Those scriptures have nothing to do with Jewish skin color. Why is it, every time a liberal attempts to quote the Bible, it is like chalk screeching on a chalk board?
You're right it has to do with HEBREW skin color. Pay attention, Bible scholar. You still haven't figured out that I'm not a "liberal christian" yet have you? I take a very literal approach to the scriptures, which is why if Job said his skin was black, I just assume he didn't look like an Ashkanezi Jew. Yahoshua's disciple Simeon was known as "Niger" to the other Hebrews of Yahoshua's day (Acts 13:1). Niger means "black" or "dark". Denoting the fact that the Hebrews, like most more dark-skinned groups, had a wide rage of skin tones.
They probably ranged from somewhere between this:
TO THIS:
Also further commenting on Lamentations, the description of the Hebrews in a famine fits almost perfectly with the description of Ethiopians when they fell into famine in the 1980s. When people of color face heat and famine they get darker. This is the imagery given by the three verse I posted in actual picture form:
"My skin is black upon me, and my bones are burned with heat." (Job 30:30)
The evidence is in the scriptures. Denying it and then calling me a "liberal" (as if that has a damn thing to do with Yahoshua's skin color) for pointing it out only brings even more evidence out. Additionally, why is it that I have to be a "liberal" to believe that Yahoshua was the same color as Ethiopians/early Egyptians as ancient scholars and the Bible seem to agree? Again, read your Bible. It helps.