How many posters here are smarter than all the world's scientists?

[Toddsterpatriot]

There is nothing gotcha about Cricks’ inquiry. Stand up for your convictions.

There is no inquiry.

What scientist?

What studies?

What theories?

This just more meaningless Leftist delusions!

The inquiry is the question in the lead post.

The scientistS are those professional scientists actively conducting research into the climate and global warming and publishing their findings in peer reviewed science journals.

The studies are the work reported on in those peer reviewed articles noted above.

The theory is the theory of anthropogenic global warming: that the Earth has been warming at an accelerating pace due to the greenhouse effect acting on increased GHGs in the atmosphere created by the human combustion of fossil fuels.

Surely that was all obvious.

The scientistS are those professional scientists actively conducting research into the climate and global warming and publishing their findings in peer reviewed science journals.

Like Michael Mann.

 

[mamooth]

You have provided neither facts nor data.

So we just imagined you screaming "liar!" and running from my points in post #71? Let's go over again what triggered you, so we can all watch you run again. That never gets old.

Ottmar Edenhoffer pointed out -- correctly -- that we've been subsidizing fossil fuel users by allowing them to pollute the world without paying for it.

Do you say I'm misrepresenting what he said? If so, please supply your own interpretation of the translation of what he said.

Or do you say the conclusion is wrong, and that pollution does _not_ represent an economic externality?

 

[GWV5903]

I don't see the tools with which we used to post up polls but we can ad lib.

Just tell us in the comments. How many people believe they are more intelligent than all the world's active climate scientists. In case you were unsure, if you have EVER put up a post that accused all those scientists of lying, of being biased by "donations and bribes", of claiming that they put out results to please whoever pays for their grants, you should post "ME!". Got it? Okay. Can't wait to see the results!

When you start walking or riding a bike everywhere you need to go, living without electricity, grow or kill your food supply, then you can talk your crap, until then you need to STFU....

 

[Rocko]

I don't see the tools with which we used to post up polls but we can ad lib.

Just tell us in the comments. How many people believe they are more intelligent than all the world's active climate scientists. In case you were unsure, if you have EVER put up a post that accused all those scientists of lying, of being biased by "donations and bribes", of claiming that they put out results to please whoever pays for their grants, you should post "ME!". Got it? Okay. Can't wait to see the results!

I’m probably the only poster here that’s smarter than those guys

 

[mamooth]

No, putting dissenters in camps is a strictly left-wing thing. There you go lying again.

Check it out! Dave can copy a gish gallop of vague quotes from nobodies.

Poor Dave. He literally spends his life looking for reasons to feel oppressed, and his cult is happy to supply them to him. After all, that keeps him hyserical, and that keeps him obedient. So very, very obedient.

It's a classic fascist tactic, by the way, making up stories of violent Jews/liberals to justify brownshirt violence against Jews/liberals.

 

[John T. Ford]

The inquiry is the question in the lead post.

The scientistS are those professional scientists actively conducting research into the climate and global warming and publishing their findings in peer reviewed science journals.

The studies are the work reported on in those peer reviewed articles noted above.

The theory is the theory of anthropogenic global warming: that the Earth has been warming at an accelerating pace due to the greenhouse effect acting on increased GHGs in the atmosphere created by the human combustion of fossil fuels.

Surely that was all obvious.

You want to discuss scientist and their opinions published in per reviews?

Fine.

Post the scientist.

Post the peer reviews.

Until then you are simply blathering about a bunch of imaginary and delusional Leftist BS.

 

[mamooth]

When you start walking or riding a bike everywhere you need to go, living without electricity, grow or kill your food supply, then you can talk your crap, until then you need to STFU....

I hate denier hippies. Everyone hates denier hippies.

Look, if you want to hump trees all day and live in a cave with a hairy woman, go right ahead. It's your choice.

However, the rest of us like electricity and indoor plumbing. And since none of us every called for ending such things, you look like a sad cult liar for pretending we did.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

I don't see the tools with which we used to post up polls but we can ad lib.

Just tell us in the comments. How many people believe they are more intelligent than all the world's active climate scientists. In case you were unsure, if you have EVER put up a post that accused all those scientists of lying, of being biased by "donations and bribes", of claiming that they put out results to please whoever pays for their grants, you should post "ME!". Got it? Okay. Can't wait to see the results!

I don't know... but why do you repeat the lie that "all the world's scientist" agree on this?
They don't.
There is no consensus among serious scientist. There are brilliant scientist that say one thing, and others that say soemthing else.
But, of course, then there are the media whoring scientist and college professors that use the media as a guaranteed way to continue getting slush funding to the tune of $billions. They will say anything to continue the funding.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

IPCC Official: “Climate Policy Is Redistributing The World's Wealth” - The Global Warming Policy Forum

I thought you knew this by now

So, not the IPCC, just an official. Not honest of you leave that out.

And what's the problem with the quote? After all, it doesn't say the plan is to redistribute wealth. It says that's what's already been done.

Basically he says -- correctly -- that we've been subsidizing fossil fuel users by allowing them to pollute the world without paying for it.

Her was speaking as a co-author of the latest IPCC Fiction.

Moron

 

[Crick]

I don't see the tools with which we used to post up polls but we can ad lib.

Just tell us in the comments. How many people believe they are more intelligent than all the world's active climate scientists. In case you were unsure, if you have EVER put up a post that accused all those scientists of lying, of being biased by "donations and bribes", of claiming that they put out results to please whoever pays for their grants, you should post "ME!". Got it? Okay. Can't wait to see the results!

You know those scientists believe in climate change before they start working on it, Scientists have agendas too. And the financial rewards from people who are only trying to redistribute wealth for those scientists are huge.

This is another big lie. There are so many it is hard to keep track of them.

Then you MUST have some evidence of those scientists receiving those financial rewards. Right? Could you share it with us?

Climate Change Research Grants | US EPA

EPA’s Science to Achieve Results, or STAR, program supports Climate Change research through research grants in three broad areas

www.epa.gov

Follow the (Climate Change) Money

The first iron rule of American politics is: Follow the money. This explains, oh, about 80 percent of what goes on in Washington. Shortly after the latest Chicken Little climate change report was published last month, I noted on CNN that one reason so many hundreds of scientists are persuaded...

www.heritage.org

Grants for Universities/ Research Institutions — California Climate Investments

Universities and research institutions within California can receive grants for climate change research, recycling opportunities, electric vehicles.

www.caclimateinvestments.ca.gov

Why don't you tell us what you believe your three links are telling us, because I see nothing there to support any of the comments you've made.

 

[Flash]

If AGW was a real thing then then every once in awhile some of the dire predictions would come true but they never do.

They've pretty much all come true. If your cult told you otherwise, your cult lied to you.

Hell even the Worthless Negro

Oh, that's right. You just make up whatever story helps you push your racist hatred. Thanks for reminding everyone why to not take you seriously on any topic.

20 years ago that dimwit Al Gore told us we would all be drowning and burning up by now but that didn't stop him from buying a mansion on the ocean, did it?

 

[Flash]

I am not an expert on Climate Science but I am an Environmental Engineer with 30 years experience cleaning up real pollution and I know bullshit when I see it.

AGW is unadulterated bullshit.

 

[mamooth]

He was speaking as a co-author of the latest IPCC Fiction.

That still doesn't excuse claming that a one-man interview is an official IPCC statement.

And you're not addressing the topic. What's wrong with what he said? What's wrong with pointing out that pollution is an economic externality?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don't see the tools with which we used to post up polls but we can ad lib.

Just tell us in the comments. How many people believe they are more intelligent than all the world's active climate scientists. In case you were unsure, if you have EVER put up a post that accused all those scientists of lying, of being biased by "donations and bribes", of claiming that they put out results to please whoever pays for their grants, you should post "ME!". Got it? Okay. Can't wait to see the results!

How many Trumpanzees here? Same answer.

 

[mamooth]

20 years ago that dimwit Al Gore told us we would all be drowning and burning up by now but that didn't stop him from buying a mansion on the ocean, did it?

Gore Rule invoked, wrap up the thread. Whenever some nitwit invokes Gore to back up their case, they forfeit the thread for their own side.

Thos who can, they talk about the data and the science. Those who can't, they rave about their political enemies.

 

[Crick]

By now NYC was supposed to be underwater and there should be no polar ice caps anymore. It is bullshit.

Nope, the scientists never predicted that. You're repeating some fabricated nonsense that your cult fed you, because that's what authoritarian-followers do

Nolte: Climate 'Experts' Are 0-41 with Their Doomsday Predictions

For more than 50 years Climate Alarmists in the scientific community and environmental movement have not gotten one prediction correct.

www.breitbart.com

Well, I didn't see a single peer reviewed article among those sources and a large portion were all from one man (Paul Ehrlich) but despite that, I will put you down for a firm YES.

Knock yourself out. Another lie, another virtue signaling cause, another globalist scheme to lower our standard of living. The climate is unimportant to them it is being exploited for political reasons.

And pray tell how do you know that the climate is unimportant to climate scientists and that they are exploiting it for political reasons - particularly when they come from every nation on Earth and thus every political position on the entire spectrum? How do you know?

I think you may qualify for some sort of SUPER YES.

 

[Crick]

I don't see the tools with which we used to post up polls but we can ad lib.

Just tell us in the comments. How many people believe they are more intelligent than all the world's active climate scientists. In case you were unsure, if you have EVER put up a post that accused all those scientists of lying, of being biased by "donations and bribes", of claiming that they put out results to please whoever pays for their grants, you should post "ME!". Got it? Okay. Can't wait to see the results!

I don't know... but why do you repeat the lie that "all the world's scientist" agree on this?
They don't.
There is no consensus among serious scientist. There are brilliant scientist that say one thing, and others that say soemthing else.
But, of course, then there are the media whoring scientist and college professors that use the media as a guaranteed way to continue getting slush funding to the tune of $billions. They will say anything to continue the funding.

Surely you have seen the surveys of the scientists and of the writing. The consensus is VERY close to 100%. See Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

 

[Crick]

I am not an expert on Climate Science but I am an Environmental Engineer with 30 years experience cleaning up real pollution and I know bullshit when I see it.

AGW is unadulterated bullshit.

Then we will put you down for a YES as the world's published climate scientists disagree with you whole hog.

 

[Crick]

If AGW was a real thing then then every once in awhile some of the dire predictions would come true but they never do.

They've pretty much all come true. If your cult told you otherwise, your cult lied to you.

Hell even the Worthless Negro

Oh, that's right. You just make up whatever story helps you push your racist hatred. Thanks for reminding everyone why to not take you seriously on any topic.

20 years ago that dimwit Al Gore told us we would all be drowning and burning up by now but that didn't stop him from buying a mansion on the ocean, did it?

Is Al Gore a climate scientist? No. Was he a participant in any of the consensus surveys mentioned here? No. Was he noted in any way in the lead post of this thread? No. So, I have no idea what bearing you think Al Gore's home has on the validity of AGW or the very nearly unanimous opinion of the scientists studying it.

 

[GWV5903]

When you start walking or riding a bike everywhere you need to go, living without electricity, grow or kill your food supply, then you can talk your crap, until then you need to STFU....

I hate denier hippies. Everyone hates denier hippies.

Look, if you want to hump trees all day and live in a cave with a hairy woman, go right ahead. It's your choice.

However, the rest of us like electricity and indoor plumbing. And since none of us every called for ending such things, you look like a sad cult liar for pretending we did.

You obviously have a comprehension problem, we’re did I claim anything remotely close to your drivel...
We’ve doubled our population since 1970 and reduced our consumption of fossil fuels, that’s called progress, but you want to confuse the facts...
You’re ilk has come so close to the truth, we’re living in a world that came to an end 5 years ago according to Gore, now Kerry says the same crap...
Little one, get your story straight and quit being led around by your stupidity....