How the Democrats Fund Nefarious Activities (that would outrage us if they did it openly)

[DGS49]

How Democrats used NGOs to end-run voters: A ‘parallel government’

DOGE’s digging reveals that many “non-governmental” entities are just fronts for government acts that Americans would never stand for if Washington attempted them directly.

nypost.com

Maybe I should have posted this in the DOGE space, because it has been DOGE that has brought this bullshit to light.

"For example, America’s border crisis was funded in large part by Joe Biden’s government, which sent large sums of money in the form of grants to various NGOs that helped train migrants on how to get to the United States — and how to claim asylum when they arrived."

"NGOs helped the illegal immigrants with expenses on their way, and then provided legal resources and more than $22 billion worth of assistance for them — including cash for cars, home loans and business start-ups — once they got in."

All the self-dealing by Congress-persons, all the funding of anti-American, anti-logical activities, bizarre Woke campaigns in our international sphere of influence...it's enough to piss a body off.

Seriously, there is not enough outrage about these shenanigans. Got bless the NY Post for publishing this.

 

[Billiejeens]

Not really shocking -

The Military has never been in the business of paying $700.00 for a hammer.

They are $20.00 hammers and $680.00 pushed over to off the book activities.

And they buy a lot of stuff.

 

[Moonglow]

Not really shocking -

The Military has never been in the business of paying $700.00 for a hammer.

They are $20.00 hammers and $680.00 pushed over to off the book activities.

And they buy a lot of stuff.

The military has a history of overspending, particularly on spare parts, with numerous examples of inflated prices for seemingly simple items. The issue became particularly prominent in the 1980s, fueled by whistleblowers and investigative journalists exposing excessive costs. Notable cases include a $640 toilet seat and a $7,600 coffee maker, which sparked public outrage and congressional hearings, according to the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft.

 

[Billiejeens]

The military has a history of overspending, particularly on spare parts, with numerous examples of inflated prices for seemingly simple items. The issue became particularly prominent in the 1980s, fueled by whistleblowers and investigative journalists exposing excessive costs. Notable cases include a $640 toilet seat and a $7,600 coffee maker, which sparked public outrage and congressional hearings, according to the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft.

Yes

That is what the famous receipts show.

The actual money went off book.

 

[Moonglow]

Yes

That is what the famous receipts show.

The actual money went off book.

Where did it go? I know at the company level, we drank our share of beer.

 

[Billiejeens]

Where did it go? I know at the company level, we drank our share of beer.

Yes
But, you are a substance abusing clown.

 

[Hellokitty]

The military has a history of overspending, particularly on spare parts, with numerous examples of inflated prices for seemingly simple items. The issue became particularly prominent in the 1980s, fueled by whistleblowers and investigative journalists exposing excessive costs. Notable cases include a $640 toilet seat and a $7,600 coffee maker, which sparked public outrage and congressional hearings, according to the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft.

I'm not sure you follow the point Billiejeens was making. Either way you pointing out a problem going back to the 80's which involved outrage, congressional hearing/investigation yet NEVER solved the problem involving corrupt spending.
Overspending spending is ALWAYS a pay off to someone!!!

 

[Billiejeens]

I'm not sure you follow the point Billiejeens was making. Either way you pointing out a problem going back to the 80's which involved outrage, congressional hearing/investigation yet NEVER solved the problem involving corrupt spending.
Overspending spending is ALWAYS a pay off to someone!!!

Thank You.

They didn't have a chance at actually solving the problem.

The MIC was so happy to take a little heat for overspending to deflect from the black ops that they were actually funding.

We, as a country realize that they do things in our name that, we wouldn't actually authorize, if asked.

We accept them blowing shit up and blaming Islam, we accept the overthrowing of foreign Governments, they simply weren't supposed to do that domestically.