How many posters here are smarter than all the world's scientists?

[CrusaderFrank]

It's simple, even today.

Just take the old data and "adjust" it.

Who do you think we are, deniers?

Just because your side commits fraud more readily than most people breathe doesn't mean that honest people do the same. Try to understand that we are not like you. All of the fraud comes from your side. That's because all of the corrupting money flows to your side.

 

[mamooth]

The total adjustments make the warming look smaller. That's not debatable by any honest person, so deniers debate it. Sorry, but your conspiracy theory is demonstrably crap. Fuck your feelings, cult bois.

And again, fuck off with the trolling. You want an honest debate, stop being dishonest trolls and asking dishonest questions.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's simple, even today.

Just take the old data and "adjust" it.

Who do you think we are, deniers?

Just because your side commits fraud more readily than most people breathe doesn't mean that honest people do the same. Try to understand that we are not like you. All of the fraud comes from your side. That's because all of the corrupting money flows to your side.

Who do you think we are, deniers?

Cheaters, fraudsters, liars.

All of the fraud comes from your side.

Of course, you have all the science on your side, that's why they keep "adjusting" old data.
That's why they "hid the decline", used Mike's Nature Trick and stopped scientists on the other side from being published.

 

[Oddball]

It's simple, even today.

Just take the old data and "adjust" it.

Who do you think we are, deniers?

Just because your side commits fraud more readily than most people breathe doesn't mean that honest people do the same. Try to understand that we are not like you. All of the fraud comes from your side. That's because all of the corrupting money flows to your side.

Who do you think we are, deniers?

Cheaters, fraudsters, liars.

All of the fraud comes from your side.

Of course, you have all the science on your side, that's why they keep "adjusting" old data.
That's why they "hid the decline", used Mike's Nature Trick and stopped scientists on the other side from being published.

The ocean ate my Goebbels warming!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Remaining employed with excellent benefits

You know, when you dummies say this, you are actually telling on yourselves. Just because you would lie and cheat and fake your work at your job doesn't mean others would.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Of course, you have all the science on your side, that's why they keep "adjusting" old data.

Why say this? You don't know why they are adjusting the data, or you would not say that. . This is a stupid denier moron talking point. I expect better from you.

 

[22lcidw]

I don't see the tools with which we used to post up polls but we can ad lib.

Just tell us in the comments. How many people believe they are more intelligent than all the world's active climate scientists. In case you were unsure, if you have EVER put up a post that accused all those scientists of lying, of being biased by "donations and bribes", of claiming that they put out results to please whoever pays for their grants, you should post "ME!". Got it? Okay. Can't wait to see the results!

Every single poster who identifies as conservative, right wing, republican, or tRump supporter.

The earth has been around a long time. Somehow Prog Socialists were chosen to play god in this small era of time to save the planet. Many people have been enriched on this agenda over the last half century or more. All the lies of the worst that was supposed to happen, has not happened. Trillions of dollars from your livelihood is going to be taken from you. Making you poorer. It is a scam to transfer wealth from our nation to other nations.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Of course, you have all the science on your side, that's why they keep "adjusting" old data.

Why say this? You don't know why they are adjusting the data, or you would not say that. . This is a stupid denier moron talking point. I expect better from you.

Why say this?

Because it points out the weakness of the warmist side.

You don't know why they are adjusting the data,

To make the past look cooler, the present look warmer.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Because it points out the weakness of the warmist side

No, it highlights your ignorance and will to make an appeal to emotion, hoping others are equally ignorant. While that is shameful, your ignorance is not. It should not surprise you that you don't understand why they adjust some data, given the fact that you have zero education or experience in any relevant field.

 

[daveman]

Since 1850 the climate has been doing this:

View attachment 486482

This is more than seasons coming and going.

Modern weather technicians are just that: technicians. They do NOT have better tools to determine global temperatures. As is typical for deniers, you vastly oversimplify the actual practice of science.

If you think the idea that hurricane counts are up because storms are now identified without coming ashore is something no one ever thought of - you're just being stupid.

AGW is not an invention of Al Gore for christ's sake.

Generally speaking, you haven't a clue what you're talking about. Read some good books about global warming. Go to www.ipcc.ch and find the Summary for Policymakers inside "The Physical Science Basis". It's written to be understood by layfolks. Give it an honest look and I am quite certain you will find it is very objectively written. The right wing has been spewing so many lies the last ten years, its no surprise you don't know what's real and what isn't.

You can measure accurately to a tenth of a degree back in 1890?

Are you sure?

"...with ocean data adapted from the UK Hadley Centre."

There was no ocean data in the late 1800s. So they made it up.

 

[daveman]

I'm astounded that you are allowed to remain on this forum.

You just need to accept the fact that people are allowed to disagree with your cult.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because it points out the weakness of the warmist side

No, it highlights your ignorance and will to make an appeal to emotion, hoping others are equally ignorant.

I'm not the one whining when the dishonesty of the warmers is pointed out.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You just need to accept the fact that people are allowed to disagree with your cult

Of course you are "allowed" to be a denier moron. Who is stopping you? You always try to play the victim card.

 

[daveman]

A few numbers?!?!? How much temperature data do you think the world has to offer?

Not nearly as much as you think.

GHCN V4 Data Show That ONLY 277 Stations Have Temperature Data Since 1880​

In addition, climatologist/former NASA researcher Dr. Mototaka Nakamura wrote that over the last 100 years “only 5 percent of the Earth’s area is able show the mean surface temperature with any certain degree of confidence.”

I’m sure that 5 percent area data cannot offset the 95 percent remaining area with no data. If climate alarmists noticed that, what percent of them would continue to believe the AGW hypothesis, I wonder.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

not the one whining when the dishonesty of the warmers is pointed out.

That's nice. But since you didn't do that, i have to assume you are now embarrassed and trying to change the direction of the discussion.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

not the one whining when the dishonesty of the warmers is pointed out.

That's nice. But since you didn't do that, i have to assume you are now embarrassed and trying to change the direction of the discussion.

Of course, you have all the science on your side, that's why they keep "adjusting" old data.
That's why they "hid the decline", used Mike's Nature Trick and stopped scientists on the other side from being published.

That's what you do when you're winning, eh?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Of course, you have all the science on your side, that's why they keep "adjusting" old data.

This comment makes you seem pretty stupid. "My" side? I relate what the scientists learn. And adjusting the data has had no real impact on the fundamentals of the theory or its predictions. I don't know if you are trying to sound smart or trying to fool other equally ignorant people. Doesn't matter. I am quite sure the IPCC understands why some data was adjusted, while you do not. But i do look forward to your academic research paper.

 

[daveman]

You just need to accept the fact that people are allowed to disagree with your cult

Of course you are "allowed" to be a denier moron. Who is stopping you? You always try to play the victim card.

No, you tool, I will NOT join your cult.

 

[daveman]

Of course, you have all the science on your side, that's why they keep "adjusting" old data.

This comment makes you seem pretty stupid. "My" side? I relate what the scientists learn. And adjusting the data has had no real impact on the fundamentals of the theory or its predictions. I don't know if you are trying to sound smart or trying to fool other equally ignorant people. Doesn't matter. I am quite sure the IPCC understands why some data was adjusted, while you do not. But i do look forward to your academic research paper.

What do their boots taste like?

 

[Oddball]

"The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't."