How Clinton Used Russian Loyalists & Propaganda Funneled through The Ukraine in the 2016 Election!

The Original Tree

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 2016
41,125
17,962
2,300
OHIO
UKRAINE NOT WEAK!

MORE LIES.. Read between The Lines Kiddies. We know for a Fact The Clinton Campaign met with Ukrainian Agents in The Ukraine Embassy to kick off their smear campaign against The President.

THE BACK STORY: HOW THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN SOLICITED FOREIGN AGENTS AND GOVERNMENTS TO HELP THEM IN THE 2016 ELECTION:

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents (Portions of The Fusion GPS Dossier) implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

“It was clear that they were supporting Hillary Clinton’s candidacy,” Artemenko said. “They did everything from organizing meetings with the Clinton team, to publicly supporting her, to criticizing Trump.

RUSSIAN STOOGES IN THE UKRAINE:

Ukraine’s minister of internal affairs, Arsen Avakov, even joined in, trashing Trump on Twitter in July as a “clown” and asserting that Trump is “an even bigger danger to the US than terrorism.”

So did Leshchenko, who daily made accusations against the Trump Campaign after meeting with Clinton Campaign Officials.

At the time, Leshchenko suggested that his motivation was partly to undermine Trump.

“For me, it was important to show not only the corruption aspect, but that he is [a] pro-Russian candidate who can break the geopolitical balance in the world,” Leshchenko told the Financial Times about two weeks after his news conference. The newspaper noted that Trump’s candidacy had spurred “Kiev’s wider political leadership to do something they would never have attempted before: intervene, however indirectly, in a U.S. election,” and the story quoted Leshchenko asserting that the majority of Ukraine’s politicians are “on Hillary Clinton’s side.”

THE CONDUIT FOR UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDA FROM RUSSIAN LOYALISTS Straight to The Clinton Campaign: May I have a CHULUPA? :

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials (THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN & UKRAINIAN AGENTS) in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

The Ukrainian antipathy for Trump’s team — and alignment with Clinton’s — can be traced back to late 2013. That’s when the country’s president, Viktor Yanukovych, whom Manafort had been advising, abruptly backed out of a European Union pact linked to anti-corruption reforms. Instead, Yanukovych entered into a multibillion-dollar bailout agreement with Russia, sparking protests across Ukraine and prompting Yanukovych to flee the country to Russia under Putin’s protection.

In the ensuing crisis, Russian troops moved into the Ukrainian territory of Crimea, and Manafort dropped off the radar.

Manafort’s work for Yanukovych caught the attention of a veteran Democratic operative named Alexandra Chalupa, who had worked in the White House Office of Public Liaison during the Clinton administration. Chalupa went on to work as a staffer, then as a consultant, for Democratic National Committee. The DNC paid her $412,000 from 2004 to June 2016, according to Federal Election Commission records, though she also was paid by other clients during that time, (FUSION GPS & COIE Lawfirm) including Democratic campaigns and the DNC’s arm for engaging expatriate Democrats around the world.

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client (Steele's Orbis Intelligence Firm) interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.

A former DNC staffer described their exchange initially with Chalupa as an “informal conversation,” saying “‘briefing’ makes it sound way too formal,” and adding, “We were not directing or driving her work on this.” Yet, the former DNC staffer and the operative familiar with the situation agreed that with the DNC’s encouragement, Chalupa asked embassy staff to try to arrange an interview in which Poroshenko might discuss Manafort’s ties to Yanukovych.

While the embassy declined that request, officials there became “helpful” in Chalupa’s efforts, she said, explaining that she traded information and leads with them. “If I asked a question, they would provide guidance, or if there was someone I needed to follow up with.” But she stressed, “There were no documents given, nothing like that.”

RUSSIAN LOYALISTS IN THE UKRAINIAN EMBASSY:

But Andrii Telizhenko, who worked as a political officer in the Ukrainian Embassy under Shulyar, said she instructed him to help Chalupa research connections between Trump, Manafort and Russia. “Oksana said that if I had any information, or knew other people who did, then I should contact Chalupa,” recalled Telizhenko, who is now a political consultant in Kiev. “They were coordinating an investigation with the Hillary team on Paul Manafort with Alexandra Chalupa,” he said, adding “Oksana was keeping it all quiet,” but “the embassy worked very closely with” Chalupa.

In fact, sources familiar with the effort say that Shulyar specifically called Telizhenko into a meeting with Chalupa to provide an update on an American media outlet’s ongoing investigation into Manafort.

Telizhenko recalled that Chalupa told him and Shulyar that, “If we can get enough information on Paul [Manafort] or Trump’s involvement with Russia, she can get a hearing in Congress by September.”

Chalupa confirmed that, a week after Manafort’s hiring was announced, she discussed the possibility of a congressional investigation with a foreign policy legislative assistant in the office of Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), who co-chairs the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus. But, Chalupa said, “It didn’t go anywhere.”

Asked about the effort, the Kaptur legislative assistant called it a “touchy subject” in an internal email to colleagues that was accidentally forwarded to Politico.

Kaptur’s office later emailed an official statement explaining that the lawmaker is backing a bill to create an independent commission to investigate “possible outside interference in our elections.” The office added “at this time, the evidence related to this matter points to Russia, but Congresswoman Kaptur is concerned with any evidence of foreign entities interfering in our elections.”

A DNC official (WASSERMAN SCHULTZ OF PAKISTANI HACKER FAME) stressed that Chalupa was a consultant paid to do outreach for the party’s political department, not a researcher. She undertook her investigations into Trump, Manafort and Russia on her own, and the party did not incorporate her findings in its dossiers on the subjects, the official said, stressing that the DNC had been building robust research books on Trump and his ties to Russia long before Chalupa began sounding alarms.

Clinton’s campaign seized on the Manafort Ukraine Russia Narrative to advance Democrats’ argument that Trump’s campaign was closely linked to Russia. The ledger represented “more troubling connections between Donald Trump’s team and pro-Kremlin elements in Ukraine,” Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager, said in a statement. He demanded that Trump “disclose campaign chair Paul Manafort’s and all other campaign employees’ and advisers’ ties to Russian or pro-Kremlin entities, including whether any of Trump’s employees or advisers are currently representing and or being paid by them.”


THE ALLEGED LEDGERS:

A former Ukrainian investigative journalist and current parliamentarian named Serhiy Leshchenko, who was elected in 2014 as part of Poroshenko’s party, held a news conference to highlight the ledgers, and to urge Ukrainian and American law enforcement to aggressively investigate Manafort.

Manafort denied receiving any off-books cash from Yanukovych’s Party of Regions, and said that he had never been contacted about the ledger by Ukrainian or American investigators, later telling POLITICO “I was just caught in the crossfire.”

THE ACCUSATION:

According to a series of memos reportedly compiled for Trump’s opponents by a former British intelligence agent (Christopher Steele & Skirpal), Yanukovych, in a secret meeting with Putin on the day after the Times published its report, admitted that he had authorized “substantial kickback payments to Manafort.” But according to the report, which was published Tuesday by BuzzFeed but remains unverified. Yanukovych assured Putin “that there was no documentary trail left behind which could provide clear evidence of this” — an alleged statement that seemed to implicitly question the authenticity of the ledger.

THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE LEDGER:

Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, a Ukrainian former diplomat who served as the country’s head of security under Poroshenko but is now affiliated with a leading opponent of Poroshenko, said it was fishy that “only one part of the black ledger appeared.” He asked, “Where is the handwriting analysis?” and said it was “crazy” to announce an investigation based on the ledgers.

Some Poroshenko critics have gone further, suggesting that the bureau is backing away from investigating because the ledgers might have been doctored or even forged.

The scrutiny around the ledgers — combined with that from other stories about his Ukraine work — proved too much for Manafort, and he stepped down from the Trump campaign less than a week after the Times story.



TREE:

Clinton, with The Help of Obama, The DNC, a British and Russian Spy, & Ukrainian Agents Loyal to Russia set the whole thing up all along.

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
 
Last edited:
I know this is a long post, but what The Democrat Party did was a long thought out complicated plot which requires a long timeline and explanations.

Something like this could only be pulled off by Public Swamp Bureaucrats with many years in Government, and it required some of Hillary Clinton's contacts in Some very Swampy Places like The Obama White House, The State Department, DOJ, and FBI loyal to Clinton and Obama, and long time Bureaucrats in other places who have spent decades in The Public Sector and people who have contacts with Foreign Agents.

I thought at least someone would comment on this.


:cul2:
 
UKRAINE NOT WEAK!

MORE LIES.. Read between The Lines Kiddies. We know for a Fact The Clinton Campaign met with Ukrainian Agents in The Ukraine Embassy to kick off their smear campaign against The President.

THE BACK STORY: HOW THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN SOLICITED FOREIGN AGENTS AND GOVERNMENTS TO HELP THEM IN THE 2016 ELECTION:

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents (Portions of The Fusion GPS Dossier) implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

“It was clear that they were supporting Hillary Clinton’s candidacy,” Artemenko said. “They did everything from organizing meetings with the Clinton team, to publicly supporting her, to criticizing Trump.

RUSSIAN STOOGES IN THE UKRAINE:

Ukraine’s minister of internal affairs, Arsen Avakov, even joined in, trashing Trump on Twitter in July as a “clown” and asserting that Trump is “an even bigger danger to the US than terrorism.”

So did Leshchenko, who daily made accusations against the Trump Campaign after meeting with Clinton Campaign Officials.

At the time, Leshchenko suggested that his motivation was partly to undermine Trump.

“For me, it was important to show not only the corruption aspect, but that he is [a] pro-Russian candidate who can break the geopolitical balance in the world,” Leshchenko told the Financial Times about two weeks after his news conference. The newspaper noted that Trump’s candidacy had spurred “Kiev’s wider political leadership to do something they would never have attempted before: intervene, however indirectly, in a U.S. election,” and the story quoted Leshchenko asserting that the majority of Ukraine’s politicians are “on Hillary Clinton’s side.”

THE CONDUIT FOR UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDA FROM RUSSIAN LOYALISTS Straight to The Clinton Campaign: May I have a CHULUPA? :

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials (THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN & UKRAINIAN AGENTS) in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

The Ukrainian antipathy for Trump’s team — and alignment with Clinton’s — can be traced back to late 2013. That’s when the country’s president, Viktor Yanukovych, whom Manafort had been advising, abruptly backed out of a European Union pact linked to anti-corruption reforms. Instead, Yanukovych entered into a multibillion-dollar bailout agreement with Russia, sparking protests across Ukraine and prompting Yanukovych to flee the country to Russia under Putin’s protection.

In the ensuing crisis, Russian troops moved into the Ukrainian territory of Crimea, and Manafort dropped off the radar.

Manafort’s work for Yanukovych caught the attention of a veteran Democratic operative named Alexandra Chalupa, who had worked in the White House Office of Public Liaison during the Clinton administration. Chalupa went on to work as a staffer, then as a consultant, for Democratic National Committee. The DNC paid her $412,000 from 2004 to June 2016, according to Federal Election Commission records, though she also was paid by other clients during that time, (FUSION GPS & COIE Lawfirm) including Democratic campaigns and the DNC’s arm for engaging expatriate Democrats around the world.

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client (Steele's Orbis Intelligence Firm) interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.

A former DNC staffer described their exchange initially with Chalupa as an “informal conversation,” saying “‘briefing’ makes it sound way too formal,” and adding, “We were not directing or driving her work on this.” Yet, the former DNC staffer and the operative familiar with the situation agreed that with the DNC’s encouragement, Chalupa asked embassy staff to try to arrange an interview in which Poroshenko might discuss Manafort’s ties to Yanukovych.

While the embassy declined that request, officials there became “helpful” in Chalupa’s efforts, she said, explaining that she traded information and leads with them. “If I asked a question, they would provide guidance, or if there was someone I needed to follow up with.” But she stressed, “There were no documents given, nothing like that.”

RUSSIAN LOYALISTS IN THE UKRAINIAN EMBASSY:

But Andrii Telizhenko, who worked as a political officer in the Ukrainian Embassy under Shulyar, said she instructed him to help Chalupa research connections between Trump, Manafort and Russia. “Oksana said that if I had any information, or knew other people who did, then I should contact Chalupa,” recalled Telizhenko, who is now a political consultant in Kiev. “They were coordinating an investigation with the Hillary team on Paul Manafort with Alexandra Chalupa,” he said, adding “Oksana was keeping it all quiet,” but “the embassy worked very closely with” Chalupa.

In fact, sources familiar with the effort say that Shulyar specifically called Telizhenko into a meeting with Chalupa to provide an update on an American media outlet’s ongoing investigation into Manafort.

Telizhenko recalled that Chalupa told him and Shulyar that, “If we can get enough information on Paul [Manafort] or Trump’s involvement with Russia, she can get a hearing in Congress by September.”

Chalupa confirmed that, a week after Manafort’s hiring was announced, she discussed the possibility of a congressional investigation with a foreign policy legislative assistant in the office of Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), who co-chairs the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus. But, Chalupa said, “It didn’t go anywhere.”

Asked about the effort, the Kaptur legislative assistant called it a “touchy subject” in an internal email to colleagues that was accidentally forwarded to Politico.

Kaptur’s office later emailed an official statement explaining that the lawmaker is backing a bill to create an independent commission to investigate “possible outside interference in our elections.” The office added “at this time, the evidence related to this matter points to Russia, but Congresswoman Kaptur is concerned with any evidence of foreign entities interfering in our elections.”

A DNC official (WASSERMAN SCHULTZ OF PAKISTANI HACKER FAME) stressed that Chalupa was a consultant paid to do outreach for the party’s political department, not a researcher. She undertook her investigations into Trump, Manafort and Russia on her own, and the party did not incorporate her findings in its dossiers on the subjects, the official said, stressing that the DNC had been building robust research books on Trump and his ties to Russia long before Chalupa began sounding alarms.

Clinton’s campaign seized on the Manafort Ukraine Russia Narrative to advance Democrats’ argument that Trump’s campaign was closely linked to Russia. The ledger represented “more troubling connections between Donald Trump’s team and pro-Kremlin elements in Ukraine,” Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager, said in a statement. He demanded that Trump “disclose campaign chair Paul Manafort’s and all other campaign employees’ and advisers’ ties to Russian or pro-Kremlin entities, including whether any of Trump’s employees or advisers are currently representing and or being paid by them.”


THE ALLEGED LEDGERS:

A former Ukrainian investigative journalist and current parliamentarian named Serhiy Leshchenko, who was elected in 2014 as part of Poroshenko’s party, held a news conference to highlight the ledgers, and to urge Ukrainian and American law enforcement to aggressively investigate Manafort.

Manafort denied receiving any off-books cash from Yanukovych’s Party of Regions, and said that he had never been contacted about the ledger by Ukrainian or American investigators, later telling POLITICO “I was just caught in the crossfire.”

THE ACCUSATION:

According to a series of memos reportedly compiled for Trump’s opponents by a former British intelligence agent (Christopher Steele & Skirpal), Yanukovych, in a secret meeting with Putin on the day after the Times published its report, admitted that he had authorized “substantial kickback payments to Manafort.” But according to the report, which was published Tuesday by BuzzFeed but remains unverified. Yanukovych assured Putin “that there was no documentary trail left behind which could provide clear evidence of this” — an alleged statement that seemed to implicitly question the authenticity of the ledger.

THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE LEDGER:

Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, a Ukrainian former diplomat who served as the country’s head of security under Poroshenko but is now affiliated with a leading opponent of Poroshenko, said it was fishy that “only one part of the black ledger appeared.” He asked, “Where is the handwriting analysis?” and said it was “crazy” to announce an investigation based on the ledgers.

Some Poroshenko critics have gone further, suggesting that the bureau is backing away from investigating because the ledgers might have been doctored or even forged.

The scrutiny around the ledgers — combined with that from other stories about his Ukraine work — proved too much for Manafort, and he stepped down from the Trump campaign less than a week after the Times story.


TREE:

Clinton, with The Help of Obama, The DNC, a British and Russian Spy, & Ukrainian Agents Loyal to Russia set the whole thing up all along.


Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
BTW, this story was prove to be 100% accurate.

We should have treason trials, and the executions should be televised for the world to see.
 
Now you know why The Podesta Group was given immunity from prosecution by Comey, Mueller and company. They were doing some very Evil things in Ukraine, and so were Biden, Romney, Pelosi, and John Kerry,
 
UKRAINE NOT WEAK!

MORE LIES.. Read between The Lines Kiddies. We know for a Fact The Clinton Campaign met with Ukrainian Agents in The Ukraine Embassy to kick off their smear campaign against The President.

THE BACK STORY: HOW THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN SOLICITED FOREIGN AGENTS AND GOVERNMENTS TO HELP THEM IN THE 2016 ELECTION:

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents (Portions of The Fusion GPS Dossier) implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

“It was clear that they were supporting Hillary Clinton’s candidacy,” Artemenko said. “They did everything from organizing meetings with the Clinton team, to publicly supporting her, to criticizing Trump.

RUSSIAN STOOGES IN THE UKRAINE:

Ukraine’s minister of internal affairs, Arsen Avakov, even joined in, trashing Trump on Twitter in July as a “clown” and asserting that Trump is “an even bigger danger to the US than terrorism.”

So did Leshchenko, who daily made accusations against the Trump Campaign after meeting with Clinton Campaign Officials.

At the time, Leshchenko suggested that his motivation was partly to undermine Trump.

“For me, it was important to show not only the corruption aspect, but that he is [a] pro-Russian candidate who can break the geopolitical balance in the world,” Leshchenko told the Financial Times about two weeks after his news conference. The newspaper noted that Trump’s candidacy had spurred “Kiev’s wider political leadership to do something they would never have attempted before: intervene, however indirectly, in a U.S. election,” and the story quoted Leshchenko asserting that the majority of Ukraine’s politicians are “on Hillary Clinton’s side.”

THE CONDUIT FOR UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDA FROM RUSSIAN LOYALISTS Straight to The Clinton Campaign: May I have a CHULUPA? :

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials (THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN & UKRAINIAN AGENTS) in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

The Ukrainian antipathy for Trump’s team — and alignment with Clinton’s — can be traced back to late 2013. That’s when the country’s president, Viktor Yanukovych, whom Manafort had been advising, abruptly backed out of a European Union pact linked to anti-corruption reforms. Instead, Yanukovych entered into a multibillion-dollar bailout agreement with Russia, sparking protests across Ukraine and prompting Yanukovych to flee the country to Russia under Putin’s protection.

In the ensuing crisis, Russian troops moved into the Ukrainian territory of Crimea, and Manafort dropped off the radar.

Manafort’s work for Yanukovych caught the attention of a veteran Democratic operative named Alexandra Chalupa, who had worked in the White House Office of Public Liaison during the Clinton administration. Chalupa went on to work as a staffer, then as a consultant, for Democratic National Committee. The DNC paid her $412,000 from 2004 to June 2016, according to Federal Election Commission records, though she also was paid by other clients during that time, (FUSION GPS & COIE Lawfirm) including Democratic campaigns and the DNC’s arm for engaging expatriate Democrats around the world.

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client (Steele's Orbis Intelligence Firm) interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.

A former DNC staffer described their exchange initially with Chalupa as an “informal conversation,” saying “‘briefing’ makes it sound way too formal,” and adding, “We were not directing or driving her work on this.” Yet, the former DNC staffer and the operative familiar with the situation agreed that with the DNC’s encouragement, Chalupa asked embassy staff to try to arrange an interview in which Poroshenko might discuss Manafort’s ties to Yanukovych.

While the embassy declined that request, officials there became “helpful” in Chalupa’s efforts, she said, explaining that she traded information and leads with them. “If I asked a question, they would provide guidance, or if there was someone I needed to follow up with.” But she stressed, “There were no documents given, nothing like that.”

RUSSIAN LOYALISTS IN THE UKRAINIAN EMBASSY:

But Andrii Telizhenko, who worked as a political officer in the Ukrainian Embassy under Shulyar, said she instructed him to help Chalupa research connections between Trump, Manafort and Russia. “Oksana said that if I had any information, or knew other people who did, then I should contact Chalupa,” recalled Telizhenko, who is now a political consultant in Kiev. “They were coordinating an investigation with the Hillary team on Paul Manafort with Alexandra Chalupa,” he said, adding “Oksana was keeping it all quiet,” but “the embassy worked very closely with” Chalupa.

In fact, sources familiar with the effort say that Shulyar specifically called Telizhenko into a meeting with Chalupa to provide an update on an American media outlet’s ongoing investigation into Manafort.

Telizhenko recalled that Chalupa told him and Shulyar that, “If we can get enough information on Paul [Manafort] or Trump’s involvement with Russia, she can get a hearing in Congress by September.”

Chalupa confirmed that, a week after Manafort’s hiring was announced, she discussed the possibility of a congressional investigation with a foreign policy legislative assistant in the office of Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), who co-chairs the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus. But, Chalupa said, “It didn’t go anywhere.”

Asked about the effort, the Kaptur legislative assistant called it a “touchy subject” in an internal email to colleagues that was accidentally forwarded to Politico.

Kaptur’s office later emailed an official statement explaining that the lawmaker is backing a bill to create an independent commission to investigate “possible outside interference in our elections.” The office added “at this time, the evidence related to this matter points to Russia, but Congresswoman Kaptur is concerned with any evidence of foreign entities interfering in our elections.”

A DNC official (WASSERMAN SCHULTZ OF PAKISTANI HACKER FAME) stressed that Chalupa was a consultant paid to do outreach for the party’s political department, not a researcher. She undertook her investigations into Trump, Manafort and Russia on her own, and the party did not incorporate her findings in its dossiers on the subjects, the official said, stressing that the DNC had been building robust research books on Trump and his ties to Russia long before Chalupa began sounding alarms.

Clinton’s campaign seized on the Manafort Ukraine Russia Narrative to advance Democrats’ argument that Trump’s campaign was closely linked to Russia. The ledger represented “more troubling connections between Donald Trump’s team and pro-Kremlin elements in Ukraine,” Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager, said in a statement. He demanded that Trump “disclose campaign chair Paul Manafort’s and all other campaign employees’ and advisers’ ties to Russian or pro-Kremlin entities, including whether any of Trump’s employees or advisers are currently representing and or being paid by them.”


THE ALLEGED LEDGERS:

A former Ukrainian investigative journalist and current parliamentarian named Serhiy Leshchenko, who was elected in 2014 as part of Poroshenko’s party, held a news conference to highlight the ledgers, and to urge Ukrainian and American law enforcement to aggressively investigate Manafort.

Manafort denied receiving any off-books cash from Yanukovych’s Party of Regions, and said that he had never been contacted about the ledger by Ukrainian or American investigators, later telling POLITICO “I was just caught in the crossfire.”

THE ACCUSATION:

According to a series of memos reportedly compiled for Trump’s opponents by a former British intelligence agent (Christopher Steele & Skirpal), Yanukovych, in a secret meeting with Putin on the day after the Times published its report, admitted that he had authorized “substantial kickback payments to Manafort.” But according to the report, which was published Tuesday by BuzzFeed but remains unverified. Yanukovych assured Putin “that there was no documentary trail left behind which could provide clear evidence of this” — an alleged statement that seemed to implicitly question the authenticity of the ledger.

THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE LEDGER:

Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, a Ukrainian former diplomat who served as the country’s head of security under Poroshenko but is now affiliated with a leading opponent of Poroshenko, said it was fishy that “only one part of the black ledger appeared.” He asked, “Where is the handwriting analysis?” and said it was “crazy” to announce an investigation based on the ledgers.

Some Poroshenko critics have gone further, suggesting that the bureau is backing away from investigating because the ledgers might have been doctored or even forged.

The scrutiny around the ledgers — combined with that from other stories about his Ukraine work — proved too much for Manafort, and he stepped down from the Trump campaign less than a week after the Times story.


TREE:

Clinton, with The Help of Obama, The DNC, a British and Russian Spy, & Ukrainian Agents Loyal to Russia set the whole thing up all along.


Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
false.
 
All of this has been verified. Operation Russian Collusion Crossfire Hurricane was a treasonous COUP, launched by Clinton, Obama and Biden with the help of treasonous moles in The FBI and FISA.

One would think someone like you would be against sedition, insurrection and treason and want to see the perpetrators of such a crime that we have verified did occur punished to the full extent of THE LAW.
 
By the way, this was the Russian Agent Obama, Clinton and Biden used along with Steele to build the Dirty Dossier. Skirpal used his contacts with Putin and The KGB to try to give the false accusations a little credibility. When it was exposed that Skirpal was involved, and he was the direct link to Russia, they tried to eliminate "loose ends" by an assassination attempt of Skirpal and his daughter by poisoning.

 
By the way, this was the Russian Agent Obama, Clinton and Biden used along with Steele to build the Dirty Dossier. Skirpal used his contacts with Putin and The KGB to try to give the false accusations a little credibility. When it was exposed that Skirpal was involved, and he was the direct link to Russia, they tried to eliminate "loose ends" by an assassination attempt of Skirpal and his daughter by poisoning.

Thanks for the chuckle.

Does it bother you that you have to keep creating these super villains out of thin air?
 
UKRAINE NOT WEAK!

MORE LIES.. Read between The Lines Kiddies. We know for a Fact The Clinton Campaign met with Ukrainian Agents in The Ukraine Embassy to kick off their smear campaign against The President.

THE BACK STORY: HOW THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN SOLICITED FOREIGN AGENTS AND GOVERNMENTS TO HELP THEM IN THE 2016 ELECTION:

Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents (Portions of The Fusion GPS Dossier) implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

“It was clear that they were supporting Hillary Clinton’s candidacy,” Artemenko said. “They did everything from organizing meetings with the Clinton team, to publicly supporting her, to criticizing Trump.

RUSSIAN STOOGES IN THE UKRAINE:

Ukraine’s minister of internal affairs, Arsen Avakov, even joined in, trashing Trump on Twitter in July as a “clown” and asserting that Trump is “an even bigger danger to the US than terrorism.”

So did Leshchenko, who daily made accusations against the Trump Campaign after meeting with Clinton Campaign Officials.

At the time, Leshchenko suggested that his motivation was partly to undermine Trump.

“For me, it was important to show not only the corruption aspect, but that he is [a] pro-Russian candidate who can break the geopolitical balance in the world,” Leshchenko told the Financial Times about two weeks after his news conference. The newspaper noted that Trump’s candidacy had spurred “Kiev’s wider political leadership to do something they would never have attempted before: intervene, however indirectly, in a U.S. election,” and the story quoted Leshchenko asserting that the majority of Ukraine’s politicians are “on Hillary Clinton’s side.”

THE CONDUIT FOR UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDA FROM RUSSIAN LOYALISTS Straight to The Clinton Campaign: May I have a CHULUPA? :

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials (THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN & UKRAINIAN AGENTS) in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

The Ukrainian antipathy for Trump’s team — and alignment with Clinton’s — can be traced back to late 2013. That’s when the country’s president, Viktor Yanukovych, whom Manafort had been advising, abruptly backed out of a European Union pact linked to anti-corruption reforms. Instead, Yanukovych entered into a multibillion-dollar bailout agreement with Russia, sparking protests across Ukraine and prompting Yanukovych to flee the country to Russia under Putin’s protection.

In the ensuing crisis, Russian troops moved into the Ukrainian territory of Crimea, and Manafort dropped off the radar.

Manafort’s work for Yanukovych caught the attention of a veteran Democratic operative named Alexandra Chalupa, who had worked in the White House Office of Public Liaison during the Clinton administration. Chalupa went on to work as a staffer, then as a consultant, for Democratic National Committee. The DNC paid her $412,000 from 2004 to June 2016, according to Federal Election Commission records, though she also was paid by other clients during that time, (FUSION GPS & COIE Lawfirm) including Democratic campaigns and the DNC’s arm for engaging expatriate Democrats around the world.

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client (Steele's Orbis Intelligence Firm) interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.

A former DNC staffer described their exchange initially with Chalupa as an “informal conversation,” saying “‘briefing’ makes it sound way too formal,” and adding, “We were not directing or driving her work on this.” Yet, the former DNC staffer and the operative familiar with the situation agreed that with the DNC’s encouragement, Chalupa asked embassy staff to try to arrange an interview in which Poroshenko might discuss Manafort’s ties to Yanukovych.

While the embassy declined that request, officials there became “helpful” in Chalupa’s efforts, she said, explaining that she traded information and leads with them. “If I asked a question, they would provide guidance, or if there was someone I needed to follow up with.” But she stressed, “There were no documents given, nothing like that.”

RUSSIAN LOYALISTS IN THE UKRAINIAN EMBASSY:

But Andrii Telizhenko, who worked as a political officer in the Ukrainian Embassy under Shulyar, said she instructed him to help Chalupa research connections between Trump, Manafort and Russia. “Oksana said that if I had any information, or knew other people who did, then I should contact Chalupa,” recalled Telizhenko, who is now a political consultant in Kiev. “They were coordinating an investigation with the Hillary team on Paul Manafort with Alexandra Chalupa,” he said, adding “Oksana was keeping it all quiet,” but “the embassy worked very closely with” Chalupa.

In fact, sources familiar with the effort say that Shulyar specifically called Telizhenko into a meeting with Chalupa to provide an update on an American media outlet’s ongoing investigation into Manafort.

Telizhenko recalled that Chalupa told him and Shulyar that, “If we can get enough information on Paul [Manafort] or Trump’s involvement with Russia, she can get a hearing in Congress by September.”

Chalupa confirmed that, a week after Manafort’s hiring was announced, she discussed the possibility of a congressional investigation with a foreign policy legislative assistant in the office of Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), who co-chairs the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus. But, Chalupa said, “It didn’t go anywhere.”

Asked about the effort, the Kaptur legislative assistant called it a “touchy subject” in an internal email to colleagues that was accidentally forwarded to Politico.

Kaptur’s office later emailed an official statement explaining that the lawmaker is backing a bill to create an independent commission to investigate “possible outside interference in our elections.” The office added “at this time, the evidence related to this matter points to Russia, but Congresswoman Kaptur is concerned with any evidence of foreign entities interfering in our elections.”

A DNC official (WASSERMAN SCHULTZ OF PAKISTANI HACKER FAME) stressed that Chalupa was a consultant paid to do outreach for the party’s political department, not a researcher. She undertook her investigations into Trump, Manafort and Russia on her own, and the party did not incorporate her findings in its dossiers on the subjects, the official said, stressing that the DNC had been building robust research books on Trump and his ties to Russia long before Chalupa began sounding alarms.

Clinton’s campaign seized on the Manafort Ukraine Russia Narrative to advance Democrats’ argument that Trump’s campaign was closely linked to Russia. The ledger represented “more troubling connections between Donald Trump’s team and pro-Kremlin elements in Ukraine,” Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager, said in a statement. He demanded that Trump “disclose campaign chair Paul Manafort’s and all other campaign employees’ and advisers’ ties to Russian or pro-Kremlin entities, including whether any of Trump’s employees or advisers are currently representing and or being paid by them.”


THE ALLEGED LEDGERS:

A former Ukrainian investigative journalist and current parliamentarian named Serhiy Leshchenko, who was elected in 2014 as part of Poroshenko’s party, held a news conference to highlight the ledgers, and to urge Ukrainian and American law enforcement to aggressively investigate Manafort.

Manafort denied receiving any off-books cash from Yanukovych’s Party of Regions, and said that he had never been contacted about the ledger by Ukrainian or American investigators, later telling POLITICO “I was just caught in the crossfire.”

THE ACCUSATION:

According to a series of memos reportedly compiled for Trump’s opponents by a former British intelligence agent (Christopher Steele & Skirpal), Yanukovych, in a secret meeting with Putin on the day after the Times published its report, admitted that he had authorized “substantial kickback payments to Manafort.” But according to the report, which was published Tuesday by BuzzFeed but remains unverified. Yanukovych assured Putin “that there was no documentary trail left behind which could provide clear evidence of this” — an alleged statement that seemed to implicitly question the authenticity of the ledger.

THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE LEDGER:

Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, a Ukrainian former diplomat who served as the country’s head of security under Poroshenko but is now affiliated with a leading opponent of Poroshenko, said it was fishy that “only one part of the black ledger appeared.” He asked, “Where is the handwriting analysis?” and said it was “crazy” to announce an investigation based on the ledgers.

Some Poroshenko critics have gone further, suggesting that the bureau is backing away from investigating because the ledgers might have been doctored or even forged.

The scrutiny around the ledgers — combined with that from other stories about his Ukraine work — proved too much for Manafort, and he stepped down from the Trump campaign less than a week after the Times story.


TREE:

Clinton, with The Help of Obama, The DNC, a British and Russian Spy, & Ukrainian Agents Loyal to Russia set the whole thing up all along.


Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
You poor thing.
 
BTW, this story was prove to be 100% accurate.

We should have treason trials, and the executions should be televised for the world to see.
What’s been proven accurate is that Manafort engaged in highly illegal lobbying and bank fraud.

He’s exactly as dirty as they said he was.
 
Thanks for the chuckle.

Does it bother you that you have to keep creating these super villains out of thin air?
Thinking about your comment, isn't this exactly what The Desperate and Evil Obama-Biden Regime and Clinton Campaign did to try to win the 2016 Election, and then launch their treasonous COUP with the help of their friends in Russia, and Traitors in The FBI?

We remember the lies you told about Clarence Thomas, Justice Kavanaugh, and President Trump.
This is why you get less and less traction each time you scheme to unleash another wave of propaganda against your political opponents.

Lies and Smear Campaigns are your Go to Weapon of Choice against American Citizens, because honestly, if you were honest about what your Agendas really were about, No One who is sane would vote for you except for The Lunatics that believe the same horse shit you do and who have no regard for human life, nor do they give a damn about Individual Liberties and Human Freedoms granted to us by our Creator.

This is why you despise God, despise National Sovereignty, despise things like Due Process, Natural Law, The Right to Life, Liberty and The Pursuit of Happiness. It's why you despise The Family, ferment division in communities, because it is only through Division can you people wield power.

America truly free and truly united means there is no place for your Globalist Fascist Marxist DemNazi Ideologies.
 
What’s been proven accurate is that Manafort engaged in highly illegal lobbying and bank fraud.

He’s exactly as dirty as they said he was.
Anything Manafort allegedly did, he actually did while working for The Podesta Group for Obama, Biden and Clinton. This is why Mueller, Comey, and The Obama Regime granted The Podesta Group Immunity from Prosecution, cutting off Manafort from his defense, depriving him of the ability to request documents from The Podesta Group proving his innocence, and depriving him of the ability to request anyone from his Employer The Podesta Group to be called to The Witness Stand.

As if that wasn't cruel enough and wasn't enough of a violation of his Civil Rights and Due Process, they attacked this man's home in a Military Style Pre-Dawn Assault on his family with literally an army of goons equipped with machine guns and other heavy military arms for an alleged petty white collar crime, called CNN to make sure they were there to film it, then threw him in Solitary Confinement for his entire trial, slapped a GAG order on him, and then held a Kangaroo Court trial in which he was not permitted to call key witnesses and key evidence from The Podesta Group in his defense.

And when they were done tormenting and trying to ruin the man, They Put a LIFETIME GAG order on him so that he could not talk about what really happened on penalty of losing his freedom and dying in prison in solitary confinement.

They tried to ruin General Flynn in the same way. They have tried to ruin everyone and anyone associated with President Trump in the same fashion.

Their playbook is very simple, and very Evil.

Schummer said it best when he said, "If you resist The Deep State, they will find 1,000 ways to ruin you."
We saw that played out every day these past 6 years.
 
Last edited:
Thinking about your comment, isn't this exactly what The Desperate and Evil Obama-Biden Regime and Clinton Campaign did to try to win the 2016 Election, and then launch their treasonous COUP with the help of their friends in Russia, and Traitors in The FBI?

We remember the lies you told about Clarence Thomas, Justice Kavanaugh, and President Trump.
This is why you get less and less traction each time you scheme to unleash another wave of propaganda against your political opponents.

Lies and Smear Campaigns are your Go to Weapon of Choice against American Citizens, because honestly, if you were honest about what your Agendas really were about, No One who is sane would vote for you except for The Lunatics that believe the same horse shit you do and who have no regard for human life, nor do they give a damn about Individual Liberties and Human Freedoms granted to us by our Creator.

This is why you despise God, despise National Sovereignty, despise things like Due Process, Natural Law, The Right to Life, Liberty and The Pursuit of Happiness. It's why you despise The Family, ferment division in communities, because it is only through Division can you people wield power.

America truly free and truly united means there is no place for your Globalist Fascist Marxist DemNazi Ideologies.

I asked God about you.

She hates you.
 
Anything Manafort allegedly did, he actually did while working for The Podesta Group for Obama, Biden and Clinton. This is why Mueller, Comey, and The Obama Regime granted The Podesta Group Immunity from Prosecution, cutting off Manafort from his defense, depriving him of the ability to request documents from The Podesta Group proving his innocence, and depriving him of the ability to request anyone from his Employer The Podesta Group to be called to The Witness Stand.

As if that wasn't cruel enough and wasn't enough of a violation of his Civil Rights and Due Process, they attacked this man's home in a Military Style Pre-Dawn Assault on his family with literally an army of goons equipped with machine guns and other heavy military arms for an alleged petty white collar crime, called CNN to make sure they were there to film it, then threw him in Solitary Confinement for his entire trial, slapped a GAG order on him, and then held a Kangaroo Court trial in which he was not permitted to call key witnesses and key evidence from The Podesta Group in his defense.

And when they were done tormenting and trying to ruin the man, They Put a LIFETIME GAG order on him so that he could not talk about what really happened on penalty of losing his freedom and dying in prison in solitary confinement.

They tried to ruin General Flynn in the same way. They have tried to ruin everyone and anyone associated with President Trump in the same fashion.

Their playbook is very simple, and very Evil.

Schummer said it best when he said, "If you resist The Deep State, they will find 1,000 ways to ruin you."
We saw that played out every day these past 6 years.
You’re so misled. You just believe downright lies.

Podesta was hired by Manafort. Not the other way around.

Podesta was given immunity by Trump’s DoJ, not Obama’s.

Manafort broke his bail agreement and was put back into prison because of his own actions.

He’s scum and the fact you defend Manafort indicates you have no judgement of character.
 
You’re so misled. You just believe downright lies.

Podesta was hired by Manafort. Not the other way around.

Podesta was given immunity by Trump’s DoJ, not Obama’s.

Manafort broke his bail agreement and was put back into prison because of his own actions.

He’s scum and the fact you defend Manafort indicates you have no judgement of character.
WRONG: You should dig deeper into the illegal activities of The Podesta Group, and you will then discover why The FBI protected them like Comey protected Hillary Clinton. Everything they went after Manafort for was in association with The Podesta Group and Obama Regime. There is no way around that.

You will most likely not hear about all the illegalities committed by The Podesta Group in Ukraine as The FBI gave them full immunity from prosecution so they could railroad Manafort like they tried to do with General Flynn, and President Trump with their treasonous COUP attempt codenamed Operation Russian Collusion Crossfire Hurricane.


 
Last edited:
WRONG: You should dig deeper into the illegal activities of The Podesta Group, and you will then discover why The FBI protected them like Comey protected Hillary Clinton. Everything they went after Manafort for was in association with The Podesta Group and Obama Regime. There is no way around that.

You will most likely not hear about all the illegalities committed by The Podesta Group in Ukraine as The FBI gave them full immunity from prosecution so they could railroad Manafort like they tried to do with General Flynn, and President Trump with their treasonous COUP attempt codenamed Operation Russian Collusion Crossfire Hurricane.


Your own link proves I’m right.

“According to Manafort's indictment, he and Gates created a think tank in Brussels, Belgium called the European Centre for a Modern Ukraine (ECMU), which then solicited lobbying services from two companies that were only identified in the indictment documents as companies "A" and "B." The companies were later revealed to be the Podesta Group and Mercury Public Affairs, according to NBC News.”

Manafort hired Podesta. Not the other way around.

Podesta could have been hit with FARA violation but the case was harder to prove because they were hired by Manafort.

I know a lot more about this than you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top