People who are so concerned about it that they believe other people are parasites should be the first ones to get themselves and theirs neutered or take the plunge and fully opt out of life. Leave the rest alone though if you think that you are a parasite deal with yourself first.
Said belief is the basis of environmentalism....
1. Modern environmentalism is, and I mean this in the kindest way, a bastardization of the conservation of the Progressive Era. Today’s devotees are a random mix of
a) the pagan religion of Gaia worship,
b) folks who believe that human beings are a virus that must be eradicated from the land,
c) the ignorant and easily led,
and…a very strong influence of the NeoMarxist Frankfurt School.
2. What the take-away? Environmentalists view mankind as a virus, a disease that must be eradicated. In 2011, Ehrlich’s wife wrote a piece in the LATimes, comparing humanity to cancer: “Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society.”
Overpopulation: Perpetual growth is the creed of a cancer cell, not a sustainable human society
Gee….I’ll bet these folks would be in favor of a President who favored infanticide...like the previous President.
This concern has nothing to do with Leftism. Even if the OP is one.
The real concern is that in majority the dumb multiply.
If you localize it, it is mainly Africa, the rest of the world is relatively stable in the meantime.
They are not in a position to feed themselves now, they will surely not be able to do that if they are 2 billion instead of 1 billion in 10 years. ONE BILLION MORE IN TEN YEARS!!!! Did yolu get that??
1. It has everything to do with Leftism.
Their theme and fundraising modus operandi is to cause fear, and tell dunces that only collectivism and totalitarian governance can save the world.
2. It is my mission to explode Liberal mythology.....
But try as I may, I simply cannot keep up with the nonsense that Liberals are willing to believe.
....
the godfather of hand-wringing environmentalism, Thomas 'Chicken-Little' Malthus is simply ground-floor claptrap.
a. Malthus originated the view that the food production of the world would increase arithmetically (1-2-3-…), while the human population would increase geometrically (1-2-4-8…). Conclusion: mass starvation and epidemics. Sounds ‘environmental’ already, doesn’t it?
b. Malthus passed on in1834- yet
his views continue in the hearts and minds of Progressives, who have expanded the vision to pollution and environmental damage.
c. Fact: Malthus has been proven wrong over and over, based on agricultural advances, and technological innovation.
"In spite of the serious errors in Malthus, we have witnessed in the last decade an outburst of "neo-Malthusianism," a new widespread fear, sometimes verging on hysteria, about a world "population explosion." Paul Erlich, professor of biology at Stanford University, in a book entitled
The Population Bomb, warns us that we are all doomed if we do not control population growth."
Hazlitt, "The Conquest of Poverty," p.27.
Like Malthus, and like Ehrlich, and like you.......your worldview is in direct contravention to the facts.
Wise up.
Do you get it now, you dope?????
