- Thread starter
- #221

American billionaires’ political spending overwhelmingly leans Republican
A record-breaking $881 million were donated by the country’s 465 richest people

Soros may be the biggest donor but
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because you're a covetous bloodsucking parasite.Nonsense. I'm going to get $400,000 someday. Now you're going too far. And if we did this, my dad would just slowly give me money while he's alive. Tax free.
I only want to impose a death tax on extreme wealth because
![]()
On the News With Thom Hartmann: Extreme Inequality Is Dragging Down Our Economy, and More
In today’s On the News segment: According to a new paper from the International Monetary Fund, countries with a large wealth divide have less economic growth than nations with more evenly distributed…truthout.org
You didn't prove the majority donated to Republicans. You just assumed it.![]()
American billionaires’ political spending overwhelmingly leans Republican
A record-breaking $881 million were donated by the country’s 465 richest peopleqz.com
Soros may be the biggest donor but
American billionaires’ political spending overwhelmingly leans Republican
A record-breaking $881 million were donated by the country’s 465 richest people
100%Isn't that why you want to take 90% of his estate when he dies?
Yem Trump pays taxes. One year he didn't pay taxes because his losses were greater than what he earned. Prog idiots like you pretend that happens every year.
You admit that you're a blood sucker100%
You admit that you're a blood sucker
You didn't click on my link. It shows you the top 20 donors. Soros at the top yes but add up all the millions going to Republicans from 14 of the 20 who give to Republicans and the rich give more to Republicans.You didn't prove the majority donated to Republicans. You just assumed it.
Inheritance Destroys MeritNonsense. I'm going to get $400,000 someday. Now you're going too far.
I only want to impose a death tax on extreme wealth because
![]()
On the News With Thom Hartmann: Extreme Inequality Is Dragging Down Our Economy, and More
In today’s On the News segment: According to a new paper from the International Monetary Fund, countries with a large wealth divide have less economic growth than nations with more evenly distributed…truthout.org
Inheritance Destroys Merit
The destruction of earned opportunities is right out in the open. It is hidden in plain sight because people rely on fake dissidents to expose it. So we never hear what is most wrong about a situation, because we are deafened by the noisemakers hired to distract us with irrelevant criticisms.
The ticket to success is primarily college education. But it is work without pay, which is a demoralizing disincentive to the people the country needs for economic progress. So $100,000 inheritance won't be enough to buy a ticket; anyone who only has the tuition money is so inferior that he's willing to live in emasculating and childish student poverty just to steal a job from those who deserve to be paid to go college, the only ones the country needs to get educated.
What do you thing of unpaid internships? Even worse, ones that require an intern to pay a firm for letting him work there? If you don't see that college today is the same thing and should be equally resented, then you're displaying the cognitive dissonance that, ironically, is taught to college students under this humiliating and dumbing-down system.
Someone who wrote about that and also didn't see its equivalence to college "education" used as the clincher in her criticism that it was suggested that those who wanted those internships should get the money to pay for it from their trust funds! More proof that college, too, is designed for HeirHeads. For others, the reward is not worth the sacrifice, not even if they are no-talents who can't get a white-collar job any other way. What is worse is that neither group belongs in the responsible positions unpaid education rewards these no-talent generics with.
Likewise with starting a business with an inheritance. Those businesses are bound to fail, which creates misery for their employees, their consumers, and the economy in general. Any country that pays students for their grades will lead this century's world economy.
Sperm BingoI dig the vibe but can't say I agree. You seem a bit out there. Jealous of people who have success.
Republicans hate when we call what Reagan did trickle down because the last time it was tried was before the Great Recession. That’s what they called it back then."Trickle down" is just an insulting label some left-winger invented to refer to it. There's no such economic policy. Allowing people to keep their money rather than the government taking it always benefits taxpayers.
Free market economic has been the rule sine shortly before the Great Depression. Abandoning it is what caused the Great DepressionRepublicans hate when we call what Reagan did trickle down because the last time it was tried was before the Great Recession. That’s what they called it back then.
Free market economic has been the rule sine shortly before the Great Depression. Abandoning it is what caused the Great Depression
During the Bush years, for us liberals it was the Koch brothers.
There is so much dark money in politics now. Today rich people, for their image, donate publicly to Democrats. Secretly they give 10 x as much to Republicans.
Free market economic has been the rule sine shortly before the Great Depression. Abandoning it is what caused the Great Depression
There were more regulations in place in 1929 than we had in the preceding 50 years. Why didn't we have a depression then? How was credit any looser in 1929 than it was in 1909?False. Completely false. Loose credit and lax banking regulations lead to the Depression. Unfettered free market capitalism CAUSED the Depression. It wasn't "abandoned" until the passage of the New Deal under Roosevelt, starting in 1933. The Great Depression began in 1929.
There were more regulations in place in 1929 than we had in the preceding 50 years. Why didn't we have a depression then? How was credit any looser in 1929 than it was in 1909?
Wrong.Because you didn't have easy credit and buying "on margin" prior to 1920.
That's one theory. That's all it is.The problems created didn't collapse the economy overnight. The crash occurred when banks and brokerages were overextended and started making "margin calls" to shore up their portfolios.
The drought didn't occur until years later. Margin accounts have existed since the stock market was created, nimrod.Borrowers had to sell off their stocks to pay their loans, and the stock prices cratered. Borrowers were ruined and banks failed. Add in a drought and crop failures throughout the midwest. The Crash is all on the capitalists and the Republican policies.