How Will the Rich Rule Without Money?

[Likkmee]

They rule by the illusion of having no money. Think Fidel

 

[ReinyDays]

The IPCC report predicts a 2ºC temperature rise over the next 100 years, and then level out over the next 200 years, maybe reaching 3ºC then ... AR5 WG1 Figure 12-5 ...

That's a tiny difference, so small we won't notice ... any "climate crisis" will need one or more Laws of Nature to collapse ... the OP needs to brush up on his calculus and then read a meteorology textbook ... so much that he's posting defies basic physics ...

One can't post to the internet without creating a shit-load of carbon pollution ... so why are you complaining about carbon-pollution on the internet? ... if you honestly believed any of what you're posting, you'd sell your cars and grow a garden, then you wouldn't have time to post on the internet ... just being part of the problem doesn't solve the problem ... you must not believe there's a problem ...

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The rich aren't worried. There is no catastrophic climste chaos coming.

 

[DOTR]

How 'bout Pentagon fellers?

MR Online | How the rich plan to rule a burning planet

"Military strategists have been awake to the implications of climate change for a long time.

"As early as 2003, in a report commissioned by the Pentagon, U.S. researchers Peter Schwartz and Doug Randall argued that 'violence and disruption stemming from the stresses created by abrupt changes in the .

LOL. Yeah how about them geniuses...https://eesc.columbia.edu/courses/v1003/readings/Pentagon.pdf

"In the climate change disruption scenario proposed here, we consider a period of gradual warming leading to 2010 and then outline the following ten years...In 2007, a particularly severe storm causes the ocean to break through levees in the Netherlands making a few key coastal cities such as The Hague unlivable. Failures of the delta island levees in the Sacramento River region in the Central Valley of California creates an inland sea and disrupts the aqueduct system transporting water from northern to southern California because salt water can no longer be kept out of the area during the dry season. Melting along the Himalayan glaciers accelerates, causing some Tibetan people to relocate. Floating ice in the northern polar seas, which had already lost 40% of its mass from 1970 to 2003, is mostly gone during summer by 2010...
...the thermohaline collapse begins in 2010, disrupting the temperate climate of Europe...The Mega-droughts begin in key regions in Southern China and Northern Europe around 2010 and last throughout the full decade. At the same time, areas that were relatively dry over the past few decades receive persistent years of torrential rainfall, flooding rivers, and regions that traditionally relied on dryland agriculture... the cooling becomes increasingly intense and less predictable. As snow accumulates in mountain regions, the cooling spreads to summertime...."

We should listen to these scientists. We only have until 2010 before brrr...cold summers.... And those people in the Hague better leave by at least 2006 dont you think?

 

[Mac-7]

How will the richest among us protect themselves and their property if (when?) catastrophic climate chaos makes money worthless?

MR Online | How the rich plan to rule a burning planet

"Writing in the Guardian in 2018, media theorist and futurist Douglas Rushkoff related his experience of being paid half his annual salary to speak at 'a super-deluxe private resort … on the subject of "the future of technology’”. He was expecting a room full of investment bankers. When he arrived, however, he was introduced to 'five super-wealthy guys … from the upper echelon of the hedge fund world'. Rushkoff wrote:

"'After a bit of small talk, I realized they had no interest in the information I had prepared about the future of technology.

"They had come with questions of their own … Which region will be less affected by the coming climate crisis: New Zealand or Alaska? … Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system and asked: "How do I maintain authority over my security force after the Event?"

"The Event.

"That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, unstoppable virus, or Mr Robot hack that takes everything down … They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from the angry mobs.

"But how would they pay the guards once money was worthless?

"What would stop the guards from choosing their own leader?

"The billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew.

"Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for survival."

If your plan calls for allowing the world to drown in the swamp of mass death and destruction while you cower in a South Pacific bunker protected by hired killers wearing exploding collars, you are not likely to win much in the way of public support for the capitalist state economics that are creating the next mass extinction, are you?

The climate chaos thats threatens us is not physical

its political and will be caused by global warming doomsday hoax wackos

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Climate change is boring. Climate zealots have to rebrand with climate chaos or climate collapse.
Alarmists Propose Rebranding ‘Climate Change’ for Greater Shock Value

 

[whitehall]

"Catastrophic climate crisis"? Is that what the crazy left is wishing for these days? How are (rich) left wing propaganda sources going to survive when they can't use ordinary climate change as a political tool?

 

[2aguy]

How will the richest among us protect themselves and their property if (when?) catastrophic climate chaos makes money worthless?

MR Online | How the rich plan to rule a burning planet

"Writing in the Guardian in 2018, media theorist and futurist Douglas Rushkoff related his experience of being paid half his annual salary to speak at 'a super-deluxe private resort … on the subject of "the future of technology’”. He was expecting a room full of investment bankers. When he arrived, however, he was introduced to 'five super-wealthy guys … from the upper echelon of the hedge fund world'. Rushkoff wrote:

"'After a bit of small talk, I realized they had no interest in the information I had prepared about the future of technology.

"They had come with questions of their own … Which region will be less affected by the coming climate crisis: New Zealand or Alaska? … Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system and asked: "How do I maintain authority over my security force after the Event?"

"The Event.

"That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, unstoppable virus, or Mr Robot hack that takes everything down … They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from the angry mobs.

"But how would they pay the guards once money was worthless?

"What would stop the guards from choosing their own leader?

"The billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew.

"Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for survival."

If your plan calls for allowing the world to drown in the swamp of mass death and destruction while you cower in a South Pacific bunker protected by hired killers wearing exploding collars, you are not likely to win much in the way of public support for the capitalist state economics that are creating the next mass extinction, are you?

There won't be climate chaos, and if there was...the rich would be the ones doing the best......you really should stop taking your meds with booze....

 

[georgephillip]

A TDS thread blended with a touch of "climate crisis". Quite a fantasy.

The leaders of the new world order in a civilization ending event will be more like this feller, than any ex hedge fund manager.
View attachment 297172

How 'bout Pentagon fellers?

MR Online | How the rich plan to rule a burning planet

"Military strategists have been awake to the implications of climate change for a long time.

"As early as 2003, in a report commissioned by the Pentagon, U.S. researchers Peter Schwartz and Doug Randall argued that 'violence and disruption stemming from the stresses created by abrupt changes in the climate pose a different type of threat to national security than we are accustomed to today. Military confrontation may be triggered by a desperate need for natural resources such as energy, food, and water rather than conflicts over ideology, religion, or national honor. The shifting motivation for confrontation would alter which countries are most vulnerable and the existing warning signs of security threats'.

"More recently, a 2015 U.S. Department of Defense memorandum to Congress argued: 'Climate change is an urgent and growing threat to our national security, contributing to increased natural disasters, refugee flows, and conflicts over basic resources such as food and water. These impacts are already occurring, and the scope, scale and intensity of these impacts are projected to increase over time'".

In 2015, of course, Obama was commander in chief, and demanded vocal assent to his ultra radical Climate Change Agenda. a DOD memo only indicates that the generals will say what the c-in-c tells them to say. Remember, America was a signatory under Obama to the Paris Accords treaty, and it did nothing to change the weather at all

In 2015, of course, Obama was commander in chief, and demanded vocal assent to his ultra radical Climate Change Agenda. a DOD memo only indicates that the generals will say what the c-in-c tells them to say. Remember, America was a signatory under Obama to the Paris Accords treaty, and it did nothing to change the weather at all

Not exactly.

Climate change threatens a majority of mission-critical military bases, Pentagon report says

"More than two-thirds of the military’s operationally critical installations are threatened by climate change, according to a new DoD report.

"The January 2019 report, 'Report on Effects of a Changing Climate to the Department of Defense,' was submitted to Congress Thursday without an official announcement of the report or a public release.

"Several environmental organizations made the report publicly available early Friday."

Climate chaos is as real as Trump's impeachment.

 

[jasonnfree]

When I look into the global warming argument, it seems most all scientists agree it's mainly caused by humans. It seems that a line is drawn between right wing and left wing whether this is true or not. May be best to opt on the side of safety and go with the scientists since the average guy knows diddley squat about science and too many politicians will take the side of the oil billionaires who support them. Time for public financed elections and make bribing politicians a crime like back in the day?
https://skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm

 

[georgephillip]

How will the richest among us protect themselves and their property if (when?) catastrophic climate chaos makes money worthless?

MR Online | How the rich plan to rule a burning planet

"Writing in the Guardian in 2018, media theorist and futurist Douglas Rushkoff related his experience of being paid half his annual salary to speak at 'a super-deluxe private resort … on the subject of "the future of technology’”. He was expecting a room full of investment bankers. When he arrived, however, he was introduced to 'five super-wealthy guys … from the upper echelon of the hedge fund world'. Rushkoff wrote:

"'After a bit of small talk, I realized they had no interest in the information I had prepared about the future of technology.

"They had come with questions of their own … Which region will be less affected by the coming climate crisis: New Zealand or Alaska? … Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system and asked: "How do I maintain authority over my security force after the Event?"

"The Event.

"That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, unstoppable virus, or Mr Robot hack that takes everything down … They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from the angry mobs.

"But how would they pay the guards once money was worthless?

"What would stop the guards from choosing their own leader?

"The billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew.

"Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for survival."

If your plan calls for allowing the world to drown in the swamp of mass death and destruction while you cower in a South Pacific bunker protected by hired killers wearing exploding collars, you are not likely to win much in the way of public support for the capitalist state economics that are creating the next mass extinction, are you?

You should axe how the poor will defend their food stash under socialism when the State goes door to door to grab your food "for the people"

You should axe how the poor will defend their food stash under socialism when the State goes door to door to grab your food "for the people"

You should focus on the State power that currently rules this planet:

MR Online | How the rich plan to rule a burning planet

"The rich don’t have to depend only on themselves.

"Their most powerful, and well-armed, protector is the capitalist state, which they can rely on to advance their interests even when those may conflict with the imperative to preserve some semblance of civilisation...."

"They’re the ones who have been delegated the task, as Karl Marx put it in the Communist Manifesto, of 'managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie'.

"In the context of climate change, this means taking the steps necessary to ensure the continued ability of the capitalist class to profit even if the world may be unravelling into ecological breakdown and social chaos."

In March 2012, Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13603, better known as the “National Defense Resources Preparedness” which enables the Federal government to confiscate and re-distribute all potable water, food, and whatever resources are necessary to protect the United States during a state of emergency.

In March 2012, Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13603, better known as the “National Defense Resources Preparedness” which enables the Federal government to confiscate and re-distribute all potable water, food, and whatever resources are necessary to protect the United States during a state of emergency.

Executive Order 13603 - Wikipedia

"The National Defense Resources "Preparedness executive order (Executive Order 13603) is an order of the President of the United States, signed by President Barack Obama on March 16, 2012..."

"A number of viral emails claimed that the executive order 'creates martial law.'[4]

"Similar claims were repeated by Texas congresswoman Kay Granger of Texas in a constituent newsletter; she later retracted her statements.[4]

"In reality, the order updated long-existing directives that have been issued ever since the Truman administration"

 

[georgephillip]

HEY know it's a scam, but it pays to keep the masses indoctrinated

Is the Pentagon in on the scam or the science?

Papers - 2019 - Pentagon Fuel Use, Climate Change, and the Costs of War | Costs of War

 

[Polishprince]

HEY know it's a scam, but it pays to keep the masses indoctrinated

Is the Pentagon in on the scam or the science?

Papers - 2019 - Pentagon Fuel Use, Climate Change, and the Costs of War | Costs of War

A paper from Boston University? LOL- that's a fake college, they graduated AOC in Economics and her qualifications were enough to get her a job as a barkeep.

My own bartenders never attended college at all, much less a pricy Fake School like Boston U.

You really don't need to go to college to open a beer bottle or pour a shot.

 

[georgephillip]

The IPCC report predicts a 2ºC temperature rise over the next 100 years, and then level out over the next 200 years, maybe reaching 3ºC then ... AR5 WG1 Figure 12-5 ...

Did you forget a link?

"A military police officer walks near a destroyed gate at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida in the aftermath of Hurricane Michael on Oct. 12, 2018."

Climate change threatens a majority of mission-critical military bases, Pentagon report says

"The storm caused extensive damage to nearly every building on the base.

"A new Defense Department report finds that most of the military’s operationally critical installations face a threat from climate change

"More than two-thirds of the military’s operationally critical installations are threatened by climate change, according to a new DoD report.

The January 2019 report, 'Report on Effects of a Changing Climate to the Department of Defense,' was submitted to Congress Thursday without an official announcement of the report or a public release.

"Several environmental organizations made the report publicly available early Friday.

"After several reporters questioned why the report was not made public by DoD, the Pentagon published it on Defense.gov mid-Friday."

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How will the richest among us protect themselves and their property if (when?) catastrophic climate chaos makes money worthless?

MR Online | How the rich plan to rule a burning planet

"Writing in the Guardian in 2018, media theorist and futurist Douglas Rushkoff related his experience of being paid half his annual salary to speak at 'a super-deluxe private resort … on the subject of "the future of technology’”. He was expecting a room full of investment bankers. When he arrived, however, he was introduced to 'five super-wealthy guys … from the upper echelon of the hedge fund world'. Rushkoff wrote:

"'After a bit of small talk, I realized they had no interest in the information I had prepared about the future of technology.

"They had come with questions of their own … Which region will be less affected by the coming climate crisis: New Zealand or Alaska? … Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system and asked: "How do I maintain authority over my security force after the Event?"

"The Event.

"That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, unstoppable virus, or Mr Robot hack that takes everything down … They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from the angry mobs.

"But how would they pay the guards once money was worthless?

"What would stop the guards from choosing their own leader?

"The billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew.

"Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for survival."

If your plan calls for allowing the world to drown in the swamp of mass death and destruction while you cower in a South Pacific bunker protected by hired killers wearing exploding collars, you are not likely to win much in the way of public support for the capitalist state economics that are creating the next mass extinction, are you?

If your plan calls for allowing the world to drown in the swamp of mass death and destruction while you cower in a South Pacific bunker protected by hired killers wearing exploding collars, you are not likely to win much in the way of public support for the capitalist state economics that are creating the next mass extinction, are you?

To protect ourselves from the next capitalist mass extinction in the future.....we must initiate a socialist mass extinction.....TODAY!!!

 

[georgephillip]

The rich aren't worried. There is no catastrophic climste chaos coming.

Did Trump tell you that?

New Pentagon Report: “The effects of a changing climate are a national security issue”

"In the Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Act, the U.S. Congress asked the Department of Defense (DoD) to provide a report on 'vulnerabilities to military installations and combatant commander requirements resulting from climate change over the next 20 years.'

"That report was delivered to Congress yesterday, prosaically-titled Report on Effects of a Changing Climate to the Department of Defense.

"The first sentence in the 'background' section of the study is worth noting.

"It reaffirms that the DoD continues to take climate change seriously, as it has across four administrations, both Republican and Democrat.

"The sentence reads: 'The effects of a changing climate are a national security issue with potential impacts to Department of Defense (DoD or the Department) missions, operational plans, and installations.'"

 

[Polishprince]

The rich aren't worried. There is no catastrophic climste chaos coming.

Did Trump tell you that?

New Pentagon Report: “The effects of a changing climate are a national security issue”

"In the Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Act, the U.S. Congress asked the Department of Defense (DoD) to provide a report on 'vulnerabilities to military installations and combatant commander requirements resulting from climate change over the next 20 years.'

"That report was delivered to Congress yesterday, prosaically-titled Report on Effects of a Changing Climate to the Department of Defense.

"The first sentence in the 'background' section of the study is worth noting.

"It reaffirms that the DoD continues to take climate change seriously, as it has across four administrations, both Republican and Democrat.

"The sentence reads: 'The effects of a changing climate are a national security issue with potential impacts to Department of Defense (DoD or the Department) missions, operational plans, and installations.'"

Here's problems with the entire climate change/globalwarming hoax.

1. They have too many failed prophecies ,by now we were supposed to have an ice free arctic and 50 million climate refugees.

and B. We tried the Global Warming program for 8 years under the leadership of B. Hussein O. Did not stop climate change at all.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The rich aren't worried. There is no catastrophic climste chaos coming.

Did Trump tell you that?

New Pentagon Report: “The effects of a changing climate are a national security issue”

"In the Fiscal Year 2018 National Defense Authorization Act, the U.S. Congress asked the Department of Defense (DoD) to provide a report on 'vulnerabilities to military installations and combatant commander requirements resulting from climate change over the next 20 years.'

"That report was delivered to Congress yesterday, prosaically-titled Report on Effects of a Changing Climate to the Department of Defense.

"The first sentence in the 'background' section of the study is worth noting.

"It reaffirms that the DoD continues to take climate change seriously, as it has across four administrations, both Republican and Democrat.

"The sentence reads: 'The effects of a changing climate are a national security issue with potential impacts to Department of Defense (DoD or the Department) missions, operational plans, and installations.'"

"It reaffirms that the DoD continues to take climate change seriously, as it has across four administrations, both Republican and Democrat.

Is supporting the idea of catastrophic climate change going to get the military more money, or less?

 

[evenflow1969]

How will the richest among us protect themselves and their property if (when?) catastrophic climate chaos makes money worthless?

MR Online | How the rich plan to rule a burning planet

"Writing in the Guardian in 2018, media theorist and futurist Douglas Rushkoff related his experience of being paid half his annual salary to speak at 'a super-deluxe private resort … on the subject of "the future of technology’”. He was expecting a room full of investment bankers. When he arrived, however, he was introduced to 'five super-wealthy guys … from the upper echelon of the hedge fund world'. Rushkoff wrote:

"'After a bit of small talk, I realized they had no interest in the information I had prepared about the future of technology.

"They had come with questions of their own … Which region will be less affected by the coming climate crisis: New Zealand or Alaska? … Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system and asked: "How do I maintain authority over my security force after the Event?"

"The Event.

"That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, unstoppable virus, or Mr Robot hack that takes everything down … They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from the angry mobs.

"But how would they pay the guards once money was worthless?

"What would stop the guards from choosing their own leader?

"The billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew.

"Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for survival."

If your plan calls for allowing the world to drown in the swamp of mass death and destruction while you cower in a South Pacific bunker protected by hired killers wearing exploding collars, you are not likely to win much in the way of public support for the capitalist state economics that are creating the next mass extinction, are you?

What makes you think that the elite even believe in this "climate crisis" bullshit?

They know that past prophecies of climactic apocalypse have failed.

You really don't have much faith in these people's intelligence. Only the commonest of the common people actually believe that poppycock.

Oh one of the things that give yo a clue is all of the shelters being built by the wealthy and how they are stocking them.

 

[georgephillip]

How 'bout Pentagon fellers?

MR Online | How the rich plan to rule a burning planet

"Military strategists have been awake to the implications of climate change for a long time.

"As early as 2003, in a report commissioned by the Pentagon, U.S. researchers Peter Schwartz and Doug Randall argued that 'violence and disruption stemming from the stresses created by abrupt changes in the .

LOL. Yeah how about them geniuses...https://eesc.columbia.edu/courses/v1003/readings/Pentagon.pdf

"In the climate change disruption scenario proposed here, we consider a period of gradual warming leading to 2010 and then outline the following ten years...In 2007, a particularly severe storm causes the ocean to break through levees in the Netherlands making a few key coastal cities such as The Hague unlivable. Failures of the delta island levees in the Sacramento River region in the Central Valley of California creates an inland sea and disrupts the aqueduct system transporting water from northern to southern California because salt water can no longer be kept out of the area during the dry season. Melting along the Himalayan glaciers accelerates, causing some Tibetan people to relocate. Floating ice in the northern polar seas, which had already lost 40% of its mass from 1970 to 2003, is mostly gone during summer by 2010...
...the thermohaline collapse begins in 2010, disrupting the temperate climate of Europe...The Mega-droughts begin in key regions in Southern China and Northern Europe around 2010 and last throughout the full decade. At the same time, areas that were relatively dry over the past few decades receive persistent years of torrential rainfall, flooding rivers, and regions that traditionally relied on dryland agriculture... the cooling becomes increasingly intense and less predictable. As snow accumulates in mountain regions, the cooling spreads to summertime...."

We should listen to these scientists. We only have until 2010 before brrr...cold summers.... And those people in the Hague better leave by at least 2006 dont you think?

We should listen to these scientists. We only have until 2010 before brrr...cold summers.... And those people in the Hague better leave by at least 2006 dont you think?

Your link:

"Executive Summary There is substantial evidence to indicate that significant global warming will occur during the 21st century.

"Because changes have been gradual so far, and are projected to be similarly gradual in the future, the effects of global warming have the potential to be manageable for most nations.

"Recent research, however, suggests that there is a possibility that this gradual global warming could lead to a relatively abrupt slowing of the ocean’s thermohaline conveyor, which could lead to harsher winter weather conditions, sharply reduced soil moisture, and more intense winds in certain regions that currently provide a significant fraction of the world’s food production.

"With inadequate preparation, the result could be a significant drop in the human carrying capacity of the Earth’s environment.