CrazyTrader55
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #41
Then fix it, Einstein.
AND GIVE DETAILS. Don't just give some mumbo jumbo nonsense about how we 'need to move off of fossil fuels". Give details on exactly what you want to accomplish.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then fix it, Einstein.

Are you able to quantify the "significant greenhouse emissions" produced by the decommissioning process?Here's why offshore windmills don't work.
SaveLBI
@saveLBIorg
The "build now, figure it out later" mentality
@GovMurphy
#offshore wind turbine decommissioning fails to consider the total expense and environmental impact. Decommissioning #OSW turbines is a technology and energy-intensive process, potentially costing up to 70% of the installation price. It involves significant greenhouse gas emissions and produces considerable waste that cannot yet be recycled. Disassembling these turbines is presumably as costly as their installation. A big problem for Future generations. We must not let this happen
Forgive me but your qualifications give the strong impression that you're not really interested in his answer. "Moving off fossil fuels" is a perfectly adequate answer as it encapsulate precisely how we will finally overcome global warming. We need to stop adding GHGs to the Earth's atmosphere and to do that we need to stop burning fossil fuels. Is there something about that message that you're having trouble following?Then fix it, Einstein.
AND GIVE DETAILS. Don't just give some mumbo jumbo nonsense about how we 'need to move off of fossil fuels". Give details on exactly what you want to accomplish.
Another EINSTEIN here.Forgive me but your qualifications give the strong impression that you're not really interested in his answer. "Moving off fossil fuels" is a perfectly adequate answer as it encapsulate precisely how we will finally overcome global warming. We need to stop adding GHGs to the Earth's atmosphere and to do that we need to stop burning fossil fuels. Is there something about that message that you're having trouble following?
lol! Tho I'm not sure which context the term "derp" comes in, but my point was that the AGW premise of a greenhouse causing warming should show heat waves when there's more radiation to be greenhoused. It doesn't show heat waves when there's more radiation. Heat waves when there's LESS radiation suggests the greenhouse isn't operative.Derp derp derp
Well, I disagree, but thanks anyway.Another EINSTEIN here.
Yep. That's the idea."Stop burning fossil fuels"
Yes. Do you realize Tesla and others sell EV trucks?Do you realize that the food supply moves mainly by truck?
The science behind all this says that is just not so. The sooner we do what we need to do (and yesterday was already far too late) the less people will be harmed. See:Do you realize that you will kill off huge numbers of people with this insane green new deal?
Yes Tesla builds electric trucks. With limited range and power. Does Tesla build 18 wheeler electric trucks?Well, I disagree, but thanks anyway.
Yep. That's the idea.
Yes. Do you realize Tesla and others sell EV trucks?
The science behind all this says that is just not so. The sooner we do what we need to do (and yesterday was already far too late) the less people will be harmed. See:
AND
Another EINSTEIN here.
"Stop burning fossil fuels".
Do you realize that the food supply moves mainly by truck? Do you realize that you will kill off huge numbers of people with this insane green new deal?
View attachment 966269
View attachment 966270
Notice the abject dishonesty in modern AGW Cult reporting?
It's propaganda 101, Goebbels would be proud.Temperatures are cooler now or the same as in 1988. But now they're going overboard with the red color, which makes everything appear hotter.
Have you been hiding under a rock?Yes Tesla builds electric trucks. With limited range and power. Does Tesla build 18 wheeler electric trucks?
The Tesla truck would have no problem pulling a reefer trailer.Does Telsa build REFRIGERATED electric trucks also?
Of course.Kinda important for produce, dairy, frozen goods, NO?
Yes. And not that long ago it would have been 100% and not to long from now it will be approaching zero.Do you realize that most electric generation -about 60% of it - comes from burning of fossil fuels?
I do like nuclear.That would be natural gas and coal. Remainder comes from nuclear (you guys don't like that either)
Well, renewables aren't burning any fossil fuels but I'll forgive your misconstruction.and then finally, renewables.
What forest? What trees? No one (myself included) ever said that the transition would be easy. But, it still needs to be done. It disappoints me that the "Get-r-Done" crowd is so seemingly afraid of a challenge.Are you so blinded by propaganda that you can't see the forest through the trees?
Derp derp derplol! Tho I'm not sure which context the term "derp" comes in, but my point was that the AGW premise of a greenhouse causing warming should show heat waves when there's more radiation to be greenhoused. It doesn't show heat waves when there's more radiation. Heat waves when there's LESS radiation suggests the greenhouse isn't operative.
Seems difficult to get the story straight.
But it FEELS like its hotter. What a crock.Temperatures are cooler now or the same as in 1988. But now they're going overboard with the red color, which makes everything appear hotter.
There are a total of 100 Tesla electric trucks, nationwide, all of them delivered to only one customer: PEPSI.Have you been hiding under a rock?
View attachment 966275
The Tesla truck would have no problem pulling a reefer trailer.
Of course.
Yes. And not that long ago it would have been 100% and not to long from now it will be approaching zero.
I do like nuclear.
Well, renewables aren't burning any fossil fuels but I'll forgive your misconstruction.
What forest? What trees? No one (myself included) ever said that the transition would be easy. But, it still needs to be done. It disappoints me that the "Get-r-Done" crowd is so seemingly afraid of a challenge.
Have you been hiding under a rock?
View attachment 966275
The Tesla truck would have no problem pulling a reefer trailer.
Of course.
Yes. And not that long ago it would have been 100% and not to long from now it will be approaching zero.
I do like nuclear.
Well, renewables aren't burning any fossil fuels but I'll forgive your misconstruction.
What forest? What trees? No one (myself included) ever said that the transition would be easy. But, it still needs to be done. It disappoints me that the "Get-r-Done" crowd is so seemingly afraid of a challenge.

But it FEELS like its hotter. What a crock.
The only "rights" that the government has, are those that WE GIVE THEM.We do not have a right to fly on airplanes. We have a right to unrestricted travel across state borders but there is no guarantee that it be by airplane or any other technology.
We have no right to drive a car, much less one with a specified power plant.
We have no right to air conditioning.
No one in government has so much as hinted at taking anything from anyone.
Be all that as it may, the government does possess the authority to regulate air travel, even if those regulations lead to reduced availability. Fortunately for you, no one has even suggested legislation to do any such thing. I'm not saying it won't become an issue someday. Air travel represents a very large portion of the transportation sector GHG emissions and will eventually have to be dealt with. But, we have no right to air travel. It is a convenience for which we pay and since it is a public offering, the government has the authority and legal, ethical and moral responsibility to regulate the industry for the maximum benefit for the maximum number as it sees those things. The same can be said of automobiles.
I'm not sure why deniers so frequently suggest that the government wants to seize their air conditioners. They are certainly great energy hogs and some individuals leaning towards your way of thinking seem to think they're the only thing needed to address global warming. But aside from small amounts of Freon leakage from rapidly disappearing units not yet replaced by those with newer refrigerants, their only drawback is the energy they use. It's not uncommon for symptomatic treatments to worsen underlying causes and that's precisely what you've got here. But, again, we have no right to air conditioning.