How the Left fakes the hate: A primer

[Dante]

After years of covering racial hoaxes on college campuses and victim sob stories in the public arena, I’ve encountered countless opportunists who live by that demented mindset. At best, the fakers are desperately seeking 15 minutes of infamy. At worst, their aim is the criminalization of political dissent.

Upon decimating the deliberative process to hand President Obama a health care “reform” victory, unpopular Beltway Democrats and their media water-carriers now claim there’s a Tea Party epidemic of racism, harassment, and violence against them. On Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued a tepid, obligatory statement against smearing all conservatives as national security threats. But her lieutenants had already emptied their tar buckets.






Michelle Malkin How the Left fakes the hate: A primer

You're a world class idiot and an ignorant fool when it comes to understanding AMerica and it's traditions.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/education-and-history/112382-calling-opposition-absolute-terrorists-is-an-american-tradition.html

Do you even know what terms Jefferson called his political opponents? no you don't. you are clueless as well as ignorant.

You're dumber'n a box of rocks. You got a point, fuckwit? You damned sure sure can't dispute the OP. That would require a functioning brain cell. Or two.

dispute? it's a lunatic rant posing as a what---Current event?

 

[Dante]

stoking the flames? sounds just about right.

What would President Jefferson call opponents who stoked flames of hate against him? Terrorists? Oh, that was what Justice Marshall, Jeffersons cousin called the populists of his day.

yet somehow calling conservatives who fan the flames of hate, witness the signs and speeches, out of their behavior is somehow a new thing?

bullshit.

People who spread hateful messages while in office--calling the President a 'liar' during a State of the Union speech---should be called out for offering faux apologies and then using what they apologized for as a fund raising tool. fanning the flames of hate doesn't get much more obvious

 

[Gunny]

stoking the flames? sounds just about right.

What would President Jefferson call opponents who stoked flames of hate against him? Terrorists? Oh, that was what Justice Marshall, Jeffersons cousin called the populists of his day.

yet somehow calling conservatives who fan the flames of hate, witness the signs and speeches, out of their behavior is somehow a new thing?

bullshit.

People who spread hateful messages while in office--calling the President a 'liar' during a State of the Union speech---should be called out for offering faux apologies and then using what they apologized for as a fund raising tool. fanning the flames of hate doesn't get much more obvious

Who cares? Marshall was a partisan hack. Next ....

 

[Dante]

stoking the flames? sounds just about right.

What would President Jefferson call opponents who stoked flames of hate against him? Terrorists? Oh, that was what Justice Marshall, Jeffersons cousin called the populists of his day.

yet somehow calling conservatives who fan the flames of hate, witness the signs and speeches, out of their behavior is somehow a new thing?

bullshit.

People who spread hateful messages while in office--calling the President a 'liar' during a State of the Union speech---should be called out for offering faux apologies and then using what they apologized for as a fund raising tool. fanning the flames of hate doesn't get much more obvious

Who cares? Marshall was a partisan hack. Next ....

no more so than you or Thomas Jefferson...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-lame-zone/112521-how-the-right-wallows-in-hate-a-primer.html

thank you