How Hillary Clinton / Tim Kane rigged the nomination process for themselves...

TheGreatGatsby

Gold Member
Mar 27, 2012
24,433
3,105
280
California
aUObaCl.png
 
The corruption involved with Crooked Hillary is off the fucking charts. The thing is the corruption runs so deep in Washington DC and their MSM it is something low information folks, who are mostly low life criminals or "hustlers" themselves, cannot even grasp.
 
Tim Kaine was long discussed among Democrats to be one of her possible choices for a running mate, along with many others. He is a good choice for many reasons, none of which have to do with some kind of scheme.

Your suggestion a previously planned corrupt deal is ludicrous, preposterous, pathetic, and just plain silly, signifying a desperate need to frame everything, and I mean everything, Mrs. Clinton does as corrupt double dealing. You are a joke.
 
Nice find, it is interesting... She still needed to get the votes though, which she did... don't think rigged is the right word
 
Tim Kaine was long discussed among Democrats to be one of her possible choices for a running mate, along with many others. He is a good choice for many reasons, none of which have to do with some kind of scheme.

Your suggestion a previously planned corrupt deal is ludicrous, preposterous, pathetic, and just plain silly, signifying a desperate need to frame everything, and I mean everything, Mrs. Clinton does as corrupt double dealing. You are a joke.

Of course he was long discussed. He made a deal in 08 for the job. Duh.
 
Nice find, it is interesting... She still needed to get the votes though, which she did... don't think rigged is the right word

She put her head corruption officer in place to make sure the votes were there. Not sure what you're saying otherwise.
 
Tim Kaine was long discussed among Democrats to be one of her possible choices for a running mate, along with many others. He is a good choice for many reasons, none of which have to do with some kind of scheme.

Your suggestion a previously planned corrupt deal is ludicrous, preposterous, pathetic, and just plain silly, signifying a desperate need to frame everything, and I mean everything, Mrs. Clinton does as corrupt double dealing. You are a joke.

Of course he was long discussed. He made a deal in 08 for the job. Duh.
You don't know what you are talking about. There is no way that you or anyone who is not a Clinton insider would k n ow if there was a deal. So you cannot say it as a fact that he made a deal. It's gossip at best. Fabrication, innuendo, etc. What I was referring to is that when a list was discussed in the news of possible running mates, his name was one of those discussed. By the press. As one of many possible running mates. You are taking something that is completely unsubstantiated and saying it is fact. What kind of a muddly mind do you have anyway?
 
Nice find, it is interesting... She still needed to get the votes though, which she did... don't think rigged is the right word
She put her head corruption officer in place to make sure the votes were there. Not sure what you're saying otherwise.
I think what he's saying is that no one marched people to the polls to vote for Hillary. Also what's usually ignored is the fact that for most of his career Bernie didn't even identify himself as a Democrat. It's hardly surprising that the party establishment would work to make sure a Johnny-come-lately didn't steal the nomination. If the Republicans had done the same, they might be in a better position today.
 
Nice find, it is interesting... She still needed to get the votes though, which she did... don't think rigged is the right word

She put her head corruption officer in place to make sure the votes were there. Not sure what you're saying otherwise.
The people vote, nobody was twisting their arm and nobody was fudging the numbers. She may have played politics, leveraged relationships, and strategized to get super delegates, you can argue whether that's her campaign being smart or corrupt.... However she won the popular vote so the argument is kind of mute.
 
Tim Kaine was long discussed among Democrats to be one of her possible choices for a running mate, along with many others. He is a good choice for many reasons, none of which have to do with some kind of scheme.

Your suggestion a previously planned corrupt deal is ludicrous, preposterous, pathetic, and just plain silly, signifying a desperate need to frame everything, and I mean everything, Mrs. Clinton does as corrupt double dealing. You are a joke.

Of course he was long discussed. He made a deal in 08 for the job. Duh.
You don't know what you are talking about. There is no way that you or anyone who is not a Clinton insider would k n ow if there was a deal. So you cannot say it as a fact that he made a deal. It's gossip at best. Fabrication, innuendo, etc. What I was referring to is that when a list was discussed in the news of possible running mates, his name was one of those discussed. By the press. As one of many possible running mates. You are taking something that is completely unsubstantiated and saying it is fact. What kind of a muddly mind do you have anyway?

Right. Inside deals don't happen in politics. It all just magically happens.
 
"One would assume..."

There's your problem right there.

Kaine stepped down from the DNC Chairmanship because Jim Webb announced he was not going to run for re-election. Kaine announced his candidacy for Webb's seat in April 2011.

Try to do better than copy and paste manufactured bullshit created by propaganda outlets for rubes with the intellectual bandwith of a bumper sticker to parrot.

 
Nice find, it is interesting... She still needed to get the votes though, which she did... don't think rigged is the right word

She put her head corruption officer in place to make sure the votes were there. Not sure what you're saying otherwise.
The people vote, nobody was twisting their arm and nobody was fudging the numbers. She may have played politics, leveraged relationships, and strategized to get super delegates, you can argue whether that's her campaign being smart or corrupt.... However she won the popular vote so the argument is kind of mute.

She didn't win the popular vote other than officially. We saw it from the start with the Iowa shenanigans. Her people rigged it; the media pretended she was way ahead (which was somewhat true with the superdelegate narrative) and they just kept cramming through even though people ultimately didn't want her.
 

Forum List

Back
Top