How George Soros Became The Subject Of So Many Far-Right Conspiracies

Democrats are the corporation party, dumbass.


After the Republican Great Depression, FDR put this nation back to work, in part by raising taxes on income above $3 to $4 million a year (in today's dollars) to 91 percent, and corporate taxes to over 50% of profits. The revenue from those income taxes built dams, roads, bridges, sewers, water systems, schools, hospitals, train stations, railways, an interstate highway system, and airports. It educated a generation returning from World War II. It acted as a cap on the rare but occasional obsessively greedy person taking so much out of the economy that it impoverished the rest of us.

Through the 1950s, though, more and more loopholes for the rich were built into the tax code, so much so that JFK observed in his second debate with Richard Nixon that dropping the top tax rate to 70% but tightening up the loopholes would actually be a tax increase.

JFK pushed through that tax increase to take us back toward FDR/Truman/Eisenhower revenue levels, and we continued to build infrastructure in the US, and even put men on the moon. Health care and college were cheap and widely available. Working people could raise a family and have security in their old age. Every billion dollars (a half-week in Iraq) invested in infrastructure in America created 47,000 good-paying jobs as Americans built America.

But the rich fought back, and won big-time in 1980 when Reagan, until then the fringe "Voodoo economics" candidate who was heading into the election trailing far behind Jimmy Carter, was swept into the White House on a wave of public concern of the Iranians taking US hostages. Reagan promptly cut income taxes on the very rich from 70% down to 27%. Corporate tax rates were also cut so severely that they went from representing over 33% of total federal tax receipts in 1951 to less than 9% in 1983 (they're still in that neighborhood, the lowest in the industrialized world).

Let me repeat a few times to point it out.

Corporate tax rates were also cut so severely that they went from representing over 33% of total federal tax receipts in 1951 to less than 9% in 1983

Corporate tax rates were also cut so severely that they went from representing over 33% of total federal tax receipts in 1951 to less than 9% in 1983

Corporate tax rates were also cut so severely that they went from representing over 33% of total federal tax receipts in 1951 to less than 9% in 1983

Corporate tax rates were also cut so severely that they went from representing over 33% of total federal tax receipts in 1951 to less than 9% in 1983
 
The only way BackAgain will be happy is if it's a Trump appointed prosecutor and judge to bring charges against Trump.

And the My Pillow guy on the jury.
Why not? They're all such paragons of virtue, these Trump Liars.
 
Why did Reagan, Bush and Trump give them tax breaks?


Stop being a liar

We're the union party not you. I know Trump tried to steal them but that was a con.
Republicans give everyone tax breaks, dumbass.

Why leftwingers believe anyone aside from their parasites benefits from taxes I'll never understand.
 
But the right passed citizens united allowing dark money to come into play. At least you are seeing clearly that Soros is contributing to Democrats. What about all the dark money going to politicians?

Every trip Clarence took from Billionaire Crow. How did the Founding Fathers feel about that? You know. It was inappropriate. Don't deny it. You can argue that they all PROBABLY do it so he shouldn't have to step down. I disagree. But you can't say him not disclosing all those trips wasn't an ethics violation. Lower courts can't do it why can he? Soooo fucking corrupt.

Soros is a person who donates his money. You got a problem with that? No you don't. In fact, your party wants to make Corporations into people. Give them the rights of people and let them unfairly influence our politics.

Why did the founders not like Soros? Or the Koch Brothers? Or Mr. Crow. Please explain it to us all why they are a problem. Or is it just Soros?
Doing things that are "inappropriate" aren't synonymous with doing things that are directly designed to weaken our Constitutional Republic. Taking a trip somewhere doesn't equate to purposely funding progressive DAs who use their power to go after conservatives while allowing hardened criminals out on the street.

As for "my Party" ... I don't believe the Conservative Party USA (my Party) has any intent to "make Corporations into people." At least not to my knowledge. You may have to enlighten me in case I missed something.
 

After the Republican Great Depression, FDR put this nation back to work, in part by raising taxes on income above $3 to $4 million a year (in today's dollars) to 91 percent, and corporate taxes to over 50% of profits. The revenue from those income taxes built dams, roads, bridges, sewers, water systems, schools, hospitals, train stations, railways, an interstate highway system, and airports. It educated a generation returning from World War II. It acted as a cap on the rare but occasional obsessively greedy person taking so much out of the economy that it impoverished the rest of us.

Through the 1950s, though, more and more loopholes for the rich were built into the tax code, so much so that JFK observed in his second debate with Richard Nixon that dropping the top tax rate to 70% but tightening up the loopholes would actually be a tax increase.

JFK pushed through that tax increase to take us back toward FDR/Truman/Eisenhower revenue levels, and we continued to build infrastructure in the US, and even put men on the moon. Health care and college were cheap and widely available. Working people could raise a family and have security in their old age. Every billion dollars (a half-week in Iraq) invested in infrastructure in America created 47,000 good-paying jobs as Americans built America.

But the rich fought back, and won big-time in 1980 when Reagan, until then the fringe "Voodoo economics" candidate who was heading into the election trailing far behind Jimmy Carter, was swept into the White House on a wave of public concern of the Iranians taking US hostages. Reagan promptly cut income taxes on the very rich from 70% down to 27%. Corporate tax rates were also cut so severely that they went from representing over 33% of total federal tax receipts in 1951 to less than 9% in 1983 (they're still in that neighborhood, the lowest in the industrialized world).

Let me repeat a few times to point it out.

Corporate tax rates were also cut so severely that they went from representing over 33% of total federal tax receipts in 1951 to less than 9% in 1983

Corporate tax rates were also cut so severely that they went from representing over 33% of total federal tax receipts in 1951 to less than 9% in 1983

Corporate tax rates were also cut so severely that they went from representing over 33% of total federal tax receipts in 1951 to less than 9% in 1983

Corporate tax rates were also cut so severely that they went from representing over 33% of total federal tax receipts in 1951 to less than 9% in 1983
Marxist propaganda. Roosevelt made the Depression last 10 years longer than it had to last.

Get Over It: New Deal Didn't Do the Job

"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work."
Sound like Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, or perhaps another exasperated Republican stalwart, lamenting President Barack Obama's inclination this week to try to spend our way out of the recession?
Listen again:
"I want to see this country prosperous. I want to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have never made good on our promises."
Sound more like a liberal Democrat -- say, Harlem's Rep. Charlie Rangel -- pushing Obama to "create" jobs?
How about this:
"I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started. ... And an enormous debt to boot!"
Surely this must be House Speaker Nancy Pelosi denouncing the Bush administration's economic policies.
Wrong. Wrong. And wrong again.
The words came from none other than Henry Morgenthau Jr. -- pal, lunch companion and loyal secretary of the Treasury to President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Morgenthau made this "startling confession," as historian Burton W. Folsom Jr. calls it, during the seventh year of the New Deal he helped FDR create to combat the rampant unemployment of the Great Depression.
It was May 9, 1939, and Morgenthau was appearing before powerful Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee.
"In these words, Morgenthau summarized a decade of disaster, especially during the years Roosevelt was in power. Indeed average unemployment for the whole year in 1939 would be higher than that in 1931, the year before Roosevelt captured the presidency from Herbert Hoover," Folsom writes in his new book,"New Deal or Raw Deal?: How FDR's Economic Legacy Has Damaged America."
Indeed, Morgenthau confessed what so many keepers of FDR's flame won't admit: The New Deal failed. Massive spending on public works programs didn't erase historic unemployment. It didn't produce a recovery.
 
That Soros spent tens of millions to get a BUNCH of progressive DA's elected? That isnt a fabrication. What the fuck made you think that was made up? You think donor lists are private? Its public information. :laugh:
Nope.

You claimed SOROS finances DA's in the US. He does not.

SOROS, the ACLU, and two PACs backed elections. Win or lose, they do not finance or control the Offices of DAs
 
What's he got? Soros donated to a group who donated to Bragg? That's nothing and you know it. And that's all you got.
You’re excessively dull.

You make ennui bored.

I doubt you’re capable of grasping this, but the dishonorable DA, Alvin Chipmunk Bragg, campaigned on getting Trump. The scumbag prosecutor simply doesn’t give a shit about justice. This is entirely a politically partisan persecution.

And the fact that he got financial support from Soros is but one example of how political he has made the criminal Justice system. He is beholden to the kooky far left when he is supposed to be beholden to actual justice and fairness.
 
Last edited:
Why did Reagan, Bush and Trump give them tax breaks?


Stop being a liar

We're the union party not you. I know Trump tried to steal them but that was a con.
You forgot to mention Obama & Biden. It's why it's called "the Swamp." Catfish of different species swim in it.

You're the "union Party," eh?

Biden signs bill to block U.S. railroad strike​

 
It's not the slightest bit ridiculous. Soros spends billions to influence thousands of polticieans institutions.
Here is something your MAGA propagandists have been keeping from you parroting tard consumers of manufactured bullshit:

Who are the Biggest Donors?



Coming in at #1, every Nazi's favorite international Jew banker: George Soros, with donations amounting to $128,475,971 to Democrats.

Coming in at #2, Richard Uihlein, with $80,692,168 to Republicans.

Ringing the bell at #3, Kenneth C. Griffin, with $68,571,500 to Republicans.

Rushing past the goalpost as #4, Jeffrey and Janine Yass, with $44,075,100 to Republicans.

Skipping across as #5, Timothy Mellon, with $40,035,815 for Republicans, and a miserly $10,700 for Democrats.

Cresting at #6, Sam Bankman-Fried, with $36,846,356 for Democrats, and a token $240,200 for Republicans.

Limping in at #7, Fred Eychaner, with $35,784,000 for Democrats.

Crawling in at #8, Stephen A. Schwarzman, with $35,506,058 for Republicans.

Hobbling in at #9, Peter Thiel, with $32,623,342 for Republicans.

Why did he bother at #10, comes Lawrence Ellison, with $31,007,944 for Republicans.


All told, the top 10 contributed $376,827,227 to Republicans and $201,117,027 to Democrats.

The Pubs reaped a fantastic $175,710,200 more than Democrats.




"Yeahbut...Soros!"
 
New York DA Morgenthau protected Trump. Trump donated to his campaigns and to Morgenthau's favorite charities.

Morgenthau is dead now.

Sooner or later, karma catches up to everyone.
 
Nope.

You claimed SOROS finances DA's in the US. He does not.

SOROS, the ACLU, and two PACs backed elections. Win or lose, they do not finance or control the Offices of DAs
Are you fucking retarded? Have you even attempted a google search on this? :laugh:
 
Win or lose, SOROS does not finance or control the Offices of DAs

try a search engine
He financed the DA's, which means they do what he wants. Every single one of them does the same thing. He has funded 75 DA's in the past decade and they all let criminals go. It doesnt take a genius to detect a pattern here. :cuckoo:
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom