What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Huma Talks. Nobody Walks.

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
744
Points
205

The Criminal Code says “Nobody talks. Everybody walks.” If this report is true nobody is walking:


WASHINGTON – Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s closest aide, has reportedly “flipped” and is cooperating with investigators looking into possible crimes by the former secretary of state.​

Huma reportedly 'flipped' against Hillary
Posted By Garth Kant On 11/03/2016 @ 5:11 pm

Huma reportedly ‘flipped’ against Hillary

Two things did not exist when I posted this on my second message board in May of 2001:


Socialists must be funded by tax revenues if they hope to remain competitive because no free person that wants to remain free would ever voluntarily contribute to Socialism. That contribution prohibition does not apply to anyone living in tax dollar heaven who only contribute tax dollars they have latched onto in the first place. Mrs. Clinton knew all of this when she came up with her clever plan designed to set in motion the most expensive campaign finance mechanism ever devised. Renting out the Lincoln bedroom and all of the legal Clinton fund-raising methods combined only raised chump-change by comparison.

Basically, this is how it will work if the Clinton Democrats are ever in charge: A large percentage of the billions that will eventually be paid to the U.N. every year will be laundered and returned to Sen. Clinton and other Socialist Democrats in the form of illegal campaign contributions. There will be no long lists of lawbreakers pleading the Fifth or fleeing the country to avoid prosecution, and no convictions resulting from Sen. Clinton’s money-laundering operation when the Socialist Democrats rule the roost. How sweet it will be for Boss Clinton knowing that her U.N. gang members won’t have to rat her out because their diplomatic immunity will protect them. Americans only have to plead the Fifth to complete the cycle should the scam be uncovered. Nobody talks. Everybody walks.

XXXXX

Republican Senator John McCain and his supporters will never be able to write a comprehensive campaign finance reform law that will stop Sen. Clinton’s money-laundering scheme from working. “Disclosure” legislation enacted by Congress will not stop it either. The Republicans were in charge in ‘96 and are in charge now, with laws already on the books; so what do Republicans think it will be like if the Socialists ever take power again? VP Gore figured that the Buddhist temple scam was worth the risk for a limited amount of money. Socialists, led by Sen. Clinton, would be fools not to know that because of [United Nations] diplomatic immunity the risk of getting caught is nonexistent, while the amount of money involved is unlimited. No Socialist will ever say “Pass” to a foolproof ripoff like that.

Illegal campaign contributions aside, there is a greater danger involved here than corrupting the system. Using her leverage as the U.N.’s paymaster, Sen. Clinton will order her bought and paid for friends at the U.N. to oppose any attempts by this country to stop Socialism/Communism in its tracks. The U.N. is on that path already, so Sen. Clinton will be a welcomed taskmaster with deep IRS pockets.​

Hillary Clinton should have stayed with the United Nations scam instead of letting her arrogant certainty that she is too big to prosecute get the best of her. President Hillary Clinton would be a shoo-in were it not for her private e-mail server and Clinton Foundation greed. Those two train wrecks will undo the lot of them if Huma rolls over.

Finally, should the swamp creature steal the election she will have the authority to bring her original betrayal to fruition in addition to giving herself a pardon for her other crimes. In a weird turn of events if Huma Abedin is talking before the election she is the last person in the world who wants to see Hillary become president.


coffin.jpg
http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/08/coffin.jpg

'Clinton death list': 33 spine-tingling cases
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 08/21/2016 @ 4:33 pm

‘Clinton death list’: 33 spine-tingling cases

p.s. It is the NYC police who stood up to the Justice Department in the Weiner investigation. It all reminded me of the time tough New York City cops basically told the Soviets to shove diplomatic immunity where the sun never shines:

 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
74,551
Reaction score
15,537
Points
2,180
After reading your OP, I'm impressed that you have been this nuts since 2001, and nobody put you in a rubber room yet.
 

irosie91

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
75,154
Reaction score
8,383
Points
2,030
Hillary Clinton: Fry her.

I am confused-------the informant seems to be a "socialism-phobic" Hillary's sideways allusions to "GLOBALISM" strike
HORROR in my heart-------anyone willing to discuss Hillary's penchant for WORLD SOCIALISM and the dangers thereof?
 

Mrs. M.

Man Feed Guest Writer
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Messages
739
Reaction score
391
Points
940

The Criminal Code says “Nobody talks. Everybody walks.” If this report is true nobody is walking:


WASHINGTON – Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s closest aide, has reportedly “flipped” and is cooperating with investigators looking into possible crimes by the former secretary of state.​

Huma reportedly 'flipped' against Hillary
Posted By Garth Kant On 11/03/2016 @ 5:11 pm

Huma reportedly ‘flipped’ against Hillary

Two things did not exist when I posted this on my second message board in May of 2001:


Socialists must be funded by tax revenues if they hope to remain competitive because no free person that wants to remain free would ever voluntarily contribute to Socialism. That contribution prohibition does not apply to anyone living in tax dollar heaven who only contribute tax dollars they have latched onto in the first place. Mrs. Clinton knew all of this when she came up with her clever plan designed to set in motion the most expensive campaign finance mechanism ever devised. Renting out the Lincoln bedroom and all of the legal Clinton fund-raising methods combined only raised chump-change by comparison.

Basically, this is how it will work if the Clinton Democrats are ever in charge: A large percentage of the billions that will eventually be paid to the U.N. every year will be laundered and returned to Sen. Clinton and other Socialist Democrats in the form of illegal campaign contributions. There will be no long lists of lawbreakers pleading the Fifth or fleeing the country to avoid prosecution, and no convictions resulting from Sen. Clinton’s money-laundering operation when the Socialist Democrats rule the roost. How sweet it will be for Boss Clinton knowing that her U.N. gang members won’t have to rat her out because their diplomatic immunity will protect them. Americans only have to plead the Fifth to complete the cycle should the scam be uncovered. Nobody talks. Everybody walks.

XXXXX

Republican Senator John McCain and his supporters will never be able to write a comprehensive campaign finance reform law that will stop Sen. Clinton’s money-laundering scheme from working. “Disclosure” legislation enacted by Congress will not stop it either. The Republicans were in charge in ‘96 and are in charge now, with laws already on the books; so what do Republicans think it will be like if the Socialists ever take power again? VP Gore figured that the Buddhist temple scam was worth the risk for a limited amount of money. Socialists, led by Sen. Clinton, would be fools not to know that because of [United Nations] diplomatic immunity the risk of getting caught is nonexistent, while the amount of money involved is unlimited. No Socialist will ever say “Pass” to a foolproof ripoff like that.

Illegal campaign contributions aside, there is a greater danger involved here than corrupting the system. Using her leverage as the U.N.’s paymaster, Sen. Clinton will order her bought and paid for friends at the U.N. to oppose any attempts by this country to stop Socialism/Communism in its tracks. The U.N. is on that path already, so Sen. Clinton will be a welcomed taskmaster with deep IRS pockets.​

Hillary Clinton should have stayed with the United Nations scam instead of letting her arrogant certainty that she is too big to prosecute get the best of her. President Hillary Clinton would be a shoo-in were it not for her private e-mail server and Clinton Foundation greed. Those two train wrecks will undo the lot of them if Huma rolls over.

Finally, should the swamp creature steal the election she will have the authority to bring her original betrayal to fruition in addition to giving herself a pardon for her other crimes. In a weird turn of events if Huma Abedin is talking before the election she is the last person in the world who wants to see Hillary become president.


coffin.jpg
http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/08/coffin.jpg

'Clinton death list': 33 spine-tingling cases
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 08/21/2016 @ 4:33 pm

‘Clinton death list’: 33 spine-tingling cases

p.s. It is the NYC police who stood up to the Justice Department in the Weiner investigation. It all reminded me of the time tough New York City cops basically told the Soviets to shove diplomatic immunity where the sun never shines:

That was her downfall. She thought she was too big to fall. That she would never be exposed for all her crimes. At this point, Obama could walk simply by telling his DOJ to stand down and indict her. In fact, he may be getting a phone call from Kissinger & Co. telling him to do exactly that. Clinton can't even remember the election date. Loose lips sink ships. She's become a liability. They have no choice but to ditch her. I'd rather see the election postponed and have the democrats select another candidate. It would be a smart move on their part and maybe some of them that knew about Clinton could cut a deal.

Even if Clinton accused Obama of some collusion it is doubtful the FBI would pursue it as he is leaving office. I believe they want Clinton. Not Obama. Obama wasn't involved in child trafficking, money laundering, and trading State Dept. secrets for donations to a foundation. Clearly Mrs. Clinton was. She's going to go down hard. You can tell because people like Huma Abedin are beginning to cut and run. This is a very bad sign for Clinton. She's finally going to be held accountable for her crimes. Three days from the election. Saved by the NYPD and FBI that refused to lay down. How I love the NYPD and our FBI. They are truly American heroes. The American people better be down on their faces thanking God for them. Without them convincing Huma Abedin to come clean, Hillary would have walked.
 

GLASNOST

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
5,618
Reaction score
843
Points
140
Location
Salle d'attente de la gare
That was her downfall. She thought she was too big to fall. That she would never be exposed for all her crimes. At this point, Obama could walk simply by telling his DOJ to stand down and indict her. In fact, he may be getting a phone call from Kissinger & Co. telling him to do exactly that. Clinton can't even remember the election date. Loose lips sink ships. She's become a liability. They have no choice but to ditch her. I'd rather see the election postponed and have the democrats select another candidate. It would be a smart move on their part and maybe some of them that knew about Clinton could cut a deal.

Even if Clinton accused Obama of some collusion it is doubtful the FBI would pursue it as he is leaving office. I believe they want Clinton. Not Obama. Obama wasn't involved in child trafficking, money laundering, and trading State Dept. secrets for donations to a foundation. Clearly Mrs. Clinton was. She's going to go down hard. You can tell because people like Huma Abedin are beginning to cut and run. This is a very bad sign for Clinton. She's finally going to be held accountable for her crimes. Three days from the election.
Yes, but .......

Saved by the NYPD and FBI that refused to lay down. How I love the NYPD and our FBI. They are truly American heroes. The American people better be down on their faces thanking God for them. Without them convincing Huma Abedin to come clean, Hillary would have walked.
... I am under the impression that the NYPD refused to lay down DESPITE the FBI .... not together with them.
 
OP
F

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
744
Points
205
After reading your OP, I'm impressed that you have been this nuts since 2001, and nobody put you in a rubber room yet.
To BULLDOG: Instead of attacking the messenger, try defending your mental defective who can only stay out of prison by going to a mental institution —— after she pleads guilty to diminished capacity.
Hillary Clinton: Fry her.
To Glasnost: I prefer boiling her in oil.
anyone willing to discuss Hillary's penchant for WORLD SOCIALISM and the dangers thereof?
To Irosie91: That is a forbidden topic among libs.
At this point, Obama could walk simply by telling his DOJ to stand down and indict her.
To Mrs. M.: He did not do it when there was still time. He will not do it now or ever. President Hillary Clinton is the only way to save the Affordable Care Act, open-borders, and the rest of the things he/they did to this country.
I believe they want Clinton. Not Obama.
To Mrs. M.: You let him off too easy.

Almost every week brings a new reason for the United States House of Representatives to bring impeachment charges against President Obama. The question of the day is not why he should be impeached but why it hasn’t already been done.

XXXXX

Obama violated the Constitution with his “recess appointments” while the Senate was not in recess. It is up the Senate to decide when it is in recess, not the president. That distinction between executive and legislative authority is what the Separation of Powers doctrine is all about.​

Obama is an obvious participant and co-conspirator in Eric Holder’s approval and later cover-up of the illegal “Fast and Furious” gun-walking program. Unlike the Watergate case, people have actually died as a result of this illegal program.

Obama undoubtedly has knowledge of and has approved Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano’s project to require Border Patrol management to falsify apprehension numbers on the southwest border. This is a clear violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which requires the federal government to protect the country against foreign invasion.

The president’s open refusal to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act is a violation of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution, which does not authorize the president to choose which laws to “faithfully execute.” The oath taken by a new president on Inauguration Day does not say, “… to defend the Constitution of the United States… to the best of my ability except when I disagree with it.”

Did the president violate the law when he instructed Labor Secretary Solis to negotiate agreements with foreign governments to expand the “labor rights” of illegal aliens?​

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship
Published: 03/09/2012 at 7:45 PM
by TOM TANCREDO

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship

Not letting Joe Biden add U.S. President to his shameful résumé was the only reason I was against impeaching Obama. I suggested impeaching him, find him guilty in the Senate trial, then hand down the verdict one second before the next president is sworn in. In that way Joe Biden never becomes president.
... I am under the impression that the NYPD refused to lay down DESPITE the FBI .... not together with them.
To Glasnost: If I am interpreting events correctly, I believe the NYPD was on the same page as FBI investigators when they stood up to the DoJ (Loretta Lynch).
 

Mrs. M.

Man Feed Guest Writer
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Messages
739
Reaction score
391
Points
940
After reading your OP, I'm impressed that you have been this nuts since 2001, and nobody put you in a rubber room yet.
To BULLDOG: Instead of attacking the messenger, try defending your mental defective who can only stay out of prison by going to a mental institution —— after she pleads guilty to diminished capacity.
Hillary Clinton: Fry her.
To Glasnost: I prefer boiling her in oil.
anyone willing to discuss Hillary's penchant for WORLD SOCIALISM and the dangers thereof?
To Irosie91: That is a forbidden topic among libs.
At this point, Obama could walk simply by telling his DOJ to stand down and indict her.
To Mrs. M.: He did not do it when there was still time. He will not do it now or ever. President Hillary Clinton is the only way to save the Affordable Care Act, open-borders, and the rest of the things he/they did to this country.
I believe they want Clinton. Not Obama.
To Mrs. M.: You let him off too easy.

Almost every week brings a new reason for the United States House of Representatives to bring impeachment charges against President Obama. The question of the day is not why he should be impeached but why it hasn’t already been done.

XXXXX

Obama violated the Constitution with his “recess appointments” while the Senate was not in recess. It is up the Senate to decide when it is in recess, not the president. That distinction between executive and legislative authority is what the Separation of Powers doctrine is all about.​

Obama is an obvious participant and co-conspirator in Eric Holder’s approval and later cover-up of the illegal “Fast and Furious” gun-walking program. Unlike the Watergate case, people have actually died as a result of this illegal program.

Obama undoubtedly has knowledge of and has approved Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano’s project to require Border Patrol management to falsify apprehension numbers on the southwest border. This is a clear violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which requires the federal government to protect the country against foreign invasion.

The president’s open refusal to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act is a violation of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution, which does not authorize the president to choose which laws to “faithfully execute.” The oath taken by a new president on Inauguration Day does not say, “… to defend the Constitution of the United States… to the best of my ability except when I disagree with it.”

Did the president violate the law when he instructed Labor Secretary Solis to negotiate agreements with foreign governments to expand the “labor rights” of illegal aliens?​

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship
Published: 03/09/2012 at 7:45 PM
by TOM TANCREDO

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship

Not letting Joe Biden add U.S. President to his shameful résumé was the only reason I was against impeaching Obama. I suggested impeaching him, find him guilty in the Senate trial, then hand down the verdict one second before the next president is sworn in. In that way Joe Biden never becomes president.
... I am under the impression that the NYPD refused to lay down DESPITE the FBI .... not together with them.
To Glasnost: If I am interpreting events correctly, I believe the NYPD was on the same page as FBI investigators when they stood up to the DoJ (Loretta Lynch).
I apologize. You're right. With the thought of Clinton becoming president, it is tempting to let Obama walk just to keep her out of the oval office. He is ultimately the person responsible for having the DOJ give NYPD and FBI agents a stand down order. That alone should be enough to impeach him even if it is in the final hours of his presidency. No one involved should be eluding justice. Agreed.
 
Last edited:

GLASNOST

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
5,618
Reaction score
843
Points
140
Location
Salle d'attente de la gare
To BULLDOG: Instead of attacking the messenger, try defending your mental defective who can only stay out of prison by going to a mental institution —— after she pleads guilty to diminished capacity.
An excellent idea.
To Glasnost: I prefer boiling her in oil.
Just as good.
To Glasnost: If I am interpreting events correctly, I believe the NYPD was on the same page as FBI investigators when they stood up to the DoJ (Loretta Lynch).
Did you watch the video that I linked?
 

irosie91

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
75,154
Reaction score
8,383
Points
2,030
After reading your OP, I'm impressed that you have been this nuts since 2001, and nobody put you in a rubber room yet.
To BULLDOG: Instead of attacking the messenger, try defending your mental defective who can only stay out of prison by going to a mental institution —— after she pleads guilty to diminished capacity.
Hillary Clinton: Fry her.
To Glasnost: I prefer boiling her in oil.
anyone willing to discuss Hillary's penchant for WORLD SOCIALISM and the dangers thereof?
To Irosie91: That is a forbidden topic among libs.
At this point, Obama could walk simply by telling his DOJ to stand down and indict her.
To Mrs. M.: He did not do it when there was still time. He will not do it now or ever. President Hillary Clinton is the only way to save the Affordable Care Act, open-borders, and the rest of the things he/they did to this country.
I believe they want Clinton. Not Obama.
To Mrs. M.: You let him off too easy.

Almost every week brings a new reason for the United States House of Representatives to bring impeachment charges against President Obama. The question of the day is not why he should be impeached but why it hasn’t already been done.

XXXXX

Obama violated the Constitution with his “recess appointments” while the Senate was not in recess. It is up the Senate to decide when it is in recess, not the president. That distinction between executive and legislative authority is what the Separation of Powers doctrine is all about.​

Obama is an obvious participant and co-conspirator in Eric Holder’s approval and later cover-up of the illegal “Fast and Furious” gun-walking program. Unlike the Watergate case, people have actually died as a result of this illegal program.

Obama undoubtedly has knowledge of and has approved Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano’s project to require Border Patrol management to falsify apprehension numbers on the southwest border. This is a clear violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which requires the federal government to protect the country against foreign invasion.

The president’s open refusal to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act is a violation of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution, which does not authorize the president to choose which laws to “faithfully execute.” The oath taken by a new president on Inauguration Day does not say, “… to defend the Constitution of the United States… to the best of my ability except when I disagree with it.”

Did the president violate the law when he instructed Labor Secretary Solis to negotiate agreements with foreign governments to expand the “labor rights” of illegal aliens?​

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship
Published: 03/09/2012 at 7:45 PM
by TOM TANCREDO

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship

Not letting Joe Biden add U.S. President to his shameful résumé was the only reason I was against impeaching Obama. I suggested impeaching him, find him guilty in the Senate trial, then hand down the verdict one second before the next president is sworn in. In that way Joe Biden never becomes president.
... I am under the impression that the NYPD refused to lay down DESPITE the FBI .... not together with them.
To Glasnost: If I am interpreting events correctly, I believe the NYPD was on the same page as FBI investigators when they stood up to the DoJ (Loretta Lynch).
I apologize. You're right. With the thought of Clinton becoming president, it is tempting to let Obama walk just to keep her out of the oval office. He is ultimately the person responsible for having the DOJ give NYPD and FBI agents a stand down order. That alone should be enough to impeach him even if it is in the final hours of his presidency. No one involved should be eluding justice. Agreed.
After reading your OP, I'm impressed that you have been this nuts since 2001, and nobody put you in a rubber room yet.
To BULLDOG: Instead of attacking the messenger, try defending your mental defective who can only stay out of prison by going to a mental institution —— after she pleads guilty to diminished capacity.
Hillary Clinton: Fry her.
To Glasnost: I prefer boiling her in oil.
anyone willing to discuss Hillary's penchant for WORLD SOCIALISM and the dangers thereof?
To Irosie91: That is a forbidden topic among libs.
At this point, Obama could walk simply by telling his DOJ to stand down and indict her.
To Mrs. M.: He did not do it when there was still time. He will not do it now or ever. President Hillary Clinton is the only way to save the Affordable Care Act, open-borders, and the rest of the things he/they did to this country.
I believe they want Clinton. Not Obama.
To Mrs. M.: You let him off too easy.

Almost every week brings a new reason for the United States House of Representatives to bring impeachment charges against President Obama. The question of the day is not why he should be impeached but why it hasn’t already been done.

XXXXX

Obama violated the Constitution with his “recess appointments” while the Senate was not in recess. It is up the Senate to decide when it is in recess, not the president. That distinction between executive and legislative authority is what the Separation of Powers doctrine is all about.​

Obama is an obvious participant and co-conspirator in Eric Holder’s approval and later cover-up of the illegal “Fast and Furious” gun-walking program. Unlike the Watergate case, people have actually died as a result of this illegal program.

Obama undoubtedly has knowledge of and has approved Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano’s project to require Border Patrol management to falsify apprehension numbers on the southwest border. This is a clear violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which requires the federal government to protect the country against foreign invasion.

The president’s open refusal to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act is a violation of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution, which does not authorize the president to choose which laws to “faithfully execute.” The oath taken by a new president on Inauguration Day does not say, “… to defend the Constitution of the United States… to the best of my ability except when I disagree with it.”

Did the president violate the law when he instructed Labor Secretary Solis to negotiate agreements with foreign governments to expand the “labor rights” of illegal aliens?​

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship
Published: 03/09/2012 at 7:45 PM
by TOM TANCREDO

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship

Not letting Joe Biden add U.S. President to his shameful résumé was the only reason I was against impeaching Obama. I suggested impeaching him, find him guilty in the Senate trial, then hand down the verdict one second before the next president is sworn in. In that way Joe Biden never becomes president.
... I am under the impression that the NYPD refused to lay down DESPITE the FBI .... not together with them.
To Glasnost: If I am interpreting events correctly, I believe the NYPD was on the same page as FBI investigators when they stood up to the DoJ (Loretta Lynch).
I apologize. You're right. With the thought of Clinton becoming president, it is tempting to let Obama walk just to keep her out of the oval office. He is ultimately the person responsible for having the DOJ give NYPD and FBI agents a stand down order. That alone should be enough to impeach him even if it is in the final hours of his presidency. No one involved should be eluding justice. Agreed.

Dream on-----no last minute SAVE------the USA is tied to the
rail road tracks-------and their ain't gonna be a last second
HERO-------or----DEUS EX MACHINA (spelling?) -----we are
going to be INFLICTED with HILLCAT
 

boedicca

Uppity Water Nymph
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
56,572
Reaction score
19,252
Points
2,250
Location
The Land of Funk
One would have to have a heart of stone to read about Weiner & Huma taking down the Clinton Crime Family without laughing.

SRSLY
 

Mrs. M.

Man Feed Guest Writer
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Messages
739
Reaction score
391
Points
940
After reading your OP, I'm impressed that you have been this nuts since 2001, and nobody put you in a rubber room yet.
To BULLDOG: Instead of attacking the messenger, try defending your mental defective who can only stay out of prison by going to a mental institution —— after she pleads guilty to diminished capacity.
Hillary Clinton: Fry her.
To Glasnost: I prefer boiling her in oil.
anyone willing to discuss Hillary's penchant for WORLD SOCIALISM and the dangers thereof?
To Irosie91: That is a forbidden topic among libs.
At this point, Obama could walk simply by telling his DOJ to stand down and indict her.
To Mrs. M.: He did not do it when there was still time. He will not do it now or ever. President Hillary Clinton is the only way to save the Affordable Care Act, open-borders, and the rest of the things he/they did to this country.
I believe they want Clinton. Not Obama.
To Mrs. M.: You let him off too easy.

Almost every week brings a new reason for the United States House of Representatives to bring impeachment charges against President Obama. The question of the day is not why he should be impeached but why it hasn’t already been done.

XXXXX

Obama violated the Constitution with his “recess appointments” while the Senate was not in recess. It is up the Senate to decide when it is in recess, not the president. That distinction between executive and legislative authority is what the Separation of Powers doctrine is all about.​

Obama is an obvious participant and co-conspirator in Eric Holder’s approval and later cover-up of the illegal “Fast and Furious” gun-walking program. Unlike the Watergate case, people have actually died as a result of this illegal program.

Obama undoubtedly has knowledge of and has approved Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano’s project to require Border Patrol management to falsify apprehension numbers on the southwest border. This is a clear violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which requires the federal government to protect the country against foreign invasion.

The president’s open refusal to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act is a violation of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution, which does not authorize the president to choose which laws to “faithfully execute.” The oath taken by a new president on Inauguration Day does not say, “… to defend the Constitution of the United States… to the best of my ability except when I disagree with it.”

Did the president violate the law when he instructed Labor Secretary Solis to negotiate agreements with foreign governments to expand the “labor rights” of illegal aliens?​

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship
Published: 03/09/2012 at 7:45 PM
by TOM TANCREDO

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship

Not letting Joe Biden add U.S. President to his shameful résumé was the only reason I was against impeaching Obama. I suggested impeaching him, find him guilty in the Senate trial, then hand down the verdict one second before the next president is sworn in. In that way Joe Biden never becomes president.
... I am under the impression that the NYPD refused to lay down DESPITE the FBI .... not together with them.
To Glasnost: If I am interpreting events correctly, I believe the NYPD was on the same page as FBI investigators when they stood up to the DoJ (Loretta Lynch).
I apologize. You're right. With the thought of Clinton becoming president, it is tempting to let Obama walk just to keep her out of the oval office. He is ultimately the person responsible for having the DOJ give NYPD and FBI agents a stand down order. That alone should be enough to impeach him even if it is in the final hours of his presidency. No one involved should be eluding justice. Agreed.
After reading your OP, I'm impressed that you have been this nuts since 2001, and nobody put you in a rubber room yet.
To BULLDOG: Instead of attacking the messenger, try defending your mental defective who can only stay out of prison by going to a mental institution —— after she pleads guilty to diminished capacity.
Hillary Clinton: Fry her.
To Glasnost: I prefer boiling her in oil.
anyone willing to discuss Hillary's penchant for WORLD SOCIALISM and the dangers thereof?
To Irosie91: That is a forbidden topic among libs.
At this point, Obama could walk simply by telling his DOJ to stand down and indict her.
To Mrs. M.: He did not do it when there was still time. He will not do it now or ever. President Hillary Clinton is the only way to save the Affordable Care Act, open-borders, and the rest of the things he/they did to this country.
I believe they want Clinton. Not Obama.
To Mrs. M.: You let him off too easy.

Almost every week brings a new reason for the United States House of Representatives to bring impeachment charges against President Obama. The question of the day is not why he should be impeached but why it hasn’t already been done.

XXXXX

Obama violated the Constitution with his “recess appointments” while the Senate was not in recess. It is up the Senate to decide when it is in recess, not the president. That distinction between executive and legislative authority is what the Separation of Powers doctrine is all about.​

Obama is an obvious participant and co-conspirator in Eric Holder’s approval and later cover-up of the illegal “Fast and Furious” gun-walking program. Unlike the Watergate case, people have actually died as a result of this illegal program.

Obama undoubtedly has knowledge of and has approved Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano’s project to require Border Patrol management to falsify apprehension numbers on the southwest border. This is a clear violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which requires the federal government to protect the country against foreign invasion.

The president’s open refusal to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act is a violation of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution, which does not authorize the president to choose which laws to “faithfully execute.” The oath taken by a new president on Inauguration Day does not say, “… to defend the Constitution of the United States… to the best of my ability except when I disagree with it.”

Did the president violate the law when he instructed Labor Secretary Solis to negotiate agreements with foreign governments to expand the “labor rights” of illegal aliens?​

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship
Published: 03/09/2012 at 7:45 PM
by TOM TANCREDO

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship

Not letting Joe Biden add U.S. President to his shameful résumé was the only reason I was against impeaching Obama. I suggested impeaching him, find him guilty in the Senate trial, then hand down the verdict one second before the next president is sworn in. In that way Joe Biden never becomes president.
... I am under the impression that the NYPD refused to lay down DESPITE the FBI .... not together with them.
To Glasnost: If I am interpreting events correctly, I believe the NYPD was on the same page as FBI investigators when they stood up to the DoJ (Loretta Lynch).
I apologize. You're right. With the thought of Clinton becoming president, it is tempting to let Obama walk just to keep her out of the oval office. He is ultimately the person responsible for having the DOJ give NYPD and FBI agents a stand down order. That alone should be enough to impeach him even if it is in the final hours of his presidency. No one involved should be eluding justice. Agreed.

Dream on-----no last minute SAVE------the USA is tied to the
rail road tracks-------and their ain't gonna be a last second
HERO-------or----DEUS EX MACHINA (spelling?) -----we are
going to be INFLICTED with HILLCAT

I'm not so sure about that. While Hitler was able to take control of an entire nation with a comparatively small number of his own men, the country he took was already disarmed. That isn't the case with America. Doubtful that over 300 million American people will a accept Clinton presidency that less than 8% support. She is a war criminal and the American people are ready to get out of the middle east and avoid a nuclear war with Russia. Expect a recount in either case and that would be just the beginning...
 

Mrs. M.

Man Feed Guest Writer
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Messages
739
Reaction score
391
Points
940
That was her downfall. She thought she was too big to fall. That she would never be exposed for all her crimes. At this point, Obama could walk simply by telling his DOJ to stand down and indict her. In fact, he may be getting a phone call from Kissinger & Co. telling him to do exactly that. Clinton can't even remember the election date. Loose lips sink ships. She's become a liability. They have no choice but to ditch her. I'd rather see the election postponed and have the democrats select another candidate. It would be a smart move on their part and maybe some of them that knew about Clinton could cut a deal.

Even if Clinton accused Obama of some collusion it is doubtful the FBI would pursue it as he is leaving office. I believe they want Clinton. Not Obama. Obama wasn't involved in child trafficking, money laundering, and trading State Dept. secrets for donations to a foundation. Clearly Mrs. Clinton was. She's going to go down hard. You can tell because people like Huma Abedin are beginning to cut and run. This is a very bad sign for Clinton. She's finally going to be held accountable for her crimes. Three days from the election.
Yes, but .......

Saved by the NYPD and FBI that refused to lay down. How I love the NYPD and our FBI. They are truly American heroes. The American people better be down on their faces thanking God for them. Without them convincing Huma Abedin to come clean, Hillary would have walked.
... I am under the impression that the NYPD refused to lay down DESPITE the FBI .... not together with them.
You're talking about Comey. I'm talking about the FBI agents who were the majority and didn't go along with Comey's deal with DOJ ( Bill Clinton and Lynch made a deal on plane - honest FBI exposed it).
 
Last edited:
OP
F

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
744
Points
205
No one involved should be eluding justice. Agreed.
To Mrs. M.: No one should to be sure. Unfortunately, both Clintons going to jail is unlikely. The real fear is that one, or both, will skate away from the same crimes.
Did you watch the video that I linked?
To Glasnost: Twice. I love Assange’s Wikileaks. But I tend to avoid commenting on his personal politics.
 

GLASNOST

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
5,618
Reaction score
843
Points
140
Location
Salle d'attente de la gare
I'm not so sure about that. While Hitler was able to take control of an entire nation with a comparatively small number of his own men, the country he took was already disarmed. That isn't the case with America. Doubtful that over 300 million American people will a accept Clinton presidency that less than 8% support. She is a war criminal and the American people are ready to get out of the middle east and avoid a nuclear war with Russia. Expect a recount in either case and that would be just the beginning...
I'd like to agree with you but you are looking at in the wrong way. Hitler lead his nation out from the country's "external" enemy (and internal complacency). Hitler named it correctly, the people understood that (he didn't need to contrive the situation) and they followed him, pointing their weapons outwardly.

Germany eventually fell to a government that got too big for its's britches, finally becoming an internal enemy but it was the outside world that defeated it.

The US also claims the enemy is external but it isn't. This is the difference. The American citizen has been lied to and they've swallowed the bait (so far) pointing their weapons outwardly as well.

The American still hasn't woken to the true situation. So the question still remains .... will the US be defeated by external forces (as was the case with Germany), or will the American population realize the true situation and do the job themselves? It may take some time but the US (even with NATO) is creating enemies left and right. Russia, Iran, and China have been snoozing but they're not asleep. If they get serious about combining heir efforts the shit will hit the fan. NATO members are getting the short end of the stick, so it might be a matter of time before it begins to unwind, leaving the US standing alone (as it should be) and in a world of hurt.

In the end, the US will be faced with a similar situation to that of Nazi Germany. The German people failed to bring their Fascist government down and they suffered greatly because of it. What will the American population do? They are suffering in very much the same way by an increasing Fascist government.
 
OP
F

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
744
Points
205
did you not hear what he had to say about the NYPD and the FBI? There is the point.
To Glasnost: I heard everything he said. I simply did not see a reason to elaborate on it.
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
74,551
Reaction score
15,537
Points
2,180
After reading your OP, I'm impressed that you have been this nuts since 2001, and nobody put you in a rubber room yet.
To BULLDOG: Instead of attacking the messenger, try defending your mental defective who can only stay out of prison by going to a mental institution —— after she pleads guilty to diminished capacity.
Hillary Clinton: Fry her.
To Glasnost: I prefer boiling her in oil.
anyone willing to discuss Hillary's penchant for WORLD SOCIALISM and the dangers thereof?
To Irosie91: That is a forbidden topic among libs.
At this point, Obama could walk simply by telling his DOJ to stand down and indict her.
To Mrs. M.: He did not do it when there was still time. He will not do it now or ever. President Hillary Clinton is the only way to save the Affordable Care Act, open-borders, and the rest of the things he/they did to this country.
I believe they want Clinton. Not Obama.
To Mrs. M.: You let him off too easy.

Almost every week brings a new reason for the United States House of Representatives to bring impeachment charges against President Obama. The question of the day is not why he should be impeached but why it hasn’t already been done.

XXXXX

Obama violated the Constitution with his “recess appointments” while the Senate was not in recess. It is up the Senate to decide when it is in recess, not the president. That distinction between executive and legislative authority is what the Separation of Powers doctrine is all about.​

Obama is an obvious participant and co-conspirator in Eric Holder’s approval and later cover-up of the illegal “Fast and Furious” gun-walking program. Unlike the Watergate case, people have actually died as a result of this illegal program.

Obama undoubtedly has knowledge of and has approved Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano’s project to require Border Patrol management to falsify apprehension numbers on the southwest border. This is a clear violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which requires the federal government to protect the country against foreign invasion.

The president’s open refusal to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act is a violation of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution, which does not authorize the president to choose which laws to “faithfully execute.” The oath taken by a new president on Inauguration Day does not say, “… to defend the Constitution of the United States… to the best of my ability except when I disagree with it.”

Did the president violate the law when he instructed Labor Secretary Solis to negotiate agreements with foreign governments to expand the “labor rights” of illegal aliens?​

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship
Published: 03/09/2012 at 7:45 PM
by TOM TANCREDO

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship

Not letting Joe Biden add U.S. President to his shameful résumé was the only reason I was against impeaching Obama. I suggested impeaching him, find him guilty in the Senate trial, then hand down the verdict one second before the next president is sworn in. In that way Joe Biden never becomes president.
... I am under the impression that the NYPD refused to lay down DESPITE the FBI .... not together with them.
To Glasnost: If I am interpreting events correctly, I believe the NYPD was on the same page as FBI investigators when they stood up to the DoJ (Loretta Lynch).
I apologize. You're right. With the thought of Clinton becoming president, it is tempting to let Obama walk just to keep her out of the oval office. He is ultimately the person responsible for having the DOJ give NYPD and FBI agents a stand down order. That alone should be enough to impeach him even if it is in the final hours of his presidency. No one involved should be eluding justice. Agreed.
After reading your OP, I'm impressed that you have been this nuts since 2001, and nobody put you in a rubber room yet.
To BULLDOG: Instead of attacking the messenger, try defending your mental defective who can only stay out of prison by going to a mental institution —— after she pleads guilty to diminished capacity.
Hillary Clinton: Fry her.
To Glasnost: I prefer boiling her in oil.
anyone willing to discuss Hillary's penchant for WORLD SOCIALISM and the dangers thereof?
To Irosie91: That is a forbidden topic among libs.
At this point, Obama could walk simply by telling his DOJ to stand down and indict her.
To Mrs. M.: He did not do it when there was still time. He will not do it now or ever. President Hillary Clinton is the only way to save the Affordable Care Act, open-borders, and the rest of the things he/they did to this country.
I believe they want Clinton. Not Obama.
To Mrs. M.: You let him off too easy.

Almost every week brings a new reason for the United States House of Representatives to bring impeachment charges against President Obama. The question of the day is not why he should be impeached but why it hasn’t already been done.

XXXXX

Obama violated the Constitution with his “recess appointments” while the Senate was not in recess. It is up the Senate to decide when it is in recess, not the president. That distinction between executive and legislative authority is what the Separation of Powers doctrine is all about.​

Obama is an obvious participant and co-conspirator in Eric Holder’s approval and later cover-up of the illegal “Fast and Furious” gun-walking program. Unlike the Watergate case, people have actually died as a result of this illegal program.

Obama undoubtedly has knowledge of and has approved Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano’s project to require Border Patrol management to falsify apprehension numbers on the southwest border. This is a clear violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which requires the federal government to protect the country against foreign invasion.

The president’s open refusal to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act is a violation of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution, which does not authorize the president to choose which laws to “faithfully execute.” The oath taken by a new president on Inauguration Day does not say, “… to defend the Constitution of the United States… to the best of my ability except when I disagree with it.”

Did the president violate the law when he instructed Labor Secretary Solis to negotiate agreements with foreign governments to expand the “labor rights” of illegal aliens?​

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship
Published: 03/09/2012 at 7:45 PM
by TOM TANCREDO

Our choice: Impeachment or dictatorship

Not letting Joe Biden add U.S. President to his shameful résumé was the only reason I was against impeaching Obama. I suggested impeaching him, find him guilty in the Senate trial, then hand down the verdict one second before the next president is sworn in. In that way Joe Biden never becomes president.
... I am under the impression that the NYPD refused to lay down DESPITE the FBI .... not together with them.
To Glasnost: If I am interpreting events correctly, I believe the NYPD was on the same page as FBI investigators when they stood up to the DoJ (Loretta Lynch).
I apologize. You're right. With the thought of Clinton becoming president, it is tempting to let Obama walk just to keep her out of the oval office. He is ultimately the person responsible for having the DOJ give NYPD and FBI agents a stand down order. That alone should be enough to impeach him even if it is in the final hours of his presidency. No one involved should be eluding justice. Agreed.

Dream on-----no last minute SAVE------the USA is tied to the
rail road tracks-------and their ain't gonna be a last second
HERO-------or----DEUS EX MACHINA (spelling?) -----we are
going to be INFLICTED with HILLCAT

I'm not so sure about that. While Hitler was able to take control of an entire nation with a comparatively small number of his own men, the country he took was already disarmed. That isn't the case with America. Doubtful that over 300 million American people will a accept Clinton presidency that less than 8% support. She is a war criminal and the American people are ready to get out of the middle east and avoid a nuclear war with Russia. Expect a recount in either case and that would be just the beginning...


Less than 8%? Where did you get that information?
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$350.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top