That means that every protest disturbs the peace ergo protests aren't allowed.
The protestors themselves are peacefully assembling. You not liking it doesn't mean it's violent. Silly
Your opinion has no factual basis. In fact, most protests are allowed; however, those that disrupt traffic are not. Feel free to walk up and down the sidewalk with your signs if you like; stand by the side of the road if that is your preference; but if you block a highway you are disturbing the peace and there is no constitutional right for such behavior. As I said, I don't know the laws in your jurisdiction but generally blocking traffic is a crime and the First Amendment will not protect you. Here are selected portions from a good article on the subject:
“Disorderly conduct laws differ significantly among states and municipalities, and the type of conduct covered by these laws and ordinances is quite broad. States typically categorize disorderly conduct as any behavior that is likely to cause other people alarm, anger, annoyance, or an increased likelihood to engage in unlawful activity.”
“Protests: While engaging in peaceful protests is a constitutionally protected right, engaging in disruptive protests is not. For example, courts have held that participants in a sit-in demonstration engaged in disorderly conduct because they blocked traffic on a pedestrian walkway. “
Disorderly Conduct Laws by State: Charges and Penalties | Criminal Law
(Please take note that a protest doesn't have to be violent to be illegal,)
You see, protesters have certain rights, but they have no right to trample on the rights of others. Apparently, you think that it's OK for protesters to block highways keeping people from getting to work and appointments and interfering with emergency vehicles. One of us is indeed silly, and it sure as hell isn't me.
Now I am done with you and this thread.