wasn’t proper procedure... tisk tisk”.
Once again... they were all let off the hook.
No, it was absolutely Russian hacking. That is not even in dispute.


It details the contact between Russian Intel and Trump's campaign.

And this comes from the GOP dominated Senate intelligence committee.
But it doesn't show the Trump campaign participated. On top of which, Mueller investigated the matter and reached the same conclusion -- that Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary's campaign chairman; but that neither Trump nor his associates conspired with the Russian hackers.
You're only citing volume 1. Try volume 5:

" (U) The Committee's bipartisan Report found that Paul Manafort, while he was Chairman of the Trump Campaign, was secretly communicating with a Russian intelligence officer with whom he discussed Campaign strategy and repeatedly shared internal Campaign polling data. "

View attachment 408587


Thats on page 943.
That's not about the hacking. There's no evidence Impeached Trump or those close to him conspired with Russia to hack anyone.

You don't think Roger Stone's tweets about Guccifer is evidence?
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,929
Reaction score
9,840
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
There is no investigation....
The "gotcha" moment you hoped for was a dud.

Again, I think it's because the true masters of the dark arts are now working for the Lincoln Project and not your blob.
so what you're saying is that the FBI held on to the laptop to coverup for Biden? If you are correct it shows how corrupt the FBI truely is. One day they may just turn on one of your beloved democrats
LOLOL

There isn't a single FBI employee on Impeached Trump's side? Not even the Director who owes his job to Impeached Trump?

:cuckoo:
I guess you never heard of that constitutional oath they took and the constitutional process
Are you saying they are derelict of duty?
No, I'm saying you're fucked in the head. How did you not get that?
and you're an idiot that respins the same old lies
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,929
Reaction score
9,840
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
Fair enough.
I would dispute what you say caused the investigation. It wasn’t russian hacking, it was alleged Russia interference/collusion, whic we now know what made up by the Hillary clique, discussed with Obama officials, the Christopher Steele was paid to put together that bullshit dossiers, which was then shopped around and used as justification to get warrants on the Trump campaign. But the fbi knew the dossier was garbage, they chose to lie to the fisa courts anyway, on multiple occasions.
See, the IG said the warrants were obtained improperly, which we already knew and was all but proven at that point. But he conspicuously stopped there. He didn’t say “and why did the fbi lie to get these warrants, and other people subsequently lie to get more warrants, and keep extending the surveillanceHe didn’t bother, because doing so would implicate a shit load of Obama administration officials, Hillary Clinton, head of the fbi, cia, etc is illegally spying on a lolitical opponent when Trump was just a candidate, and then what could be called treason in staging a coup against a sitting president.
he didn’t bother to ask motive. He just simply stopped with “that wasn’t proper procedure... tisk tisk”.
Once again... they were all let off the hook.
No, it was absolutely Russian hacking. That is not even in dispute.


It details the contact between Russian Intel and Trump's campaign.

And this comes from the GOP dominated Senate intelligence committee.
But it doesn't show the Trump campaign participated. On top of which, Mueller investigated the matter and reached the same conclusion -- that Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary's campaign chairman; but that neither Trump nor his associates conspired with the Russian hackers.
Stupid lil faun, the pervert, none of the 17 three lettered alphabet agencies ever got to examine the DNC server and the Crowd Source owner even said under oath that they were only speculating that the ROOSKIES hacked it when it was Seth Rich that was BEHIND the firewall copied incriminating e-mails and passed them off to a British ambassador to give to Assange and Wikileaks, ya lying sack of miserable leftard shit.
Poor, dickless delusional dale. The FBI was given a byte-for-byte copy. An exact duplicate. Which the FBI stated was an acceptable substitution. Your demented conspiracies, like PizzaGate, Sandy Hook, chemtrails and this, do nothing but expose just how fucked in the head you really are.
you cannot provide a credible source to prove your opinion.
 

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
78,929
Reaction score
9,840
Points
2,070
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.

citygator

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2019
Messages
2,520
Reaction score
1,509
Points
940
Location
Charlotte
This post from Reddit seems to sum up the absurdity of it all:

I will have enough for an entire book before this “scandal” is done.

Hunter, while living in California, decides to fly 3,000 miles to Delaware. All to drop off a laptop for repair, coincidentally at a huge MAGA fan shop. he decided to never pick up his own laptop.

There’s security footage of it, but it got lost. Epstein style. But don’t worry- the MAGA man swears he saw him drop it off. Turns out he has a mental condition where he CANNOT RECOGNIZE FACES (I’m not joking) he knew it was hunters though, cause of the stickers on the laptop... MAGA man, naturally, didn’t just erase and resell the laptop, but did the totally normal thing of duplicating the hard drive and spending hours sorting through thousands of emails to find one that suggests Hunter might’ve tried to arrange a meeting with daddy Biden no evidence any meeting ever occurred, but who cares.

In comes Rudy Giuliani, cyber security expert, and talking set of teeth -who was tricked by Borat, and periodically butt dials reporters on accident -he has ‘confirmed’ the info not even the FBI could. Rudy was so worried about the intel, he sat on the laptop for months until 3 weeks before the election.

Naturally, it proves Hunter was into pedo devil sex too, but the proof is secret and for Rudy’s eyes only. there’s a video of said drug fueled sexcapades, but again, you just gotta trust rudy

Rudy refuses to send any electronic proof of the emails to anyone. But it’s definitely real, and definitely exists Heh. Again- not a single news agency has actually seen any proof, except for photos of printed emails. This is why ThEY WoNT CoVeR iT

He was ‘confirming’ it the same time Trump received an intel briefing that Rudy was unknowingly being used by Russian operatives to spread disinformation. Lmao.

Rudy, tired of getting made fun of, tweets some more ‘source material’ text messages... except the text is in an app that didn’t exist at the time it supposedly happened, and...literally in Russia. Poor guy.

This was all also investigated by a real Post reporter who refused to put their name on it, as no part of it could be verified. Several news outlets also passed on the story for the same reason, including FoxNews and WSJ. Ended up written by Sean Hannity’s producer. Lol.

Now comes a guy named Bobulinski - alleging he, uhh met with Biden to discuss a Chinese business deal. He has proof, of course: ‘documents’ he says naturally, he actually hasn’t released anything.

The WSJ opinion section finally publishes a Bobulinkski piece. Note: opinion section, not news, as they still couldn’t verify anything. It alleges the above Chinese deal. They very next day, the WSJ news section refutes the entire thing, using Bobulinksi’s own source material.

Here comes Tucker Carlson. He is about to release a bombshell. All the emails. Proving everything. Unfortunately, these apparently only existed as single physical copies. The emails. Electronic mails. Only existed as one physical copy. (Got that?).Sadly, these printed non-electronic emails were lost (stolen!) in the mail, and no one ever made a copy , so we may never know which dog ate Tucker’s homework or who made-up this made-up story.

Next up is Martin Aspen, Swiss intelligence operative. He is the basis for many of these allegations and brought it public in a dossier that the PRESIDENT received.. it turns out he is not real. Literally, they made his face on a face generator and gave him a cute linkedIn profile at a fake company. Probably just a cover for the deep state.

I think I’ve got it all, but hard to say as they keep making new stuff up.
 

tyroneweaver

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2012
Messages
20,019
Reaction score
4,309
Points
280
Location
Burley, Idaho
So much for that legend....

The manufactured evidence never elevated into the realm of believability. That a computer repair guy would first go through someone's laptop...THEN hand it over to the FBI (not just call the local police)...THEN hand a copy to Rudy Guliani's lawyer....it is straight out of a bad Hollywood script.

Here is the story that lays out the above chain of custody.


When you read this dude's words...you have less confidence (if possible) that this is legit....

“When you’re afraid that you don’t know anything about the depth of the waters that you’re in, you kind of, you want to find a lifeguard.”

Sounds like he botched a line he was fed.

Anyway..the story is fading into the ether... Good.
.... and then handed it over to the FBI??????
what a ridiculous statement. Considering the Feds have had the laptop for a year and Hunter is under investigation for money laundering by non other than the FBI
 

Beef_Supreme

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Messages
1,366
Reaction score
1,615
Points
1,908
BUT I thought it was ALL DISAPPEARING??? :eek:
Wow, another newly created conservative website that nobody reads. Shocking.
so what youre saying is its been true all along and all you got left is attacking the messenger,,,
So what you're saying is that you can't read.
you must be feeling like a real shmuck about now since you started this saying its all disappearing and now find out theres been a criminal investigation all along,,,
LOL

According to the brain-dead right, the FBI is in possession of hard evidence that Hunter Biden raped and tortured a minor, but for some unknown reason, won't go after him.

:cuckoo:
The Blob's FBI at that.

Really believable.
it was that same FBI that created the Russian conspiracy
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Actually, Durham pointing out wrong doing all over the place. But he mysteriously concluded that the wrong doing wasn’t intentional, that it wasn’t done maliciously, etc.
Kinda like how Comey said Hillary committed a shit load of crimes, but it was because she is a dumb ass not because she was actually doing illegal things, and gave her a pass.
LOL

By "all over the place," you mean one indictment on someone no one ever heard of before.

:abgg2q.jpg:
No, by allmover the place he said the fisa court was abused, lied to, etc.
That’s for starters. But in typical Washington fashion, they grabbed some low level guy, slapped him in the ass, and declared that all was now well.
That’s the way it works. You know that. You may be a leftist/democrat, but you don’t strike me as stupid. I think you are well aware that the politicians and connected don’t play by he same rules as we do, and “justice” is a completely different issue altogether. I’m talking whether it’s republicans or democrats, I’m not foolish enough to think it’s just one side. Take the Hillary email server incident, for example. Love her or hate her, let’s look at the facts...
She illegally set up a server that contained classified government files, emails, etc. Thousands of them. Tens of thousands. Now I am pretty sure I know her motivation, but for the sake of fairness to you let’s pretend she meant nothing shady or illegal (no selling info, no avoiding oversight, etc). Let’s pretend she just did it because she was bored and wanted her own server. Well, that’s illegal. Highly illegal actually. And the law she broke states clearly that mishandling classified information, regardless of malicious intent, negligence, etc is irrelevant. To simply mishandle it in any way is a felony FOR EACH document/email/etc.
That right there is literally thousands of felonies she committed. Then when caught and the server and info was subpoenaed, she hid emails and didn’t turn then over. The then destroyed evidence (phones and such), wiped her server, etc. Any bud all of that would have you or me buried underneath the jail. Her and her friends who also destroyed evidence (Cheryl mills was one, there were others)...nothing. An “investigation” that to call half-hearted is being wildly generous. They didn’t care she destroyed evidence. They asked nicely for her to turn over evidence, which she was allowed to have her attorneys pick out what would be handed over. What was asked to be turned over, she didn’t (you or I would have had our houses raided), they interviewed her off the record for about an hour, claimed to go through 30,000+ emails in 2 days, and so in and so forth. Then the director of the fbi, who badly wants this to go away, gets up there and tells the nation that yes she did all these things, but because she didn’t mean to that itnisnt a crime. He tells us that she didn’t mean to, as if she accidentally set up a private server and then did all those things I outlined above . And despite the wording of the law explicitly telling us that “mean to do” has no bearing on it being a crime, she didn’t mean to so it’s ok.
I was clearly not speaking about the FISC. I was very specifically discussing the justification for opening an investigation into Russia's meddling -- which was in response to some putz claiming the FBI created the Russian conspiracy. They didn't. Russia hacking Americans is what created it. Only it wasn't a conspiracy, they really did. The other aspect of their investigation was determining if Trump or his people were complicit. While it turned out they weren't, the Inspector General determined opening an investigation into the matter was justifiable. The IG's beef was in how the FBI later obtained FISA warrants.
Fair enough.
I would dispute what you say caused the investigation. It wasn’t russian hacking, it was alleged Russia interference/collusion, whic we now know what made up by the Hillary clique, discussed with Obama officials, the Christopher Steele was paid to put together that bullshit dossiers, which was then shopped around and used as justification to get warrants on the Trump campaign. But the fbi knew the dossier was garbage, they chose to lie to the fisa courts anyway, on multiple occasions.
See, the IG said the warrants were obtained improperly, which we already knew and was all but proven at that point. But he conspicuously stopped there. He didn’t say “and why did the fbi lie to get these warrants, and other people subsequently lie to get more warrants, and keep extending the surveillanceHe didn’t bother, because doing so would implicate a shit load of Obama administration officials, Hillary Clinton, head of the fbi, cia, etc is illegally spying on a lolitical opponent when Trump was just a candidate, and then what could be called treason in staging a coup against a sitting president.
he didn’t bother to ask motive. He just simply stopped with “that wasn’t proper procedure... tisk tisk”.
Once again... they were all let off the hook.
No, it was absolutely Russian hacking. That is not even in dispute.


It details the contact between Russian Intel and Trump's campaign.

And this comes from the GOP dominated Senate intelligence committee.
But it doesn't show the Trump campaign participated. On top of which, Mueller investigated the matter and reached the same conclusion -- that Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary's campaign chairman; but that neither Trump nor his associates conspired with the Russian hackers.
You're only citing volume 1. Try volume 5:

" (U) The Committee's bipartisan Report found that Paul Manafort, while he was Chairman of the Trump Campaign, was secretly communicating with a Russian intelligence officer with whom he discussed Campaign strategy and repeatedly shared internal Campaign polling data. "

View attachment 408587


Thats on page 943.
Let’s say that’s completely true.... so what?
Someone discussed polling data? Who gives a shit. That helps the Russians interfere in the election? That’s stealing the election? How so?
 

Turtlesoup

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
3,169
Reaction score
3,768
Points
1,893
So much for that legend....

The manufactured evidence never elevated into the realm of believability. That a computer repair guy would first go through someone's laptop...THEN hand it over to the FBI (not just call the local police)...THEN hand a copy to Rudy Guliani's lawyer....it is straight out of a bad Hollywood script.

Here is the story that lays out the above chain of custody.


When you read this dude's words...you have less confidence (if possible) that this is legit....

“When you’re afraid that you don’t know anything about the depth of the waters that you’re in, you kind of, you want to find a lifeguard.”

Sounds like he botched a line he was fed.

Anyway..the story is fading into the ether... Good.
The October surprise is and was a complete smear campaign gone bad. Giuliani screwed it all up for Trump.
The Trump supporter who supposedly owns the repair shop can no longer confirm if it was Hunter Biden who dropped the laptop for repair.

Hey easyt and all the conspiracy loons... How's it all going now? Ha Ha Hah!
What are you babbling about---he could never confirm it was Hunter who dropped the video off as he has sight problems hun. Stop spinning nonsense---there was NO LONGER BS.
 

Uncensored2008

Libertarian Radical
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
85,837
Reaction score
16,116
Points
2,180
Location
Behind the Orange Curtain
Dumbfuck, the Inspector General spent some 2 years investigating that and concluded there was justifiable cause to investigate Russia hacking our election. Don't you remember that report? It was the one you rightards couldn't stop cheering for -- until it was released. Then y'all started cheering for Durham after Horowitz failed to deliver the goods you were salivating over.
Dumbfuck, you morons LIED about "Russian Collusion." Your own Grand Inquisitor had to admit it.

Russia has interfered in every election since 1918. But the interference by Russia is miniscule in comparison to the MASSIVE election tampering by Facebook and Twitter on behalf of the filthy democrats.

Oh, and your country interferes as well.

:cuckoo:
DERP

{
The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section IV above.
style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Courier;color:#333333'>The investigation did not, however, yield evidence sufficient to sustain any charge that any individual affiliated with the Trump Campaign acted as an agent of a foreign principal within the meaning of FARA or, in terms of Section 951, subject to the direction or control of the government of Russia, or any official thereof. In particular, the Office did not find evidence likely to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Campaign officials such as Paul Manafott, George Papadopoulos, and Carter Page acted as agents of the Russian government or at its direction, control, or request during the relevant time period.1232
}

Farouk, you're a liar for Allah and your sleazy little god Muhammad.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top