The decision was made by the same judge who refused to recuse herself
www.theblaze.com
A jurist said she was bias!
Why are democrats so deranged! That they turn away from the constitution? Justice is blind! Any judge would have dismissed this, and granted a new trial.
Democrats have gone to far.
No jurist said she was bias
everybody is bias, yet some can set this aside and be impartial and listen to the evidence
You seem to think that she bias means you cannot hear evidence and make an impartial decision. Well if Trump was a juror in the trial could he be impartial?
Hart said she stood by the answers she gave during jury selection, when she said she could fairly act as a juror in the case.
After Hart’s role as the jury foreperson became publicly known earlier this month, several of her social media posts criticizing Trump were uncovered.
So any person who criticizes Trump is bias and any person who praises Trump is bias. Well that is quite the conundrum as no jury can be selected as they are all bias. Still the question is can you put your bias aside and look at the evidence.
two other jurors were question by the Judge both of whom said that Hart did not try to prejudice the panel and did not appear biased.
I know its hard to believe that someone has opinions can be unbiased.
well it it goes against badly against the right then they are bias. if the juror all wore red maga hats then you would applaud and say there is no bias
Sorry can't have it both ways. Verdict stands.
Trump now has to play the get out of jail card.