How Trump Plays Into Putin’s Hands, From Ukraine to Slashing U.S. Institutions

Nothing vague about what I’ve been saying. MAGA just engages in selective ignorance. MAGA is fascist. Any questions?


Actually, it is the left that has been making a... protocol on playing dumb.


Yes, Appeasement was a failed policy. But on teh other hand, being overly entangled can drag you into war after war too.


Both extremes can lead to negative outcomes. Leftards are pretending to be ignorant of that, and acting like MORE HARDCORE is always the answer.


When there is no clear path to your side achieving it's goals, and the war is killing your people and ruining a nation, it is time to negotiate a deal.
 
Actually, it is the left that has been making a... protocol on playing dumb.


Yes, Appeasement was a failed policy. But on teh other hand, being overly entangled can drag you into war after war too.


Both extremes can lead to negative outcomes. Leftards are pretending to be ignorant of that, and acting like MORE HARDCORE is always the answer.


When there is no clear path to your side achieving it's goals, and the war is killing your people and ruining a nation, it is time to negotiate a deal.
We’ve been “entangled” in Europe since the end of WW2. No wars until now, a good record considering the almost unending wars of the previous centuries. Involvement doesn’t lead to war; insularism does.
 
We’ve been “entangled” in Europe since the end of WW2. No wars until now, a good record considering the almost unending wars of the previous centuries. Involvement doesn’t lead to war; insularism does.


Drawing a line stating that an invasion of west germany, by the soviet union would lead to WWIII, made sense.


Such a move would have tilted the global balance of power to the communist Soviet Union which would have been very bad for America and the human race.


Drawing a line stating that a russian invasion of ESTONIA, would lead to WWIII, was retarded.


Russia taking Estonia, would mean nothing to the global balance of power.
 
Drawing a line stating that an invasion of west germany, by the soviet union would lead to WWIII, made sense.


Such a move would have tilted the global balance of power to the communist Soviet Union which would have been very bad for America and the human race.


Drawing a line stating that a russian invasion of ESTONIA, would lead to WWIII, was retarded.


Russia taking Estonia, would mean nothing to the global balance of power.
That’s wrong, because dictators don’t stop, when they get what they want. What’s next, Helsinki, Finland, Warsaw, Poland, Sitka, Alaska? They were all part of the Russian Empire that Putin wants to reconstitute.
 
Get with the program. Biden is history; Trump is the brain-addled resident of the WH de jour.
The current admin is dealing with the fall out of xiden and the demafasict pro Putin policy
 
That’s wrong, because dictators don’t stop, when they get what they want. What’s next, Helsinki, Finland, Warsaw, Poland, Sitka, Alaska? They were all part of the Russian Empire that Putin wants to reconstitute.

YOU'RE the one that cited our post war involvement in europe to support your position today.

THe basis for that, was that West Germany was crucial to the global balance of power. YOU made that argument when you cited that history to support your currect position.


That argument is a dumb argument, because neither Estonia, nor Ukraine, even if successfully conquered by Russia, would make Russia a threat to the global balance of power.
 
YOU'RE the one that cited our post war involvement in europe to support your position today.

THe basis for that, was that West Germany was crucial to the global balance of power. YOU made that argument when you cited that history to support your currect position.


That argument is a dumb argument, because neither Estonia, nor Ukraine, even if successfully conquered by Russia, would make Russia a threat to the global balance of power.
So, you’re going to wait until a dictator can threaten the global balance of power?! That’s the Chamberlain strategy. Didn’t work then; won’t work now.
 
Bullshit!
Facts are facts

You spent 12 of the last 16 years being “more flexible” with your have Putin bend you over the desk policies and you then whine that Trump can’t fix it in four months

You are a Putin puppet
 
Facts are facts

You spent 12 of the last 16 years being “more flexible” with your have Putin bend you over the desk policies and you then whine that Trump can’t fix it in four months

You are a Putin puppet
Bullshit!!
 
So, you’re going to wait until a dictator can threaten the global balance of power?! That’s the Chamberlain strategy. Didn’t work then; won’t work now.


That's not the chamberlain strategy.

To be clear, you are dropping your current justification for your support of the war?

You made your claim, and now you have stopped defending it.


THe idea for NATO was NOT that once the soviets started rolling that they would never stop. THe justification was that taking West German would allow them to dominate the rest of Europe and thus the world.

Takign Ukraine, does not allow Russia to do that. Even if Ukraine was conquered and magically...assimilated back into Mother Russia,


Russia would not be able to dominate the rest fo Europe. Europe is too big, for modern Russia to dominate.


So. Do you have a new justification for your support of the war, or do you want to be honest and give me your REAL REASON for supporting the war?
 
That's not the chamberlain strategy.

To be clear, you are dropping your current justification for your support of the war?

You made your claim, and now you have stopped defending it.


THe idea for NATO was NOT that once the soviets started rolling that they would never stop. THe justification was that taking West German would allow them to dominate the rest of Europe and thus the world.

Takign Ukraine, does not allow Russia to do that. Even if Ukraine was conquered and magically...assimilated back into Mother Russia,


Russia would not be able to dominate the rest fo Europe. Europe is too big, for modern Russia to dominate.


So. Do you have a new justification for your support of the war, or do you want to be honest and give me your REAL REASON for supporting the war?
Don’t give an inch. Ukraine is as important as anywhere.
 
Don’t give an inch. Ukraine is as important as anywhere.


No, it's not. That's just not true.


Flipping Ukraine will NOT upset the global balance of power, which is your justifcation for your support of this war.


Even if PUtin won this war, he would not be in a position to dictate global policy or actions.


We would not be living in fear or having to accomadate his demands.


Your claim is nonsense, completely false.


What is your real reason for supporting the war even though you know that there is no clear path to victory?
 
No, it's not. That's just not true.


Flipping Ukraine will NOT upset the global balance of power, which is your justifcation for your support of this war.


Even if PUtin won this war, he would not be in a position to dictate global policy or actions.


We would not be living in fear or having to accomadate his demands.


Your claim is nonsense, completely false.


What is your real reason for supporting the war even though you know that there is no clear path to victory?
That’s very shortsighted. Putin isn’t.
 
That’s very shortsighted. Putin isn’t.

ONe could look at the map of the world in the 1950s adn see how taking West Germany would give the soviets global domination.

ONe didn't have to imagine a series of ADDITIONAL invasions and conquests that would have to take place before the new reality would be shoved down our throats.


It would be there, day one.


THAT is the historical example YOU cited to justify the war in Ukraine.


I didn't assign that to you, I didn't craft a stawman and then demand you defend it.

YOU brought that up as an analogy to support your support of the war.


Now you are refusing to address the obvious reality that your claim is false.


Yet you stand by your support of the war, but you refuse to explain why.



The obvious conclusion is that you realize that being honest would undermine your argument.
 
No. Try to return Crimea to Ukraine and the resulting war would make this one look gentle.

Agreed. But more to the point, the lefty poster knows that too. ALL of them do.

THey are supporting a war that they know is not winnable.


They are willign to see ukrainians die to the last man, or woman and child, and they refuse to discuss why.
 
Agreed. But more to the point, the lefty poster knows that too. ALL of them do.

THey are supporting a war that they know is not winnable.


They are willign to see ukrainians die to the last man, or woman and child, and they refuse to discuss why.
Why is easy. Degenerate democrats told them that they must support this lunacy. Why did democrats tell them this? Because Ukraine is nothing more than a money laundry.
 
Why is easy. Degenerate democrats told them that they must support this lunacy. Why did democrats tell them this? Because Ukraine is nothing more than a money laundry.


Mostly. I think there is also some simple PARTISAN ZEALOTRY here. Trump is for PEACE so the left reflexively opposes him, willing to see people die, if it means that they can oppose Trump, or God Forbid, deny him a win.


I think some of these lefties would rather see a NUCLEAR WAR than let Trump get a nobel peace prize.
 
Back
Top Bottom