How would you kill him?

[Roudy]

Koran is Mohammad's Mein Kampf, it's possible that Hilter may have been inspired by it, because he favored Islam more than all other faiths, and saw it as a perfect fit for his superior German warrior race. Although Hitler was friendly towards the Arabs, he perceived them to be too inferior to carry out the true potentials of the religion. He saw Christianty as an offshoot of Judaism and essentially "too soft" for Nazism.

 

[montelatici]

He didn't like Jews or Muslims but he certainly was a Christian.

You have been reading too much Zionist propaganda. Hitler also made clear anti-Muslim comments.


“My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a
fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded
by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and
summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! was greatest
not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian
and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord
at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the
Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was his fight
against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with
deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact
that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross. As
a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have
the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice… And if there is
anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly, it is
the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty
to my own people. And when I look on my people I see them work and
work and toil and labor, and at the end of the week they have only
for their wages wretchedness and misery. When I go out in the morning
and see these men standing in their queues and look into their
pinched faces, then I believe I would be no Christian, but a very
devil, if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two
thousand years ago, turn against those by whom today this poor people
are plundered and exposed.”

[Adolf Hitler, speech in Munich on April 12, 1922,

"What did the Nazis really think about Muslims?
According to the Nazis' racist ideology, Arabs are racial Semites and thus subhumans, similar to Jews. In his book, Mein Kampf, Hitler described the struggle for world domination as an ongoing racial, cultural and political battle between Aryans and non-Aryans. He envisaged a "ladder" of racial hierarchy, asserting that German "Aryans" were at the top of the ladder, while Jews and Gypsies were consigned to the bottom of the order. On Hitler's racial ladder, Arabs and Muslims occupied a servile place, held in much the same contempt as the Jews.
Hitler made a personal remark in 1939 in which he referred to the populace of the Middle East as "painted half-apes that ought to feel the whip".

Holocaust | The Nazis, the Holocaust and Muslims

 

[Roudy]

And now the truth. It seems like Hitler grew quite fond of Islam after his good friend and ally the Nazi Mufti of Palestine showed him what a barbaric, warrior like religion it was:

Nazi-era Minister of Armaments and War Production Albert Speer acknowledged that in private, Hitler regarded Arabs as an inferior race[224] and that the relationship he had with various Muslim figures was more political than personal.[224] During a meeting with a delegation of distinguished Arab figures, Hitler learned of how Islam motivated the Umayyad Caliphate during the Islamic invasion of Gaul and was now convinced that "the world would be Mohammedan today" if the Arab regime had successfully taken France during the Battle of Tours,[224] while also suggesting to Speer that "ultimately not Arabs, but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."[224]

In speeches, Hitler made apparently warm references towards Muslim culture such as: "The peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France".[225]

According to Speer, Hitler stated in private, "The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"[224] Speer also stated that when he was discussing with Hitler events which might have occurred had Islam absorbed Europe: "Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."[224]

Similarly, Hitler was transcribed as saying: "Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers [...] then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world."[226]

 

[montelatici]

And now the truth. It seems like Hitler grew quite fond of Islam after his good friend and ally the Nazi Mufti of Palestine showed him what a barbaric, warrior like religion it was:

Nazi-era Minister of Armaments and War Production Albert Speer acknowledged that in private, Hitler regarded Arabs as an inferior race[224] and that the relationship he had with various Muslim figures was more political than personal.[224] During a meeting with a delegation of distinguished Arab figures, Hitler learned of how Islam motivated the Umayyad Caliphate during the Islamic invasion of Gaul and was now convinced that "the world would be Mohammedan today" if the Arab regime had successfully taken France during the Battle of Tours,[224] while also suggesting to Speer that "ultimately not Arabs, but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."[224]

In speeches, Hitler made apparently warm references towards Muslim culture such as: "The peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France".[225]

According to Speer, Hitler stated in private, "The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"[224] Speer also stated that when he was discussing with Hitler events which might have occurred had Islam absorbed Europe: "Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."[224]

Similarly, Hitler was transcribed as saying: "Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers [...] then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world."[226]

Well, when I post fact, you post propaganda and lies. Typical. Fact is, Hitler was a Christian and hated Jews as much as Muslims. No amount of your bullshit propaganda changes fact. Speer never said anything of the sort, by the way. Just Zionist propaganda. You must have noted that my source was a Jewish Holocaust website.

 

[Roudy]

And now the truth. It seems like Hitler grew quite fond of Islam after his good friend and ally the Nazi Mufti of Palestine showed him what a barbaric, warrior like religion it was:

Nazi-era Minister of Armaments and War Production Albert Speer acknowledged that in private, Hitler regarded Arabs as an inferior race[224] and that the relationship he had with various Muslim figures was more political than personal.[224] During a meeting with a delegation of distinguished Arab figures, Hitler learned of how Islam motivated the Umayyad Caliphate during the Islamic invasion of Gaul and was now convinced that "the world would be Mohammedan today" if the Arab regime had successfully taken France during the Battle of Tours,[224] while also suggesting to Speer that "ultimately not Arabs, but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."[224]

In speeches, Hitler made apparently warm references towards Muslim culture such as: "The peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France".[225]

According to Speer, Hitler stated in private, "The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"[224] Speer also stated that when he was discussing with Hitler events which might have occurred had Islam absorbed Europe: "Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."[224]

Similarly, Hitler was transcribed as saying: "Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers [...] then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world."[226]

Well, when I post fact, you post propaganda and lies. Typical. Fact is, Hitler was a Christian and hated Jews as much as Muslims. No amount of your bullshit propaganda changes fact. Speer never said anything of the sort, by the way. Just Zionist propaganda. You must have noted that my source was a Jewish Holocaust website.

Bullshit propaganda garbage is what you provided. I just proved what Hitler really thought of Islam, just because Achmed Montelatici doesn't like it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

 

[Likkmee]

No food for 3 weeks then air drop 100 LBS of bacon into his fenced area. Same as you do a Muslim.
Same savage. Different hat.

 

[Phoenall]

No I have researched the koran and compared it to Nazism and the similarities are overwhelming. From the need to conquer the world to the elimination of "untermensch" . The segregation of non believers through fear and violence and the imposed dress codes. The work they can do and the work they cant, the banning of what they can do in public and the penalties for any infringement. Another close relative of islam/Nazism was the deep south of America prior to the crash of the 1930's

The question is have you studied other forms of extremism?

I mean, we've found similarities with rock structures on Mars with those of human beings. It's not hard to find similarities. That doesn't mean much.

See? Similarities. Does this mean there's a link between them? Divorces in Maine go down because in the US less people consume margarine? Really, you think because the similarities are there that there's an impact?

What you've seen is human nature. Human nature doesn't change that much around the planet, and when extremism takes over, it generally takes forms that are similar. Which is why Nazis and Communism had many similarities, because they're extremism.

All you're telling me is that there are similarities therefore there must be a link. I call bullshit of this. You've proven NOTHING.

No not even close enough for you to say they are similar, many cases the lines don't even look similar. The rules and tenets are copies of each other if you look and show that Nazism is copied from islam.

Just as communism Is copied from the original concept of Christianity

 

[frigidweirdo]

No I have researched the koran and compared it to Nazism and the similarities are overwhelming. From the need to conquer the world to the elimination of "untermensch" . The segregation of non believers through fear and violence and the imposed dress codes. The work they can do and the work they cant, the banning of what they can do in public and the penalties for any infringement. Another close relative of islam/Nazism was the deep south of America prior to the crash of the 1930's

The question is have you studied other forms of extremism?

I mean, we've found similarities with rock structures on Mars with those of human beings. It's not hard to find similarities. That doesn't mean much.

See? Similarities. Does this mean there's a link between them? Divorces in Maine go down because in the US less people consume margarine? Really, you think because the similarities are there that there's an impact?

What you've seen is human nature. Human nature doesn't change that much around the planet, and when extremism takes over, it generally takes forms that are similar. Which is why Nazis and Communism had many similarities, because they're extremism.

All you're telling me is that there are similarities therefore there must be a link. I call bullshit of this. You've proven NOTHING.

No not even close enough for you to say they are similar, many cases the lines don't even look similar. The rules and tenets are copies of each other if you look and show that Nazism is copied from islam.

Just as communism Is copied from the original concept of Christianity

Don't look similar? Similar enough for people to make comparisons, that's the whole point.

You're making a claim that Nazism copied stuff from Islam. Then you'd need to prove the links between Nazism and Islam. What did Hitler know about Islam? What did the Nazi bigwigs know about Islam?

You haven't bothered to even make this case. It would seem rather important when this is what you're claiming.

 

[Indofred]

How would you want to kill an Israeli soldier?

I don't especially, but I can see why the oppressed people of occupied countries would want to do so.
Many French people wanted to kill occupying Germans - no worries.

 

[Phoenall]

No I have researched the koran and compared it to Nazism and the similarities are overwhelming. From the need to conquer the world to the elimination of "untermensch" . The segregation of non believers through fear and violence and the imposed dress codes. The work they can do and the work they cant, the banning of what they can do in public and the penalties for any infringement. Another close relative of islam/Nazism was the deep south of America prior to the crash of the 1930's

The question is have you studied other forms of extremism?

I mean, we've found similarities with rock structures on Mars with those of human beings. It's not hard to find similarities. That doesn't mean much.

See? Similarities. Does this mean there's a link between them? Divorces in Maine go down because in the US less people consume margarine? Really, you think because the similarities are there that there's an impact?

What you've seen is human nature. Human nature doesn't change that much around the planet, and when extremism takes over, it generally takes forms that are similar. Which is why Nazis and Communism had many similarities, because they're extremism.

All you're telling me is that there are similarities therefore there must be a link. I call bullshit of this. You've proven NOTHING.

No not even close enough for you to say they are similar, many cases the lines don't even look similar. The rules and tenets are copies of each other if you look and show that Nazism is copied from islam.

Just as communism Is copied from the original concept of Christianity

Don't look similar? Similar enough for people to make comparisons, that's the whole point.

You're making a claim that Nazism copied stuff from Islam. Then you'd need to prove the links between Nazism and Islam. What did Hitler know about Islam? What did the Nazi bigwigs know about Islam?

You haven't bothered to even make this case. It would seem rather important when this is what you're claiming.

Enough to see islam as an ally, or at least the Suuni muslims under the Mufti. Enough to copy their laws and adapt them for their own use, Enough to know that without the support they would fail in the M.E. if they won the war. Enough to copy their tactics and implement them. Enough to say that islam would be the best state religion for Germany once they had won the war. Again full details and a link posted just today that details it all and you must have ignored it.

 

[Phoenall]

How would you want to kill an Israeli soldier?

I don't especially, but I can see why the oppressed people of occupied countries would want to do so.
Many French people wanted to kill occupying Germans - no worries.

But not take it out on the children or women like the arab muslims do. That is the difference between freedom fighters and terrorists, the terrorists go after soft targets.

 

[frigidweirdo]

No I have researched the koran and compared it to Nazism and the similarities are overwhelming. From the need to conquer the world to the elimination of "untermensch" . The segregation of non believers through fear and violence and the imposed dress codes. The work they can do and the work they cant, the banning of what they can do in public and the penalties for any infringement. Another close relative of islam/Nazism was the deep south of America prior to the crash of the 1930's

The question is have you studied other forms of extremism?

I mean, we've found similarities with rock structures on Mars with those of human beings. It's not hard to find similarities. That doesn't mean much.

See? Similarities. Does this mean there's a link between them? Divorces in Maine go down because in the US less people consume margarine? Really, you think because the similarities are there that there's an impact?

What you've seen is human nature. Human nature doesn't change that much around the planet, and when extremism takes over, it generally takes forms that are similar. Which is why Nazis and Communism had many similarities, because they're extremism.

All you're telling me is that there are similarities therefore there must be a link. I call bullshit of this. You've proven NOTHING.

No not even close enough for you to say they are similar, many cases the lines don't even look similar. The rules and tenets are copies of each other if you look and show that Nazism is copied from islam.

Just as communism Is copied from the original concept of Christianity

Don't look similar? Similar enough for people to make comparisons, that's the whole point.

You're making a claim that Nazism copied stuff from Islam. Then you'd need to prove the links between Nazism and Islam. What did Hitler know about Islam? What did the Nazi bigwigs know about Islam?

You haven't bothered to even make this case. It would seem rather important when this is what you're claiming.

Enough to see islam as an ally, or at least the Suuni muslims under the Mufti. Enough to copy their laws and adapt them for their own use, Enough to know that without the support they would fail in the M.E. if they won the war. Enough to copy their tactics and implement them. Enough to say that islam would be the best state religion for Germany once they had won the war. Again full details and a link posted just today that details it all and you must have ignored it.

Well at the same time the US has the USSR as allies. Does this mean the USA was based on Communism?

They copied their laws? Which laws did they copy?

So, the Nazis needed oil to make their tanks and planes work, therefore they copied Islam?

They wanted Islam as state religion after the war? WTF?

Again, you're talking a crock of shit.

You've proven NOTHING. You've provided no links. You're making connections in such a rubbish way. This is laughable. I take it you didn't do history at degree level.

 

[Indofred]

How would you want to kill an Israeli soldier?

I don't especially, but I can see why the oppressed people of occupied countries would want to do so.
Many French people wanted to kill occupying Germans - no worries.

But not take it out on the children or women like the arab muslims do. That is the difference between freedom fighters and terrorists, the terrorists go after soft targets.

The Germans raped a lot of French women, but the Nazis suggested the French freedom fighters were terrorists as well.
In Oradour-sur-Glane, the Nazis killed a whole village full of people, but the French were still painted as terrorists.

 

[frigidweirdo]

How would you want to kill an Israeli soldier?

I don't especially, but I can see why the oppressed people of occupied countries would want to do so.
Many French people wanted to kill occupying Germans - no worries.

But not take it out on the children or women like the arab muslims do. That is the difference between freedom fighters and terrorists, the terrorists go after soft targets.

That's just so wrong.

A terrorist is merely someone who is on the "wrong side".

Mandela was a terrorist to the white South Africans. To the black South Africans he was a freedom fighter. To those who hate apartheid he is a freedom fighter, to those who are racists he was a terrorist.

The IRA were terrorists to the British, freedom fighters to the Catholics.
ETA were terrorists to the Spanish, freedom fighters to the Basque separatists.

It's semantics.

A terrorist is a negative word. People hate terrorists.

Freedom fight is a positive word. People like freedom fighters.

 

[Phoenall]

No I have researched the koran and compared it to Nazism and the similarities are overwhelming. From the need to conquer the world to the elimination of "untermensch" . The segregation of non believers through fear and violence and the imposed dress codes. The work they can do and the work they cant, the banning of what they can do in public and the penalties for any infringement. Another close relative of islam/Nazism was the deep south of America prior to the crash of the 1930's

The question is have you studied other forms of extremism?

I mean, we've found similarities with rock structures on Mars with those of human beings. It's not hard to find similarities. That doesn't mean much.

See? Similarities. Does this mean there's a link between them? Divorces in Maine go down because in the US less people consume margarine? Really, you think because the similarities are there that there's an impact?

What you've seen is human nature. Human nature doesn't change that much around the planet, and when extremism takes over, it generally takes forms that are similar. Which is why Nazis and Communism had many similarities, because they're extremism.

All you're telling me is that there are similarities therefore there must be a link. I call bullshit of this. You've proven NOTHING.

No not even close enough for you to say they are similar, many cases the lines don't even look similar. The rules and tenets are copies of each other if you look and show that Nazism is copied from islam.

Just as communism Is copied from the original concept of Christianity

Don't look similar? Similar enough for people to make comparisons, that's the whole point.

You're making a claim that Nazism copied stuff from Islam. Then you'd need to prove the links between Nazism and Islam. What did Hitler know about Islam? What did the Nazi bigwigs know about Islam?

You haven't bothered to even make this case. It would seem rather important when this is what you're claiming.

Enough to see islam as an ally, or at least the Suuni muslims under the Mufti. Enough to copy their laws and adapt them for their own use, Enough to know that without the support they would fail in the M.E. if they won the war. Enough to copy their tactics and implement them. Enough to say that islam would be the best state religion for Germany once they had won the war. Again full details and a link posted just today that details it all and you must have ignored it.

Well at the same time the US has the USSR as allies. Does this mean the USA was based on Communism?

They copied their laws? Which laws did they copy?

So, the Nazis needed oil to make their tanks and planes work, therefore they copied Islam?

They wanted Islam as state religion after the war? WTF?

Again, you're talking a crock of shit.

You've proven NOTHING. You've provided no links. You're making connections in such a rubbish way. This is laughable. I take it you didn't do history at degree level.

WRONG again as they were not allies just fighting for the same cause.

Dhimmi laws, sharia laws and the pact of Omar

WRONG again as they had oil aplenty, research the subject before making a fool of yourself.

Read the links provided

Only because it destroys your argument

Only in your fantasy world

 

[Phoenall]

How would you want to kill an Israeli soldier?

I don't especially, but I can see why the oppressed people of occupied countries would want to do so.
Many French people wanted to kill occupying Germans - no worries.

But not take it out on the children or women like the arab muslims do. That is the difference between freedom fighters and terrorists, the terrorists go after soft targets.

The Germans raped a lot of French women, but the Nazis suggested the French freedom fighters were terrorists as well.
In Oradour-sur-Glane, the Nazis killed a whole village full of people, but the French were still painted as terrorists.

Correct all part of the Islamic morality that was seeping down to the troops. All armies use rape as a weapon, it is when they mix it with murder like the muslims do that it becomes more. And mo'mad was known to rape girls in the blood of their murdered families.

 

[Phoenall]

How would you want to kill an Israeli soldier?

I don't especially, but I can see why the oppressed people of occupied countries would want to do so.
Many French people wanted to kill occupying Germans - no worries.

But not take it out on the children or women like the arab muslims do. That is the difference between freedom fighters and terrorists, the terrorists go after soft targets.

That's just so wrong.

A terrorist is merely someone who is on the "wrong side".

Mandela was a terrorist to the white South Africans. To the black South Africans he was a freedom fighter. To those who hate apartheid he is a freedom fighter, to those who are racists he was a terrorist.

The IRA were terrorists to the British, freedom fighters to the Catholics.
ETA were terrorists to the Spanish, freedom fighters to the Basque separatists.

It's semantics.

A terrorist is a negative word. People hate terrorists.

Freedom fight is a positive word. People like freedom fighters.

Not according to the definition of terrorism, look it up

He was a self confessed terrorist in the name of communism. A neo Marxist butcher that had more blacks murdered than the Pretoria government killed.

The IRA were terrorist to the Catholic church as well, which is why they are still going strong. All they do is walk over the border and they are safe.

Yes people do hate terrorists and for a good reason as they are psychopaths

Depends on your definition of freedom fighter, and how they act. target children so you can force the people to force their government to surrender is not the action of a freedom fighter is it. If it was then the enemy can use the same methods.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The question is have you studied other forms of extremism?

I mean, we've found similarities with rock structures on Mars with those of human beings. It's not hard to find similarities. That doesn't mean much.

See? Similarities. Does this mean there's a link between them? Divorces in Maine go down because in the US less people consume margarine? Really, you think because the similarities are there that there's an impact?

What you've seen is human nature. Human nature doesn't change that much around the planet, and when extremism takes over, it generally takes forms that are similar. Which is why Nazis and Communism had many similarities, because they're extremism.

All you're telling me is that there are similarities therefore there must be a link. I call bullshit of this. You've proven NOTHING.

No not even close enough for you to say they are similar, many cases the lines don't even look similar. The rules and tenets are copies of each other if you look and show that Nazism is copied from islam.

Just as communism Is copied from the original concept of Christianity

Don't look similar? Similar enough for people to make comparisons, that's the whole point.

You're making a claim that Nazism copied stuff from Islam. Then you'd need to prove the links between Nazism and Islam. What did Hitler know about Islam? What did the Nazi bigwigs know about Islam?

You haven't bothered to even make this case. It would seem rather important when this is what you're claiming.

Enough to see islam as an ally, or at least the Suuni muslims under the Mufti. Enough to copy their laws and adapt them for their own use, Enough to know that without the support they would fail in the M.E. if they won the war. Enough to copy their tactics and implement them. Enough to say that islam would be the best state religion for Germany once they had won the war. Again full details and a link posted just today that details it all and you must have ignored it.

Well at the same time the US has the USSR as allies. Does this mean the USA was based on Communism?

They copied their laws? Which laws did they copy?

So, the Nazis needed oil to make their tanks and planes work, therefore they copied Islam?

They wanted Islam as state religion after the war? WTF?

Again, you're talking a crock of shit.

You've proven NOTHING. You've provided no links. You're making connections in such a rubbish way. This is laughable. I take it you didn't do history at degree level.

WRONG again as they were not allies just fighting for the same cause.

Dhimmi laws, sharia laws and the pact of Omar

WRONG again as they had oil aplenty, research the subject before making a fool of yourself.

Read the links provided

Only because it destroys your argument

Only in your fantasy world

The US was fighting the same cause as the Soviets.

Where did Nazi Germany get its oil from?

Germany and Oil • Axis History Forum

"In 1938, of the total consumption of 44 million barrels, imports from overseas accounted for 28 million barrels or roughly 60 percent of the total supply. An additional 3.8 million barrels were imported overland from European sources (2.8 million barrels came from Romania alone), and another 3.8 million barrels were derived from domestic oil production. The remainder of the total, 9 million barrels, were produced synthetically."

"At the outbreak of the war, Germany’s stockpiles of fuel consisted of a total of 15 million barrels. The campaigns in Norway, Holland, Belgium, and France added another 5 million barrels in booty, and imports from the Soviet Union accounted for 4 million barrels in 1940 and 1.6 million barrels in the first half of 1941. Yet a High Command study in May of 1941 noted that with monthly military requirements for 7.25 million barrels and imports and home production of only 5.35 million barrels, German stocks would be exhausted by August 1941. "

Oil aplenty. Hmm, that's why Germany's oil would be exhausted by August 1941 then... because they... er.... had so much......

As for you fantasy world and all of that... I'm sorry, you've making a really bad case for something. I mean, REALLY BAD. You don't like it, well that's your problem.

 

[frigidweirdo]

How would you want to kill an Israeli soldier?

I don't especially, but I can see why the oppressed people of occupied countries would want to do so.
Many French people wanted to kill occupying Germans - no worries.

But not take it out on the children or women like the arab muslims do. That is the difference between freedom fighters and terrorists, the terrorists go after soft targets.

That's just so wrong.

A terrorist is merely someone who is on the "wrong side".

Mandela was a terrorist to the white South Africans. To the black South Africans he was a freedom fighter. To those who hate apartheid he is a freedom fighter, to those who are racists he was a terrorist.

The IRA were terrorists to the British, freedom fighters to the Catholics.
ETA were terrorists to the Spanish, freedom fighters to the Basque separatists.

It's semantics.

A terrorist is a negative word. People hate terrorists.

Freedom fight is a positive word. People like freedom fighters.

Not according to the definition of terrorism, look it up

He was a self confessed terrorist in the name of communism. A neo Marxist butcher that had more blacks murdered than the Pretoria government killed.

The IRA were terrorist to the Catholic church as well, which is why they are still going strong. All they do is walk over the border and they are safe.

Yes people do hate terrorists and for a good reason as they are psychopaths

Depends on your definition of freedom fighter, and how they act. target children so you can force the people to force their government to surrender is not the action of a freedom fighter is it. If it was then the enemy can use the same methods.

The definition of terrorism.

terrorist: definition of terrorist in Oxford dictionary (American English) (US)

"A person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims."

Definition of “terrorist” | Collins English Dictionary

"a person who employs terror or terrorism, esp as a political weapon"

freedom fighter: definition of freedom fighter in Oxford dictionary (American English) (US)

"A person who takes part in a violent struggle to achieve a political goal, especially in order tooverthrow their government."

Definition of “freedom fighter” | Collins English Dictionary

"a militant revolutionary"

Who decides whether the person is using terrorism for political aim or if they're taking part in a violent struggle to achieve a political goal?

I mean, they're the same thing. Just looked at from different perspectives.

 

[Phoenall]

How would you want to kill an Israeli soldier?

I don't especially, but I can see why the oppressed people of occupied countries would want to do so.
Many French people wanted to kill occupying Germans - no worries.

But not take it out on the children or women like the arab muslims do. That is the difference between freedom fighters and terrorists, the terrorists go after soft targets.

That's just so wrong.

A terrorist is merely someone who is on the "wrong side".

Mandela was a terrorist to the white South Africans. To the black South Africans he was a freedom fighter. To those who hate apartheid he is a freedom fighter, to those who are racists he was a terrorist.

The IRA were terrorists to the British, freedom fighters to the Catholics.
ETA were terrorists to the Spanish, freedom fighters to the Basque separatists.

It's semantics.

A terrorist is a negative word. People hate terrorists.

Freedom fight is a positive word. People like freedom fighters.

Not according to the definition of terrorism, look it up

He was a self confessed terrorist in the name of communism. A neo Marxist butcher that had more blacks murdered than the Pretoria government killed.

The IRA were terrorist to the Catholic church as well, which is why they are still going strong. All they do is walk over the border and they are safe.

Yes people do hate terrorists and for a good reason as they are psychopaths

Depends on your definition of freedom fighter, and how they act. target children so you can force the people to force their government to surrender is not the action of a freedom fighter is it. If it was then the enemy can use the same methods.

The definition of terrorism.

terrorist: definition of terrorist in Oxford dictionary (American English) (US)

"A person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims."

Definition of “terrorist” | Collins English Dictionary

"a person who employs terror or terrorism, esp as a political weapon"

freedom fighter: definition of freedom fighter in Oxford dictionary (American English) (US)

"A person who takes part in a violent struggle to achieve a political goal, especially in order tooverthrow their government."

Definition of “freedom fighter” | Collins English Dictionary

"a militant revolutionary"

Who decides whether the person is using terrorism for political aim or if they're taking part in a violent struggle to achieve a political goal?

I mean, they're the same thing. Just looked at from different perspectives.

Only to you as the proper definition of terrorism includes the use of fear to force the people to give in to political, religious or ideological groups. That is why so many Islamic groups are seen as terrorists, because they push the islamonazi ideology