How Long Until Cordoba House False Flag?

[CurveLight]

None of your examples deal with any type of religion.

Just like 9/11 had nothing to do with religion.

When you do something in the name of what ever god then it does have a lot to do with religion.

Quote one or two of the 9/11 hijackers where they said they did it for Islam.

 

[CurveLight]

None of your examples deal with any type of religion.

Just like 9/11 had nothing to do with religion.

When you do something in the name of what ever god then it does have a lot to do with religion.

When you do something in the name of what ever god then it does have a lot to do with religion.

Muslims, Jews, and Christians share the same God.
All are referred to as people of the book, by Islam.

And your point would be? oh and no they d not serve the same God. Christian and Jew Maybe but not muslim. They all three might serve a one figure God but they are not the same.

But your point does not negate the fact that 9/11 was done in the name of religion.

Christianity and Islam have far far far more in common than Judaism and Christianity.

 

[CurveLight]

Perhaps... but claiming Islam has nothing to do with this is laughable.

What I said is blaming 9/11 on Islam is as stoopid as blaming Smith and Wesson for nutjobs killing co-workers. But no worries soggy......

How about Islam as a whole ? Are you ready for it in America? Sharia law and all ?

Lol.........too funny.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Just like 9/11 had nothing to do with religion.

When you do something in the name of what ever god then it does have a lot to do with religion.

Quote one or two of the 9/11 hijackers where they said they did it for Islam.

Revision of historical facts right before our very eyes.

 

[CurveLight]

And your point would be? oh and no they d not serve the same God. Christian and Jew Maybe but not muslim. They all three might serve a one figure God but they are not the same.

But your point does not negate the fact that 9/11 was done in the name of religion.

All three religions worship the same God.

So why do they fight so much?

They can't agree on who loves God the most and like most children, fight over who is better.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What I said is blaming 9/11 on Islam is as stoopid as blaming Smith and Wesson for nutjobs killing co-workers. But no worries soggy......

How about Islam as a whole ? Are you ready for it in America? Sharia law and all ?

Lol.........too funny.

TOOOO funny huh?

 

[CurveLight]

When you do something in the name of what ever god then it does have a lot to do with religion.

Quote one or two of the 9/11 hijackers where they said they did it for Islam.

Revision of historical facts right before our very eyes.

I'm proud of you for admitting you are making things up and calling it a revision of history. Some punks would dance and refuse to retract their claim when they can't support it with evidence but you being a stand up guy and all, are not playing those games. You know you can't provide a single quote from any of the hijackers saying they did it for Islam so you have stopped making claims you cannot support. Nice job!

 

[CurveLight]

Perhaps... but claiming Islam has nothing to do with this is laughable.

What I said is blaming 9/11 on Islam is as stoopid as blaming Smith and Wesson for nutjobs killing co-workers. But no worries soggy......

you needn't re-erect your strawman, we got it the first time.

What strawman? You think pointing out many idiots blame 9/11 on Islam is a strawman? Lol!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Quote one or two of the 9/11 hijackers where they said they did it for Islam.

Revision of historical facts right before our very eyes.

I'm proud of you for admitting you are making things up and calling it a revision of history. Some punks would dance and refuse to retract their claim when they can't support it with evidence but you being a stand up guy and all, are not playing those games. You know you can't provide a single quote from any of the hijackers saying they did it for Islam so you have stopped making claims you cannot support. Nice job!

I did not make this statement
Quote one or two of the 9/11 hijackers where they said they did it for Islam.

Thus here is the revision of historical fact.

And here is the truth
Al-Qaida formally claimed responsibility last night for the September 11 attacks on the United States, with a video showing some of the hijackers making preparations in Afghanistan.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2002/sep/10/alqaida.september112001

 

[asterism]

And your point would be? oh and no they d not serve the same God. Christian and Jew Maybe but not muslim. They all three might serve a one figure God but they are not the same.

But your point does not negate the fact that 9/11 was done in the name of religion.

While it may have been claimed to be in the name of religion, 9/11 and the Crusades were both actually done for the benefit of someone crafty enough to convince a bunch of idiots that they were doing God's bidding. In the end, both were done in pursuit of power for some person.

Bin Laden in not a Muslim purist, he's using religion as a means to acquire power. He got all butthurt when King Fahd wouldn't let him lead the defense of Saudi Arabia alone. While this is a gross oversimplification, the current war against the US is an attempt by Bin Laden to show that he can beat us. At that point he then (in his view, IMO) will have credibility to take over Saudi Arabia and install the first modern Caliph (leader and uniter of all Muslims).

It's a power play, that's all. Islam in the areas where Bin Laden and his associates attain recruits is more cultural than religious.

While it may have been claimed to be in the name of religion, 9/11 and the Crusades were both actually done for the benefit of someone crafty enough to convince a bunch of idiots that they were doing God's bidding. In the end, both were done in pursuit of power for some person.

We aren't talking about the people behind the people who carried out the attacks. We are talking about the peiople who killed the pilots , siting behind the controls of the aircraft saying allahu akbar. The one who completed the task are the ones who did it in the name of a religion.

Ignorant people are easily manipulated. Perhaps focusing on the means to stop that would be more productive.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

While it may have been claimed to be in the name of religion, 9/11 and the Crusades were both actually done for the benefit of someone crafty enough to convince a bunch of idiots that they were doing God's bidding. In the end, both were done in pursuit of power for some person.

Bin Laden in not a Muslim purist, he's using religion as a means to acquire power. He got all butthurt when King Fahd wouldn't let him lead the defense of Saudi Arabia alone. While this is a gross oversimplification, the current war against the US is an attempt by Bin Laden to show that he can beat us. At that point he then (in his view, IMO) will have credibility to take over Saudi Arabia and install the first modern Caliph (leader and uniter of all Muslims).

It's a power play, that's all. Islam in the areas where Bin Laden and his associates attain recruits is more cultural than religious.

While it may have been claimed to be in the name of religion, 9/11 and the Crusades were both actually done for the benefit of someone crafty enough to convince a bunch of idiots that they were doing God's bidding. In the end, both were done in pursuit of power for some person.

We aren't talking about the people behind the people who carried out the attacks. We are talking about the peiople who killed the pilots , siting behind the controls of the aircraft saying allahu akbar. The one who completed the task are the ones who did it in the name of a religion.

Ignorant people are easily manipulated. Perhaps focusing on the means to stop that would be more productive.

Does it negate the fact that the people who carried out the 9/11 attacks did it in the name of their religion?

 

[asterism]

We aren't talking about the people behind the people who carried out the attacks. We are talking about the peiople who killed the pilots , siting behind the controls of the aircraft saying allahu akbar. The one who completed the task are the ones who did it in the name of a religion.

Ignorant people are easily manipulated. Perhaps focusing on the means to stop that would be more productive.

Does it negate the fact that the people who carried out the 9/11 attacks did it in the name of their religion?

Ah, now I see your point. No, it does not negate it. However, there is no advantage gained by concentrating on the means by which they were manipulated.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Ignorant people are easily manipulated. Perhaps focusing on the means to stop that would be more productive.

Does it negate the fact that the people who carried out the 9/11 attacks did it in the name of their religion?

Ah, now I see your point. No, it does not negate it. However, there is no advantage gained by concentrating on the means by which they were manipulated.

Shouldn't adults be held accountable for what they do instead of saying they were manipulated as though they were like children?

 

[CurveLight]

Revision of historical facts right before our very eyes.

I'm proud of you for admitting you are making things up and calling it a revision of history. Some punks would dance and refuse to retract their claim when they can't support it with evidence but you being a stand up guy and all, are not playing those games. You know you can't provide a single quote from any of the hijackers saying they did it for Islam so you have stopped making claims you cannot support. Nice job!

I did not make this statement
Quote one or two of the 9/11 hijackers where they said they did it for Islam.

Thus here is the revision of historical fact.

And here is the truth
Al-Qaida formally claimed responsibility last night for the September 11 attacks on the United States, with a video showing some of the hijackers making preparations in Afghanistan.
Bin Laden voice on video, says TV channel | Media | The Guardian

I was wrong. You are the kind of punk to make claims, fail to support them, then march on like a complete fool. What does that article have to do with anything? It's about an unverifiable video with an unknown speaker and there is no confirmation on who made it. I guess for people like you the standards of evidence shift always in favor of shit you wanna sell.

 

[CurveLight]

We aren't talking about the people behind the people who carried out the attacks. We are talking about the peiople who killed the pilots , siting behind the controls of the aircraft saying allahu akbar. The one who completed the task are the ones who did it in the name of a religion.

Ignorant people are easily manipulated. Perhaps focusing on the means to stop that would be more productive.

Does it negate the fact that the people who carried out the 9/11 attacks did it in the name of their religion?

Why are you calling your unsupported claims "facts?"

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I'm proud of you for admitting you are making things up and calling it a revision of history. Some punks would dance and refuse to retract their claim when they can't support it with evidence but you being a stand up guy and all, are not playing those games. You know you can't provide a single quote from any of the hijackers saying they did it for Islam so you have stopped making claims you cannot support. Nice job!

I did not make this statement
Quote one or two of the 9/11 hijackers where they said they did it for Islam.

Thus here is the revision of historical fact.

And here is the truth
Al-Qaida formally claimed responsibility last night for the September 11 attacks on the United States, with a video showing some of the hijackers making preparations in Afghanistan.
Bin Laden voice on video, says TV channel | Media | The Guardian

I was wrong. You are the kind of punk to make claims, fail to support them, then march on like a complete fool. What does that article have to do with anything? It's about an unverifiable video with an unknown speaker and there is no confirmation on who made it. I guess for people like you the standards of evidence shift always in favor of shit you wanna sell.

As I said history revisionist at work. Will you ever stop tring to revise the truth?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Ignorant people are easily manipulated. Perhaps focusing on the means to stop that would be more productive.

Does it negate the fact that the people who carried out the 9/11 attacks did it in the name of their religion?

Why are you calling your unsupported claims "facts?"

Al-Qaida formally claimed responsibility last night for the September 11 attacks on the United States, with a video showing some of the hijackers making preparations in Afghanistan.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2002/sep/10/alqaida.september112001

 

[CurveLight]

Does it negate the fact that the people who carried out the 9/11 attacks did it in the name of their religion?

Why are you calling your unsupported claims "facts?"

Al-Qaida formally claimed responsibility last night for the September 11 attacks on the United States, with a video showing some of the hijackers making preparations in Afghanistan.
Bin Laden voice on video, says TV channel | Media | The Guardian

Re-posting the same bullshit doesn't make it stink any less. You have a purported alquaida video with an unknown speaker claiming responsibility a full year after 9/11. We are quickly approaching the first decade milestone of the attacks and the US has yet to charge bin laden with anything related to it. If this (or any other asserted confession) was legitimate that is all the evidence the fbi would need to file charges but they never have. You are the one re-writing history and you don't give a ****. You can't provide a single quote from just one of the nineteen hijackers stating a motivation. So, in the absence of facts you make up your own fantasies and try to pass them off as "truth."

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why are you calling your unsupported claims "facts?"

Al-Qaida formally claimed responsibility last night for the September 11 attacks on the United States, with a video showing some of the hijackers making preparations in Afghanistan.
Bin Laden voice on video, says TV channel | Media | The Guardian

Re-posting the same bullshit doesn't make it stink any less. You have a purported alquaida video with an unknown speaker claiming responsibility a full year after 9/11. We are quickly approaching the first decade milestone of the attacks and the US has yet to charge bin laden with anything related to it. If this (or any other asserted confession) was legitimate that is all the evidence the fbi would need to file charges but they never have. You are the one re-writing history and you don't give a ****. You can't provide a single quote from just one of the nineteen hijackers stating a motivation. So, in the absence of facts you make up your own fantasies and try to pass them off as "truth."

So you are saying that Al-Qaida had nothing to do with 9/11?
Is Al-Qaida sect of the muslim religion?

 

[CurveLight]

Al-Qaida formally claimed responsibility last night for the September 11 attacks on the United States, with a video showing some of the hijackers making preparations in Afghanistan.
Bin Laden voice on video, says TV channel | Media | The Guardian

Re-posting the same bullshit doesn't make it stink any less. You have a purported alquaida video with an unknown speaker claiming responsibility a full year after 9/11. We are quickly approaching the first decade milestone of the attacks and the US has yet to charge bin laden with anything related to it. If this (or any other asserted confession) was legitimate that is all the evidence the fbi would need to file charges but they never have. You are the one re-writing history and you don't give a ****. You can't provide a single quote from just one of the nineteen hijackers stating a motivation. So, in the absence of facts you make up your own fantasies and try to pass them off as "truth."

So you are saying that Al-Qaida had nothing to do with 9/11?
Is Al-Qaida sect of the muslim religion?

What I am saying is your claim that 9/11 happened because of Islam is wholly unsupported.