How will you celebrate Obama's election loss?

OK, Tired of waiting so I altered your graph to show unemployment vs party in control of Congress. Note that from 2001 to 2003, the Senate was controlled by the Democrats and since January of 2011, the GOP has controlled the House.
 

Attachments

  • $GOP_vs_DNC-unemployment-january-2012-data.jpg
    $GOP_vs_DNC-unemployment-january-2012-data.jpg
    23.8 KB · Views: 61
Great Gatsby -

The banking system itself may never have been in danger, but - obviously - banks were in danger. We know this, because those banks no longer exist.

How many major trading banks were wiped out? Maybe 15 or 20, I guess?

There is no question at all that what the global economy exprienced in 2008 was unprecedented in our lifetimes, and was at last the worst financial crisis since 1934, and possibly ever.

Any intelligent person knew this was going to mean higher unemployment and lower per capita incomes for the next five years, at least, and right around the world. I'm jusy amazed to see how many people on this thread did not understand that, or choose to be wilfuly ignorant to make it a partisan issue.
 
Last edited:
Gatsby, you did hear about the Booosh/Pub Great Depression, right?- it was in most of the papers...change the channel Pub dupe. Ay caramba LOL

Actually the unemployment rate reached its highest level since the early 80's during the Presidency of Barack Obama.

Bush shit the bed and left town. So what's your point?

bush-vs-obama-unemployment-january-2012-data.jpg


Bush vs. Obama: Unemployment (January 2012 Jobs Data) | Reflections of a Rational Republican

My question is how can Jan 01 be bushes unemployment and Jan. 09 not be obama's unemployment?
 
Actually the unemployment rate reached its highest level since the early 80's during the Presidency of Barack Obama.

Bush shit the bed and left town. So what's your point?

bush-vs-obama-unemployment-january-2012-data.jpg


Bush vs. Obama: Unemployment (January 2012 Jobs Data) | Reflections of a Rational Republican

My question is how can Jan 01 be bushes unemployment and Jan. 09 not be obama's unemployment?

I don't know... maybe by looking at the state of the economy and the union, and the trend of the curve.

Look at the gradation.
 

My question is how can Jan 01 be bushes unemployment and Jan. 09 not be obama's unemployment?

I don't know... maybe by looking at the state of the economy and the union, and the trend of the curve.

Look at the gradation.

According to the graph who ever created Jan 2001 is given to Bush and then they also give up to March 2009 to Bush also
 
You sure the hell post like a damned socialist. Are you sure you aren't one?

I think anyone who blurts out the word "Socialist" has forfeited any right to be taken seriously on anything.

You have said this about a hundred times in the short time you have been here.

It only proves how much against the right to free speech you truly are.

It also only proves that you are in fact a socialist at heart.

Grow the hell up.

Immie

Well, I'll keep saying it because honestly, when you say crap like that, you really shouldn't be taken seriously. It shows how crazy the GOP has gotten. You get people like West who blurt out there are 90 Communists in Congress, your movement has become- a joke.
 
OK, Tired of waiting so I altered your graph to show unemployment vs party in control of Congress. Note that from 2001 to 2003, the Senate was controlled by the Democrats and since January of 2011, the GOP has controlled the House.

So it's your contention that unemployment is tied to Congress.

So this means you won't be citing unemployment as part of the campaign against Obama.

Well alrighty then.
 
I think anyone who blurts out the word "Socialist" has forfeited any right to be taken seriously on anything.

You have said this about a hundred times in the short time you have been here.

It only proves how much against the right to free speech you truly are.

It also only proves that you are in fact a socialist at heart.

Grow the hell up.

Immie

Well, I'll keep saying it because honestly, when you say crap like that, you really shouldn't be taken seriously. It shows how crazy the GOP has gotten. You get people like West who blurt out there are 90 Communists in Congress, your movement has become- a joke.

True
Communists are too honest of leftists and tell you want they want
Technically, all communists are socialists

He would have been better to say socialists-


Does it really matter ?
they are all pushing for some form of statist gov't that
puts state above man

--------------------------

No doubt with all of Papa Obama's evolving
and the Left pushing stories on Mitt from 50 years
ago

Everybody takes the Democrats serious

Next it will be that Mitt did not eat his vegetables
60 years ago
:eusa_whistle:
 
Last edited:
Guy, here's the problem-

The following words disqualify you from serious consideration in discussing Obama-

Socialist
Marxist
Maoist
Communist

Once you've used any of those words proceeded by "Obama is a....", you are really no longer anyone who can be taken seriously in a discussion. Sorry. You just can't.

There are VERY VALID criticisms to be made of Obama and his leadership. I've made them. He's a weak president, and it's too bad the GOP couldn't come up with a good candidate. "Well, the guy we roundly rejected four years ago was the best we could come up with this time."

But frothing in the corner about how he went to a party once with a 60's radical or how he was born in Keyna, well, guy, you are just scaring the straights.
 
Sort of like when someones uses "Teabagger"
You know they are a knee jerk leftist who
parrot whatever the MSM and the Left say


The left is so desperate to push the "line"
left to create the illusion that Papa Obama is "center"

This is the problem, no believes Papa Obama is "center"
except the Left and the MSM

The Left just fights their labels because
they suck

Socialism is an accepted form of gov't in Europe
Yet the Left fights the label that they aspire to be..

Socialist programs, socialist idea
But don't call use socialists
what wimps
 
Last edited:
Sort of like when someones uses "Teabagger"
You know they are a knee jerk leftist who
parrot whatever the MSM and the Left say

Guy, you all were calling yourselves "TeaBaggers" until someone pointed out that it was slang for a sex act.

Before then, you were standing their stupidly wondering why people were snickering when you called yourselves that.
 
Sort of like when someones uses "Teabagger"
You know they are a knee jerk leftist who
parrot whatever the MSM and the Left say

Guy, you all were calling yourselves "TeaBaggers" until someone pointed out that it was slang for a sex act.

Before then, you were standing their stupidly wondering why people were snickering when you called yourselves that.

Yeah those stupid Senor citizens who didn't know what a Teabagger was..
I and MANY people didn't know what a friggen Teabagger was until all this..
pathetic little people you all can be
 
Sort of like when someones uses "Teabagger"
You know they are a knee jerk leftist who
parrot whatever the MSM and the Left say

Guy, you all were calling yourselves "TeaBaggers" until someone pointed out that it was slang for a sex act.

Before then, you were standing their stupidly wondering why people were snickering when you called yourselves that.

Yeah those stupid Senor citizens who didn't know what a Teabagger was..
I and MANY people didn't know what a friggen Teabagger was until all this..
pathetic little people you all can be

So it's our fault you picked a stupid name for yourselves?

Then again, calling yourselves "Taxed Enough Already" group when Obama cut your taxes in most cases kind of show you all as a little clueless beyond the sex thing.

Or the Guy with the Teabags hanging off his hat yelling 'Keep your government hands off my medicare!"
 

Forum List

Back
Top